[Senate Hearing 111-880] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] S. Hrg. 111-880 UNTIL THERE'S A CURE: HOW TO HELP ALZHEIMER'S PATIENTS AND FAMILIES NOW ======================================================================= FORUM before the SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON AGING UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED ELEVENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION __________ WASHINGTON, DC __________ DECEMBER 8, 2010 __________ Serial No. 111-26 Printed for the use of the Special Committee on Aging [GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.gpoaccess.gov/congress/ index.html U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 64-225 PDF WASHINGTON : 2011 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512-1800; DC area (202) 512-1800 Fax: (202) 512-2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402-0001 SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON AGING HERB KOHL, Wisconsin, Chairman RON WYDEN, Oregon BOB CORKER, Tennessee BLANCHE L. LINCOLN, Arkansas RICHARD SHELBY, Alabama EVAN BAYH, Indiana SUSAN COLLINS, Maine BILL NELSON, Florida GEORGE LeMIEUX, FLORIDA ROBERT P. CASEY, Jr., Pennsylvania ORRIN HATCH, Utah CLAIRE McCASKILL, Missouri SAM BROWNBACK, Kansas SHELDON WHITEHOUSE, Rhode Island LINDSEY GRAHAM, South Carolina MARK UDALL, Colorado SAXBY CHAMBLISS, Georgia KIRSTEN GILLIBRAND, New York MICHAEL BENNET, Colorado ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania AL FRANKEN, Minnesota Debra Whitman, Majority Staff Director Michael Bassett, Ranking Member Staff Director (ii) C O N T E N T S ---------- Page Opening Statement of Senator Herb Kohl, Chairman................. 1 Opening Statement of Senator Bob Corker, Ranking Member.......... 2 Panel I Statement of Kathy Greenlee, Assistant Secretary, Administration on Aging, Washington, DC....................................... 3 Statement of Patricia A. Grady, Ph.D., R.N., F.A.A.N., Director, National Institute of Nursing Research, Bethesda, MD........... 15 Panel II Statement of Loren Shook, Chairman, President and CEO, Silverado Senior Living, on Behalf of the Assisted Living Federation of America, Irvine, CA............................................ 31 Statement of Laura N. Gitlin, Ph.D., Director, Jefferson Center for Applied Research on Aging and Health, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA................................... 43 Statement of Christine R. Kovach, Ph.D., R.N., F.A.A.N., Professor and Methods Core Director, College of Nursing and Self-Management Science Center, University of Wisconsin- Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI....................................... 59 Statement of Patricia L. McGinnis, Executive Director, California Advocates for Nursing Home Reform, San Francisco, CA........... 72 Statement of Robert Egge, Vice President, Public Policy and Advocacy, Alzheimer's Association, Washington, DC.............. 82 Statement of Eric J. Hall, President and CEO, Alzheimer's Foundation of America, New York, NY............................ 91 APPENDIX Additional Information from Loren Shook.......................... 111 Additional Information from Laura Gitlin, Thomas Jefferson University..................................................... 133 Statement by Speaker Newt Gingrich............................... 154 Testimony from Richard P. Grimes, CEO and President Assisted Living Federation of America................................... 156 Statement submitted by Center for Medicare Advocacy.............. 162 Statement from Michael D. Shmerling, of Abe's Garden............. 170 Information from Experience Corpos............................... 172 Information from Linda Nichols................................... 193 Statement from Dr. Louis Mudannayake, MD, CMD.................... 201 Information from Geropsychiatric Nursing Collaborative (GPNC).... 202 Information from Mary S. Mittleman, Dr. P.H...................... 205 (iii) UNTIL THERE'S A CURE: HOW TO HELP ALZHEIMER'S PATIENTS AND FAMILIES NOW ---------- -- WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 8, 2010 U.S. Senate, Special Committee on Aging, Washington, DC. The committee met, pursuant to notice, at 1 p.m. in room G- 50, Dirksen Senate office Building, Hon. Herb Kohl (Chairman of the Committee) presiding. Present: Senators Kohl and Corker. OPENING STATEMENT OF SENATOR HERB KOHL, CHAIRMAN The Chairman. Good afternoon, everybody. We welcome you here today. We especially would like to welcome our distinguished participants for being here with us. We are lucky to have Assistant Secretary Kathy Greenlee and Director Patricia Grady, as well as several other experts and advocates. We are happy to be hearing from them and we encourage all of you here today to participate in our activity. Senator Corker and I are holding this forum so that we can exchange best ideas about how to provide the best care to the 5.3 million Americans suffering from Alzheimer's disease. This is a huge concern for the much larger number of family members, relatives, and friends whose lives are also affected. These caregivers do not have the luxury of waiting for a cure. They need support now. I do feel strongly that we will find a cure and I congratulate the Senate HELP Committee for approving the National Alzheimer's Project Act last week, which will speed up the research process. But until there is a cure, we must focus on improving the services for people living with Alzheimer's disease. Today's forum will highlight the best methods of care that can take place in a variety of settings, including nursing homes, assisted living facilities, and in the home. The right interventions can greatly improve the quality of life for people living with Alzheimer's disease as well as their families. We believe these best practices should be put to use by medical personnel, long-term care staff, and family caregivers. In a few moments, we will hear from the Administration on Aging, the National Institute of Nursing Research, the Alzheimer's Association, and the Alzheimer's Foundation of America, about how they are spreading the word about models of new dementia care. They will talk to us about what type of training really works, who needs to be trained, and how this can be done in a cost effective manner. The good news is that conversations about Alzheimer's care are happening all across the country. In my State, the Alzheimer's Association of Southeastern Wisconsin recently convened a multi-stakeholder task force to take a close look at how individuals with moderate and severe dementia who exhibit aggression and other challenging behaviors can be treated with greater skill and dignity by nursing homes, hospitals, and law enforcement. The task force was founded following the tragic and untimely death of a longtime Milwaukee resident earlier this year, who was asked to leave his long-term care residential community after developing such challenging behaviors. Subsequently, he became even more confused and agitated and was arrested and restrained, a traumatic process that contributed to the deterioration of his health, and that ultimately hastened his death. We should not let these circumstances be repeated. It is my hope that this forum will serve as a source of hope for the Alzheimer's community as we emphasize all the things we can do now to improve the quality of life for people with Alzheimer's disease and those who love them. I will be turning now to Senator Corker for his opening comments. I regret I cannot be here with you throughout the forum as I have previous important engagement that I must attend. Thank you again for being here, and we look forward now to Senator Corker's remarks. STATEMENT OF SENATOR BOB CORKER Senator Corker. I know, because of the many raucous things that are happening right now, we both have meetings that start at 1. But I want to thank Senator Kohl and his staff and our staff for helping to organize this forum and certainly appreciate all of the many intelligent people who are here to talk and to hear from wonderful witnesses and others about how we deal with the protocols, how we deal with care, how we deal with this issue that affects our society in such a huge way. I know that one of the things we talk about a great deal are the costs associated with Alzheimer's and what that does to our country as a whole. But on the other hand, we know that on an individual basis Alzheimer's affects millions of people. As a matter of fact, there is not a person in this room, it would be my guess, that in some personal way has not been affected. My dad passed away a month ago after being diagnosed with Alzheimer's 15 years ago, and I have watched the progression that takes place. I have watched the stress on the caregiver. I have watched all of that, and candidly our family was in a situation where financially we were able to ensure that he had the best of care. My biggest thought over the course of the last few years is how those families who do not have similar resources to us deal with this issue. It has to be absolutely devastating not just personally but in so many other ways. So I thank Senator Kohl and all of you for focusing on this issue, and I hope that together as a country we deal with this issue that certainly affects us in many ways financially but also deal with it in a way that over time in a more humane way our society with individuals can deal with it also. Thank you very much. The Chairman. Thank you. Ms. Whitman. Welcome to you all. I am Debra Whitman. I am the Staff Director for the Senate Aging Committee. I would like to introduce our wonderful first panel. We are pleased to welcome Kathy Greenlee, Assistant Secretary for the Administration on Aging. Prior to becoming Assistant Secretary, Ms. Greenlee served as a State long-term care ombudsman and Secretary of Aging for the State of Kansas. Ms. Greenlee will highlight the AoA's current efforts to implement evidence-based programs of services and training