[House Hearing, 111 Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
ADAPTIVE HOUSING GRANTS
=======================================================================
HEARING
before the
SUBCOMMITTEE ON ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY
of the
COMMITTEE ON VETERANS' AFFAIRS
U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
ONE HUNDRED ELEVENTH CONGRESS
FIRST SESSION
__________
NOVEMBER 19, 2009
__________
Serial No. 111-52
__________
Printed for the use of the Committee on Veterans' Affairs
----------
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE
54-419 PDF WASHINGTON : 2010
For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing
Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512-1800;
DC area (202) 512-1800 Fax: (202) 512-2104 Mail: Stop IDCC,
Washington, DC 20402-0001
COMMITTEE ON VETERANS' AFFAIRS
BOB FILNER, California, Chairman
CORRINE BROWN, Florida STEVE BUYER, Indiana, Ranking
VIC SNYDER, Arkansas CLIFF STEARNS, Florida
MICHAEL H. MICHAUD, Maine JERRY MORAN, Kansas
STEPHANIE HERSETH SANDLIN, South HENRY E. BROWN, Jr., South
Dakota Carolina
HARRY E. MITCHELL, Arizona JEFF MILLER, Florida
JOHN J. HALL, New York JOHN BOOZMAN, Arkansas
DEBORAH L. HALVORSON, Illinois BRIAN P. BILBRAY, California
THOMAS S.P. PERRIELLO, Virginia DOUG LAMBORN, Colorado
HARRY TEAGUE, New Mexico GUS M. BILIRAKIS, Florida
CIRO D. RODRIGUEZ, Texas VERN BUCHANAN, Florida
JOE DONNELLY, Indiana DAVID P. ROE, Tennessee
JERRY McNERNEY, California
ZACHARY T. SPACE, Ohio
TIMOTHY J. WALZ, Minnesota
JOHN H. ADLER, New Jersey
ANN KIRKPATRICK, Arizona
GLENN C. NYE, Virginia
Malcom A. Shorter, Staff Director
______
Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity
STEPHANIE HERSETH SANDLIN, South Dakota, Chairwoman
THOMAS S.P. PERRIELLO, Virginia JOHN BOOZMAN, Arkansas, Ranking
JOHN H. ADLER, New Jersey JERRY MORAN, Kansas
ANN KIRKPATRICK, Arizona GUS M. BILIRAKIS, Florida
HARRY TEAGUE, New Mexico
Pursuant to clause 2(e)(4) of Rule XI of the Rules of the House, public
hearing records of the Committee on Veterans' Affairs are also
published in electronic form. The printed hearing record remains the
official version. Because electronic submissions are used to prepare
both printed and electronic versions of the hearing record, the process
of converting between various electronic formats may introduce
unintentional errors or omissions. Such occurrences are inherent in the
current publication process and should diminish as the process is
further refined.
C O N T E N T S
__________
November 19, 2009
Page
Adaptive Housing Grants.......................................... 1
OPENING STATEMENTS
Chairwoman Stephanie Herseth Sandlin............................. 1
Prepared statement of Chairwoman Herseth Sandlin............. 24
Hon. John Boozman, Ranking Republican Member, prepared statement
of............................................................. 24
Hon. Gus M. Bilirakis............................................ 2
WITNESSES
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Mark Bologna, Director of
Loan Guaranty Service, Veterans Benefits Administration........ 15
Prepared statement of Mr. Bologna............................ 35
______
Blinded Veterans Association, Thomas Zampieri, Ph.D., Director of
Government Relations........................................... 5
Prepared statement of Dr. Zampieri........................... 29
Disabled American Veterans, John L. Wilson, Associate National
Legislative Director........................................... 3
Prepared statement of Mr. Wilson............................. 25
Homes For Our Troops, John S. Gonsalves, President and Founder... 7
Prepared statement of Mr. Gonsalves.......................... 31
Paralyzed Veterans of America, Richard Daley, Associate
Legislation Director........................................... 4
Prepared statement of Mr. Daley.............................. 27
SUBMISSIONS FOR THE RECORD
U.S. Department of Defense, Noel C. Koch, Deputy Under Secretary
of Defense, Wounded Warrior Care and Transition Policy,
statement...................................................... 37
Disabled Veterans Committee on Housing, John S. Lewandowski,
President/Chief Executive Officer, statement................... 38
MATERIAL SUBMITTED FOR THE RECORD
Post-Hearing Questions and Responses for the Record:
Hon. Stephanie Herseth Sandlin, Chairwoman, Subcommittee on
Economic Opportunities, Committee on Veterans' Affairs, to
Carl Blake, National Legislative Director, Paralyzed
Veterans of America, letter dated November 20, 2009, and
response letter from Richard C. Daley, Associate
Legislation Director, letter dated January 8, 2010......... 41
Hon. Stephanie Herseth Sandlin, Chairwoman, Subcommittee on
Economic Opportunities, Committee on Veterans' Affairs, to
Tom Miller, Executive Director, Blinded Veterans
Association, letter dated November 20, 2009, and response
letter from Thomas Zampieri, Ph.D., Director, Government
Relations, dated December 1, 2009.......................... 44
Hon. Stephanie Herseth Sandlin, Chairwoman, Subcommittee on
Economic Opportunities, Committee on Veterans' Affairs, to
Mark Bologna, Director of Loan Guaranty Service, Veterans
Benefits Administration, U.S. Department of Veterans
Affairs, letter dated November 20, 2009, and VA responses.. 50
ADAPTIVE HOUSING GRANTS
----------
THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 2009
U.S. House of Representatives,
Committee on Veterans' Affairs,
Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity,
Washington, DC.
The Subcommittee met, pursuant to notice, at 2:18 p.m., in
Room 334, Cannon House Office Building, Hon. Stephanie Herseth
Sandlin [Chairwoman of the Subcommittee] presiding.
Present: Representatives Herseth Sandlin, Adler, Boozman,
Bilirakis.
OPENING STATEMENT OF CHAIRWOMAN HERSETH SANDLIN
Ms. Herseth Sandlin. Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen.
The Committee on Veterans' Affairs, Subcommittee on Economic
Opportunity, hearing on Adaptive Housing Grants will come to
order.
Before I begin with my opening statement, I would like to
call attention to the fact that Mr. Noel Koch, Deputy Under
Secretary of Defense, Wounded Warrior Care and Transition
Policy, U.S. Department of Defense has asked to submit a
written statement for the hearing record.
If there is no objection, I ask for unanimous consent that
his statement be entered for the record. Hearing no objection,
so entered.
[The prepared statement of Mr. Koch appears on p. 37.]
Ms. Herseth Sandlin. According to the Defense Manpower Data
Center at the Department of Defense, approximately 35,000
servicemembers have been wounded in Iraq and Afghanistan. Today
we will receive timely testimony that foreshadows the increased
need for adaptive housing grants.
In caring for our injured men and women in uniform, we must
continue to address their needs so that they may live as
independently as possible after their honorable military
service.
Some of our panelists might recall a hearing that we held
on specially adaptive housing early in the 110th Congress in
which we received testimony on ways to improve existing VA
adaptive housing programs.
Following this hearing, the Subcommittee worked with
stakeholders to provide specially adaptive housing assistance
to disabled servicemembers residing temporarily in housing
owned by a family member, to require the U.S. Department of
Veterans Affairs (VA) to update its pamphlet on the
construction and design of specially adapted housing, and to
increase the amount of assistance available to disabled
veterans for specially adaptive housing grants.
While these legislative accomplishments are significant,
today's hearing will provide the Subcommittee Members the
opportunity to determine if the existing adaptive housing
grants provide the needed benefits for our most injured
servicemembers and veterans.
I look forward to working with the Ranking Member, other
Members of our Subcommittee, and veterans' advocates to ensure
that our most critically wounded servicemembers are provided
adequate benefits to modify their homes, to achieve
independence and comfort when they return home.
[The prepared statement of Chairwoman Herseth Sandlin
appears on p. 24.]
I would now like to recognize Mr. Bilirakis for any opening
remarks that he may have.
OPENING STATEMENT OF HON. GUS M. BILIRAKIS
Mr. Bilirakis. Thank you, Madam Chair. I appreciate it very
much.
No citizen of this country deserves our help more than our
wounded warriors. I am very gratified to attend this hearing.
Madam Chair, thank you very much for holding this hearing.
Despite some of the things that our government does wrong,
on this issue of whether we will care for our wounded warriors,
our heroes, this hearing is a signal that we are getting it
right. We are getting our priorities straight in my opinion.
I have been to the Haley Hospital just outside of my
district. Haley has a polytrauma unit where we have some of the
most severely wounded warriors from the wars of Iraq and
Afghanistan. These wounded warriors have an amazing dedication
and their tenacity is truly something to behold.
The question is whether this House will have the same
dedication to them. We can start by ensuring a living
environment that affords our veterans a level of independent
living. We can provide some relief by enabling these veterans
to enjoy at least some independence inside of their homes. And
I strongly support this program.
Again, I thank you for holding this hearing, Madam Chair.
Thank you.
Ms. Herseth Sandlin. Thank you.
Mr. Bilirakis. I yield back the balance.
Ms. Herseth Sandlin. Thank you very much, Mr. Bilirakis.
I would now like to welcome our panelists testifying before
the Subcommittee today. Joining us on our first panel is Mr.
John Wilson, Assistant National Legislative Director for the
Disabled American Veterans (DAV); Mr. Richard Daley, Associate
Legislation Director for the Paralyzed Veterans of America
(PVA); Dr. Thomas Zampieri, Director of Government Relations
for the Blinded Veterans Association (BVA); and Mr. John
Gonsalves, President and Founder for Homes For Our Troops.
Gentlemen, thank you for joining us today. In the interest
of time and courtesy to all of the panelists here, we ask that
you limit your testimony to 5 minutes on your comments and your
recommendations. As you know, your entire written statement has
been entered into the Committee record.
So, Mr. Wilson, we will begin with you. You are recognized
for 5 minutes.
STATEMENTS OF JOHN L. WILSON, ASSOCIATE NATIONAL LEGISLATIVE
DIRECTOR, DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS; RICHARD DALEY, ASSOCIATE
LEGISLATION DIRECTOR, PARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA; THOMAS
ZAMPIERI, PH.D., DIRECTOR OF GOVERNMENT RELATIONS, BLINDED
VETERANS ASSOCIATION; AND JOHN S. GONSALVES, PRESIDENT AND
FOUNDER, HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS
STATEMENT OF JOHN L. WILSON
Mr. Wilson. Thank you, ma'am.
Madam Chairwoman and Members of the Subcommittee, I am glad
to be here this afternoon on behalf of the Disabled American
Veterans to present our views on the VA adaptive housing
programs, the Special Housing Adaptation Grant Program and the
Temporary Residence Assistance Grant Program.
With the enactment of Public Law 109-233, the Veterans
Housing Opportunity and Benefits Improvement Act of 2006,
Congress enhanced the benefits available to veterans and the
now approximate 34,000 servicemembers wounded since May 2009 as
part of Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) and Operation Iraqi
Freedom (OIF).
As a result, the Temporary Residence Assistance or TRA
Grant was established which allows eligible individuals living
in a temporary status to adapt that temporary housing provided
it is owned by a family member. The Specially Adapted Housing
or SAH Grant Program has a ceiling of $60,000 for modifications
to a home.
As too many veterans have come to know, injuries that
result in loss of use or loss of extremities as well as loss of
sight, severe burns, and other conditions require programs such
as these to provide the necessary assistance to this deserving
population. The question comes down to the effectiveness of
these programs.
TRA eligibles can use up to $14,000 from SAH and $2,000
from Special Housing Adaptation or SHA grants. To do so would,
however, reduce the amount available under the other Adaptive
Housing Grant programs.
Some would argue that utilization is a good measure of
program effectiveness. I agree. The U.S. Government
Accountability Office (GAO) study of June 15th, 2009, titled
``Veterans Affairs Implementation of Temporary Residence
Adaptation Grants,'' found only nine TRA grants had been
processed by the VA with approval for adaptations ranging from
approximately $3,500 to $14,000.
Of the three reasons cited by GAO as to why the grants have
been so limited in their utilization, the fact that using TRA
reduces availability of funds from other adaptive housing
programs seems to be the most significant to my mind.
What is to become of this important program, which is
scheduled to expire December 31st of 2011? It seems logical
that severely injured veterans and servicemembers who often
need daily care during an extended convalescence would benefit
from a program that allowed them to adapt their temporary
surroundings using the TRA Grant Program. DAV calls on Congress
not to allow this program to come to an end but rather modify
TRA.
First, Congress should delink TRA from SHA and SAH grants
so that using one program does not reduce the funds available
on the others.
Second, increase the TRA allowance from $14,000 to $28,000
for those veterans eligible under SAH grants.
Third, for those veterans eligible under SHA grants,
Congress should increase the allowance from $2,000 to $5,000.
Modifications such as these will substantially improve TRA
and should result in a greater utilization of this important
program.
That concludes my statement, Madam Chairwoman. It is a
pleasure to appear before this Subcommittee and I am glad to
answer any questions.
[The prepared statement of Mr. Wilson appears on p. 25.]
Ms. Herseth Sandlin. Thank you very much, Mr. Wilson.
Mr. Daley, welcome back. You are recognized for 5 minutes.
STATEMENT OF RICHARD DALEY
Mr. Daley. Chairwoman Herseth Sandlin, Ranking Member
Bilirakis, and other Members of the Subcommittee, Paralyzed
Veterans of America appreciates the opportunity to express our
ideas on the issue of specially adaptive housing.
Since PVA's beginning, the organization has advocated for
the idea that the disabled veteran should have the same use of
their home as the nondisabled veteran.
In 1947, PVA lobbied Congress for new legislation that
would provide Federal grants to make homes accessible. They
argued that the paralyzed veterans were forced to remain in the
hospital because their former homes would not accommodate a
wheelchair.
In 1948, the U.S. Senate passed Public Law 702. Under this
law, the Veterans Administration, now the VA, approved $47
million for the construction of wheelchair accessible homes.
Through the years, the grant has been adjusted in an attempt to
keep pace with the rising cost of home construction.
Since it is difficult to find an existing home that can be
made totally accessible, some veterans choose to design a new
house and incorporate accessibilities into their plans, but
financial considerations or possibly the need to be near a
family member may preclude the design of a new home and
building a new home. In those situations, the most monumental
task of making an existing home accessible must be considered.
The Specially Adapted Housing Grant which has a value of
$63,780 this year will help cover some of the cost of making it
accessible.
The 109th Congress made significant adjustments to the
grant when they passed Public Law 109-461. This legislation was
intended to resolve an important problem with the grant for
disabled veterans. The grant can now be used for a home that is
not owned by the veteran, but owned by a family member. This
allows the veteran to live with family members while
participating in the VA rehabilitation or other necessary
programs.
In the future, the veteran's condition may allow them to
move to their own home with the second use the grant. Many
paralyzed veterans that I have met have moved in with a family
member while establishing their new life from the perspective
of a wheelchair.
Unfortunately, when they use the Temporary Residence
Adaptation Grant to accommodate their new condition, this
reduces some of the options they may have when moving to their
new home. This program should be a separate grant program and
should not be subtracted from the Special Adapted Housing
Grant.
I would like to bring to your attention another issue
relating to housing. That is the maximum amount of mortgage
life insurance known as the Veterans Mortgage Life Insurance,
VMLI, available for veterans that qualify to use the Specially
Adapted Housing Grant.
Regardless of how much is still owed on the home when the
veteran dies, the maximum amount paid is $90,000 on this policy
and the veteran has paid for this policy for many months, many
years.
The 100 percent disabled veteran, because of their physical
condition, cannot purchase life insurance on the open market
such as I can or other people can. The VA provides this option
for the veteran to purchase the Veterans Mortgage Life
Insurance, the VMLI.
I spoke with a PVA member just today who lives in the
Atlanta, Georgia, area and he is a bit concerned about this. He
was saying that he is a 100-percent service-connected, 64-years
old, and not in the best of health. His wife, because she has
raised two kids and moved around constantly with his 25-year
military career, has never established a career of her own.
So to date, he has $150,000 left on his mortgage which the
insurance which he has paid for for years will cover $90,000.
If the husband dies in the next 4, 8 years before the amount
owed goes below $90,000, she will have to be forced to sell the
house, if she can sell it, or it will be foreclosed on her
because it is harder to sell an accessible house sometimes.
So the Senate Committee on Veterans' Affairs has addressed
this issue in legislation introduced by Chairman Akaka this
year,
S. 728. This would raise the amount of the Veterans Mortgage
Life Insurance to $150,000 and $200,000 in 2012. This was
passed by the Senate and returned to the House along with H.R.
1037 for further action. PVA would appreciate this
Subcommittee's support for this legislation to ensure its
passage soon.
That concludes my testimony. I will be available for
questions.
[The prepared statement of Mr. Daley appears on p. 27.]
Ms. Herseth Sandlin. Thank you, Mr. Daley.
Dr. Zampieri, you are recognized for 5 minutes.
STATEMENT OF THOMAS ZAMPIERI, PH.D.
Mr. Zampieri. On behalf of the Blinded Veterans
Association, thank you very much for inviting us to testify
today on this issue. And I also want to thank this Subcommittee
for a lot of the legislation that you have done in the last few
years in regards to trying to improve the Adaptive Housing
Program.
As you mentioned, the numbers the Defense Department has
published in regards to the total numbers of wounded from OIF
is well over 35,850 now and OEF is 4,982 and climbing.
And the Washington Post recently had an article and the
Army Times that in Afghanistan, there have been over 1,000
wounded in just a 3-month period.
Of interest to me, it may miss some folks, I found in there
buried in the article, there were over 17 new spinal cord
injured in a 3-month period in Afghanistan and this has caused
some concern because of the fact that the total numbers of
spinal cord injured has been over the long course of the war
been much lower than that. In that short time period, this was
a high number. And so it continues.
Our interest in these programs is that, you know, I had an
OIF blinded servicemember that sent me an e-mail about the
Special Housing Grant Program, which I included in my testimony
because it sort of explains some of the frustration. While he
was happy that he got the $10,000 grant in 2007, I actually had
to spend $27,000 to do the adaptive housing changes that he
needed to provide room and space for his computer, the
monitors, the scanners, the printers, and the magnifiers in
order for him to complete his college degree.
All this was great VA adaptive technology that was provided
to him as a blind veteran, but you have to have a place in
order to store it and a way for that equipment to be connected.
A lot of the blind veterans have unique requirements in regards
to writing and electrical work and the current amounts do not
cover that.
We agree with the discussion about the Temporary Residence,
the TRA Grant, the concerns that family members who bring home
a severely injured servicemember may have decided not to try to
use that grant because of the fact that then they have to
subtract it from the Specially Adaptied Housing money that the
person may need eventually if they move into their own home.
I wanted to point out we are always concerned about costs,
but in my testimony, hopefully this will cause some careful
consideration here, the cost for a nursing home now is $212 a
day or $77,380 a year. For a semi-private room, it is $69,715 a
year and for an assisted living center, it is an even $36,000.