in Alzheimer's care. Next we will hear from Patricia Grady, Director of the National Institute on Nursing Research. Dr. Grady joined NIH in 1988 where much of her scientific research has been in stroke and brain imaging. Dr. Grady will describe the role of research and training to improve the quality of care for people with Alzheimer's disease and to provide adequate support for their caregivers. Thank you both. STATEMENT OF KATHY GREENLEE, ASSISTANT SECRETARY, ADMINISTRATION ON AGING, WASHINGTON, DC Ms. Greenlee. Good afternoon to you all. It is good to see you, and great to see such a good turnout. Thank you, Debra, for the introduction. I would like to acknowledge Senator Corker and Senator Kohl for convening this forum. I had a chance to talk briefly with Senator Kohl before we started. I last saw him in Milwaukee in September. It was warm in Milwaukee then. I hear it is not now. Talking about Alzheimer's disease is just one of the many things that Senator Kohl focuses on with regard to seniors. As the chair of this committee, his knowledge is vast, his interest is deep, and we had a wonderful opportunity in Milwaukee to talk specifically about the reauthorization of the Older Americans Act. Many of the things that I am talking about today with regard to Administration on Aging programs are funded from that Act, and so I wanted to acknowledge that he sees the big picture as well as looking at specific topics that are this important such as Alzheimer's. There are a few things I want to point out about Alzheimer's, and what I would like to focus on specifically are the things that we are doing at the Administration on Aging to help support home and community-based services for those people with dementia, as well as those who care for those. Helping older Americans who have Alzheimer's disease and related dementias maintain their dignity is central to our mission at AoA. Access to appropriate supports is critical in understanding and managing these diseases, especially those services that allow families to plan in the early stages of the disease and those that support family caregivers. The Administration on Aging supports embedding dementia practice into State long-term services and supports. This effort is designed to be responsive and improve the home and community-based services that currently exist so that they can better support people with Alzheimer`s disease and other related dementia. It is important to focus on the fact that we currently have a home and community-based service network in this country and that we need to embed the practice of paying attention to Alzheimer's and other dementias into those current systems, as well as to look at new things that we can be doing, to help people with Alzheimer's and their caregivers. The challenges posed by Alzheimer's disease and related dementias for persons with the disease and their families are enormous. I know this personally as a granddaughter. I know this as the assistant secretary as I meet with members of various communities across this country, members and individuals who are providing support specifically to caregivers. AoA works within HHS, with our partner agencies at the National Institutes on Aging (NIA) at the National Institutes of Health (NIH), with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and with the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), to determine the universe of interventions that are suitable for translation in the community where three- quarters of the people with dementia live. The interventions that AoA funds are those that have been tested in randomized controlled trials and found to have positive effects on persons with dementia and their families. For example, we have worked closely with the NIA to understand and disseminate evidence- based interventions such as ``Resources for Enhancing Alzheimer's Caregiver Health,'' or REACH. I believe you will talk about REACH, Patricia, as well in your testimony. This intervention is specifically aimed at enabling caregivers to cope with the daily, often intense stress they face in providing care to their loved ones. AoA and the National Institute on Aging have also collaborated in providing materials that we can disseminate to all the people in this country who are receiving home-delivered meals to provide basic education about Alzheimer's, other related dementias, and the services that we have available. According to recent estimates, between 2.4 million and 5.1 million Americans have Alzheimer's disease. Unless the disease can be effectively treated or prevented, the number of people with Alzheimer's disease will increase significantly if the current population trend continues. That is because the risk of Alzheimer's disease increases with age and the U.S. population is aging. The number of people 65 and older is expected to grow from 39 million in 2008 to 72 million in 2030, and the number of people with Alzheimer's disease doubles for every 5-year interval in age beyond the age of 65. According to the Alzheimer's Association, at least 10 million baby boomers will develop Alzheimer's disease in their remaining lifetimes. That is twice as many people as the number estimated to have the disease right now. In addition, four million baby boomers will develop a related dementia, which poses similar challenges as Alzheimer's for people who have related dementias, as well as their families and the health and long-term care systems. I want to stop and emphasize that point twice. We are talking today specifically about Alzheimer's, but the thing that we all know, those of us here and those of us who work in this area, is that the field of dementia is much broader than Alzheimer's. There are other related dementias that may have a slightly different disease progression but have the impacts on the individual and the community that are very similar to Alzheimer's disease. This is something that our partners at the Alzheimer's Association understand, as well as the community providers. Today we are talking about Alzheimer's and all of the other related dementias that impact individuals as they age. States and the Federal Government are currently engaged in major efforts to transform health and long-term services. If those efforts are successful, they should also address dementia in order to transform the care that we are providing. While medical research pursues the cause and treatment of the disease, which is critically important for understanding why we must talk to clinicians and professionals in the field of health, we must also develop better, cost effective ways to support and sustain family caregivers and people who have the disease right now. Leading policymakers are emphasizing prevention and chronic disease management as strategies for improving quality and controlling costs. AoA, through the administration of the ``Alzheimer's Disease Supportive Services Program,'' is working with the States, communities, and researchers to translate proven caregiver support programs into practice at the community level. Through this work, we are developing tools to make available these programs so again we can embed them into the current long-term services system. We began this specific emphasis on evidence-based research at AoA nearly a decade ago. We have had a focus on evidence- based research with a number of programs at AoA, and the one that I can point to and talk about the most is the work that we have done in the field of Alzheimer's. We began by developing research materials and evidence-based guidelines for physicians. As a result of that effort nearly a decade ago, we have physicians nationwide who have adopted our best practices. This fall we announced funding to 16 States to field test nine evidence-based caregiver interventions with the goal of embedding successful translation in State programs and funding streams. We are looking at how those interventions can be effectively provided through the aging network, and if these interventions can be successfully translated to other community settings. If they are successful, they will have a significant impact on supporting caregivers and their families. I would like to give you some examples of the types of interventions that we are looking at. One intervention currently being translated in six States, California, Florida, Georgia, Minnesota, Utah, and Wisconsin, is the ``New York University Caregiver Intervention.'' Because this program has been tested in a randomized controlled trial, we know that the New York University Caregiver Intervention significantly delays institutionalization of persons with dementia by providing education, support, and counseling to spousal caregivers. The average institutional delay for persons with dementia who received support from this one program is 557 days. That has a significant impact on the health and life of the individual. It also has an impact on the cost. If you look at the national average nursing home rate of $219 a day, if you can delay nursing home admission by 557 days, you have saved someone, whether it is private resources or a government program, $121,000 for helping one particular person. For each of these programs in these six States, we will work to implement and prove and test and find out what works. We have other types of programs, the ``Savvy Caregiver'' program, which are operating in three States. The Savvy Caregiver is a different kind of training program that delivers 2-hour sessions over a 6-week period focusing on helping caregivers think about their situation objectively and provides them with the knowledge and skills that they need so they can manage stress and carry out their lives. What we believe is that successful translation should be designed to be embedded in systems over time. The caregiver translations need to intervene at one point and be successful as the disease progresses to both help the individual with the disease, as well as the person providing care. We have numerous examples of evidence-based practices that we are working to embed with our partners. I believe that there is a process for doing this work that involves partnership with NIA and our other partners where we look for promising practices. We find a way to test approaches like the examples that I have given so that we know nationally what are the best systems. We have a good program working in New Mexico that is helping to specifically provide assistance to adult day providers on what they can do to better support and recognize people with Alzheimer's and provide respite services. In Minnesota, we are working with the Aging and Disability Resource Center to identify opportunities so we can provide better education in the community. There are a number of things it will take to tackle this overwhelming disease and to be able to move forward. As an administration, we are very committed to working with our partners, to working with those of you here to do something as basic as what works, how do we try it, and how do we make sure everybody in the Nation who needs the support gets it. This is a critically important issue and I would like to again thank the committee for talking about Alzheimer's and the related dementias today. Thank you very much. [The prepared statement of Ms. Greenlee follows:] [GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] STATEMENT OF PATRICIA A. GRADY, PH.D., R.N., F.A.A.N., DIRECTOR, NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NURSING RESEARCH, BETHESDA, MD Dr. Grady. Good afternoon. I would also like to add my thanks to Senators Kohl and Corker and the committee for their interest in this important area. I appreciate the opportunity to discuss the research and training activities of the National Institute of Nursing Research at the NIH for older adults with Alzheimer's disease, or AD, and their families. I am the Director of NINR, one of the 27 institutes and centers at the National Institutes of Health and one of several that support research on AD. Today I will describe some of the NINR's recent research findings and current efforts focused on older adults with AD and other dementias and also on improving the quality of life for caregivers. I will also stress the importance of supporting training opportunities to ensure that the next generation of scientists and caregivers have the knowledge and tools to serve the needs of our rapidly aging population. We have heard that Alzheimer's disease affects up to 5 million Americans, and with the baby boomers' increased life expectancy, this number is expected to increase dramatically in the coming years. NIH is dedicated to supporting a broad interdisciplinary program of research to answer critical questions about what causes AD, how to better diagnosis it, how to best treat it, and ultimately how it can be prevented. Over the past 20 years, we have significantly increased our understanding of the biological and the genetic underpinnings of this disease. However, there is currently no way to prevent the onset of AD and drug treatments are not very effective in delaying the progression of this disease. Consequently, in addition to the efforts on prevention of AD, we must be equally mindful of improving the care and the quality of life for those suffering from this disease and from alleviating the burden faced by the informal caregivers who provide the majority of care for their friends and families with AD. As an overview, these issues form the cornerstones of NINR's portfolio on AD research. We support clinical and basic research to build a scientific foundation for clinical practice, to prevent disease and disability, to eliminate symptoms caused by illness, and to enhance end-of-life and palliative care, as well as training the next generation of scientists. As part of this mission, NINR focuses on quality of care and quality of life for older adults with AD and other dementias, as well as their informal caregivers. We study interventions for alleviating symptoms such as pain, discomfort, delirium, improving communication for clinicians, and memory support. For example, NINR is currently supporting a project to test the effectiveness of an activity-based intervention to increase quality of life by reducing agitation and passivity, and increasing engagement and positive mood in nursing home residents with dementia. Another example is an intervention designed to improve early detection and management of delirium in those with dementia. This has the potential to improve the quality of life and decrease costs of care. A third project currently underway is one testing an evidence-based, nurse practitioner-guided intervention for patients with AD or other dementia and their family caregivers. This intervention is expected to improve overall quality of life by decreasing depressive symptoms, reducing burden, and improving self-efficacy. NINR also emphasizes research on interventions aimed at improving quality of life and reducing burden for caregivers. There are nearly 11 million unpaid caregivers responsible for caring for loved ones with Alzheimer's disease. These caregivers often experience stress, burden, depression, and decline in their own physical health while taking care of their loved ones with chronic illnesses such as AD and other forms of dementia. We need better interventions to assist these caregivers, to help them manage their symptoms, and reduce stress, so they may continue to remain healthy while they provide care. Recognizing these challenges, nurse scientists conduct research to improve the skills caregivers need to provide in-home care, and to teach caregivers health promotion and behaviors that will help them to maintain and improve their own health and emotional well-being. As an example, NINR currently supports a study that uses a telephone-based intervention for caregivers to enhance emotional support; locate needed resources; improve coping skills; and assist in attending to physical, social, and emotional needs. Another current project involves the development and testing of an intervention to promote and improve shared decisionmaking and communication between the caregivers of persons with advanced dementia and clinicians in regards to tube feeding and treatment decisions. A third example is studying the effects of a psycho- educational and physical exercise interventions in family caregivers of African American dementia patients, and the caregivers of heart failure patients, to promote health and reduce cardiovascular risk. The studies that I have described just now provide merely a glimpse of the current efforts to improve the quality of life and care for those with AD and their caregivers, efforts that offer the promise of a better tomorrow for individuals affected by dementia. But what have we learned so far? Scientists have made substantial progress in understanding the challenges of living with AD and developing interventions to support the caregivers. I would draw your attention to recent findings from some of these studies that are NINR-supported. One of the challenges of providing quality care for older adults with AD is accurately detecting and treating symptoms such as pain and discomfort, which is critical to their quality of life. It is essential for health care providers as well as informal caregivers to have the tools to recognize pain in older adults with dementia who may not be able to express their need for pain relief. A recent study funded by NINR showed a discrepancy between the pain reported by the dementia patients and the pain behaviors that were observed. In this study, cognitively impaired older adults self-reported less intense pain after movement activities such as walking and other movements, than the cognitively intact older adults. However, the behavioral observations of pain such as grimacing and verbal complaints showed no differences between the two groups. This suggests that commonly used self-report measures of pain may underestimate pain in older adults with dementia. Another recent NINR funded study showed that a comprehensive exercise program increased positive mood and decreased negative mood in nursing home residents with AD. Preliminary findings regarding health promotion interventions for older adults with early stage dementia living in the community, as well as interventions to increase activity engagement in nursing home residents with dementia, demonstrate that such interventions have the potential for improving quality of life for this group. Now, what about the caregivers? Recent findings from our supported investigators are also contributing to the development of an evidence base of interventions to support caregivers. One example is the ``Resources for Enhancing Alzheimer's Caregiver Health'' program, which Kathy mentioned earlier, also known as REACH. Co-funded by NINR and the National Institute on Aging, REACH is a comprehensive, multi- site intervention to assist AD caregivers. This program teaches the caregivers about AD, along with giving strategies to help them manage the troublesome behaviors of the care recipients, something that Senator Kohl referred to earlier. It also emphasizes ways for caregivers to manage stress, maintain their social support groups, and enhance their own health with self- care activities. In a recent study involving AD caregivers from diverse racial and ethnic groups, those who received the REACH intervention reported better physical, emotional, and overall health compared to those who received the usual care packet of basic AD educational information and two brief check-in telephone calls. In addition, the REACH caregivers had lower scores for depression, which contributed to reducing their sense of caregiving burden. These findings indicate that the REACH program, by providing information about both AD and self-care, helped AD caregivers from diverse racial and ethnic groups maintain their own physical, emotional, and mental well-being. Multiple efforts across the Federal Government are currently underway to implement REACH in the community. So with