BVA would point out that those are recurring costs. You
know, if you do adaptive housing and you spend whatever it is
to allow an individual to live in their home for the next 40
years, that is a one-time grant whether it is $180,000 or
whatever the right amount should be.
If you put a young servicemember in a nursing home at a
cost of $78,000 a year times 10 years, start to add that up
over 20 years, add that up over 30 years, it is just something
that people ought to consider when they are looking at numbers
and crunching and everything else.
Anyway, I appreciate the opportunity to testify today. Our
recommendations in the back include that, you know, I think
that TRA is a good program, it should continue, but there
should be a separate amount of money for those homes, you know,
for the needs of those servicemembers.
And last but not least, I have a blind servicemember in
South Dakota that sometime I need to talk to you about, a side
bar.
So thank you for inviting me to testify.
[The prepared statement of Dr. Zampieri appears on p. 29.]
Ms. Herseth Sandlin. Very good. I look forward to visiting
with you about that servicemember, Dr. Zampieri.
Mr. Gonsalves, you are now recognized for 5 minutes.
STATEMENT OF JOHN S. GONSALVES
Mr. Gonsalves. Chairwoman Sandlin, thank you for having me.
I am very grateful to be here for the second time. And I do
want to thank all Members of the Subcommittee. I have looked at
recently, I just got the new VA handbook, and when I think back
to a lot of what the last discussion was about, I see a lot of
changes have been made in a very positive direction. And I
think that is very important.
Really two points that I think I would like to make today
that really get to the crux of the problem. We want to look at
specially adapted housing and its effectiveness. And any
program can only be effective if it is funded correctly to
really make this something that is going to make a difference
in these servicemembers.
And probably the most important piece that I brought in
would be Exhibit 1 in here. And it does look through the years
of how much the Specially Adapted Housing Grant was and how
much it was compared to the cost of a home in those years.
And one thing we look at is right now it is at its lowest
percentage as far as covering the cost of a new home in the
United States.
Now, in the far left column where the years are, if you
look at the first 3 years listed in the column and then you
look at the bottom 3, they have something very unique in
common. Those are wartime years.
In 1969, 1972, and 1974, the grant as a percentage of the
cost of a new home was steadily going up. It went from 43
percent in 1969 to 58 percent in 1972 to its high in 1974. The
grant was $25,000 where the average cost of a new home in the
United States was $39,000. So at that time, it covered 64
percent of the cost of a new home in the United States.
Again, the bottom three numbers are wartime numbers again.
And we look at 2001 where the $48,000 covered only 23 percent.
And the next two times we have raised the grant, it went up in
2003 and again in 2008, but right now we are at our lowest
point when we look at the grant as a percentage of the cost of
a home.
If we went back, and I do appreciate that it is on the cost
of living index now, which I think was a very important
decision that was made, had we done that in 1974, the grant
right now would be $187,000. And I think those are really the
types of changes we need to look at. Let us make real changes
to this program and that is where we can look at this program
and really find it effective.
When we are talking about homes, one of my colleagues
mentioned, you know, the VA grant at $60,000, if you owned a
home, that may be okay to do some of what is needed. But my
background came in construction. I have never served in the
military. I have never been with a Veterans Service
Organization. I come from the private sector. And I can tell
you even the few veterans that have applied to our program that
have owned homes, we have looked at them, they just were not
designed to be made handicap accessible. So that is going to be
an issue.
When we talk about soldiers, you know, a soldier like Matt
Kyle who we built a house for in Colorado, he was shot in the
neck by a sniper, he needed a very special home that needed to
be built. This is not something that was available. And it has
voice activated controls and everything Matt needs. He is
paralyzed from the neck down.
I think fundamentally we have to ask ourselves, and I
respectfully ask the Subcommittee to think about if this
question was posed to you from a soldier like Matt Kyle who on
maybe his third or fourth tour of combat asked a Member of this
Subcommittee, ``I came home after serving my country in combat,
I was cut down by a sniper in Iraq, why is it only worth
$60,000 to my country,'' how would we answer that question?
I had a similar question posed to me in 2004 when watching
TV, I saw the story of a soldier who had lost both of his legs
in Iraq. And I thought Homes For Our Troops was already out
there doing this. And I went online because I had 2 weeks
vacation and I was going to donate my 2 weeks time. There was
no organization like Homes For Our Troops at the time. I asked
myself a question, what am I going to do about it. And that is
why I am here today.
And I think we really need to ask ourselves some
fundamental questions. Are we really going to make this the
American dream possible for these men and women? If we are, we
need to find a way to fully fund at least $187,000.
Homes For Our Troops relies on volunteer labor, donated
materials, and that number there would still only cover half
the cost of what we spend to donate these homes. And we have
done nearly 50 so far and we have 30 plus that are under
construction right now. And we are looking at the next group of
30 veterans that we are taking on over the next couple of
months. These are the kind of changes that will really make
that impact.
Thank you.
[The prepared statement of Mr. Gonsalves appears on p. 31.]
Ms. Herseth Sandlin. Thank you very much for your
testimony, for being back here at the Subcommittee, and for the
outstanding work that you are doing on behalf of so many of our
veterans.
Let me start with the Temporary Residence Adaptation Grant
Program. Mr. Wilson, you had mentioned three specific
recommendations, decoupling that program so as to avoid the
reduction in payments, increasing the allowance, and your third
recommendation, can you repeat that for me, please?
Mr. Wilson. Yes, ma'am, as soon as I can find it. Here we
are. Yes. The third recommendation was for those veterans who
are eligible for the Special Housing Adaptation grants, SHA,
Congress should increase that amount from the current $2,000
cap to a $5,000 cap.
Ms. Herseth Sandlin. Mr. Daley, you had indicated you agree
with the decoupling, and in the written testimony of Mr.
Gonsalves, he indicated the need to increase the amount of the
Specially Adapted Housing Grant specifically to TRA.
Did the other panelists agree with all three of those
recommendations.
Mr. Daley.
Mr. Daley. Yes, ma'am, I do agree. The actual amount, I was
concerned that you would ask how much should it be.
Ms. Herseth Sandlin. I was going to ask you that as a
follow-up question actually.
Mr. Daley. I have a colleague over here that knows a lot
more. I have never knocked out a wall with a hammer. I know
nothing about construction, but we know that that cost rises
constantly.
And I have talked to other veterans in wheelchairs and they
say, I may use that grant to put a lift in, if you have a
bungalow style house with a big front porch that is 42 inches
high, you are going to have to put one of these Canadian
Garaventa lifts. Twenty thousand dollars right there to get you
up to the front door, not even in the front door.
So when you think about it, some people can get by with
that amount of funding but it does not make the house usable.
And I have known people that have actually added on another
room, a big room, accessible, that becomes the person's family
room and bedroom. And what does a room cost? It is $50,000,
$60,000 at a minimum. So it definitely should be increased.
Ms. Herseth Sandlin. Do we have any information on the
average out-of-pocket cost beyond the $63,000 plus of the
current grant?
Mr. Daley. No, ma'am, I do not. I am curious of that also.
It is probably all over the board because I know where I came
from in the St. Louis area, on the weekends, there were
projects where people come out to do volunteer work on homes
for our veteran. So, you would actually have to count that as
hours of labor cost.
Ms. Herseth Sandlin. Right.
Mr. Daley. So I do not have an actual figure. But,
somewhere we can arrive at something.
Ms. Herseth Sandlin. That or the historical numbers that
Mr. Gonsalves offered here are also very helpful in terms of if
the grant had been indexed to inflation back decades ago what
it would be today and what the cost of the homes are today. And
it gives us some numbers to work from. But anything that we
could get to figure out on average what additional monies are
being paid out of pocket.
But back to the other recommendations. And I assume, Dr.
Zampieri, Mr. Gonsalves, you agree with the recommendations on
the application of TRA?
Mr. Gonsalves. TRA.
Mr. Gonsalves. Yes.
Ms. Herseth Sandlin. Doctor, you as well.
Mr. Zampieri. Yes.
Ms. Herseth Sandlin. One of the concerns that Dr. Zampieri
has is with the updated version of the handbook. Could you
elaborate for us if the handbook is helpful for visually
impaired veterans or what further provisions would your
organization like to see in the handbook?
Mr. Zampieri. Yeah. The handbook is helpful. A lot of the
modifications in regards to lighting and additional electrical
outlets and all those things and then the----
Ms. Herseth Sandlin. You had mentioned that in your oral
statement that you would like to see those types of adaptations
added.
Mr. Zampieri. Right.
Ms. Herseth Sandlin. So maybe a comprehensive list of what
would be available.
Mr. Zampieri. Okay. And then----
Ms. Herseth Sandlin. Is that----
Mr. Zampieri. Right.
Ms. Herseth Sandlin. Okay.
Mr. Zampieri. And then the voice activated types of devices
are also, you know, being mentioned, especially for blind
veterans who nowadays, you know, live alone. All those things
add to safety and other things.
Ms. Herseth Sandlin. Mr. Gonsalves, you had expressed
concerns that, I think in terms of some requirements in the
grants, there are injuries that require some adaptations, which
may be mandatory. But it would be helpful to have some
additional flexibility in the grants. Is that correct.
Mr. Gonsalves. Yes.
Ms. Herseth Sandlin. Okay.
Mr. Gonsalves. And I think some of that may have been taken
out. I hadn't seen the new VA pamphlet. I had not seen it
before in the testimony.
But one of the things that Homes for Our Troops does now,
and you can tell from one of the pictures that we have here, we
have a soldier who is actually before his house is being built,
this is under the fully functional kitchens for mobility, we
qualify what types of adaptations are going to happen in a
house based on injury.
And I guess it would sort of work the way the VA rates
disability percentage. At the time a servicemember gets
qualified for SAH, we have enough information at that time. And
what Homes for Our Troops has done is we have an adaptation
check list.
We only have five sets of home plans that we build. And the
footprint is always the same. The windows are always the same.
The floor plan is always the same. But there is an adaptation
check list based on what the soldier needs. And that is why I
provided some photos in here. It really gives you an idea.
You know, obviously a quadriplegic would need a lift and
care system where somebody that has the mobility of their upper
arms probably does not need it.
And I think at the time of being qualified for SAH,
basically all the technology is there. We have built for, I
think, every type of injury out there from amputees who are
blind to different levels of spinal cord injuries.
So we know what is available to put in a home and it would
be really great to be out in the front once they qualify a
whole check list be put together.
Ms. Herseth Sandlin. I think that is very helpful. I think
that you have some ideas and recommendations that would be
helpful and would like you to share those with us and with the
VA.
I think in addition to what they have done to update their
pamphlet, to have someone who has undertaken the mission that
you have undertaken, doing this work on the ground would be
beneficial in creating those types of check lists.
I would also think that it would be somewhat beneficial
based on the work that you have done and having these check
lists for the different types of injuries that a veteran may
have suffered from and how to construct homes suitable to his
or her needs as it relates to the overall cost of that.
And I know that you agree that in addition to TRA that the
Specially Adapted Housing Grant be increased. And, that is sort
of the historical analysis that you are providing, specifically
on Exhibit 1 for that grant.
Do you have a ballpark figure? Again, knowing that if we
had adjusted it to inflation, it would be up to $187,000. But
based on the work you have done and the relative cost of doing
that, do you have a ballpark figure?
Mr. Gonsalves. Yes. On average, we have averaged $343,000
for the cost of building a new home.
Ms. Herseth Sandlin. So that is even greater than the
average new home price?
Mr. Gonsalves. Right. But these are, you know, 100 percent
fully adapted homes which, you know, they do cost a little more
to build. You need a little extra square footage compared to
what the average home that the Census Bureau uses.
Ms. Herseth Sandlin. Okay.
Mr. Bilirakis.
Mr. Bilirakis. Thank you, Madam Chair. I appreciate it.
Mr. Wilson, if you were to define loss of use, should any
residual function, any limb disqualify someone from eligibility
for the adaptive housing benefit?
Mr. Wilson. Excuse me, sir. Would you please repeat the
question?
Mr. Bilirakis. Okay. I am sorry. If you were to define loss
of use, should any residual function, any limb disqualify
someone from eligibility for the Adapted Housing Grant?
Mr. Wilson. No, sir, I would not think so.
Mr. Bilirakis. This is a question for the entire panel.
Keeping in mind, there are limitations imposed by PAYGO. If
there is one change to the TRA Program you could make, what
would it be?
Mr. Wilson. Sir, if there is one change I can make, I would
first and foremost delink it from the SAH and SHA grants.
Mr. Daley. I would agree with that. Make it a separate
grant, a separate pool of money. And that way, we will see more
veterans using it. I myself knowing that I only have $63,000 to
renovate a home not use it temporarily for 6 months while I am
living with mom and dad, I would not use it.
Mr. Bilirakis. Thank you.
Mr. Zampieri. Yes, I agree with that. I think, you know, it
is either that or you try to increase the total amount and,
therefore, you are still doing the same thing, you know, with
the SHA or the, you know, as far as, you know, either way you
go, you are going to have a problem because you are going to
have to increase the amounts either just for the TRA or SHA.
Mr. Gonsalves. I agree. I would just make the TRA a
separately funded project and not tie it into the adapted
housing money and have to deduct that. I do not believe many
veterans have actually used it.
And, you know, although I do not have any statistics, I
would think I would go the same way if I had to make that
choice and looked at the amount of a grant I had for a
specially adapted home and I knew I could use some of that
money for a temporary 6 months or maybe a year, when we look
at, you know, $14,000 compared to $60,000 as a percentage, you
are taking a good percentage of that funding out by doing that
and I know I would not do it.
Mr. Bilirakis. Thank you very much.
Mr. Daley, in your testimony, you described several
features such as ramps, doorways, bathrooms, kitchens, and
bedrooms that may need adaptation to accommodate a chair-bound
veteran.
Since PVA has an architect department, does PVA have any
data showing the total cost of such renovation.
Mr. Daley. No, sir. I am not aware of data that shows the
total cost because we do not perform construction, but we do
advise in accessibility and we certainly go by the Federal
standards.
And I want to make something clear that in the testimony, I
said that PVA reviewed the VA's new pamphlet. We did not
approve. We reviewed. So it does not have our seal of approval
on it.
Mr. Bilirakis. Okay. Thank you very much.
Thank you, Madam Chair. I yield back the balance of my
time.
Ms. Herseth Sandlin. Thank you, Mr. Bilirakis.
I would now like to recognize the Ranking Member who I know
had a markup in his other Committee.
Thank you, Mr. Boozman. I recognize you for questions.
Mr. Boozman. Well, thank you very much, Madam Chair.
And I really do not have a question for this panel, but I
appreciate you again having this hearing. This is one of the, I
think, most important things that our little Subcommittee deals
with.
And so it is important that we give all the aid that we can
and get this thing right and certainly are committed to moving
this forward. So we appreciate you all very, very much.
Ms. Herseth Sandlin. Thank you, Mr. Boozman.
Just a couple more questions that I have for this panel.
Mr. Wilson, in your testimony, you state that changes in
the nature of a veteran's disability may necessitate a home
configured differently and/or changes to the special
adaptations.
Do you know how often there is a change in the nature of
the veteran's disability? I mean, do we have any figures that
we could work from.
Mr. Wilson. No, ma'am, I do not. I know, as Mr. Daley had
indicated and others on the panel, we have spoken to veterans
in the field and understood from their concerns, as their
particular disabling conditions change, they ask for different
additional assistance, but having reached the funding ceiling,
no further assistance is available to them. And so it has made
it more problematic for them to utilize the program again.
There are three opportunities to use SAH for a total of
$60,000. But as Mr. Daley was indicating, that certainly can be
quickly consumed due to the various costs of construction. I
understand from personal experience myself of a home having a
water disaster this summer. Just to get that part done cost me
$12,000 just to replace the flooring.
So as I said, personal experience is a difficult teacher,
but lots of our veterans are learning from a much more
difficult circumstance than a malfunctioning water heater.
Ms. Herseth Sandlin. Okay. Mr. Daley, thank you for
bringing to the Subcommittee's attention again the maximum
amount of the mortgage life insurance. We will certainly take a
look at both Senator Akaka's bill and H.R. 1037. I appreciate
the point that you made and the specific example that you
shared with us from the veteran that you heard from down in
Georgia.
One last question, Dr. Zampieri, can you explain the
difference in changing the Specially Adapted Housing Grant from
5/200 to 20/200 with regard to visual impairment?
Mr. Zampieri. Yes. In fact, thank you very much. I was
afraid someone did not notice that. And also I appreciate that
Congressman Boozman just coincidentally showed up at the right
time.
I am legally blind. I cannot drive. A lot of jobs I cannot
do. My vision is worse than 20/200 and I do not qualify for
anything under this program because the requirement is 5/200,
which is really just you cannot tell if there is a light on.
There is no light/dark perception for lack of a better way to
describe it.
If somebody has 5/200 and they wave their hand in front of
their face and you do not see it, you, quote, meet this
requirement of totally blind.
Our concern is, and this is a growing thing, a lot of the
traumatic brain injured servicemembers who have significant
functional impairments who need extra lighting and all these
other things get zip.
When I was in Houston and I was first service-connected for
my blindness, for example, because of the 20/200 vision, they
said no. So I went and I ended up spending about, not a whole
lot, but almost $7,000 to do the modifications to my house in
Houston because, you know--and so the total numbers of
servicemembers coming back that would be 5/200 is fairly low.
In fact, the Navy says there is less than 20 in the last 8
years out at Bethesda. But there are 140 that are enrolled in
the VA with this 20/200 and are told no. And so it is a
frustrating thing.
And I realize, of course, you know, the magic problem is if
you change this section and you open it up to 20/200 is the
definition of blindness, then, of course, you know, the
automatic reaction is, uh-oh, you are going to expand the cost
of the program.
And I, you know, am always suspicious of that. It is sort
of like a couple years ago when you did the TRA legislation. I
am sure people initially reacted by saying this is going to
cost millions and millions and you are going to have all sorts
of veterans applying for this. And the experience which I have
is it usually is not that way. You know, people do not apply
automatically.
But I think Mr. Boozman may have some thoughts about this
problem of the vision complications.
Mr. Boozman. I appreciate you bringing that up. And you
make such an important comment. Probably the VA is the only
entity in the world, you know, that uses that standard versus
the 20/200 standard.
As an optometrist, I helped start--in fact, I started the
School for the Blind's Low Vision Program in Little Rock. And I
would say probably, you know, 90 percent of the kids in there
would not meet the--did you say 5/200 was the standard? I mean,
that is the standard that I am familiar with because nobody
uses it. Okay.
But I would say if you looked at all the kids in blind
schools or schools for the impaired, the vast majority, vast,
vast majority, there is no way that they would meet a 5/200
standard. Most people that, and lay people do not understand
this, but most people that are blind have a lot of usable
vision that can be worked with.
And it truly does, you know, going in and setting up a
kitchen or setting up a house so that a person can easily pour
a cup of coffee, you know, do things that we just take for
granted, somebody might really struggle with that, that it did
not meet this definition of vision which is so stringent in the
VA.