regard to teaching the next generation of scientists and caregivers, to ensure continued advancement in improving care for AD and other dementias, it is essential that we train the next generation of innovative, interdisciplinary scientists and clinicians with expertise in chronic illness and symptom management and with the knowledge necessary to translate successful research to clinical practice. To this end, NINR supports extensive training activities across all of the areas of our scientific portfolios. Current efforts include training future nurse scientists and clinicians to conduct research on transitional and personalized care for chronically ill older adults, biobehavioral pain research, genetics, and basic neuroscience, all of which are relevant to the care of those with AD and other dementias. In conclusion, I would like again to thank the committee for offering me the opportunity to present an overview of the research and training activities at the National Institute of Nursing Research at NIH, those activities to improve the lives of older adults with AD and their caregivers. As we await the day when Alzheimer's disease can be prevented and successfully treated, we must never lose sight of the needs of the individuals suffering from these and other dementias and the people who care for them. Given this, the National Institute of Nursing Research and the NIH will continue our comprehensive efforts to provide the evidence base for providing and improving the quality of care and quality of life for individuals affected by these illnesses. We will also train the next cohort of researchers and clinicians to generate new discoveries and provide better care, and to translate this into everyday practice. Thank you all very much. [The prepared statement of Dr. Grady follows:] [GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] Ms. Montgomery. Well, thanks to both of you. I am Anne Montgomery. I am a senior policy advisor for the Aging Committee, and it is my pleasure to field a couple of questions for Assistant Secretary Greenlee who will not be able to stay for the second panel, as she has other commitments. We are going to be able to have Dr. Grady stay for the second panel. So I would like to ask a couple of questions that both of you could answer, and since both of you discussed family caregivers quite a bit, I am wondering if you are a family caregiver out there in whatever State you live in, what are some of the very best ways and quickest ways you can access the most comprehensive information on how to support a loved one with dementia who is at home? Is there sort of a single best organized website or source, or is it really best to search widely? Ms. Greenlee. The best resource is the network of aging service providers around the country. They have different names sometimes in different places but a local aging and disability resource center, an area agency on aging; of course, if the caregiver is caring for someone with Alzheimer's or related dementia, the Alzheimer's Association locally. If someone looks at their local community and cannot figure out where to call, there are State resources with the State unit on aging and a State Alzheimer's chapter that would be helpful as well. We have information on our website at the Administration on Aging, aoa.gov. We support the National Alzheimer's Hotline where people can call and get information as well. Dr. Grady. Also, if I could add that we would recommend our website. But we do fund at least two web-based resources for education and training of both the caregivers at home and also the variety of health care workers in the care settings from the hospital to the nursing home and extended care. So I think there are a number of these. Also, as Kathy mentioned, the local Alzheimer's foundations and associations are really helpful with hands-on material. Ms. Montgomery. We are delighted to have them on the second panel. Speaking of the second panel, one of our witnesses, Laura Gitlin, will be discussing interventions for family caregivers who support a relative or friend at home, and she includes a quote that I found very striking from the journal ``Alzheimer's & Dementia.'' It says that, ``failure to fund effective caregiver interventions may be fiscally unsound.'' So I am wondering if you agree with that, if you feel similarly, and if so, are there new strategies that we can embrace to make better family caregiver support a reality for more people, or do we need to just expand on what we already have and sort of keep going? Ms. Greenlee. Anne, as I am sure, you know and many people here and those watching now, 80 percent of the long-term care in this country is provided by families and family caregivers. It is a tremendous burden on everyone involved from the family, to the community, and to the individual. I think it is important that we work with local communities and other organizations to keep that care happening. There would be a tremendous loss of support for families if we could not do that. It also is something that if you quantified would be unaffordable for any system and is not what people prefer. So it is a wise investment to help family caregivers because it is what they want, it is what families support, and it is a good investment and worth our time. Dr. Grady. I would echo that as well. In preparing for this forum, I was reviewing the figures of how much our country spends on health care in this particular population, and contrasting that with how much is invested in the front end, it is pretty dramatic. So I think that anything that we can do to help reduce the burden of suffering for this population is important to them as well, but also to our health care system. We co-funded a study with the VA system that looks at what influences the decisions to have to place people in long-term care facilities and nursing homes. The first of these is related to the skills required to provide care at home for people, and that is something that we are trying to do something about and we can do something about much of that to help prepare people. But the second of these, which is close to the third, was something happening with their own physical health, that people really cannot keep up with the demands of caregiving physically themselves. We are talking about typically middle-aged people who often are caring for young children as well as older adults. So again, it underscores the importance of the caregiver piece. Then the third was related to the behaviors that people develop and some of the difficult characteristics of the disorder, and that also is something that we are funding studies to try to make a difference in and are showing some success--with engagement studies of patients even in the nursing homes show that there is a decrease in some of this very disruptive behavior if one can engage them. Ms. Montgomery. Finally, many more individuals will be screened in the coming years for detection of cognitive impairment as part of their Medicare wellness exam, and some percentage will, be diagnosed as having Alzheimer's or another type of dementia. For these individuals, there could well be feelings of anxiety or depression. So I am wondering what interventions would you point to that can give individuals who are living with Alzheimer's hope that they can maintain a high quality of life for as long as possible? Dr. Grady. There are a number of studies that are now giving us information to help out with this. Physical activity, and also a number of cognitive and memory system studies or approaches, as well as educational and developmental approaches, are able to show a decrease in the progression of the illness. Some of these decreases are modest, but they are promising. So I think that people now can look forward to being able to put off some of the progression of illness, not to mention that with each passing day, that there is a great deal of work which promises to be successful with time, and that may allow us to prevent and cure this disorder. For now, we do need to focus on maintaining these attributes. Much of the work that is going on in neuroscience gives us hope because it really points to the enormous plasticity of the brain and the ability to recruit other centers in the brain, other parts of the brain to help out in areas where those neurons and synapses are not working so well such as Alzheimer's. Ms. Greenlee. One of the benefits of preventative screening like we will have available in Medicare at no cost is the ability to detect these diseases early. One of the things that we know in working with our clinical partners is when we can work with someone in a community setting at early diagnosis, that is the best opportunity to do person-centered planning. The early stages of any dementia disease, including Alzheimer's, is when you want to be involved with the person. They do not disappear when they receive this diagnosis. They need to be engaged and planning for their own future. Many of the good practices that we are now supporting in the field around the country is a way to continue to involve the person who has the disease in their planning so that they can be involved in making decisions so that when they are no longer able to be as involved, there is a plan of care that everyone can follow that has the input of the person who has the disease. Dr. Grady. If I could just underscore something that Kathy said, one of the marvelous things about having a forum such as this and having the Alzheimer's Foundation, the Alzheimer's Association, and people like yourselves in the audience is that attention is being brought to this problem. For many years, because Alzheimer's patients could not speak for themselves, they did just literally disappear. As we know, when people disappear and are not face forward in front of audiences, they are often forgotten. So we have lost some early ground, I think, in being able to address this issue. So the fact that all of you are here today and that we are paying attention to this and