So I think you make a great point. I think hopefully we
can--I know that Ms. Herseth Sandlin and her staff and my
staff, that is something that we really do need to address
right now.
And, again, I think I can be helpful in that because I
really do understand it. So thank you for bringing that up.
Ms. Herseth Sandlin. Yes. And thank you, Mr. Boozman. I
look forward to working with you.
Mr. Boozman. It was providence.
Ms. Herseth Sandlin. That is right.
The timing was perfect. Again, you make the very important
point, Doctor, about the impact of some of the traumatic brain
injuries that our servicemembers are suffering. And so I think
given Dr. Boozman's expertise, given the thoughtful testimony
you have provided today that we will work with you and together
here with the Subcommittee and the VA to take a look at making
this important change.
I would also encourage all of you and with our next panel
to work together. We appreciate the update to the handbook, but
it looks like we may have missed an opportunity that we need to
seize once again to be even more comprehensive with that update
as it relates to integrating some modern technologies, again
putting our heads together in light of the experience of
members of your organizations and, of course, Mr. Gonsalves'
professional endeavor and volunteer endeavor with his
organization and with his professional expertise that we can
create a more comprehensive check list. At the same time we are
looking at what we can do to improve the grants, whether it is
through decoupling, whether it is through increasing the
amounts and other recommendations that you have made for us
here today.
I thank you all very much for your testimony, for your
commitment to our Nation's veterans and will look forward to
working with you further.
Mr. Gonsalves. Thank you.
Ms. Herseth Sandlin. We now invite our witness for the
second panel to the table. Participating on the second panel is
Mr. Mark Bologna, Director of Loan Guaranty Service for the
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs.
Mr. Bologna, thank you for being here. Welcome to the
Subcommittee. Again, your written statement has been entered
into the record and so you will be recognized for 5 minutes.
And we will have some questions for you.
STATEMENT OF MARK BOLOGNA, DIRECTOR OF LOAN GUARANTY SERVICE,
VETERANS BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
Mr. Bologna. Madam Chairwoman, Ranking Member Boozman, and
Members of the Subcommittee, I appreciate the opportunity to
appear before you today to discuss VA's Specially Adapted
Housing Program.
Eligible veterans may use a grant from VA to purchase or
construct a home or to adapt an existing one to meet their
needs. Through the SAH Grant Program, thousands of veterans
have been afforded a level of independent living they may not
have otherwise enjoyed.
VA administers, as you know, three types of grants under
the SAH Program. To be eligible for a grant, a veteran or a
servicemember must be entitled to VA compensation benefits for
permanent and total service-connected disabilities. Amounts of
assistance are subject to aggregate maximums and no individual
may receive more than three grants of assistance.
The Adaptive Housing (AH) Grant, the smaller grant, is
available to individuals whose disabilities are due to
blindness in both eyes, the anatomical loss or loss of use of
both hands, or severe burns.
With the enactment of Public Law 110-289, the maximum
amount of assistance is now tied to an annual cost of
construction index and was recently increased by 6.3 percent to
$12,756. This grant may be used to purchase, construct, or
adapt a home owned by the eligible individual or to adapt a
home owned by a member of their family.
The Paraplegic Housing (PH) Grant is the larger grant and
is available to severely disabled individuals who are entitled
to assistance due to the loss or loss of use of both lower
extremities or of both upper extremities. The law also provides
eligibility be based on other types of injuries such as
blindness and loss or loss of use of one lower extremity in
combination or severe burns. The maximum amount of assistance
for this grant is also adjusted annually and was increased to
$63,780 on October 1st.
Unlike the AH grants, which may be used to adapt the home
of a family member, PH grants are only available to purchase,
construct, or adapt a home owned by the veteran or
servicemember.
The TRA Grant is available to an individual who is
temporarily residing with a family member and is otherwise
eligible for either a PH or an AH Grant. An individual eligible
for the PH Grant may receive up to $14,000 while the veteran or
servicemember eligible for the AH Grant may receive up to
$2,000. Unlike the PH and AH grants, VA does not have the
authority to adjust these amounts to keep pace with costs of
construction.
Between fiscal years 1989 and 2006, VA provided an average
of 500 grants per year. In fiscal year 2009, we approved 1,270
grants. That is an increase of 140 percent between fiscal year
2006 and fiscal year 2009 and we expect that upward trend will
continue.
Congress made a number of legislative changes to this
program in recent years. Most notably Congress changed the
program from a one-time use to a three-time use. This change
allowed individuals to make additional adaptations to their
homes or upgrade existing modifications.
Additionally, if they move to another home, and have
remaining eligibility, they can now use the program to adapt
their new home.
These legislative changes have significantly improved the
benefits available to severely injured veterans and
servicemembers and they have increased the overall flexibility
of the program.
However, as noted in VA's report to Congress published in
August, there are statutory inadequacies that may prevent a
number of individuals from receiving much needed assistance.
According to VA's survey in 2007 of SAH grantees, most AH
recipients, again the smaller grant, indicated that the grant
amount was not enough to cover the full cost of adaptations. As
a result, they may have incurred significant out-of-pocket
expenses or had to rely on the generosity of others.
In other cases, veterans or servicemembers who have
service-connected conditions that may benefit from home
adaptations are not eligible due to the fact that the law
specifies a finite list of qualifying disabilities.
Congress created the TRA Grant in 2006 and extended the
benefit to active-duty servicemembers in July of 2008. As you
know, since the inception of the grant, VA has dispersed 12
grants and approved an additional five for processing.
There are several factors that may explain why so few
individuals have chosen to use this valuable benefit. First,
GAO reported that several veteran service organizations believe
the number of veterans and servicemembers whose living
situation is appropriate for TRA could, in fact, be very small.
Second, severely injured servicemembers often face a
difficult transition when returning from combat and may not be
ready to make decisions regarding their living situation.
Consequently, these eligible individuals might delay or even
opt out of using the TRA benefit.
Additionally, when individuals use the TRA Grant, their
opportunity to receive future assistance is limited in two
ways, as you know. The amount of the grant is deducted from the
aggregate amount of assistance available and the use counts as
one of the three uses.
As a result, an individual needs to consider their future
plans in terms of using the AH or PH Program before deciding
whether to use a TRA Grant.
In addition, the GAO report noted comments from other
veteran service organizations that additional outreach to
servicemembers and veterans about TRA could potentially
increase the use.
Finally, the Subcommittee requested information about our
Handbook for Design and we already heard some information about
that. VA worked in conjunction with a graphics designer and we
sought advice from Carol Paredo Lopez, the National
Architecture Director for the Paralyzed Veterans of America. We
published the pamphlet on our Web site in October and we will
continue to work with the industry to regularly update the
guidance provided in that pamphlet.
Madam Chairwoman, this concludes my testimony. Again, I
appreciate the opportunity to be here today and I look forward
to answering your questions.
[The prepared statement of Mr. Bologna appears on p. 35.]
Ms. Herseth Sandlin. Thank you very much for your
testimony.
I recognize Mr. Boozman to begin our questions.
Mr. Boozman. Thank you very much, Madam Chair.
The Chair and I have supported increasing the benefit
levels and introduced H.R. 1169 to triple the benefit levels.
You have testified for an increase in the adapted housing
benefit, yet your data shows that average payments are $9,256
for the Adapted Housing Grant and $43,353 for the Paraplegic
Housing Grant.
What should the benefit levels be and will the
Administration be requesting an increase in any or all of the
SAH grants.
Mr. Bologna. Thank you for the question, sir.
The information we provided that you referred to, the
average on the AH Grant of $9,266 or $9,256, excuse me, that
was based on the total AH Grant usages in fiscal year 2009.
There were 81 of those. That included reuse, so that brought
the number down. The number, if I isolate that number to those
that only used the AH Grant in 2009 for the first time, the
average was $10,600 and the median was $12,000, which was also
the maximum.
In regards to your question about what should the numbers
be, I would point out that in our report, we mention that we
have been told through the SAH survey that we do of veterans
and servicemembers that use our grant program that they believe
that in many cases, the grant is not sufficient.
We, as the first panel mentioned, we have heard as well
from veteran service organizations that they are concerned over
that. And we noted in one of the two reports to the Congress a
fairly recent New York Times article that also expressed that
concern.
Mr. Boozman. Very good.
Mr. Bologna. Thank you.
Mr. Boozman. First of all, I would like unanimous consent
to introduce my statement into the record.
Ms. Herseth Sandlin. Without objection, so entered.
[The prepared statement of Congressman Boozman appears on
p. 24.]
Mr. Boozman. And then if it is okay, let me read just a
little bit of it because it kind of addresses, I think, what we
might have is maybe catch-22 situations in some cases.
Let me start with, currently one of the limitations for the
large grant is loss of or loss of use of both lower extremities
such as to preclude locomotion without the aid of braces,
crutches, canes, or wheelchair.
And then that is the regulation, but as presently worded,
it is my understanding that an amputee whose remaining leg
retains some function however minimal would not qualify for the
larger grant or, put another way, the remaining leg must have
no functionality.
Likewise, I find no temporal limitation on the loss of
locomotion. For example, someone who required the use of
crutches, a cane, or a wheelchair for several months but may
eventually be able to move without such aid may also not
qualify.
It is possible that, you know, we are wrong in that
interpretation, but we have received a lot of anecdotal
examples of such limitations on the application of the current
law.
I guess what I am saying is if we are correct in our
interpretation that that is a problem, then what we would like
to do is work with the Chair and work with you all and get it
straight.
Is that a problem as I am saying? One of the things that is
happening right now is that it appears that there is an effort
to save limbs even if they are not of much use, but they are a
limb and this and that. So can you comment on that for us.
Mr. Bologna. Yes, sir. The decision as to whether, and
obviously the decision is based on Compensation and Pension
Service in VA makes their rating determination, but those
determinations are based on the medical exam and the findings.
And so as a result, and I think you hit it specifically, if
the ability to ambulate on the lower extremities without the
use of crutches, braces, or other means, if the person cannot
ambulate without those things and it is found to be a permanent
condition, then the determination is that they are going to be
eligible. If they are able to ambulate with some assistance or
without assistance, then they would not be eligible as it
stands today.
Mr. Boozman. If it is okay with you, could he----
Ms. Herseth Sandlin. Yes.
Mr. Boozman [continuing]. Address the----
Ms. Herseth Sandlin. Certainly. We will recognize counsel.
Mr. Boozman. That way, we will not have a three-party
thing.
Mr. Bologna. Yes, sir. Yes, sir.
Mr. Brinck. Thank you, Mr. Bologna.
As you know, Master Sergeant Gibson is on our staff, a
fellow active-duty Marine who is an above-the-knee amputee. And
he was mentioning several of his friends who are amputees, one
leg, with virtually no but maybe some small residual remaining
functionality. Maybe they could stand on a leg, but certainly
could not walk, but they have been denied Adapted Housing
grants based on that residual or retained functionality. And I
think that is what we are trying to get at here.
Mr. Bologna. Sure. I would like to take that for the record
and get more details from the medical professionals both in
Veterans Health Administration as well as my counterparts in
Compensation and Pension.
My understanding is that if, the person is not able to
ambulate on their own, even if the limb is still physically
present, then they should meet the criteria.
So I am certainly happy to interact with you all on any
specific veterans, but I would like to take it for the record
and get someone with a medical background to address that for
me----
Mr. Boozman. Okay.
Mr. Bologna [continuing]. If that is acceptable.
[The VA provided the answer in Question #6 of the Post-
Hearing Questions and Responses for the Record, which appears
on p. 51.]
Mr. Boozman. And I appreciate the Chair's indulgence in
letting counsel ask the question because it really is
important.
I mean, the intent of this Committee, the intent of all
this, and I said earlier we deal with a lot of things on this
Committee, but I think all of us up here, the entire Committee
really feels like this is one of the most important things that
we deal with.
But we do not want some situation like was mentioned with
the 20/200 vision where that is not--20/200 is the accepted
rating for blindness throughout the world, certainly throughout
the United States. But we do not want some catch-22 where these
severely injured guys do not qualify for some mess-up in the
law where you cannot do that.
So if you would find out what is going on with that and
then get back with us, that really would be greatly
appreciated.
Mr. Bologna. Yes, sir, absolutely. Thank you.
Mr. Boozman. And also would you find out about the
temporary--if a guy is going to be for 2 or 3 years in a
wheelchair or something, you know, would that preclude. Again,
we just do not want any catch-22 situations.
Mr. Bologna. And the second part, Mr. Boozman, I believe I
can answer, And that is the way that the program is set up
today, it is a permanent condition. So if it is a temporary
condition, then that would preclude eligibility.
Mr. Boozman. Okay. Even if it were for an extended period?
Mr. Bologna. Again, I will take that to get clarification,
if I may.
Mr. Boozman. Okay. Thank you very much.
Mr. Bologna. Thank you, Congressman.
Mr. Boozman. Thank you, Madam Chair.
Ms. Herseth Sandlin. Thank you.
Would it preclude eligibility, if the condition is
temporary, would it preclude eligibility for TRA.
Mr. Bologna. I believe it would, in that again the way the
TRA Grant Program works is that you have to be otherwise
eligible for either the AH or the PH and those are both based
on permanent loss of use.
Ms. Herseth Sandlin. Well, following up on Mr. Boozman's
concern, I want to make sure, too. He cited the visual
impairment example that Dr. Zampieri mentioned in his testimony
but also any residual use.
I mean, you stated in your testimony there has been a 140
percent increase.
Mr. Bologna. Yes.
Ms. Herseth Sandlin. That is of people who have been
eligible.
Mr. Bologna. Correct.
Ms. Herseth Sandlin. So it somewhat skews the analysis
either from your office or the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB), for us to assess in looking at annual budget need all of
these people who may be denied the grants based on some of
these questionable eligibility determinations. Therefore, it is
very important if you can pursue this and get back to us.
Mr. Bologna. Sure.
Ms. Herseth Sandlin. Because I know OMB is currently
putting together fiscal year 2011 and we are looking at this
increase that you had given us as a projected outlook for grant
usage.
Just given that 140 percent increase, how long will this
increase of usage for the Specially Adapted Housing grants last
and are you confident that you have the resources to meet the
need?
Mr. Bologna. Sure. Thank you.
We have not projected it out 10, 15, 20 years. We just
looked to the next 2 or 3 years. We can certainly continue to
look. We believe that the increase is due in large part to the
work of Congress over the last couple of years in changing the
program and making it available essentially and useful to many
more people.
We do anticipate that we are going to continue to see,
again, we approved nearly 1,300 grants in the last fiscal year,
we expect that we will exceed that this coming year. We do have
in terms of the staffing, we believe we have more than enough
staffing today. I guess I should not say more than enough, but
we have enough staffing.
One of the things that we are doing in addition to
addressing the folks that are coming in and using the program
is continuing to expand and think of new ways to do outreach to
make sure that everyone knows whether they are eligible or may
be potentially eligible, that they know about the benefit.
Ms. Herseth Sandlin. I appreciate that, the efforts at the
outreach as well and how important that is. In light of some of
the changes that Congress has made, we want to make sure it
gets to all of the folks and all of the regional offices to
make sure there is consistency of interpretation of any new
regulations and the provisions and legislation that we have
passed.
You also highlighted some of the findings of the 2007
survey of those using Specially Adapted Housing. You mentioned
that most grantees felt the current grant program was not
sufficient to cover the cost of adaptations.
Did the survey inquire as it relates to any cost above the
grant amount, what the out-of-pocket costs are, what
charitable, amounts of charitable donations or volunteer
efforts to meet the need? Do you have any of that type of
information available that would assist us in determining an
appropriate grant amount if indeed we could find ways to
increase any mandatory spending in these grant programs?
Mr. Bologna. We do not retain or maintain collection of
data in terms of if needed adaptations exceed the amount. We
mentioned----
Ms. Herseth Sandlin. Did you ask even if you did not
maintain the information?
Mr. Bologna. I do not know. I will have to check. I do not
know if we asked that specific question in the survey. We did
mention and, excuse me----
Ms. Herseth Sandlin. Uh-huh.
Mr. Bologna [continuing]. While I flip through my note. In
the report, one of the recent reports to Congress, we did
provide a chart that showed some sample costs of typical
adaptations. I believe one of the gentlemen on the previous
panel mentioned something similar in terms of the typical
kitchen remodel, in terms of the part that would need to be
done in association with an adaptation, as well as some of the
assistive devices with lighting and enhanced lighting and those
sorts of things that would be beneficial. And we do provide
information on sample costs there.
Ms. Herseth Sandlin. What more should we be doing in your
opinion for burn victims or veterans with visual impairments?
Again, and maybe a specific response to Dr. Zampieri's
testimony and Mr. Boozman highlighting the standard of 5/200 is
used for eligibility determinations versus standard in the
profession and what is recognized elsewhere outside the VA of
the 20/200.
Mr. Bologna. Sure. In terms of the second part, the visual
impairment, I would defer to the medical experts both within VA
as well as the Congressman and others in terms of the medical
definition.
Ms. Herseth Sandlin. Could you follow up with them, take
the question for the record, and provide us a response from
some of the medical experts within the VA to justify that
standard?
Mr. Bologna. Yes, I can do that.
[The VA subsequently provided the following information.]
The SAH program is currently limited by existing statute.
Currently, all disabilities that entitle a Veteran to SAH
benefits are required to be rated permanent and total (100
percent). The existing 20/200 standard does not result in a
permanent and total disability rating.
Ms. Herseth Sandlin. Okay. Thank you.
Mr. Bologna. In terms of the burn victims, we have been
working on the regulation package. It is going through final
approval now. We have been working, obviously while we are
responsible for administering the Specially Adapted Housing
Grant Program, working closely with medical experts as well as
my counterpart in Compensation and Pension. I know they have
worked closely with Paralyzed Veterans of America as well as
some others.
As this body knows, one of the challenges with the burns is
the issue of the varying degrees of burns. Some affect the
outer layer of skin. Some affect the inner. And some of those
injuries that result in burns are temporary and the veteran or
servicemember does regain some use. In other cases, the burns
are so severe that they do not.
So I know that the experts have been working through that
in terms of trying to quantify that and put it in a way that we
can put into practice and help servicemembers and veterans.
Ms. Herseth Sandlin. Very good.
My final question relates to the handbook. We appreciate
getting the update in anticipation of this hearing. We passed
the legislation requiring the update at the end of last
Congress.
In light of what we heard from the first panel and what I
am hearing from counsel, we anticipated that this maybe would
have been a little bit more comprehensive. And I know that you
consulted with an expert working with PVA. It does seem to be
focused on adaptations for veterans who may be bound to
wheelchairs. And we were anticipating perhaps that we would
incorporate adaptive technology available on the marketplace.
Can you provide us some assurance that this is not the only
update we are going to be seeing? We were anticipating
something a bit more comprehensive and I would hope that you
would be willing to work with the Committee and those that
testified earlier in addition to the work that you did for this
update to expand this either further, incorporate other options
that are available that those in the construction industry
could provide us.