speaking openly, cannot be underscored in its importance. Ms. Montgomery. Well, thank you very much. Those are excellent presentations and remarks and very inspirational, if I may say so. So now we will say thank you again and have our second panel come up. [Applause.] Ms. Hennie. Hello. My name is Alicia Hennie and I work for Senator Corker's Aging Committee staff. It is my pleasure to call up our next panel and introduce them as they get situated. First, we have Loren Shook. He is Chairman, President, and CEO of Silverado Senior Living, a nationally recognized leader in services to those with Alzheimer's disease and other memory impairing diseases. Silverado currently has 20 assisted living communities throughout California, Utah, Texas, and Arizona with plans for growth. In addition, Silverado has five care management home care offices and eight hospice offices. Mr. Shook has served on various boards, including the Assisted Living Federation of America, the American Senior Housing Association, the National Investment Center, and is past chair and board member of the Alzheimer's Association of Orange County, CA. Before co-founding Silverado Senior Living, Mr. Shook was president of worldwide operations at Community Psychiatric Centers. Next we will then hear from Dr. Laura Gitlin, Director of the Jefferson Center for Applied Research on Aging and Health at Thomas Jefferson University and a professor at the Jefferson School of Health Professions, Department of Occupational Therapy. As of January 15, 2011, she will be Director of a new center on innovation and aging and health at the Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, with joint appointments in the School of Medicine, Departments of Psychiatry, and Behavioral Services and Medicine, and the Division of Geriatrics. Dr. Gitlin's NIH-funded intervention, ``Skills to Care for Families of Individuals with Dementia,'' has won numerous awards, including a SAMHSA service award and the Rosalynn Carter Institute caregiver program merit award. Next is Dr. Christine Kovach, professor at the College of Nursing at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. She researches innovative approaches to dementia care, including pain management in advanced dementia cases. Dr. Kovach opened and conducted research on some of the first hospice households designed to care for people with late-stage dementia. She has also researched the programmatic, environmental, and behavioral aspects of special care units for mid-stage dementia. Dr. Kovach is a fellow of the American Academy of Nursing and the Gerontological Society of America. Our final panelist is Patricia McGinnis, Director of California Advocates for Nursing Home Reform. Ms. McGinnis has written and lectured extensively on elder abuse and long-term care issues, and has served as an adjunct professor in San Francisco State University's Gerontology program. She has received numerous awards for her advocacy on behalf of long- term care consumers in California. For closing remarks and reflections on what we are about to hear from this panel, we are thankful to have the Alzheimer's Association and Alzheimer's Foundation of America to wrap up. Robert Egge, the Alzheimer's Association's Vice President of Public Policy, will start our discussion. Chief among his priorities are increasing Federal support for Alzheimer's research, enhancing Alzheimer's care and support, and improving Alzheimer's planning, coordination, and education by Federal and State agencies. Previously Mr. Egge was executive director of the Alzheimer's Study Group, a blue ribbon task force of national leaders. Mr. Egge worked closely with the co-chairs, former Speaker Newt Gingrich and former Senator Bob Kerrey and other Alzheimer's Study Group members, such as former U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, to shape and develop the group's national assessment strategy and specific policy proposals. Wrapping up will be Eric J. Hall, President and founding CEO of the Alzheimer's Foundation of America. Mr. Hall founded AFA to improve the quality of care for dementia patients and their families by allowing organizations nationwide to advocate for optimal care and enhanced services. AFA now includes approximately 800 member organizations and associate member organizations. As CEO, Mr. Hall started the AFA ``Quilt to Remember,'' National Memory Screening Day, and the Nation's first magazine for dementia caregivers, among other major initiatives. We welcome you all and look forward to an interesting and informative discussion, and with that, I turn it over to Mr. Shook. STATEMENT OF LOREN SHOOK, CHAIRMAN, PRESIDENT, AND CEO, SILVERADO SENIOR LIVING, ON BEHALF OF THE ASSISTED LIVING FEDERATION OF AMERICA, IRVINE, CA Mr. Shook. Thank you, Chairman Kohl and Ranking Member Corker, for having me here today to speak to you. As mentioned, I am Loren Shook, President and CEO of Silverado Senior Living and Vice Chair of Assisted Living Federation of America. ALFA represents the assisted living industry, the owners and operators of assisted living communities, and the frail elderly residents they serve. The assisted living industry is resident-centered care in a community home-based setting. My company, specifically Silverado Senior Living, operates 20 communities in four States entirely dedicated to serving those with memory-impairing diseases such as Alzheimer's disease and other dementias. I will be discussing how my company meets their needs. The Silverado philosophy of care and the company vision is to give life. Our purpose is to give life to the residents we serve, their families, and the associates. We are additionally a purpose-driven company designed to change the way memory care services are provided, and it is in this process that we seek to touch the human spirit in all that we do. Silverado Senior Living cares for people with all types of memory-impairing diseases, including Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, and others. We provide a full continuum of memory impairment care, from the disease's early onset with geriatric care management and home care and residential care services, in addition to hospice care at the end of life. We partner with many universities in the markets we work with, such as the University of Southern California, University of California at Los Angeles, University of California at San Diego, Baylor College of Medicine, Stanford University, and the University of Utah in Salt Lake City. We founded the company in 1996, opening our first assisted living community in June 1997. Silverado now operates 20 memory care communities with 1,578 beds in four States. Silverado has five home care offices and eight hospice care offices. In addition, we offer skilled nursing services for rehabilitation purposes for those who have memory-impairing diseases in Salt Lake City, UT, and Dallas, TX. We serve the population in the setting of their choice, be it at their own home, at residential settings such as Silverado or others, or even in a skilled nursing facility. Providing care for our aging population, especially for those with memory-impairing diseases, is more than just meeting their medical needs. It is about providing for their psychosocial needs as well. It includes providing and supporting a quality of life that brings life-affirming meaning and fulfillment to them daily. In an assisted living setting, enhancing quality of life requires that the following elements be in place in order to create and maintain a supportive and life-enriching environment: a philosophy of care promoting independence, choice, dignity, and daily purpose for each resident; quality and compassionate staff who are trained to meet the unique needs of this population; and a strong supportive company culture which is clear to all staff. A culture where the operating philosophy of love is greater than fear prevails. Our environments provide a social setting which is comfortable, home-like, and attractive. Age-appropriate, engaging activities which promote self-worth, involved, and purpose are offered. Coordination with care practitioners is encouraged and a comprehensive plan designed in conjunction with the primary care team is developed in order to create a holistic approach to meet individual needs. The Silverado model of care is different than most traditional settings in that it focuses on creating an attractive social home-like residential environment in addition to adding a strong clinical support component, including physician medical directors, and licensed nurses 24 hours/7 days a week, and Masters-trained social workers who work with families and residents. In so doing, we meet the comprehensive needs of people from the beginning through the end of their life. Silverado has developed extensive clinical outcome measures that provide the following benefits: documentable evidence- based results showing quality of care and quality of life benefits; provides a management tool to benchmark one Silverado community against another. It also demonstrates savings to payers that are real. At the start of the company in 1997, Silverado collected data on use of psychotropic medications, ambulation, feeding, weight gain/loss, falls, and pressure wounds. In the case of psychotropic medication use, we record each of our 1,250-plus residents' use of medications every month, separating medications by the following categories: anti- anxiety, antipsychotic, sedative hypnotic, and use of antidepressants. Every resident is assessed using the ``Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia,'' or a similar tool. We find that about 60 percent of the residents need treatment for depression. Because of our excellent results in serving the most challenging behavioral cases and our expertise in serving complex diagnoses like frontotemporal dementia, which also is called Picks disease, Lewy-Body dementia, et cetera, we are the No. 1 referral choice for people with challenging behaviors from behavioral health