What are your thoughts when you put this update together?
Was it something that you thought met our needs or was it sort
of one step among others that you envision for updating the
handbook.
Mr. Bologna. Sure. Thank you.
I think it is the latter. The handbook, the design handbook
had not been updated in many, many years. And as you point out,
we did work with PVA and appreciate their assistance. We talked
to some others.
It was a conscientious decision frankly not to publish it
in hard copy but to put it on the Web and to only put it on the
Web. And the reason for that primarily is so that while we are
proud to have updated it, we think it is a big improvement, we
recognize that there may be more to do.
And in putting it on the Web, we can put it out there and
certainly find if we have gaps, if there are still needs, and
it sounded like certainly not only your comments but the first
panel had some very good points. The nice thing about the Web
is we can do an update as often as we need to.
Now, obviously we put a lot of effort into it and want to
make sure it is a good product, not one that we have to change
every week, every month. But we are more than willing to work
with not only this Committee but certainly the panel members to
incorporate their ideas and to figure out are there other
places we can get ideas. And certainly putting it on the Web,
we can update it as frequently as need be.
Ms. Herseth Sandlin. I am glad to hear that because I think
we have a lot of ideas circulating and ways to improve the
product.
Do you have plans at any point to publish it or is this
something that will be just Web based from here on out?
Mr. Bologna. Sure. So I have been in my present job
officially since January and on the ground probably since early
summer. One of the first things that was presented to me was
the Handbook for Design along with a purchase order request to
have it printed. And I made the decision not to print it
initially.
If it stabilizes and we collectively, the audience for
which it is intended, the people that have to use it, if we get
to the point in say the next few months, next 6 months that we
believe it has reached that level, then certainly we can print
it.
My intent was not to print something and then get advice
and find out, gosh, you know, there are some more things we
could have done that would make it an even better product. But
certainly we can print it when or if the time is appropriate or
we can continue to put it out solely on the Web.
Ms. Herseth Sandlin. Well, I really appreciate your
foresight and your judgment and the decision that you made in
light of the moving parts of what was happening after the
legislation was enacted and some of what may have been
happening in your Department before you came on board.
Recognizing that the stakeholders, those that will be using it,
as well as veteran service organizations and, of course, the
Committee just recently receiving it would like to have that
chance to review to determine whether or not it meets the
expectations and the needs.
Mr. Bologna. Sure.
Ms. Herseth Sandlin. We will look forward to following up
with you and working with others that testified earlier in this
hearing to make this as useful for those that are assisting our
veterans in utilizing these grants as possible. We appreciate
your leadership on the issue.
Mr. Bologna, thank you very much for your testimony.
Mr. Boozman, do you have any final questions?
Mr. Boozman. Just very quickly, Madam Chair.
The PVA pointed out that it takes from 6 months to a year
to adapt a home, some of which is due to the approval process
by VA.
I guess the question is, what can we do, what can VA do, is
there anything we need to do to help such that the claim is
completed, you know, and the adaptation is put into place in as
timely a fashion as we can?
Mr. Bologna. Yes. Thank you.
And I have not had a chance to read the first panel's
testimony yet. Certainly every adaptation is unique and so
there are some challenges sometimes and there is some back and
forth.
One of the things we have done earlier this year in the
Loan Guaranty Service in VBA is to put a new system in place
that allows us to track and get information on all of the
adapted grants. Prior to this system, it was more of a legacy
system, it was harder to compile the information. So from my
perspective, from my desk, it is going to be increasingly
easier to get information and to be able to track.
The other thing that we have done as part of our overall
accuracy reviews is we are now injecting some reviews before
grant approval so that we will be able to take a look as time
goes by.
And, one, if there are bottlenecks because of not acting
appropriately, we will know that, but, more importantly, if
there are bottlenecks because of process or challenges, we can
learn from that and improve--you know, it may be a combination
of things, improving policy, improving oversight, those sorts
of things.
Mr. Boozman. Thank you, Madam Chair.
Ms. Herseth Sandlin. Thank you, Mr. Boozman.
Again, thank you, Mr. Bologna, for being here and your
work.
We thank all of our panelists who testified this afternoon
for your statements, for your many insightful recommendations.
We will continue to look forward working with all of you in
partnership to address the growing needs of our veteran
population, those who have been severely injured and would
derive great benefit from these programs and modernize them to
meet those needs.
I thank you again, and the hearing stands adjourned.
[Whereupon, at 3:31 p.m., the Subcommittee was adjourned.]
A P P E N D I X
----------
Prepared Statement of Hon. Stephanie Herseth Sandlin, Chairwoman,
Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity
According to the Defense Manpower Data Center, at the Department of
Defense, approximately 35,000 servicemembers have been wounded in Iraq
and Afghanistan. Today, we will receive timely testimony that
foreshadows the increased need for adaptive housing grants. In caring
for our injured men and women in uniform, we must continue to address
their needs so they may live as independent as possible after their
honorable military service.
Some of our panelists might recall a hearing we held on specially
adaptive housing, early in the 110th Congress, in which we received
testimony on ways to improve existing VA adaptive housing programs.
Following this hearing, this Subcommittee worked with stakeholders to:
Provide specially adaptive housing assistance to disabled
servicemembers residing temporarily in housing owned by a family
member;
Require the VA to update its pamphlet on the construction
and design of a specially adapted house; and
Increase the amount of assistance available to disabled
veterans for specially adaptive housing grants.
While these legislative accomplishments are significant, today's
hearing will provide the Subcommittee Members the opportunity to
determine if the existing adaptive housing grants provide the needed
benefits for our most injured servicemembers and veterans.
I look forward to working with Ranking Member Boozman, Members of
this Subcommittee and veteran advocates to ensure that our most
critically wounded servicemembers are provided adequate benefits to
modify their homes to achieve independence and comfort when they return
home. I now recognize Mr. Boozman for any opening remarks he may have.
Prepared Statement of Hon. John Boozman, Ranking Republican Member,
Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity
Good afternoon Madam Chair. Although the Adapted Housing benefit is
not the largest VA program for disabled veterans, it is among the most
important. Without it, veterans with disabilities which affect their
mobility will have difficulty living in their homes. Severely disabled
veterans will face enough challenges in their lives and by adapting
their homes to their disability will make at least that portion of
their lives easier.
On the whole, it appears the Adapted Housing program is working. VA
data shows about 1,200 Paraplegic Housing Grants averaging $43,353 last
fiscal year and 81 Adaptive Housing Grants averaging $9,256. VA also
made 9 Temporary Residence Grants which averaged $13,314. VA
satisfaction data shows the overwhelming majority of veterans regard
the program as improving their lives and that is what it is all about.
Madam Chair, during the 109th Congress, we created what is known as
the Temporary Residence Adaptation Grant or TRA in which VA will modify
the residence of a family member in which the veteran temporarily
resides. We have also increased the grant amounts up to $60,000 and
$12,000 depending on the level of disability.
I believe there are other opportunities to improve this program
without incurring PAYGO and I want to explore that further with our
witnesses. Let me give you an example of what I am thinking. Currently,
one of the limitations for the large grant is,
``the loss of, or loss of use, of both lower extremities such as to
preclude locomotion without the aid of braces, crutches, canes,
or a wheelchair.''
As presently worded, it is my understanding that an amputee whose
remaining leg retains some function--however minimal--would not qualify
for the larger grant or put another way, the remaining leg must have no
functionality. Likewise, I find no temporal limitation on the loss of
locomotion. For example, someone who required the use of crutches, a
cane, or wheelchair for several months but may eventually be able to
move without such aid, may also not qualify.
It is possible I am wrong, but we have received anecdotal examples
of just such limitations on the application of the current law. But
Madam Chair, if I am correct, I want to work with you to clarify our
intent which is to take care of our severely injured veterans.
Madam Chair, I look forward to hearing from our witnesses and
hearing how we can improve the program. I yield back.
Prepared Statement of John L. Wilson, Associate National Legislative
Director, Disabled American Veterans
Madame Chairwoman and Members of the Subcommittee:
On behalf of the 1.2 million members of the Disabled American
Veterans (DAV), I am honored to present testimony to the Subcommittee
today and comment on programs insofar as they are in accordance with
DAV's dedication to one, single purpose--building better lives for all
of our Nation's disabled veterans and their families.
Under consideration today are the Department of Veterans Affairs
(VA) Specially Adapted Housing (SAH) Grant Program, the Special Housing
Adaptation (SHA) Grant Program, as well as the Temporary Residence
Assistance (TRA) Grant Program. I will primarily address the SAH and
TRA Grant Programs in my testimony today.
Congress enacted Public Law 109-233, the Veterans' Housing
Opportunity and Benefits Improvement Act of 2006, to improve the
benefits available to veterans and servicemembers to address the needs
of the now approximately 34,000 servicemembers wounded since May 2009,
as part of Operation Enduring Freedom or Operation Iraqi Freedom. The
Act allowed the VA to expand previously existing adaptive housing
assistance grants to include the TRA Grant for eligible individuals
living in temporary status in a home owned by a family member.
The SAH and TRA adaptive housing assistance grants are provided
specifically to service-connected disabled veterans rated 100 percent
permanently disabled due to at least one of the following: the loss or
loss of use of both legs in a way that precludes locomotion without the
aid of braces, crutches, canes, or a wheelchair; blindness in both eyes
and loss of use of one leg; the loss or loss of use of one leg together
with residuals of organic disease or injury; or the loss or loss of use
of one arm affecting the functions of balance or propulsion in a way
that precludes locomotion without the aid of braces, crutches, canes,
or a wheelchair; the loss or loss of use of both arms so as to preclude
the use of the arms at or above the elbows; or a severe burn injury;
the loss or loss of use of both arms so as to preclude the use of the
arms at or above the elbow. Severe burns will also be added to the list
of disability criteria for SAH and SHA once new criteria have been
adopted. These grants allow eligible individuals to construct an
adapted home or modify an existing home to accommodate their
disabilities.
The SAH Grant Program provides financial assistance to veterans and
servicemembers who are entitled to compensation for permanent and total
service-connected disability due to the loss or loss of use of multiple
limbs, blindness and limb loss, or a severe burn injury. Eligible
individuals may receive up to three SAH grants totaling no more than 50
percent of the cost of a specially adapted house, up to the aggregate
maximum amount of $60,000, adjusted annually based on a cost-of-
construction index.
The DAV views the SAH Grant program as an important resource for
our most severely injured eligible individuals. The loss or loss of use
of extremities and other conditions place special burdens on those
impacted. Through a combination of their resourcefulness and support
from the Administration and Congress, this grant allows eligible
veterans to come to terms with managing their lives in new ways.
We believe however, that the resources provided by the Government
are insufficient, particularly in today's depressed economy housing
market. DAV, through Resolution No. 176, calls on Congress to increase
the SAH Grant Program. The current $60,000 maximum amount authorized
for this grant, although it can be used up to three times for the
aggregate $60,000 maximum, is insufficient to allow such veterans to
make all necessary adaptations and modifications. Therefore, we support
legislation that would provide a realistic increase in the grant
authorized by section 2101(a) of title 38, United States Code.
DAV also requests Congress to establish a grant program for special
adaptations to homes that veterans purchase or build to replace initial
specially adapted homes. Like those of other families today, veterans'
housing needs tend to change with time and new circumstances. An
initial home may become too small when the family grows, or become too
large when children leave home. Changes in the nature of a veteran's
disability may necessitate a home configured differently and/or changes
to the special adaptations. These evolving requirements merit a second
grant to cover the costs of adaptations to a new home.
Regarding TRA, this pilot program, which is scheduled to expire
December 31, 2011, allows veterans and active duty servicemembers to
apply for a grant to adapt the home of a family member where they will
temporarily reside, provided that family member is a person related to
the veteran by either blood, marriage, or adoption. It enables veterans
and servicemembers eligible under the SAH and SHA programs to use up to
$14,000 and $2,000, respectively, to modify a family member's home.
Each TRA grant is counted as one of the three grants allowed under
either SAH or SHA, and also counts toward the maximum allowable $60,000
under SAH and $12,000 under SHA.
The Veterans' Housing Opportunity and Benefits Improvement Act of
2006 expanded the SAH and SHA benefits by increasing the number of
grants available to eligible individuals from one to three. The Housing
and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 also increased the maximum allowable
SAH and SHA grants to $60,000 and $12,000, respectively, adjusted
annually based on a cost-of-construction index.
DAV is concerned about the viability of the TRA Grants Program.
According to a GAO Study of June 15, 2009, titled Veterans Affairs:
Implementation of Temporary Residence Adaptation Grants, there have
only been nine TRA Grants processed by the VA, ranging from $3,575 to
$14,000. The GAO study cites three reasons why the grants have been so
limited in their utilization.
First, the pool of eligible veterans and servicemembers is very
small in that, although 1,800 become eligible for adaptive housing
assistance each year, these same veterans must also live, or plan to
live, temporarily with a family member who owns a home. If that same
veteran planned to live with a friend or a family member in a rental
property, they would not be eligible. This is likely a small set of
eligible recipients.
Second, TRA may not be a suitable option for some who are eligible
for it. Severely wounded veterans may find transition difficult when
they return from combat, and may not have definite plans for what they
will do when they leave the hospital, for such pivotal issues as where
to live, with whom, and for how long. Uncertainty such as this may
cause some otherwise eligible individuals to delay or opt out of using
it.
Third, TRA counts against the $60,000 maximum amount of adaptive
housing assistance available in SAH, and $12,000 in the case of SHA.
Given the high cost of adapting a house, some eligible individuals do
not choose to use TRA in order to preserve their full SAH or SHA
benefit. They also said that they were aware of some veterans and
servicemembers who, in lieu of using TRA to adapt a temporary
residence, received assistance from nonprofit organizations or from
other VA programs.
What is to become of this important program? It seems logical that
severely injured veterans and servicemembers, who often need daily care
during an extended convalescence, would benefit from a program that
allowed them to adapt their temporary surroundings using the TRA Grant
Program. It is the DAV's view that the primary obstacle to a broader
utilization of this program is the fact that participation in this
program negatively impacts the monetary cap of the SAH program.
DAV calls on Congress to modify the TRA Grant Program for special
adaptations to homes in which veterans temporarily reside, which are
owned by a family member. Specifically, Congress should increase the
allowance from $14,000 to $28,000 for those veterans who have a
permanent and total service-connected disability as a result of the
loss or loss of use of both lower extremities, such as to preclude
locomotion without the aid of braces, crutches, canes, or a wheelchair.
For those veterans who have a permanent and total service-connected
disability rating due to blindness in both eyes with 5/200 visual
acuity or less, and the disability includes the anatomical loss or loss
of use of both hands, Congress should increase the allowance from
$2,000 to $5,000.
The DAV further recommends that the TRA Grant Program be decoupled
from SAH and SHA monetary caps, and be placed at a level on par with
those caps. This would provide our veterans and servicemembers in the
most need with the flexibility necessary to respond to their own
changing lifestyle requirements given their level of recovery and
mobility.
Madame Chairwoman, this concludes my testimony on behalf of DAV. We
hope you will consider our recommendations. I would be happy to answer
any questions members of the Subcommittee might have.
Prepared Statement of Richard Daley, Associate Legislation Director,
Paralyzed Veterans of America
Chairwoman Herseth Sandlin, Ranking Member Boozman, Members of the
Subcommittee, Paralyzed Veterans of America (PVA) would like to thank
you for the opportunity to testify today regarding veterans use of the
Specially Adapted Housing Grant, the Special Housing Adaptation grant
and the latest housing program, the Temporary Residence Assistance
grant. We appreciate the efforts of the Subcommittee to address these
grants provided by the Department of Veterans Affairs to assist the men
and women who have made the commitment to serve their Nation and have
become permanently disabled while serving.
SPECIAL ADAPTED HOUSING GRANTS
SPECIAL HOUSING ADAPTATION GRANTS
The Department of Veterans Affairs programs being discussed today
are very important to the members of PVA and other seriously disabled
veterans. For many years the co-authors of The Independent Budget--
AMVETS, Disabled American Veterans, Paralyzed Veterans of America, and
Veterans of Foreign Wars have emphasized the need for adequate
increases in the Specially Adapted Housing grant (SAH) and the Special
Housing Adaptation grant (SHA) programs. We are very thankful for the
significant increases in the Specially Adapted Housing grant program
and Special Housing Adaptation grant program that were enacted in the
110th Congress. The increases in the value of these grants, along with
the yearly index adjustment for inflation received the full support of
this Subcommittee and the full House Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
Fortunately, improvements were included in H.R. 3221, the ``Housing and
Economic Recovery Act of 2008'' (P.L. 110-289). PVA has long supported
increases in these programs as they directly help to improve the lives
of our members and other disabled veterans.
PVA along with the other VSO's strongly supported recent
legislation adjusting the Specially Adapted Housing (SAH) grant to
$60,000. PVA's architecture program provided the information, based on
the cost of construction at that time. The grant has been adjusted over
time in an attempt to keep pace with the rising cost of home
construction. The grants value has usually lagged behind the cost of
construction since legislation was required to adjust the value of the
grant and construction costs consistently outpaced inflation. We were
pleased that an automatic annual adjustment which reflects the cost-of-
construction index rather than the cost-of-living index was included in
the ``Housing and Economic Recovery Act'' passed late last year.
PVA members and other disabled veterans that qualify for these
programs were also appreciative when Congress increased the number of
times the grant may be accessed by qualified veterans from one-time use
to a maximum of three times up to the maximum allowable amount of
$63,700. In today's mobile society it is common for members of the
general population, including disabled veterans, to move their place of
residence several times during their adult years for personal-family
reasons, health reasons, or employment reasons. The multiple uses
option of this grant will be well received among the qualified program
participants today and those disabled veterans of the future.
The $63,700 currently available using the Specially Adapted Housing
grant is a significant help for a veteran to make the needed
modifications to their existing home or newly purchased previously
owned home. Since it is difficult to find an existing home that can be
made totally accessible, some veterans choose to design a new house
incorporating accessibility into the plans. Often financial
considerations or a convenient living location near family members may
preclude designing a new home. In those situations the often monumental
task of making the existing structure accessible must be considered.
Guidance and information to make modifications for accessibility can be
found in the VA's newly issued VA pamphlet 26-13, Handbook for Design:
Specially Adapted Housing for Wheelchair Users, which was also reviewed
by PVA's Architecture Department before its publication.
Many existing homes can be modified to improve access for a
wheelchair user and enhance the function of the home. Some basic
alterations would include creating an accessible entrance to the home
including an accessible route to the entrance door, a level platform
that is large enough for maneuvering during door operation, and
enlarging entrance doorways. One bathroom would need complete
renovation including plumbing arrangements if an accessible roll-in
shower is required. The movement of an existing wall may be necessary
for a person in a wheelchair to use each fixture of the bathroom, allow
room for door operation and general circulation in the bathroom.