hospitals, assisted livings, and even skilled nursing, as well as cognitive assessment centers. Taking the cases that no one else is willing or able to handle, we have experienced an overall reduction in the use of psychotropic medications in excess of 30 percent company-wide. We have served over 1,458 people who had major behavioral problems in a 3-year period between 2006 and 2009. We did not collect specific data before that. Over the years, our clinical outcome scores were expanded to include the rate of transfers to acute care; the percent of residents on hospice care; and the percent of resident deaths on hospice care; and the number of prescription medications residents take. We have other clinical results that include reducing residents' medications from the 9 to 12 prescription medications they move in with to an average of 5.5 company- wide. This compares to skilled nursing at 12, and traditional assisted living at 7 to 8 medications per resident. While it is estimated that 6 to 8 percent of people with dementia fall and experience fracture each year--including people within settings that restrain them--Silverado has a fall and fracture rate of only one percent without restraining anyone company-wide. Compared to nursing homes where 10 to 20 percent of falls cause serious injury, at Silverado only 4.8 percent of falls cause serious injury. The details of Silverado's award-winning fall prevention program and our award-winning grand rounds behavior intervention conference calls have been shared with the Committee on Aging and others who are interested in a document entitled ``Enhancing the Quality of Life in a Dementia Care Assisted Living Environment.'' These programs are easily replicable by others. Silverado does teachings of these programs at industry conferences and just did a nationwide webinar on the fall prevention program. Let me tell you a true life story that exemplifies how Silverado's vision to give life and the Silverado model of care affects people with all types of memory-impairing diseases. As chronicled in the book ``Alive with Alzheimer's,'' Edith, a memory-impaired woman who was bedbound, unresponsive, terribly feeble, and frankly considered near the end of her life, was brought to the Silverado Senior Living-Escondido community in April 2001. We surrounded her with music and assigned a Silverado cat to Edith since we found she loved cats, spoke to her even though she could not speak to us, reduced the overly large number of medications she was being given in an effort to control her symptoms and behavior, and started the process of getting her out of bed and taking a few steps. Within 4 weeks, Edith regained her ability to walk on her own. The book shows her sitting in the stands of the Del Mar Race Track in southern California, talking with her friends, and enjoying the company of her daughter, and cheering her horse on, we hope, to success. We are proud to say that Edith's story is replicated throughout Silverado 3,600-plus times. Edith has passed away in 2010, 9 years later. We believe that people with Alzheimer's disease and other memory-impairing diseases want to lead purposeful lives. Let me tell you my final story about Walter, a 99-year-old resident at Silverado, and Lisa, the 7-year-old daughter of a staff member who works in the laundry services. This is an adaptation from the book ``Silverado's Story,'' which my partner, Steve Wynn, and I have written. Whether Walter was in Silverado's country kitchen, the garden, his home, or elsewhere in the community, Lisa somehow knew where to find him. When she arrived after school, this was no mean feat, in a building of 38,000 square feet on a 5-acre campus, and Lisa having been blind at birth. But it was a kind of bond they had. Lisa always knew where to find Walter, and he was in places where she would like to be as well. One afternoon, Lisa found Walter sitting in the gazebo. Walter spotted her crossing the lawn and broke into a wide grin. ``Lisa, I am over here,'' he called out. He knew that Lisa's instincts would bring her to him anyway, but there was just too much pleasure in having to say her name. Lisa's face lit up and she hugged him right away. They sat and talked for a bit. Then Walter asked the question that Lisa was expecting, the one she hoped he would ask. ``Lisa, can you count to 200 for me?'' Lisa began counting. Walter leaned a little closer to hear her and listen attentively as she continued. He was committed to improving her math skills. Lisa, excellent in the subject already, in truth needed no additional practice. But every time she reached 200 without an error, Walter would congratulate her and the pride in his voice always made her happy. Later that day, Lisa took Walter's hand and put it on her face. She asked Walter, ``am I beautiful?'' Walter replied, ``you are the most beautiful little girl there ever was. Your hair has a soft sheen that reflects the sun. Your complexion would be the envy of little girls everywhere. Believe me. You are a gift from God.'' Lisa smiled and bowed her head and they both sat quietly for a while. Walter was 99 years old. His advancing memory impairment had reduced the size of his brain by one-third, according to scientists, who say the actions of persons in his condition are not guided by intention or comprehension. But Walter knew exactly what to do for Lisa. Lisa was his purpose. World-class health care is made up of four things: the physical, the science behind it; the psychological; the family; and the spiritual. Throughout Silverado's model of care all four of these essential elements are served resulting in measurable clinical results that are truly remarkable like the story about Walter and Lisa and Edith. It has been an honor to present to you today, Chairman Kohl and Ranking Member Corker and members of the committee. Thank you for your time and attention. [The prepared statement of Mr. Shook follows:] [GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] STATEMENT OF LAURA N. GITLIN, PH.D., DIRECTOR, JEFFERSON CENTER FOR APPLIED RESEARCH ON AGING AND HEALTH, THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY, PHILADELPHIA, PA Dr. Gitlin. Good afternoon. I would like to thank Senators Kohl and Corker and members of the committee for inviting me to present at this very critical and important forum. I would like to start by telling you about Millie. Shortly after her husband passed away, Millie became increasingly forgetful and delusional. With time, however, Millie's condition worsened, and she was finally diagnosed with dementia. Millie moved in with her daughter Diane and her family. Diane had to stop working to care for her mother, and she quickly found that she had to manage many complications of the disease beyond that of memory loss. Millie constantly followed Diane around the house. She repeatedly asked questions such as what day and time it was and where Diane was going. She resisted bathing and appeared fearful of the tub, and she roamed the house in the middle of the night, sometimes trying to leave. Diane thought that her mom also might be in pain due to arthritis, but she could not gauge her pain as Millie had difficulties communicating, a common factor in dementia. Diane felt guilty that she was not doing enough for her mom. She became increasingly distressed due to her lack of sleep and having to juggle the care of her mother with that of her family. Her health in turn began to suffer and she missed her own doctor appointments. Millie's story is not unusual. She is one of the over 5 million people in the United States who suffer from Alzheimer's disease or a related disorder, the majority of whom live at home with a family member or alone in the community. This is also the story of the over 11 million family members who, like Diane, are caring for their family members with dementia. Although each situation is unique, family caregivers share similar challenges and experiences. They are often exhausted, frustrated, saddened, and unsure how to manage functional dependence and troublesome behaviors such as wandering, agitation, or waking up at night such as in the case of Millie, which are common and can occur throughout the disease process. They also must make very difficult decisions with little to no help or formal support. Although we know that a cure for dementia is not in sight now or in the near future, there are treatments available right now that could help Millie and Diane. Most families, however, do not hear about them. These therapies--called non- pharmacologic treatments--do not come in a pill. Instead, they may involve personal counseling, education, hands-on-skills training, home modification, exercise, or simplifying activities. These treatments, as you have heard from the morning panel, are based on over 2 decades of evidence from randomized controlled trials funded by the NIH and the Alzheimer's Association. One example of an effective intervention is Project COPE. This was developed and tested recently by myself and my research team at Thomas Jefferson University. In a randomized trial with 237 families, we recently reported in the ``Journal of the American Medical Association'' that our home-based intervention, provided by occupational therapists and nurses, minimized functional dependence, and minimized behaviors in persons with dementia such as Millie, while enhancing their quality of life. It also reduced caregiver burden and helped caregivers keep their family members at home. We also found an alarming number--close to 40 percent--of people with dementia in the intervention group, who had an undiagnosed but treatable medical condition, such as a urinary tract infection. This finding in particular raises significant concerns about the frequency with which this clinical population should be monitored medically. When Millie became a recipient of Project COPE, an occupational therapist conducted a systematic assessment of her abilities and her deficit areas. She also observed Diane's communication style, and the physical