Similar construction alterations would be required for the kitchen to
be accessible and usable, and perhaps alterations to the master
bedroom. The current grant amount of $63,700 in many situations would
not pay for the entire project of making a home accessible for a
wheelchair user. Since the house must be made accessible for the
veteran, they would have no other option than to pay for remaining
construction costs from personal savings, arrange a loan from a bank,
or borrow needed funds from family members. We have been told that more
often, than not, this is the situation the veteran faces.
Eventually the disabled veteran will have a home that is usable for
themselves and their families. Often this will be accomplished with
donated building supplies, donated labor from friends and family
members, and support from non-profit organizations. Increasing the
maximum value of this grant along with the annual index would make the
transition to civilian life less stressful for the veteran.
THE TEMPORARY RESIDENCE ADAPTATION GRANT
PVA supports the Subcommittee's interest the Temporary Residence
Adaptation grant. The maximum amount of this grant is $14,000. This is
a small amount of funding for making the necessary modifications for a
residence to become useable for a disabled veteran who is temporarily
residing in housing owned by a family member. Unfortunately, that
amount could be exhausted in the modifications to allow the veteran to
travel from the edge of the property (accessible route from sidewalk or
Community Street) into the front door of the home. The $14,000 in most
cases would get the veteran in the home, but they would be unable to
use the home.
However, the current benefit provided by the TRA grant is
problematic to veterans in need of transitional housing who may wish to
purchase a home and use adaptive housing assistance at a later date.
The Temporary Residence Assistance grant is subtracted from the overall
maximum Specially Adapted Housing grant benefit of $63,700. For
example: If a disabled veteran receives a TRA grant of $14,000, he/she
would have only $49,700 available under the SAH grant to adapt or build
a permanent residence in the future. The current grant is not a
conducive benefit to disabled veterans who have temporary adaptive
housing needs and ultimately will have permanent adaptive housing
needs.
The GAO reported (GAO-09-637R) on June 15, 2009 to Members of
Congress that VA has processed nine TRA grants since it was created on
June 15, 2006 through the period ending February 28, 2009. During the
same period, VA processed 2,431 SAH and SHA grants. This is a
substantial difference in the number of applications for each program.
PVA recommends SAH and TRA become two separate grants due to their
different objectives. This would exclude the TRA deduction from the
maximum benefit of SAH and substantially increase the favorability of
the TRA grant and the number of applicants. This provides a reason for
veterans to use TRA and still allow them to adapt their own residence
in the future. Additionally, this is something our severely disabled
veterans desperately need and would provide a substantial difference in
their quality of life and create less of a financial hardship on the
veteran and their family.
The purpose of this hearing was to review the grants to determine
if they were ``meeting the needs of our injured veterans.'' With regard
to the timeliness of the process for making a home accessible using the
SAH grant or the SHA grant, it would appear that there is room for
improvement. This home modification process which involves education
about accessibility along with layers of approval from the VA, and
construction decisions for the disabled veteran and construction
approval along with the actual construction, can take 6 months to 1
year according to PVA's veterans service program. It would be
disturbing to most Americans to learn that a young man or woman could
go from average citizen, to an enlisted member of the military,
trained, deployed to Iraq or Afghanistan, severely injured, returned to
the U.S. for medical care, transferred to a military hospital or VA
hospital near their home, in less time than the government can assist
in making their home accessible for the disabled veteran to live in.
During this time of conflict with more veterans needing adaptive
housing to return to their civilian life, perhaps this process should
be improved to make the next phase of the seriously disabled veteran's
life, easier than the current process.
I would like to thank you again for your concern with these
important programs. Also, thank you for providing the recent increase
in the SAH and SHA grants along with their index in total funding
value. This concludes my testimony and I would be pleased to answer any
questions you may have.
Prepared Statement of Thomas Zampieri, Ph.D., Director of Government
Relations, Blinded Veterans Association
INTRODUCTION
On behalf of the Blinded Veterans Association (BVA), thank you for
this opportunity to present BVA's legislative concerns on the
Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Specially Adaptive Housing
programs. Chairwoman Herseth Sandlin, Ranking Member Boozman, and
members of the Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity, thank you for the
changes you already have made to these grant programs with Public Law
110-289 in the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008. BVA is the
only congressionally chartered Veterans Service Organization
exclusively dedicated to serving the needs of our Nation's blinded
veterans and their families for 64 years. BVA does have concerns over
the existing programs ability though to provide the amounts for
adaptive housing construction costs necessary to meet the future needs
of disabled veterans. With recent headlines in Washington Post October
31st of the growing numbers of wounded in Operation Enduring Freedom
(OEF) reaching a 1,000 total in the past 3 months, many suffering from
the same various types of injuries as those evacuated from Iraq in 2007
we expect there will be many who will be entering the VA health care
and benefits system in the near future so this hearing today is timely
to explore what else can be done to assist these severely injured in
going back home.
According to DoD Global War on Terrorism Casualties Web site,
www.SIAPP. DMOC.OSD.Mil/personnel/casualty/castop from October 7, 2001
to September 26, 2009 there have been 35,850 OIF and 4,982 OEF, wounded
in action or injured and this number again grows now with the current
battles in Afghanistan. In addition there is the aging population of
those disabled veterans from previous wars and conflicts with
additional age related physical impairments, and the VA must meet their
needs with these adaptive housing grants in order for them to live
independently in their homes.
VA screening TBI studies find that about 60 percent diagnosed with
TBI have associated visual disorders of diplopia, convergence disorder,
photophobia, ocular-motor dysfunction, and an inability to interpret
print. Approximately 4 percent of those veterans with TBI injury result
in legal blindness or have significant functional visual impairments,
diagnosed as Post-Trauma Vision Syndrome (PTVS). They often enter VA
Low Vision Optometry clinics and are prescribed wide variety of
adaptive visual technology devices and they need additional electrical
wiring in their homes for both the equipment and for increased
lighting. One blinded OIF army veteran related his experience in an
email. ``The SHA grant should be more to help house all of my equipment
and for lighting. While I received $10,000 in 2007 I actually spent
$27,000 on a 12x15 office. I needed the room because I did not have the
space in my existing home for the computer, monitor, CCTV, two
scanners, printer, magnifiers, and peripheral equipment needed for
returning to college. It was all great adaptive technology for me, but
you have to have a place to connect and store it to function
independently.''
It is, therefore, important that adaptive housing basic grant
adjustments keep pace with residential home cost-of-construction index
for each preceding year for labor and construction materials and BVA
appreciated that the index was included in the most recent legislative
changes for these programs by this Committee. If disabled veterans are
not able to make adaptive changes to their homes, they run the risk of
falls and injuries that result in expensive emergency room and costly
hospital admissions.
Further if accessible housing grants are not sufficient to allow
disabled veterans to live independently at home, the alternative high
cost of institutional care in nursing homes will occur. The average
private room charge for nursing home care was $212 daily, ($77,380
annual), and for semi-private $191 ($69,715) annually according to
MetLife 2008 Survey. Even assisted living centers charges of $3,031
month ($36,372) rose another 2 percent in 2008. BVA would point to
these more costly alternatives than VA providing sufficient adaptive
housing grants for a veteran to remain in their home functioning
independently. The caregivers of these severely injured veterans often
already give up their employment to stay at home and then must confront
these additional out of pocket expenses of making modifications to
adapt their homes adds to the socio-economic pressures on these
veterans lives if these grants are not sufficient.
CURRENT SPECIALLY ADAPTED HOUSING SERVICES
Special Home Adaptation Grant (SHA). The Special Home Adaptation
(SHA) grant, on the other hand, helps service-connected veterans with
specific mobility problems within the home. The SHA grant is for
$12,756. The disability must be permanent and total due to:
Blindness in both eyes with a 5/200 visual acuity or
less, or
Anatomical loss or loss of both hands and extremities
below the elbow.
Specially Adapted Housing (SAH) The SAH grant, currently $63,780
used to assist veterans with mobility throughout their homes. It can be
used for minor or major construction projects. BVA's experience has
been that very few blinded veterans meet the criteria to obtain the
larger SAH grant. To be eligible are service-connected veterans with a
permanent and total disability due to one of the following:
The total loss, or loss of use, of both lower extremities
as to preclude locomotion without the aid of braces, crutches, canes,
or a wheelchair.
Blindness in both eyes (having only light perception),
plus a loss or loss of use of one lower extremity.
The total loss, or loss of use, of one lower extremity
together with (1) residuals of organic disease or injury, or (2) the
loss, or loss of use, of one upper extremity which so affects the
functions of balance or propulsion as to preclude locomotion without
the aid of braces, crutches, canes, or a wheelchair.
The loss, or loss of use, of both upper extremities such
as to preclude use of arms at or above the elbow.
Temporary Residence Grant (TRA) This grant is now available to
eligible veterans temporarily residing in a home owned by a family
member. Under the VA program veterans eligible for an SAH grant would
be permitted to use up to $14,000 and those veterans eligible for an
SHA grant would be permitted to use up to $2,000 of the maximum grant
amounts. BVA has limited experience with how this program meets the
needs of disabled veterans who may initially return home to live with
family and they need home modifications. However the recent GAO report
``Implementation of Temporary Residence Adaptation Grants'' (GAO-09-
637R) should raise concerns about whether this program is assisting
disabled veterans as intended and if the low participation rate is
because any amount received is then subtracted from the total amount
they are eligible for under the SAH grant. But because of current
restrictions, and the limits of SHA of $2,000 it would offer little
assistance in any construction renovations considering costs to install
new ceiling lighting or additional electrical outlets in any older
home.
RECOMMENDATIONS
BVA recommends that Congress increase the Specially Adapted Housing
SAH grant from $63,780 and the Special Home Adaptation (SHA) amount
from $12,756 when possible up to level to meet the average national
renovation cost, according to construction experts for adaptive
accessible housing renovations.
Continue to provide for future automatic annual adjustments indexed
to the rise in the residential home cost-of-construction index for the
preceding year.
Under the Veterans Housing Opportunity and Benefits Act of 2006,
Temporary Residence Adaptation (TRA), the grant can be used for changes
to the residence of a family member with whom a veteran is temporarily
residing but it is then deducted from total SHA thus limiting the
amount for the veteran who then purchases their own home. Extending
this TRA for 2 years and changes in this section to eliminate the
offset might encourage more utilization of the benefit.
The current SAH requirement from the Veterans' Housing Opportunity
and Benefits Improvement Act of 2006 (P.L. 109-233), June 15, 2006 used
blindness of 5/200 and requirements of loss of use of both hands should
be modified to permanent service connected blindness of 20/200 or less,
or loss of peripheral visual fields to 10 degrees or less. The current
standards now for this restrict helping those returning OIF and OEF
functionally blinded veterans and some TBI veterans with visual
impairments requiring assistance and adaptive technology because they
would never qualify for this current 5/200 standard leaving them with
no grants.
VBA now requires an eligible veteran to submit additional
applications for the auto grant and special adaptive housing grants
even though their eligibility has already been established at the time
of the service connected rating, this causes unnecessary reapplications
and further delays in receiving approval of these auto grants and
special adaptive housing grants, plus adds to growing claims back log.
BVA requests congress ensure that Veterans Benefits Administration
(VBA) automatically provide ``certificates of eligibility'' for auto
grant and special adaptive housing at the time of the service
connection rating decision, with instruction booklets on the programs
be mailed to the veteran at the same time as the notification of
permanent service connection rating letter.
CONCLUSION
Chairwoman Herseth Sandlin and Ranking Member Boozman, BVA again
expresses our thanks for the recent changes that the VA Committee has
made to these various grant programs in the past couple years. Those
severely disabled from all previous wars accessing the adaptive housing
grants programs necessary to live independently in their own homes must
have adequate grants to meet the costs of renovations. BVA appreciated
the opportunity to testify today and I will be glad to answer any
questions now.
Statement of John S. Gonsalves, President and Founder,
Homes For Our Troops
Executive Summary
Improvements in battlefield medical care have resulted in more
severely injured troops surviving, for which we are all thankful. But
their more severe injuries require a wide array of special adaptation
design, equipment and technologies.
Homes for Our Troops has been building specially adapted homes for
5 years, and it incorporates into each home the adaptations necessary
for each veteran based on the veteran's specific injuries. The VA's
handbook for designing a specially adapted home is focused on
wheelchair-bound veterans, but in these current wars we are seeing many
severe injuries that do not require a wheelchair but nonetheless
require numerous special adaptations not addressed in the VA's
handbook.
We also know that the current grant amount of $60,000 is wholly
inadequate to acquire an adapted home, and is often not even adequate
to pay for the significant modifications needed for veterans who come
back from Iraq and Afghanistan with severe injuries.
Issues to Be Addressed
1. The Specially Adapted Housing Grant (SAH Grant) has not kept
pace with the cost of a home. The grant equaled 64 percent of the cost
of a new home in 1974, but today it equals just 20 percent of a new
home cost. The grant amount is wholly inadequate to obtain a new home
or to even make significant adaptations to an existing home.
2. The SAH Grant covers only 50 percent of the cost incurred by
the veteran.
3. The VA's current pamphlet for specially adapted housing design
does not provide any guidance for adaptations required to adapt homes
for veterans with ``non-wheelchair'' injuries such as loss of both
arms, or combinations of injuries such as loss of legs and arms, or
loss of limbs combined with blindness or deafness.
4. There needs to be greater flexibility in home design so that
each home includes adaptations specifically designed for each veteran's
specific injuries and unnecessary adaptations are not mandated in order
to receive the grant.
Recommendations to Address These Issues
1. Increase the SAH Grant to at least $187,000 to reflect housing
cost increases and to make it a meaningful amount that can provide the
full scope of appropriate adaptations.
2. Have the grant cover 100 percent of the cost incurred up to the
maximum grant amount.
3. Revise the VA's Handbook for Design to incorporate the large
number of new adaptations and technologies now available for not only
wheelchair-bound veterans but also for veterans with a wide range of
injuries.
4. Create a home adaptations checklist to match available
adaptations to each veteran's specific injuries so that he or she
receives all the appropriate adaptations, and is not required to
include adaptations that are not necessary for their injuries.
__________
Homes For Our Troops' Congressional Testimony, November 19, 2009
Chairwoman Sandlin and members of the Subcommittee on Economic
Opportunity, I would like to thank you for the opportunity to speak
with you today about the Specially Adapted Housing (SAH) Grant provided
by the Veterans Administration.
As the president and founder of the non-profit organization Homes
for Our Troops, my organization and I provide specially adapted homes
to our most severely injured veterans returning from the wars in Iraq
and Afghanistan. To date, we have provided specially adapted homes for
47 servicemen and their families, and we are in the process of
providing specially adapted homes to 34 more, with our waiting list
growing daily.
The services we provide are done at no cost to the veterans we
serve, and the majority of the services provided thus far have been in
the form of a newly constructed, specially adapted homes.
Who We Serve
The veterans we serve are among the most severely injured in the
wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Their injuries include amputations,
paralysis, spinal cord injuries, traumatic brain injuries, blindness,
and those with severe burns. Many have more than one of those injuries.
More often than not, they are young, with young families who previously
lived in military or rented housing that was not adapted to meet their
current needs.
The SAH Grant provides a valuable service to our servicemen and
women. However, the value of that service is diminishing in the face of
economic changes.
Also, with medical advances on the battlefield resulting in more
severely injured veterans surviving, and with technological advances in
the housing industry now available to adapt homes to address these
severe disabilities, the design, equipment and technologies included in
the grant needs to be revisited to ensure that the true potential of
``Specially Adapted'' is realized.
The Changes We Would Recommend
As discussed more fully below, we respectfully recommend the
following changes to the SAH Grant.
1. Increase the amount of the grant to reflect higher home prices
and to meet the cost of supplying the full range of appropriate
adaptations.
2. Remove the limitation that only 50 percent of the cost incurred
is reimbursed.
3. Increase the scope of included adaptations and create a full
list of available adaptations and the injuries these adaptations
address so that a checklist is available to match each home design to
each veteran's specific injuries.
Diminishing Value of the SAH Grant
Perhaps the best way to describe the greatest impact to the SAH
Grant's ability to help our severely injured veterans is to summarize
the diminishing value that the grant contributes to the construction of
a new home since the end of the Vietnam War.
In 1974, the SAH grant was equal to 64 percent of the average new
home sale price. A grant for that percentage of the home cost, combined
with the relatively low cost of homes in the 1970's, made a substantial
difference in the ability of disabled servicemen and women to obtain a
home suited to their disabilities.
Since 1974, the SAH grant has simply not kept pace with the
increasing price of homes. Exhibit A provides historical information on
the SAH grant and new home prices back to 1969, and shows that the
grant as a percentage of new home prices has decreased from a high of
64 percent in 1974 to just 20 percent in 2008.
The average new home price increased 6.1 percent per year since
that 1974 highpoint, while the grant has increased only 2.6 percent per
year. If the SAH Grant had grown at the same rate as home prices since
1974, the grant would now be $188,000, not $60,000.
Inadequacy of the $60,000 limit of the SAH Grant
The national cost of building a new home averaged $293,000 in 2008.
The homes needed by these veterans are more expensive than the average
because they require adaptations and specialized construction that
increases the cost as compared to a ``basic'' home. Because of this, we
have averaged about $343,000 for the cost of building new homes that
are fully specially adapted based on the veteran's injuries and
disabilities.
Limiting the grant to $60,000 means that, on average, these young
men and women will need to borrow $283,000 to purchase a home that
accommodates the handicaps caused by their severe injuries. Many cannot
qualify for a loan that size, and so they end up living with family
members, in apartments that are inappropriate for their condition, in
transitional housing and, in the worst cases, on the street. For those
who can obtain a loan, they will have a large financial burden on their
shoulders for the next 30 years.
The $60,000 grant is thus wholly inadequate to provide a new
specially adapted home.
Even for veterans who own a home, the cost to adapt it is often
significantly higher than $60,000. As an example, Marine Cpl. Mark
Byers of New York owned a home, but he lost both an arm and a leg in
Iraq that required the addition of a master bedroom and bathroom that
was both wheelchair accessible but also included adaptations to address
the challenges faced due to his lost arm. Homes for Our Troops put on a
relatively small addition of 500 square feet of living space that
included the bedroom, bathroom a roll-in closet, and also with a
related 500 square feet of unfinished basement expansion, and the cost
for even this relatively small amount with all the required adaptations
cost $150,000.
Reimbursement Limit of Only 50 percent of the Incurred Cost
Another aspect of the SAH Grant that should be changed is the
requirement that the grant is limited to 50 percent of the cost
incurred by the veteran. In order for a qualifying veteran to receive
the full $60,000 SAH Grant, the veteran must show a cost of $120,000 in
home purchase price or home adaptation costs.
It should be noted that $120,000 can do little these days to obtain
and/or modify a home to meet the requirements of the SAH Grant. Over
and above that, it is concerning to think that we would only reimburse
50 percent of those costs to that veteran. It would seem more
appropriate that these veterans should not have to incur a cost since
the price they have already paid as a result of their life-altering
injuries cannot be measured in dollars.