home environment for its safety and the way it supported Millie.The therapist helped Diane understand the disease and what Millie was still capable of doing, not just what she could not do. She introduced practical methods and new skills to help Diane cope, including stress reduction techniques to ease Diane's stress level, assistive devices such as grab bars and tub benches to help Millie bathe safely and without fear, and simple activities to decrease Millie's anxiety. As Millie had been a housewife, teaching Diane how to involve her mom in washing dishes and folding laundry enabled Millie to continue to participate in a meaningful way in the daily life of the family, and to feel an important sense of accomplishment. The occupational therapist also helped to establish a night-time routine for Millie that included eliminating caffeinated drinks and before bedtime taking a bath, playing soothing music, and using a nightlight. The routine prepared her for bed in a relaxed manner and reduced her erratic behavior. This, in turn, benefited Diane, who was able to sleep through the night and have more time for herself during the day. A nurse also helped Diane understand how to detect pain in her mother by paying attention to her facial gestures and physical movements, and also how to monitor her fluid intake and daily elimination patterns. The nurse also took blood and urine samples from Millie and discovered that she indeed had a urinary tract infection and hyperthyroidism--conditions which may have contributed to her agitated and sleepless states. These were subsequently treated by a doctor. In the Philadelphia region, we are now able to offer COPE as an outpatient home care service for people with dementia who have Medicare and qualify for skilled care by an occupational therapist. However, most families do not have access to this and other proven non-pharmacologic dementia care services. A recent study by researchers at Johns Hopkins University of 264 families surveyed at home found that of those individuals with dementia, 90 percent had home safety issues; 64 percent had medical care issues that were untreated; 48 percent had legal concerns; and 37 percent were not engaged in any meaningful activities. With respect to their caregivers, 88 percent needed a referral for a resource, 84 percent needed education about the disease, 45 percent had unaddressed mental health issues, and 24 percent had unmanaged health problems. Yet, our research by me and that of numerous other scientists that Dr. Grady spoke about suggests that non-pharmacologic approaches can address all of these unmet critical needs. As Dr. Covinsky stated in an editorial in the ``Annals of Internal Medicine'' in response to the positive caregiver outcomes of the NIH REACH initiative, if these interventions were drugs, it is hard to believe that they would not be on the fast track to approval. The magnitude of benefit and the quality of evidence supporting these interventions considerably exceed those of currently approved pharmacologic therapies for dementia. There is also an economic argument to be made for better dementia and caregiver supportive programs. As we have heard, in 2009 nearly 11 million unpaid caregivers provided an estimated 12.5 billion hours of care to people with dementia, valued at nearly $144 billion. Our country cannot afford the consequences of family caregivers becoming burnt out or too sick to carry on. Non-pharmacologic therapies may save more than they cost. Peer-reviewed studies have shown, for example, that the ``NYU Caregiver Intervention'' of counseling and ongoing caregiver support delayed nursing home placement by an average of 557 days, as was spoken about in the earlier panel. This could mean a savings of $100,000 per patient. An occupational therapy activity program we developed and tested at Thomas Jefferson University not only radically reduced behavioral disturbances, but it cost an average of $941 per family and was found to be cost effective. It saved caregivers up to 5 hours a day, at a cost of only $2.37 per day. The cost of drug treatment is approximately $5 per day, or $1,825 per year. Despite the promise of non-pharmacologic approaches, there are many challenges. Chiefly, we lack a national strategy for developing a new standard of care for individuals with dementia and their families that includes comprehensive and ongoing supportive, proven non-pharmacologic approaches. A national strategy might include funding large-scale demonstration projects that integrate the most promising non-pharmacologic approaches to date, and widespread training of health and human service professionals in these proven dementia care and caregiver supportive programs. It might include expanding our current reimbursement structures to allow for the provision of existing proven caregiver and dementia care programs at home. It might include expanding funding to support implementation of proven programs into a variety of practice settings, including home care, hospital discharge services, care management services, and rehabilitation services--all places where dementia patients are found. I urge the Committee to move forward with the strategic vision for enabling non-pharmacologic strategies to become part of the standard of care that is available to all individuals with dementia and their family members in order to address one of the most devastating diseases of our time, and which soon will be an epidemic. Thank you. [The prepared statement of Dr. Gitlin follows:] [GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] STATEMENT OF CHRISTINE R. KOVACH, PH.D., R.N., F.A.A.N., PROFESSOR AND METHODS CORE DIRECTOR, COLLEGE OF NURSING AND SELF-MANAGEMENT SCIENCE CENTER, UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN- MILWAUKEE, MILWAUKEE, WI Dr. Kovach. Good afternoon. In my time with you this afternoon, I will be talking about nursing home care, posing a few of the problems and some solutions. Because 50 to 75 percent of nursing home residents have dementia, the topic of nursing home quality of care is particularly relevant for this population. The needs of nursing home residents with dementia are often left unmet because staff do not know how to interpret dementia behaviors, complete a comprehensive assessment, or intervene to meet needs. In a recent 6-month period, the Milwaukee Police Department was called 386 times to nursing homes. Many of these calls were for behavioral issues. Commonly the individual is restrained and handcuffed in order for law enforcement officials to transport him or her. A ``Chapter 51'' petition is initiated so the person can be involuntarily committed to a psychiatric facility. These transfers in and of themselves create trauma for the individual, and can worsen health and behavior. In too many cases, emergency detention is being used as a vehicle to involuntarily medicate people with dementia and to discharge or get them out of the nursing home, despite the fact that the FDA has issued a black box warning against such use. This should not be happening. We can do better. We have tested an assessment and treatment protocol called the ``Serial Trial Intervention'' in two randomized controlled trials funded by NIH, and the intervention was found to be highly effective in decreasing agitated behaviors, discomfort, and comorbid problems. However, widespread diffusion of this intervention into practice, particularly in poor-performing homes, will not be far-reaching without Federal implementation programs. Our research and that of others shows that dementia behaviors often represent a physical or psychosocial unmet need. For example, if a person is being moved into the bathtub and is resistive, that often means that the person is having arthritic pain, and if you time their medications more appropriately, you will prevent this behavior from happening. If the etiology for the behavior is psychosocial, teaching staff to provide better anticipatory care can prevent the problem or at least prevent it from escalating to a crisis point. Our research found that the most important factor in determining the speed with which a change in condition is identified in people with dementia is the quality of the nurse's assessment. I will share one example from our study. A woman with dementia began exhibiting behavior that was deemed to be paranoid and she was medicated with an antipsychotic drug. Anytime any staff member went into her room or approached her, she would go, no, no, oo, oo, and get very anxious. Well, looking back on her chart, I could see that there was something going on with her right hip. Finally, 27 days after this behavior changed, her hip was finally x-rayed and she was found to have a fractured hip. This was this woman's method of communicating that if you move me, I am going to hurt, but yet she was medicated inappropriately. Imagine the month of pain that this woman endured before she was diagnosed with a fractured hip. So in terms of solutions, competence of staff needs to be improved through training, through requiring that more registered nurses provide care in the nursing home, and through the widescale transfer of empirically validated interventions, such as the Serial Trial Intervention, into clinical care in nursing homes. The goal is to reduce out-of-facility placement into general acute or acute psychiatric hospitals, and to keep people comfortable in the nursing home. The Serial Trial Intervention is a clear and straightforward protocol that is initiated when the person has a behavior change and it is unclear what the cause or the problem is. I will share one case. A gentleman was living at home and highly agitated on a daily basis. He was restless and obsessively complaining about burning in his legs and a deep itch. The family could no longer cope with this behavior and he was transferred into the nursing home. He continued to be very restless and agitated. He was entered into our study and he complained about his legs saying, ``I could go down there and pull