Redefining ``Specially Adapted'' and Allowing Flexibility in Home
Design
The VA's Handbook for Design, in its present form, is primarily
focused on the home adaptations needed for wheelchair accessibility.
Wheelchair accessibility is of course one important area. However, the
uniqueness and severity of certain injuries requires that some
adaptations, currently dictated as mandatory, become more flexible and
occasionally omitted from the requirements in lieu of other more modern
and appropriate adaptations specifically chosen for the actual needs of
the individual veteran.
For example, the SAH Grant currently dictates specifications that
mandate grab bars, countertop heights and depths, electrical outlet
placements, door handle requirements and several other adaptations that
benefit wheelchair bound individuals with upper body control, but
provide no benefit to a quadriplegic or to a blinded, upper bi-lateral
amputee.
A more preferable alternative to this would be to have a full
adaptations checklist that would prescribe which adaptation design,
equipment and technology are needed for differing types of injuries. As
the veteran goes through rehabilitation and is trying to figure out
where they will live, the specific requirements of the adaptations
needed for the home can be known beforehand and can be used to design a
home that is fully adapted to the veteran's needs.
Having the scope of work defined beforehand will allow the home to
be built more quickly and will insure that it contains the best
available adaptations for each veteran's injuries.
Case Study of Truly ``Special'' Adaptations in One of Our Home Projects
U.S. Army Specialist Russell ``Kyle'' Burleson was only 22 when he
was shot in the left cheek by a sniper during a firefight in 2004 in
Iraq while serving as a top gunner on a HMMWV. Kyle was left a C-2
quadriplegic on a ventilator and confined to an 800 pound wheelchair
and the need of a hydraulic lift to lift Kyle out of his chair and his
bed. Upon release from the Army and the hospital, Kyle, his wife
Kristy, and their two young children had no place to move to except
Kyle's mother's 120 year-old, 900 square foot house.
The house was small and because of its size, Kyle, Kristy and their
two children lived in one room that used to be his mother's living
room. Because of the size of Kyle's wheelchair, Kyle was confined to
that one room and could not move to other rooms in the house. And
because of the size of the hospital bed, the size of the wheelchair,
and the size of the other equipment like the hydraulic lift and the
ventilator, Kyle could not move his chair at all, except to wheel out
the double-doors they installed, that lead to the front porch of the
house and a wheelchair ramp.
Living conditions were very tough for this young family that had
already sacrificed so much, and because of these conditions, conducting
some of Kyle's recommended therapies and exercises became too much of a
burden, and Kyle's health deteriorated.
To say that this situation is unacceptable is a significant
understatement.
Kyle and Kristy could not afford to build their own home, nor was
the SAH Grant a sufficient monetary contribution to their financial
resources to allow them to build a home specially adapted to meet his
many needs. The family lived in those conditions until we built a home
for them in 2006. Although we conformed to unneeded adaptations like
grab bars, fixture placements and countertop heights, we also focused
on other special adaptations necessary for Kyle's situation.
Because Kyle is confined to a large wheelchair and on a respirator,
and because he lives in a rural area of Louisiana where tornadoes,
hurricanes and severe weather often occur and result in power loss, we
also adapted his house with those concerns in mind.
To meet those concerns:
1. A back-up generator was installed, so that Kyle's ventilator
would continue to function during extended power outages.
2. The walls of the house and the walls of the master bedroom were
constructed of insulated concrete forms to provide a safe haven and a
bunker for his family during a tornado or hurricane.
3. Simonton Windows, one of our corporate sponsors, donated their
Stormbreaker Plus, shatter-proof storm resistant windows to protect the
family from flying debris.
4. Knowing that a majority of Kyle's time would be spent in his
house and basically become ``his world,'' we constructed a large open
floor plan for ease of movement and greater freedom.
Had we not constructed a home for Kyle and his family, they would
still be living in the same conditions, a thought that we find
intolerable.
Closing Summary
I would like to express my gratitude for the efforts of this
Committee, the efforts of the Veterans Administration and all who are
involved in aiding our veterans.
The SAH Grant is a much needed service that is provided to our
severely injured veterans, but the amount of the grant is inadequate.
Also, the implementation of a process to identify the available
adaptation design, equipment and technologies must be implemented to
make the home design process more streamlined and thorough.
Homes for Our Troops will gladly assist the Veterans Administration
in developing new criteria and technologies for inclusion into the
requirements of the SAH Grant using the knowledge we have acquired
building homes over the last 5 years for veterans with a significant
variety of severe injuries.
Chairwoman Sandlin and members of the Subcommittee on Economic
Opportunity, I would again like to thank you for the opportunity to
speak with you today. I would be happy to answer any questions that you
might have and provide any additional information that you might need.
Exhibit 1
Homes For Our Troops
Historical Comparison
Specially Adapted Housing Grant vs. Average New Home Sales Prices*
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average New Grant As % Grant % Home Price %
Year SAH Grant Home Price Home Increase Increase
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1969 12,000 28,000 43% -- --
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1972 18,000 31,000 58% 50% 11%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1974 25,000 39,000 64% 39% 26%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1978 30,000 63,000 48% 20% 62%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1981 33,000 83,000 40% 10% 32%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1984 35,000 98,000 36% 6% 18%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1988 38,000 138,000 28% 9% 41%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1998 43,000 182,000 24% 13% 32%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2001 48,000 213,000 23% 12% 17%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2003 50,000 246,000 20% 4% 15%
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2008 60,000 293,000 20% 20% 19%----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*This table takes each year there was a change in amount of the SAH grant and compares it to the average new
home sales price for that year. Percent Increase from 1969 to 2008:
SAH Grant 400 percent
Home Price 946 percent The SAH Grant would need to be increased from $60,000 to $187,000 to maintain the highest ratio of grant amount
vs. home price of 64 percent in 1974. Note: Home Price data was derived from U.S. Census Bureau historical reports.
Statement of Mark Bologna, Director of Loan Guaranty Service,
Veterans Benefits Administration, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
Madam Chairwoman, Ranking Member Boozman, and Members of the
Subcommittee, I appreciate the opportunity to appear before you today
to discuss VA's Specially Adapted Housing (SAH) program.
Specially Adapted Housing Grant Program
The SAH grants for severely disabled Veterans are among the most
important of the benefits that the Loan Guaranty Service provides.
Eligible Veterans may use the grant from VA to purchase or construct an
adapted home or adapt an existing one to meet their needs. Through the
SAH Grant Program, thousands of Veterans have been afforded a level of
independent living they may not have otherwise enjoyed.
Types of Grants
VA administers three types of grants under the SAH program. To be
eligible for a grant, a Veteran or servicemember must be entitled to VA
compensation benefits for permanent and total service-connected
disabilities. Amounts of assistance are subject to aggregate maximums,
and no individual may receive more than three grants of assistance
under the SAH program.
The Adaptive Housing (AH) grant is available to
individuals whose disabilities are due to blindness in both eyes, the
anatomical loss or loss of use of both hands, or severe burns. With the
enactment of Public Law 110-289, the maximum amount of assistance is
now tied to an annual cost-of-construction index, and was recently
increased by 6.3 percent from $12,000 to $12,756. The AH grant may be
used to purchase, construct, or adapt a home owned (or to be owned) by
the eligible individual or a member of his or her family.
The Paraplegic Housing (PH) grant is available to
severely disabled individuals who are entitled to assistance due to the
loss (or loss of use) of both lower extremities, or the loss (or loss
of use) of both upper extremities. The law also provides eligibility
based on other types of injuries, such as blindness and loss (or loss
of use) of one lower extremity, or severe burns. The maximum amount of
assistance for this grant is also adjusted annually, and was increased
from $60,000 to $63,780 on October 1st. Unlike AH grants, which may be
used to adapt the home of a family member, PH grants are only available
to purchase, construct, or adapt a home owned (or to be owned) by the
eligible individual.
A Temporary Residence Adaptation (TRA) grant is available
to an eligible individual who is temporarily residing with a family
member, and is otherwise eligible for a PH or AH grant. An individual
eligible for a PH grant may receive up to $14,000; an individual
eligible for an AH grant may receive up to $2,000. If an eligible
individual uses a TRA grant, the amount is deducted from the aggregate
amount of assistance available for PH or AH grants. Use of a TRA grant
also counts against the individual's limit of three grants. Unlike the
PH and AH grants, VA does not have the authority to adjust these
amounts to keep pace with increases in the cost of construction. As a
result, the dollar amount of TRA grants will constitute a smaller and
smaller percentage of the aggregate amount of assistance over time.
I've included with this statement a table that summarizes the
above-described grants, including the maximum amounts available and the
qualifications for each.
Current Outlook
Since the inception of the SAH program in 1948, VA has provided
over 30,000 grants, totaling $805 million. Between fiscal years 1989
and 2006, VA provided an average of 500 grants per year to severely
disabled veterans. VA approved 724 grants in fiscal year 2007, 1,018
grants in fiscal year 2008, and 1,270 grants in fiscal year 2009, an
increase of more than 140 percent from 2006 to 2009. VA expects this
upward trend to continue.
Assessment of Adequacies
As discussed in VA's Report to Congress published on August 28,
2009, Congress has made a number of legislative changes to this program
in recent years, including: increasing the AH and PH grant amounts;
providing authority to align the grant amount to an index; authorizing
grants outside of the United States; creating the TRA grant; and
extending eligibility for TRA grants to active-duty servicemembers.
Most notably, Congress changed the program from a one-time to a three-
time use program. This change has allowed individuals to make
additional adaptations to their homes or upgrade existing adaptations.
If they move to other homes, and have remaining eligibility, they may
now use the program to adapt the new homes as well. These legislative
changes have significantly improved the benefits available to severely
injured Veterans and servicemembers and have increased the overall
flexibility of the SAH program.
However, as noted in the August report, there are statutory
inadequacies that may prevent a number of individuals from receiving
much-needed SAH assistance. Today I will highlight just two. According
to VA's 2007 Survey of SAH Grantees, most AH grant recipients indicated
that the grant amount was not enough to cover the full cost of
adaptations. As a result, they may have incurred significant out-of-
pocket expenses or had to rely on the generosity of others to adapt
their homes. In other cases, Veterans or servicemembers who have
service-connected conditions that may benefit from home adaptations are
not eligible due to the fact that the law specifies a finite list of
qualifying disabilities for these programs.
Extension of Temporary Residence Adaptation Grants
Congress created the TRA grant in June 2006, and extended this
benefit to active-duty servicemembers in July 2008. To date, there has
been limited usage of TRA grants. Since the inception of the TRA grant,
VA has fully disbursed 12 grants and has approved an additional 5 for
processing. There are several factors that may explain why so few
eligible individuals have chosen to use this valuable benefit. First,
GAO reported that several Veterans Service Organizations believed the
number of Veterans and servicemembers whose living situation is
appropriate for TRA could be very small. Second, severely injured
servicemembers often face a difficult transition when returning from
combat and may not be ready to make plans for their living situation.
Consequently, these eligible individuals may delay or opt out of using
the TRA benefit. Third, the TRA grant also has limitations for an
individual who is residing with a family member, but ultimately plans
to purchase, construct, or adapt his or her own home. As previously
noted, when an eligible individual uses a TRA grant, his or her
opportunity to receive future assistance is limited in two ways. The
amount of the TRA grant is deducted from the aggregate amount of
assistance available to the individual for future AH or PH grants.
Additionally, use of a TRA grant counts as one of the three total
grants of assistance available to an eligible individual under Chapter
21. As a result, an individual is advised to consider his or her future
plans to use an AH or PH grant before deciding whether to use a TRA
grant. In addition, the GAO report noted comments from Veterans Service
Organizations that additional outreach to servicemembers and Veterans
about the TRA benefit could potentially increase its use. Currently, VA
contacts all OEF/OIF servicemembers within 48 hours of eligibility
determination to explain the program. Additionally, VA contacts all
Veterans who have previously applied for but not used SAH benefits at
least once a year to remind them of their eligibility and to provide
updated information about the benefits available to them. We will
continue to look for opportunities to increase use of this benefit.
Handbook for Design
The Subcommittee also requested information about VA's Handbook for
Design: Specially Adapted Housing, VA Pamphlet 26-13. VA worked in
conjunction with a graphics designer to update the pamphlet.
Additionally, VA requested advice from Carol Paredo Lopez, National
Architecture Director for the Paralyzed Veterans of America, on the
revisions. VA published the pamphlet on its Web site in October, and
will work with the industry to regularly update the guidance offered in
this pamphlet.
Madam Chairwoman, this concludes my testimony. I appreciate the
opportunity to be here today, and I look forward to answering your
questions.
Appendix--Program Summary
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Living Number of Grant Grant Amount & Cost-of-
Grant Type Eligibility Situation Ownership Usages construction Index
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AH Grant Blindness in Permanent Home owned $12,756 for FY 2010
both eyes with 5/200 by eligible
visual acuity or less individual (adjusted annually)
Anatomical loss OR family
or loss of use of both member
hands Maximum of 3
Certain severe uses
burns
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Loss of mobility Loss or
loss of use of both
lower or upper
extremities
Certain severe
burns
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TRA Grant Based on eligibility for Temporary Home owned Maximum of 1 $2,000 for AH eligible
PH or AH grant by family use
member $14,000 for PH eligible
(counts against
aggregate (not adjusted annually)
amount of
assistance and
three-time
usage limit)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Statement of Noel C. Koch, Deputy Under Secretary of Defense,
Wounded Warrior Care and Transition Policy, U.S. Department of Defense
Ms. Chairwoman, Ranking Member Boozman, and members of the
Subcommittee, thank you for the opportunity to provide written
testimony about the VA's home adaptation program for Wounded Warriors.
The Department of Defense is responsible for any modifications to
DoD-owned family housing, unaccompanied housing, and lodging to meet
the medical needs of Wounded Warrior occupants. In the case of
privatized housing or leased housing, DoD actively engages the landlord
to see if the medical needs of a Wounded Warrior tenant can be met, and
if not, DoD will relocate the member to housing that meets their
medical needs. Standards for such ``medical hold housing'' were issued
by Deputy Secretary of Defense Memorandum dated September 18, 2007.
Depending on the medical condition of the member, the housing may need
to comply with accessibility standards, as specified in the Memorandum.
Accessibility features could include features such as ramps, wider
doors, lower height counters and sinks, roll-in showers, grab bars,
emergency pull switches, door handles in lieu of knobs, modifications
to the fire and smoke detector systems, and special furniture.
Additional features, such as special carpeting and furnishings
patterns, could be necessary for members with Traumatic Brain Injuries
and/or Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. Also, special toilet
modifications may be necessary for members with hand or arm injuries.
One way the Military Services are made aware of a recovering
servicemember's needs is through the development of a Comprehensive
Recovery Plan. This plan is created by the Recovering Servicemember's
Recovery Care Coordinator and Recovery Team. The Comprehensive Recovery
Plan is the Recovering Servicemember's roadmap for recovery,
rehabilitation and return to duty or reintegration into the community.
The needs of the Servicemember and family are incorporated as goals
into the Recovery Plan. If one of the identified needs is adaptive
housing the Recovery Care Coordinator obtains information on adaptive
housing through the National Resource Directory, the Department of
Veterans Affairs (VA), as well as programs sponsored by Veteran Service
Organizations and non-profits. Additionally, to meet the housing needs
of our Wounded Warriors, the Marine Corps has modified base housing at
both Wounded Warrior Battalion East (Camp Lejeune, NC) and Wounded
Warrior Battalion West (Camp Pendleton, CA).
The National Resource Directory (NRD) Web site (www.national
resourcedirectory.gov) features over one hundred links to information
on homes that are modified to be accessible to people who are injured
or disabled. The links on the NRD direct users to adaptive housing
information from the Departments of Defense and Veterans Affairs as
well as programs sponsored by Veteran Service Organizations and non-
profit organizations. To strengthen the role of the Recovery Care
Coordinators in Servicemembers' transition, these Care Coordinators
receive standardized training addressing sixteen areas of need to
include adaptive housing. Practical exercises on developing goals and
addressing needs are conducted during the training, which includes
scenarios involving acquiring adaptive housing for the Recovering
Servicemember. Authority to modify or adapt a Wounded Warrior's
privately owned house is under the jurisdiction of VA.
Madam Chairwoman, I appreciate the opportunity to explain what the
Department of Defense is doing to support housing adaptability with our
Wounded Warriors.
Statement of John S. Lewandowski, President/Chief Executive Officer,
Disabled Veterans Committee on Housing
Chairwoman Sandlin, Honorable John Boozman and Members of the
Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity, I would like to thank you for the
opportunity to submit testimony to the Committee. I would be happy to
answer any questions you might have and provide additional information
you may need.
Organization Background
I started Disabled Veterans Committee on Housing--a 501(c) (3)
nonprofit organization--program because there are so many disabled
veterans needing accessible homes who do not know how to achieve this
goal. I am a 100 percent disabled Veteran with loss of use of lower
extremities. All members of the DVCH Board of Directors are disabled
veterans. Their knowledge and experience are of great value to the DVCH
and those we serve.
The principal goal of the DVCH is assisting, in any way we can, all
disabled veterans who have served our country with pride and honor but
returned with a debilitating injury such as the loss of the use of
lower and upper extremities, are paraplegic or quadriplegic, or suffer
from TBI (Traumatic Brain Injury). We can only imagine what they suffer
each and every day. We help improve the quality of their lives by
building them the home that meets the requirements associated with
their disability. The DVCH Web site, www.DVCHVets.org, provides in-
depth information on a wide range of housing and other veteran's
subjects.
The DVCH mission is to--``Provide the highest quality specially
adapted home at affordable prices for those who require a greater level
of access and mobility.''
The DVCH believes that significantly increasing the inventory of
accessible housing is dependent on expanding the public and private-
sector partnerships it has formed in Virginia and will expand to other
States in 2010. The DVCH has partnered with a wide range of private
sector firms (banks, builders, real estate firms, developers, building
suppliers, etc.) who have proven track records of providing the
services needed by veterans so they can obtain the housing that is both
needed and deserved. Our builders have been approved by the Veterans
Affairs Special Adapted Housing Section. This is extremely important as
these companies have the knowledge to successfully comply with IAW
Special Adapted Housing Policies and Procedures.
The DVCH carries out a comprehensive program aimed at providing new
affordable and accessible housing for disabled veterans throughout
Virginia. This is an extremely important initiative as there are so
many disabled veterans who qualify for VA housing grants and can obtain
financing but are not building new accessible homes because:
They cannot identify a builder that specializes in this
type of housing;
Need help in deciding on the floor plan including the
special adapted features they need to accommodate their disability;
Do not know how to obtain financing including grants and
other forms of assistance they are entitled to; and
Need assistance in locating and purchasing affordable
land.
The DVCH ``ONE STOP SHOP'' program was developed so disabled
veterans can become as independent as possible in their home through a
remodel of their present living space or, if that is not possible, then
seeking grants so they can move into a new home built to their specific
needs. If the veteran's injury is service connected they may qualify
for a special adapted housing grant which can dramatically to reduce
the cost of the home remodel or construction of a new home. The DVCH
also works with local Department of Veterans Affairs medical officials
to determine what medical equipment can be provided to the veteran at
NO COST TO THEM.
DVCH staff work with each disabled veteran to determine and address
his/her specific mobility needs. We offer clients a full range of
services to ensure that designing, financing, lot selection and other
aspects of the new home process are as simply and efficiently carried
out as possible. Our project team also assists veterans by completing
loan applications, with assistance in credit repair, and in applying
for government and other disability grants. We typically meet directly
with the client in his or her home or wherever is most convenient. All
homes offer a wide range of accessibility options, and can be modified
to meet their specific medical needs.
``Adapted Housing Grants'' Recommendations
1. The current grant amount of $60,000 is wholly inadequate.
The DVCH enthusiastically supports the recommendations
submitted by the Homes for Our Troops.
We concur that the current grant ceiling amount of $60,000 is
wholly inadequate to cover the current costs of acquiring a SAH and as
Mr. Gonslaves stated in his testimony ``. . . often (the grant is) not
even adequate to pay for the significant modifications needed for
veterans who come back from Iraq and Afghanistan with severe
injuries.''
2. The draws which are currently 3 for the life of the veteran
needs to be increased to 6 for the life of the veteran.
The reasoning is that veterans continually need to make
changes in their homes as their medical condition changes. Then there
are the financial needs associated with periodic replacement and/or
updating that a home requires so it is properly maintained. If the draw
number is not increase this means that many veterans will do without
the housing that meets their medical needs.
3. There is a need for more trained personnel in the Specially
Adapted Housing Branch of the Regional Offices. As of today, it can
take anywhere from 8 weeks to 8 months to process a veterans
application. Such a lengthy delay is an injustice to the veteran who
has given so much to our country. Can't we better serve them by cutting
down these long wait times?
4. There is a need to establish a branch within the Department of
Veterans Affairs where service-connected injury/illness veterans can
obtain approval for construction funding to build their homes and not
have to go through the lengthy process--many times unsuccessfully--with
private lenders to gain this type of financing.
Those who have service-connected injuries/illness are paid
through the Veterans Compensation Board and Social Security. The Board
can help the veteran with construction loans, end loans, closing costs,
escrow accounts, etc. ``We need to take care of the veteran through a
Federal agency program. The recommended process will eliminate a great
amount of red tape and delays that the veteran now has to go through.
Payments could be deducted directly from the veteran's compensation. In
part, this system could reduce or eliminate banks foreclosing on
veterans properties''.
5. The standard items allowed according to ADA specification
should be changed to add items as ``required'' which are now listed as
``optional,'' such as the following:
Backup generators
Swing away hinges on all doors (Internal & External)
for the veteran access
6. Many disabled veterans are too young to have homes of their own
but require a caretaker on a 24/7 basis. Usually their family takes on
this burden yet amount maximum allowed adaptive housing grant is only
$12,000. This amount needs to be increase 10 times as to retrofit a
home is hugely expensive. It is important the veterans feel their
government does care and therefore we ask the Committee to take action
to increase the grant amount substantially this session of Congress.
Final Comment
Disabled Veterans Committee on Housing could assist many more
veterans with our program if the above recommendations are implemented.
We receive countless calls from veterans who want to know how to
proceed on obtaining an accessible home. Sadly in so many cases,
because of existing laws and policies, we are powerless to help the
veteran achieve his or her goals. We can work hand in hand with the
Special Adapted Housing Branches to develop comprehensive
recommendations and goals to meet the accessibility and affordability
requirements of our veterans.
The DVCH salutes the Army Wounded Warrior, Soldier Family
Assistance Center (SFAC), the Warrior Transition Programs and the many
other organizations that veterans can turn to for assistance in
obtaining an accessible and affordable home. We know that many more
soldiers, seamen, airmen and marines have been able to obtain the
housing they need as a result of the encouragement, expertise and
services these organizations offer.
Thank you Chairwoman Sandlin, this concludes our testimony to the
Subcommittee and I look forward to any questions you may have.
MATERIAL SUBMITTED FOR THE RECORD
Committee on Veterans' Affairs
Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity
Washington, DC.
November 20, 2009
Mr. Carl Blake
National Legislative Director
Paralyzed Veterans of America
801 18th Street, NW
Washington, DC 20006
Dear Mr. Blake:
I would like to request your response to the enclosed questions for
the record and deliverable I am submitting in reference to our House
Committee on Veterans' Affairs Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity
hearing on Adaptive Housing Grants on November 19, 2009. Please answer
the enclosed hearing questions by no later than Monday, December 21,
2009.
In an effort to reduce printing costs, the Committee on Veterans'
Affairs, in cooperation with the Joint Committee on Printing, is
implementing some formatting changes for material for all full
Committee and Subcommittee hearings. Therefore, it would be appreciated
if you could provide your answers consecutively on letter size paper,
single-spaced. In addition, please restate the question in its entirety
before the answer.
Due to the delay in receiving mail, please provide your response to
Ms. Orfa Torres by fax at (202) 225-2034. If you have any questions,
please call (202) 226-4150.
Sincerely
Stephanie Herseth Sandlin
Chairman
JL/ot
__________
Paralyzed Veterans of America
Washington, DC.
January 8, 2010
Honorable Stephanie Herseth Sandlin
Chairwoman
Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity
Committee on Veterans' Affairs
335 Cannon House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
Dear Chairwoman Herseth Sandlin:
Enclosed is our response to the additional questions you submitted
from the hearing on November 19, 2009, on Adaptive Housing Grants.
PVA would like to thank you for addressing this issue since it is
an important benefit to our members. We look forward to working with
you on this issue and other veterans' issues in the future.
Sincerely
Richard C. Daley
Associate Legislation Director
__________
Question 1: One of your concerns you mentioned in your testimony is
that the time it takes for a veteran to be approved for a grant,
construction approval, and actual construction, can take up to 1 year.
How can we streamline this process?
Answer: The first barrier may be the lack of communication between
the Department of Defense (DoD) and the VA.
Permanently Disabled Servicemember Must Receive Memorandum Rating
The DoD should inform the VA of a new injury that appears to be
totally disabling and permanent. Apparently this does not happen. With
the assumption that the servicemember will never return to active duty,
sustaining injuries such as a spinal cord injury, the VA can issue a
Memorandum Rating while the servicemember is still active military in
the DoD hospital. Having received that rating from the VA and DoD, the
grant can be submitted to start the process. The 110th Congress passed
legislation (P.L. 110-289) that allows the active duty servicemember to
qualify for the SAH grant. The intention was to accelerate the process
of modifying a home for the veteran to live in after medical release
from the VA or DoD hospital.
If the servicemember is injured in the current conflict, that
individual will have a VA Gulf War on Terror (GWOT) Coordinator
assigned to their case to insure that their rehabilitation and benefits
are attended to. The non Gulf War injured servicemember would continue
receiving medical care in the DoD, or VA facility without individual
follow-up and oversight. Often this medical care is provided for an
extended period of time with the DoD personnel not realizing that the
individual could be discharged from active duty to receive their
continued care and applicable benefits from the VA.
In some situations because of the nature of the injury or the
circumstances involved in the incident an investigation is necessary to
determine if the injury was in the line of duty. A period of 60 days is
allowed for this investigation. This investigation is often continually
extended for a 30-day period upon request. There is no limit on the
number of additional 30-day extensions requested for an investigation.
An investigation of an accident involving injury is not a priority for
the military. The officer assigned to the investigation will be
responsible for all of their regular assigned military duties along
with this investigation. Because of the lack of attention given to the
investigation of the injury, or delays in obtaining necessary
information from other sources, is common for this process to extend
for 6 months to a year.
The DoD should place a higher priority on the investigation process
and insure the injured servicemember is rated by the VA to allow them
to be discharged and receive VA benefits.
Expedite Construction Process by Using VA Experienced Builders
When the servicemember is approved for the grant, it is important
to find a builder/contractor that is familiar with the VA requirements
for accessibility and their requirements for documentation which would
include receiving payment from the VA. This process can be frustrating
for a business that has never contracted with the Federal Government
and specifically with the VA in the past. In some situations the
disabled veteran may select a convenient local builder, or an
acquaintance that is a contractor. Although they may feel comfortable
with their selection, this construction project with the VA involves
more that a typical residential construction job. Not only must this
contractor know local and State building codes and standards and have
knowledge of accessibility, this contractor must comply with all of
VA's requirements.
The VA could provide a list of contractors that have successfully
completed residential construction work for the VA. This would not be a
recommendation, only a list of past builders, within that area, that
have completed work for the VA.
The VA should develop a relationship with the National Association
of Home Builders (NAHB) to educate their members on the VA's
requirements for accessibility. The VA, along with the NAHB could offer
a workshop for contractors who would be interested in learning their
requirements. This could be offered in each region. The workshop would
focus on the VA's requirements for accessibility in residential design
and construction and VA's application process and other required
documents. Upon completion of this workshop, those contractors will be
acknowledged by the VA as having completed this training.
In the past, some PVA Chapters have used funding from the U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to build wheelchair
accessible apartments. These developments would offer completely
accessible one and two bedroom apartments for low income disabled
veterans and other members of a community. In each situation the
chapter would follow the advice of the HUD Regional Office and use an
experienced consultant. A HUD experienced consultant would be a person
very knowledgeable of the HUD requirements and often a consultant who
had previously worked for HUD. Likewise, the contractor selected to
build the apartments would have had HUD experience. Although these
projects would be small by commercial construction standards,
$1,000,000 to $2,000,000 projects, they would be very frustrating, if
not impossible to successfully complete without a consultant and a HUD
experienced builder. Having experience with contracting for
construction projects with the Federal Government is essential.
Offer Financial Incentive for On-Time Performance
As Congress considers increasing the amount of the SAH grant,
perhaps the VA could allow for a dollar amount ``bonus'' for completion
of the project on time, and an additional bonus for completion of the
project before the contracted date. This would give an incentive to the
contractor to keep the project on schedule. The contractor must take
into consideration that some of the construction components they will
need are not available locally. Items such as a molded fiberglass roll-
in shower stall, or a stair-lift or residential elevator must be
ordered in advance and on occasion, will be custom made. These factors
must be considered when projecting a completion date. Having built for
accessible standards in the past an experienced contractor will know
this.
Other Federal agencies, such as DoD, allow for a financial bonus
for early completion of projects. This incentive for the contractor to
finish the project within the expected time will also help to reduce
medical costs for the VA by avoiding an extended hospital stay. In
addition, returning home to civilian life is best for the veteran.
Increase VA Staff Level to Address Backlog
PVAs' service officers have been informed by veterans in various
regions of the country that there is currently a backlog of SAH grants
waiting for VA processing. The VA testified in this hearing (November
19, 2009) that they have seen an increase of SAH grants of more that
140 percent from 2006 to 2009. They also testified they expect this
upward trend to continue. The message is clear; they must train more
personnel to work on housing grants. The VA should address this problem
before another Subcommittee hearing is requested to ``Investigate the
Backlog.''
Question 2: During the testimony, you informed the Subcommittee
that the current amount of the adaptive housing grants does not cover
actual adaptation cost. Please provide the Subcommittee the average
out-of-pocket cost from the disabled veteran.
Answer: The purpose of the grant is twofold. Congress provided this
grant to assist the severely disabled veteran when purchasing a home to
live in. Congress also intended this grant to pay the costs associated
with making a home accessible and useable for that veteran. This can
include widening doorways, installing ramps or elevators, enlarging the
bathroom, or building an additional new accessible bathroom, making
kitchen modifications or enlargements, purchasing accessible
appliances, and creating an accessible dining area. Some of the Iraq
and Afghanistan injured veterans will require additional environmental
controls in their homes. A paraplegic veteran with severe burns may
require additional air filtration and air-conditioning systems to
maintain the exact temperature control throughout the home. This type
of accommodation to a home will also require an emergency generator
system to insure these medical necessary appliances remain functioning
at all times.
The out of pocket cost is difficult to calculate. Every disability
is unique and requires specific accommodations and modifications to
allow the veteran to maximize their life. When a veteran is building a
new home, the site is appropriately selected and the accessibility can
be designed and built into the home. A new home may not be economically
feasible for a veteran that may choose to live in the home they
previously owned or buy an existing home. If that home is not
accessible from the ground level, an elevator or ramp will be required
to enter the home. This cost along with the previously discussed
modifications far exceeds the current $63,780 provided by the grant.
The cost for a veteran to purchase or modify a home to meet their
accessibility and medical needs varies widely throughout the Nation.
The SAH grant should take that into consideration. This housing-
construction cost variation differs widely from standard metropolitan
areas more so than by basic regions of the country. It can vary
significantly within one region or State. For an example use the State
of Illinois which has 750,000 veterans living within it. For a disabled
veteran to buy, build, or modify a home in the Chicago, Illinois
metropolitan area requires significantly more money that it would 175
miles south in the Capitol of Springfield, Illinois.
Another factor that must be considered is in the northern half of
the United States the disabled veteran's accessible van will require a
carport or a garage to protect it from any snow and ice accumulation
which could affect the sophisticated door and lift equipment and the
hydraulic lowering and leveling of the van body for successful entry.
The cost for a garage which would insure a veteran could use their van
during winter months in South Dakota must be factored into that grant.
In the hearing Mr. John Gonsalves, President of Homes for Our
Troops, presented helpful information. His perspective was from a
builder that is knowledgeable of current construction costs. He
reported that the average new home price is approximately $293,000
(2008). The current SAH grant equals approximately 20 percent of that
value. With the understanding that this SAH grant of $63,870 is
inadequate, a substantial increase in the total dollar amount for the
grant would be appropriate. Unlike some benefits, a qualified veteran
will not always use the maximum allowed to modify their home. A veteran
realizes that making major modifications in a home does not increase
the value of that home, in most cases reduces the value of their
largest asset. Some qualified veterans have never used this grant,
perhaps for that reason. When a disabled veteran decides to make their
home useable for themselves and their families, the burden should not
be on the veteran. Congress should restore the grant amount to the
equivalent percentage of the cost of a new house that would be equal to
the rate when the SAH grant was originally enacted.
Committee on Veterans' Affairs
Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity
Washington, DC.
November 20, 2009
Mr. Tom Miller
Executive Director
Blinded Veterans Association
477 H Street, NW
Washington, DC 20001
Dear Mr. Miller:
I would like to request your response to the enclosed questions for
the record and deliverable I am submitting in reference to our House
Committee on Veterans' Affairs Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity
hearing on Adaptive Housing Grants on November 19, 2009. Please answer
the enclosed hearing questions by no later than Monday, December 21,
2009.
In an effort to reduce printing costs, the Committee on Veterans'
Affairs, in cooperation with the Joint Committee on Printing, is
implementing some formatting changes for material for all full
Committee and Subcommittee hearings. Therefore, it would be appreciated
if you could provide your answers consecutively on letter size paper,
single-spaced. In addition, please restate the question in its entirety
before the answer.
Due to the delay in receiving mail, please provide your response to
Ms. Orfa Torres by fax at (202) 225-2034. If you have any questions,
please call (202) 226-4150.
Sincerely
Stephanie Herseth Sandlin
Chairman
JL/ot
__________
Blinded Veterans Association
Washington, DC.
December 1, 2009
The Honorable Stephanie Herseth Sandlin
Chair, VA
Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity
335 Cannon House Building
Washington, DC 20515
Congressman John Boozman
Ranking Member, VA
Subcommittee on Economic
Opportunity
333 Cannon House Building
Washington, DC 20515
Dear Chair Herseth Sandlin, Ranking Member Boozman,
The Blinded Veterans Association appreciates the chance to provide
responses to your Committee follow up questions at the VA Subcommittee
Economic Opportunity hearing held on Thursday, November 19, 2009. Your
question pertained to adaptive housing program benefits for veterans
and contained two parts: 1) What unique needs does a visually impaired
veteran have that other service disabled veterans may not, and 2) How
should the Handbook for Design: Specially Adapted Housing, VA Pamphlet
26-13 be updated? Because of Congressman Boozman's interest in the
testimony on visual impairments BVA wanted to share the responses.
In my testimony, I indicated that BVA supports increasing the
amount VA SAH and SHA grants provide for eligible disabled veterans for
adaptive housing changes so veterans are able to live independently. We
realize that budgetary issues impact this process, but the costs of
long term nursing care as alternative to one time housing construction
grant should be carefully considered in moving forward. For the
returning OIF and OEF veterans with Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) and
with severe penetrating eye injuries with visual complications, the
current policy restricts them with the standard of 5/200 and prevents
approval of any grants which is a real hardship. Current American
Academy Ophthalmology AAO and American Optometric Association AOA use
ICD codes for describing visual impairments to define legal blindness
as 20/200 or less, or those with 20 degrees of visual field or less,
and is same standard that all 50 States use and Social Security
Administration determinations for blindness.
DISEASE DEFINITION
Low vision describes a level of visual impairment characterized by
useful residual vision that is less than normal. It is not a single
disease condition but may result from many different ophthalmologic and
neurological disorders and may cover a wide range of visual
impairments. It is most commonly described in terms of remaining visual
acuity and visual field. The ICD-9-CM divides low vision into five
categories.
Moderate visual impairment: best-corrected visual acuity is less
than 20/60 (including 20/70) to 20/160.
Severe visual impairment: best-corrected visual acuity is less than
20/160 (including 20/200) to 20/400, or the visual field diameter is 20
degrees or less (largest field diameter for Goldmann isopter III4e, 3/
100 white test object, or equivalent).
Profound visual impairment: best-corrected visual acuity is less
than 20/400 (including 20/500) to 20/1000, or the visual field diameter
is 10 degrees or less (largest field diameter for Goldman isopter
III4e, 3/100 white test object, or equivalent). Total blindness is no
light perception (LP absent).
Severe visual impairment in both eyes is the minimum requirement to
be considered legally blind, which has traditionally determined SSDI or
other disability benefits in the United States. Individuals with at
least severe visual impairment therefore qualify as an extra dependent
for Federal income tax purposes and are entitled to other benefits that
vary from State to State. The terms ``severe visual impairment'' and
``profound visual impairment'' are much preferred to ``legal
blindness'' because they are far more descriptive, indicating
accurately that some useful vision remains. For rehabilitation
services, the term ``blindness'' should be reserved for total vision
loss.
In response to the Pamphlet for Design Specially Adapted Housing,
attached is some common construction recommendations used. BVA has
sought change in VHA for more screening of TBI for vision dysfunction
as it relates to diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of these
veterans. Veterans with visual impairments do not require the wide
doorways and common physical structure changes for wheel chairs that
spinal cord injured require. Often what is needed is different lighting
in rooms, hallways, stair wells, and outside entrances, with additional
electrical outlets and counter top space for adaptive technology
devices. Contrast in flooring and with different color patterns help
visually impaired veterans in safer mobility. Contrast sensitivity
refers to the ability to detect differences between light and dark
areas; therefore, if you are an individual with low vision, increasing
the contrast between an object and its background will generally make
the object more visible. Enhancing contrast is one of the simplest,
least expensive, and most effective home modifications you can
implement.
BVA would appreciate your continued strong leadership in making
positive changes for our Nations' disabled veterans. Changes in this
program for blinded or visually impaired disabled veterans would
improve safety and independence. The VA witness at the hearing has
indicated an interest in making changes to pamphlet and housing
benefits so catastrophically disabled veterans that need adaptive
housing grants are provided them.
Sincerely,
Thomas Zampieri, Ph.D.
Director, Government Relations
__________
Below are some suggestions for either medical office building,
clinic, or home adaptations for veterans who are either blind or have
low vision problems. For those veterans with Traumatic Brain Injury
adaptive lighting is often problem because of light sensitivity
(photophobia) and they often require Rheostat lighting (adjusting light
level switches) in your rooms that is needed since each individual may
have different tolerance levels to lighting.
There are also books that are available through ADA and National
Highway and Traffic that give great suggestions and requirements for
building codes.
AER and American Printing House APB, also has books available that
provide helpful hints.
Building Configuration Suggestions for individuals who are Blind,
Visually Impaired, and have Visual Processing Deficits
This list is by no means all encompassing.
BLIND:
1. 90 degree angles are easiest for orientation and to maneuver
2. Reduce wide open spaces for orientation and also because of
the effect on ambient noises for orientation purposes
3. Use sound clues for orientation purposes (water feature,
talking elevators) for office buildings
4. Use tactile changes when transitioning from one area to
another to indicate a change. Tactile bumps at front areas and
dangerous areas such as loading docks will indicate that a person
should stop.
5. Use boundaries such as doors to indicate the separation of one
area from another (such as on a unit). This also helps a person when
traveling along a common area moving from one area to the next so that
they do not veer into each
6. Work with traffic engineers in the area for tactile bumps at
street crossing and accessible pedestrian signals. Sidewalks to areas
of interest in the immediate area will improve independence and use of
orientation and mobility skills to function in the community.
7. Check guide wires and signs in the area to ensure that they
comply with regulations on height and projections
8. Signs have building requirements of the height and projection
that is safe in a building so that blind individuals do not run into
signs. Also do not mount televisions or other projections in areas
where they would be at head height. In the case that these already
exist, place a permanent piece of furniture (bolted preferably so that
it cannot be moved) under the area so that an individual who is blind
cannot miss the projection with the long cane and hit it with his/her
head.
9. Provide security precautions for dangerous areas: stairs,
loading docks that will indicate when a person may have wondered into a
dangerous area (sounds, alarms, video monitoring)
10. Ensure that kitchen does not have a Flat Top stovetop
11. Ovens at both the higher and lower levels can provide
educational experience for patients but also allow the therapist to
work with a patient on a safe level for him/her if balance is an issue
and/or a patient is working from a wheelchair and cannot safely reach
to a higher level.
LOW VISION: Individuals with 20/100 or worse visual acuity
1. Provide high contrast. Black and white work best
2. Reduce glare with large open natural lighting areas.
Individuals with traumatic cataracts will experience great difficulty
in this area due to the light scattering effect of the cataract.
3. Do not have dark areas and bright areas contiguous with one
another as the drastic light changes will impair a person's functional
vision drastically.
4. Reduce visual clutter by using clean lines and reduce patterns.
5. Have furniture contrast with floors. Put dark blankets on the
beds to make the furniture and bed in the patient's room stand out
against the floor.
6. Provide variable lighting in the rooms and treatment areas to
reduce eye discomfort from light sensitivity, photophobia
7. Have signs in high contrast and large print. Use a font that is
very basic as a very ornate print will be difficulty to read.
8. Contrasting handrails and lines on the floor.
9. Have highly visible landmarks to indicate different areas of
the hospital or clinic.
About Color
Although many people who have low vision can also experience
decreased color perception, it is still possible to use color to
enhance independence, safety, and accessibility.
Keep the following color principles in mind as you evaluate your
home:
Bright colors are generally the easiest to see because of
their ability to reflect light.
Solid, bright colors, such as red, orange, and yellow are
usually more visible than pastels.
Lighting can influence the perception of color: Dim light
can ``wash out'' some colors, while bright light can intensify others.
Also keep in mind that distinguishing colors within each of the
following groups may be more difficult for some individuals who have
low vision:
Navy blue, brown, and black
Blue, green, and purple
Pink, yellow, and pale green
Color can also provide important safety cues:
An indicator of change in surface or level, such as ramps
or stairs
A warning for potential hazards, such as doors or
cabinets that have been left ajar
A means of color-coding household files, documents and
bills.
Here are some general color modifications for you to consider:
When creating or coding household files, use Post-It
notes in fluorescent colors, brightly colored stickers or paper clips,
or brightly colored fluorescent markers.
Mark cabinets and the edges of doors with brightly
colored fluorescent tape to make them easier to detect when open.
Mark a specific chair, table, desk, or work space with
bright fluorescent paint or tape, a brightly colored chair cushion, or
a bright red or orange ribbon to help you locate a particular location
or activity independently.
For more specific suggestions about using color when modifying your
home, see Room by Room (http://www.visionaware.org/room_by_room).
About Contrast
Contrast sensitivity refers to the ability to detect differences
between light and dark areas; therefore, if you are an individual with
low vision, increasing the contrast between an object and its
background will generally make the object more visible.
Enhancing contrast is one of the simplest, least expensive, and
most effective home modifications you can implement.
Keep the following contrast principles in mind as you evaluate your
home:
White or bright yellow objects or print against a black
background usually provide the strongest color contrast.
Use solid colors as backgrounds to make objects ``stand
out.'' Avoid the use of patterns, prints, or stripes.
Place light-colored objects against darker backgrounds. A
white sheet of paper is more visible against a brown desktop or dark
blotter.
Place dark objects against lighter backgrounds. A dark
chair will stand out better against white or cream-colored walls.
Here are some general contrast modifications for you to
consider: Paint doors, doorknobs, and door frames in
bright colors to increase their visibility. Ensure that the color
offers sufficient contrast with the door hardware, wall, or other
background.
Paint baseboards in a solid color that contrasts with
walls and floor coverings.
Use a contrasting placemat under your dinner plate to
help you see the edge of the plate.
[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]
Use solid non-patterned floor coverings (carpet, tile, or
linoleum) that emphasize the boundary between the wall and the floor.
Try to avoid using patterned carpets, especially on steps and stairs.
Install outlet and switch plates that contrast with
walls, floors, and baseboards. Illuminated light switches can provide
good contrast in a darkened room.
Place dark objects against lighter backgrounds, or vice
versa. For example, a pale green chair could ``disappear'' against a
yellow wall; instead, try covering the chair with a solid, brightly
colored slipcover or towel to create contrast and make it ``stand
out.''
For more specific suggestions about using contrast when modifying
your home, see Room by Room (http://www.visionaware.org/room_by_room).
Resources for Home Modification
The following links and resources can help you when you begin to
modify your home:
Sources of Products for Independent Living (http://
www.visionaware.org/sources_of_ products_for_independent_living)
Find Lighting Products (http://www.visionaware.org/
find_lighting_products)
Find Labeling Products (http://www.visionaware.org/
find_labeling_products)
Reading with Low Vision Optical Devices (http://
www.visionaware.org/reading-low-vision-optical-devices)
All About Maximizing All of Your Senses (http://
www.visionaware.org/all_ about_maximizing_all_your_senses)
What are the most common non-optical devices? (http://
www.visionaware.org/what_are_the_most_common_non_optical_devices)
Electrical Sockets and Light Switches
Electrical sockets and light switches are often the same color as
the surrounding walls; therefore, they can be difficult to locate if
you have low vision.
One solution is to install new face plates in a color
that contrasts with the electrical outlets and/or light switches.
Another solution is to mark your electrical outlets with
raised or color-contrasting dots that can help you locate the outlet
and align the prongs of the plug with the slits in the outlet.
You can create your own raised dots by using spots of
glue or bits of tape.
Other types of raised marking materials, such as the Hi-
Mark Tactile Pen, Spot 'n Line Pens, Touch Dots, and Maxi-Marks are
available from specialty catalogs.
See Find Labeling Products (http://www.visionaware.org/
find_labeling_
products) and Labeling and Marking (http://www.visionaware.org/
labeling_
marking) for more information.
[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]
In addition, outlets are often located behind furniture and near
the floor. One solution is to use a power strip or surge protector:
Plug the power strip/surge protector into the outlet and
place the power strip in an inconspicuous spot on an end table or other
piece of furniture.
You can also mark the outlets on the power strip with
raised or color-contrasting dots to identify each plug.
Traumatic Brain Injured TBI: Some studies find 72 percent of TBI
patients complain of vision problems, 32 percent are diagnosed with
varying levels of vision impairments ranging from mild to blindness.
1. Make sure signs and patterns and/or colors that indicate
different areas of the hospital do not have any similarities that make
it difficult to discriminate one area from another.
2. Make signs occur frequently for those with memory problems.
3. Make signs consistent throughout the center and do not change
the angle, orientation because if an individual experiences difficulty
with form constancy he/she will not realize that two signs are for the
same area if they have a different appearance (size, orientation,
color, etc.).
4. Reduce visual clutter because TBI patients experience
difficulty with figure ground discrimination. Too much visual
information can be over stimulating as well.
5. Provide maps with clearly marked ``you are here'' indicators.
6. Provide escorts for when individuals enter the building to be
7. Escorted to treatment areas and from one treatment area to the
next.
8. Provide variable lighting in rooms and treatment areas. Have
filters available to provide for patients who are photophobic and/or
sensitive to light.
9. Have the nurses' station or secretary office at the front area
to monitor patients coming onto the unit and/or leaving the unit.
Committee on Veterans' Affairs
Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity
Washington, DC.
November 20, 2009
Mr. Mark Bologna
Director of Loan Guaranty Service
Veteran Benefits Administration
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
810 Vermont Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20420
Dear Mr. Bologna:
I would like to request your response to the enclosed questions for
the record and deliverable I am submitting in reference to our House
Committee on Veterans' Affairs Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity
hearing on Adaptive Housing Grants on November 19, 2009. Please answer
the enclosed hearing questions by no later than Monday, December 21,
2009.
In an effort to reduce printing costs, the Committee on Veterans'
Affairs, in cooperation with the Joint Committee on Printing, is
implementing some formatting changes for material for all full
Committee and Subcommittee hearings. Therefore, it would be appreciated
if you could provide your answers consecutively on letter size paper,
single-spaced. In addition, please restate the question in its entirety
before the answer.
Due to the delay in receiving mail, please provide your response to
Ms. Orfa Torres by fax at (202) 225-2034. If you have any questions,
please call (202) 226-4150.
Sincerely
Stephanie Herseth Sandlin
Chairman
JL/ot
__________
Questions for the Record
The Honorable Stephanie Herseth Sandlin, Chairwoman
Subcommittee on Economic Opportunity
House Committee on Veterans' Affairs
Adaptive Housing Grants
November 19, 2009
Question 1: Your written testimony provides that some veterans and
servicemembers who have a service-connected condition do not qualify
for these grants. Can you provide us with some examples of
servicemembers and veterans who are being denied a grant and may
benefit from such programs.
Response: Title 38 U.S.C., Sec. 2101(a) and (b) specifies a finite
list of qualifying disabilities for the Specially Adapted Housing (SAH)
program. It also stipulates that the service-connected disability must
be permanent and total. Consequently, in cases where certain medical
conditions may be presumed to subside or improve, such as a temporary
visual deficiency or traumatic brain injury, the individual would not
be rated eligible for the grant. Additionally, where there is not a
total loss of use of an extremity, the individual would not be rated
eligible for the grant. Finally, as Members of Congress noted during
the hearing, the statute prescribes a more stringent standard for
blindness than the legal definition of blindness.
Question 2: You state in your testimony that there are statutory
inadequacies with the adaptive grants. Can you send us a complete list
of all statutory inadequacies for review?
Response: In VA's Report to Congress published on August 28, 2009,
VA discussed statutory inadequacies that may prevent individuals from
receiving much needed SAH assistance. The following summarizes
inadequacies noted in that report:
1. Ownership: Unlike the Adaptive Housing (AH) grant, a Veteran
who is eligible for a Paraplegic Housing (PH) grant and lives with a
family member permanently may not receive a PH grant to modify the
family member's home. For such an individual to obtain grant
assistance, SAH agents must work with the individual's family to
facilitate the transfer of an interest in the property to the eligible
individual.
2. Aggregate Amount of Assistance: According to VA's 2007 Survey
of SAH Grantees, most AH grant recipients indicated that the maximum
dollar amount for the grant did not cover the full cost of adaptations.
In many cases, these AH grant recipients may have incurred significant
out-of-pocket expenses or relied on the generosity of others to adapt
their homes.
3. Application of Cost-of-Construction Index: Need better context
- VA notes that the Transitional Residence Adaptation (TRA) grant was
not included in recently enacted legislation increasing other adaptive
housing grants by an annual cost-of-construction index. Without the
index, VA expects fewer individuals to use the TRA grant in the future.
4. Number of Grant Usages: Given the statutory restriction on the
number of grant usages (3), maximum use of the AH or TRA grants would
preclude potential use of a PH grant if a worsening disability would
deem the Veteran eligible for a PH grant.
5. TRA: TRA grant funds are deducted from the aggregate amount of
assistance available to a Veteran, and a TRA grant counts against the
maximum number of grant usages. Thus, Veterans are less likely to use
the TRA and wait and use the full benefit with AH or PH. It depends on
their individual needs and situation.
6. Use of Funds for Administrative Expenses: Chapter 21 of Title
38 does not authorize VA to use funds to pay for administrative
expenses for alternative living situations. In some cases, it is
necessary for an individual to make temporary alternative living
accommodations while adaptations are being made to the home's only
restroom (or the only restroom reasonably accessible to the
individual). Temporary lodging may also be required if construction
work results in the presence of dust or chemicals that aggravate
certain medical conditions. Current law does not authorize VA to pay
for temporary lodging during the adaptation.
Question 3: What have been the main complaints regarding adaptive
housing by veterans, servicemembers and their families?
Response: The most frequent areas of concern voiced by Veterans and
their families are outlined above in our responses to questions one and
two.
Question 4: Have there been any injuries that we have not taken
into account for adaptive housing grants?
Response: The response to question one above discusses some
injuries not considered for adaptive housing grants.
Question 5: Is there a different need between a married veteran and
a single veteran who needs to use one of these adaptive housing grants?
Response: Specific considerations are taken into account with each
eligible Veteran's family status. The SAH agent must consider an
individual's adaptive needs as they relate to assistance in daily
living activities provided by a spouse or other family member. For
example, if a Veteran is responsible for preparing his/her own meals,
adaptation of the kitchen to meet his/her needs is a priority. In
contrast, if a Veteran's spouse is responsible for cooking in the
household, emphasis is placed on modifying other areas of the home.
These considerations are evaluated on a case by case basis.
Question 6: If a veteran receives the grant under section 2101(b)
for the amount of $12,000 due to loss of use or loss of one limb and
later loses another limb or usage of a limb, the veteran will then meet
eligibility of 2101(a). Will the veteran be able to receive the full
$60,000 housing benefit or a subsequent amount minus the original
awarded $12,000?
Response: The combination of grants under Chapter 21 may not exceed
the maximum grant amount outlined in 2101(a). In fiscal year 2010
grants under sections 2101(a) and 2101(b) are now indexed. The maximum
grant under 2101(a) is currently $63,780, and the maximum grant under
2101(b) is $12,756. Therefore, if an individual receives a grant under
section 2101(b) for the amount of $12,756 due to loss of vision or loss
of both hands and later loses another limb or usage of a limb, thereby
becoming eligible for a 2101(a) grant, the original grant for $12,756
is deducted from the current maximum of $63,780, and the Veteran can
receive $51,024.
Question 7: Thank-you for the data regarding the number of grants
provided in recent years. Do you have an analysis of who is receiving
the grants in terms of age and types of disabilities?
Response: Demographic data in terms of age and disabilities are not
routinely analyzed for the SAH grant program. However, VA is compiling
available data and will provide analysis upon completion. VA estimates
the review will be completed by February 15, 2010.
Question 8: The staff has been approached by several companies
interested in developing housing projects for severely disabled
veterans. What are the pros and cons of such a program?
Response: VA has also received inquiries on such housing
developments, most of which are for rental units in high-rise
buildings. VA has identified the following significant challenges with
such a program:
An individual using the SAH grant must obtain title to
the home, which is impossible in a rental situation.
Demand may not exist for housing projects or communities
specifically for persons with disabilities. In VA's experience,
Veterans prefer to re-integrate into their communities rather than
living in highly concentrated units devoted to housing disabled
individuals.
Investment in such projects may not be cost-beneficial.
In an emergency or disaster situation, multi-level and
high-rise housing structures pose serious barriers to the evacuation of
disabled individuals.
Question 9: In BVA's testimony they recommend that when a veteran
is determined to have a permanent and total disability that they be
provided information on SAH and auto grants as well as given
Certificates of Eligibility for these benefits. Is this something VA is
already doing? If not, what are your thoughts on Dr. Zampieri's
proposal?
Response: VBA's disability compensation rating process determines
eligibility for SAH benefits. This determination is made even if the
Veteran does not specifically apply for SAH benefits. When VBA
determines a Veteran is eligible for SAH benefits, information about
the program is included with the rating decision letter.
In February 2010, Loan Guaranty Service will start receiving an
electronic notice each time a Veteran is found eligible for SAH
benefits through the disability compensation rating process. This will
allow VA to be more proactive in reaching out to Veterans eligible for
SAH benefits.
Once a Veteran is found eligible for SAH benefits and indicates an
interest in using the program, a SAH agent schedules an interview with
the individual. During that interview, the agent explains the SAH
program as well as other benefits including HISA grant and Veterans
Mortgage Life Insurance.
VA has reached out to Dr. Zampieri to schedule a meeting so we can
learn more about his proposal and any other ideas that can be
implemented to improve outreach.
Question 10: In Section 2101 (a), how does the VA determine a
disability rating for ``precludes locomotion?'' Does this definition
also include fusion of a joint and does it also include spinal fusions
where mobility is lost due to cervical, thoracic and lumbar fusions?
Response: The term ``preclude locomotion'' is defined at 38 CFR
3.809 [Specially Adapted Housing Under 38 U.S.C. 2101(A)] as, ``the
necessity for regular and constant use of a wheelchair, braces,
crutches or canes as a normal mode of locomotion although occasional
locomotion by other methods may be possible.''
Fused joints and fusion of the spinal column are not specifically
mentioned in this definition, but such fusions may lead to precluded
locomotion in certain cases. Some spinal fusions are performed as a
therapeutic surgical technique designed to increase overall locomotion
and mobility by reducing vertebral movement that causes pain. If the
joint or spinal fusion is not therapeutic, is due to injury or disease,
and causes loss of use of the lower extremities so as to require
braces, crutches, canes, or a wheelchair for locomotion, then a Veteran
with such fusion would be entitled to the Specially Adapted Housing
benefit.