my skin off.'' Many of you may recognize that this symptom is a pretty typical complaint for people who are having neuropathic pain. However, because he was a person who had dementia, people viewed the behavior as psychiatric in origin, and none of the care providers thought that it might be pain until they got to step 4 of our protocol. The nurse administered a low-dose analgesic, saw a dramatic difference in the resident's responsiveness, called the physician, and he was placed on an appropriate med for neuropathic pain. The staff described his behavior following treatment as a day-and-night difference. He was now 100 percent relaxed. We have to wonder if earlier detection and treatment of his pain could have prevented or delayed his transfer to the nursing home. I want to emphasize that the majority of people we assess and treat with this intervention are treated with non- pharmacological interventions. It is common for us to find that the person has too many environmental stressors, is not receiving enough exercise, is bored, or is not receiving enough meaningful human interaction. These needs are easily met with inexpensive non-pharmacological interventions that have no side effects. My recommendation is that this intervention be used to transform nursing home care across the United States. This intervention is not costly, it's replicable and effective, and has been associated with no serious side effects. Next, I would like to talk a little bit about the fact that nursing homes are where a lot of people die. Twenty-two percent of people in the United States die in nursing homes, and that number would be considerably higher if not for the very common practice of transferring people out of the nursing home into the hospital just prior to death. Nursing home staff should be experts in the palliative model of care, which calls for comfort, for caring for the whole person, and caring for the family. Yet, research consistently shows that nursing home staff are very poor at symptom management and that hospice services are under-utilized. When hospice services are used, nursing home staff then think the responsibility for management of symptoms lies with the hospice staff, so they decrease their engagement. In terms of solutions, the competence of nursing home and hospice staff needs to be improved. Hospice staff, while great at cancer management, often have limited understanding of how to care for people with end-stage dementia at the end of life. Nursing home staff need increased education, and they need to be held more responsible for symptom management and for family counseling. Next, I would like to talk about nursing home culture and environmental design contributing to physical and psycho-social problems. There are many things I could touch on here, but I want to mention that many nursing homes were initially designed based on a medical model for care delivery, with long corridors, institutional scale, and very rigid schedules. This creates a host of problems. For example, bodies are meant to move. When bodies don't move, when their movement is limited, all sorts of problems ensue. People end up in wheelchairs, they end up falling, they end up developing pressure sores and muscles atrophy. In terms of psycho-social problems, a psycho-social problem of becoming institutionalized has been described in multiple reports regarding nursing home care. In this process, people give up having preferences and control over their daily activities. These changes are accompanied by increased depression and anxiety, and decreased perceptions of quality of life. Nursing home staff can provide all of the skilled care needed to residents in environments that are much more home- like in scale, and with schedules that are much less rigid, that allow for residents to retain more control over their daily lives. So in terms of solutions, I think we need to begin the process of expecting that dining rooms in nursing homes will be smaller, and more home-like; for there to be living rooms, and for there to be space and opportunity for participation in quality of life activities, as well as opportunities for maximum mobility in the immediate environment. The preferences of residents, even if provided by family proxy, need to take more precedence. These are things that can be done right now to significantly improve the quality of care and the quality of life for those with dementia in nursing home. Thank you for your attention and your interest in improving the care delivered to people with Alzheimer's disease. [The prepared statement of Dr. Kovach follows:] [GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] STATEMENT OF PATRICIA L. McGINNIS, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, CALIFORNIA ADVOCATES FOR NURSING HOME REFORM, SAN FRANCISCO, CA Ms. McGinnis. Good afternoon. I want to thank the committee and certainly the staff of the Senate Special Committee on Aging for inviting our organization to address this very important forum. Our organization, California Advocates for Nursing Home Reform, is based in San Francisco and it has been active for over 28 years assisting people who need long-term care, and their caregivers and relatives. For more than 28 years, our organization has heard, firsthand, the confusion, distress, and loss that is associated with the misuse of anti-psychotic drugs, and other psychoactive medications, to chemically restrain nursing home residents who have dementia. I want to start by reading a statement about nursing home drugging. ``Excessive use of tranquilizers can quickly reduce an ambulatory patient to a zombie, confining the patient to a chair or bed, causing the patient's muscles to atrophy from inaction and causing general health to deteriorate quickly. It appears many doctors give blanket instructions to nursing home staff for the use of tranquilizer drugs on patients who do not need them.'' This statement sounds as if it was made very recently, but in fact, it was made before Congress in 1970, and it was included in a 1975 report by the Senate Special Committee on Aging titled, ``Drugs in Nursing Homes: Misuse, High Costs, and Kickbacks.'' Everything old is new again. Unbelievably, the problems have worsened considerably in the last 35 years. Today, drugging has reached epidemic levels. Nationally more than 350,000 nursing home residents--one of every four residents--are given anti-psychotic drugs. The vast majority of these residents suffer from dementia, and are receiving drugs off-label, meaning that the drugs are provided to control behavior, and not to treat a diagnosed mental illness. The way anti-psychotic drugs are used in nursing homes is a form of elder abuse--let's not kid ourselves. Instead of providing individualized care, many nursing homes indiscriminately use these drugs to sedate and subdue residents. Anti-psychotic drugs carry black-box warnings indicating that their use nearly doubles a person with dementia's risk of death. But nursing home residents and their representatives are rarely informed about these warnings. Anti-psychotics don't just hasten death, they often turn elders into people their own families don't even recognize by dulling their memories, sapping their personalities and crushing their spirits. I'd like to make it clear for the Committee that, while some psychoactive drugs may have positive benefits for the treatment of depression, anxiety, or even dementias, the drugs we are focusing on today are anti-psychotics, such as Seroquel, Risperdal, Zyprexa, and Haldol, which was the drug of choice in the nineties. These drugs are designed for the treatment of schizophrenia. There are many reasons that anti-psychotic drugs have become the first alternative for intervention in nursing homes, particularly for residents who exhibit agitation or aggression. Drugs are cheaper than staff, at least on a short- term basis, as most of these drugs are paid for by Medicare. I think the last year, it was about $5 billion. Additionally, many doctors who prescribe these drugs and the pharmacists who dispense them for dementia are ignorant of the risks and effects of the drugs prescribed, and in some cases, these doctors and pharmacists are intentionally misled by pharmaceutical companies. Just since 2009, over $4 billion has been paid to the Federal Government by drug manufacturers to settle charges of fraudulent marketing, false claims, and kickback schemes. Finally, reimbursement for alternative therapies-- particularly for therapists, psychologists, and psychiatrists-- are very limited under the Medicare and Medicaid programs. It's a shameful situation, but believe it or not, there are actually some positives in this situation, as well. If the biggest problem with drugging is that it is the first measure in behavioral control for people with dementia it, is also a gateway for the inevitable solution. If we shift this culture and deemphasize drugging, we can dramatically reduce the misuse of anti-psychotic drugs for people with dementia, and most importantly, improve their quality of life. We already know what an effective campaign to shift this culture looks like. Over the last 25 years, there has been a pronounced effort by consumers, advocates, the government, providers, and others to stop the inappropriate use of physical restraints in nursing homes. The result has been startling. Physical restraint use has dropped from more than 25 percent of all residents, to less than 3 percent. The key to this has been concentrated and sustained education, awareness, effort, oversight and enforcement. Our organization, CANHR, has initiated a campaign in California to stop drugging in California, and we are hoping that it will take root--throughout the Nation. Our campaign combines practical advice for residents and their families and caregivers on how to stop the misuse of drugs, along with a broad movement to raise awareness, strengthen laws and enforcement, and target offenders. The Website includes a well-received video series and a free advocacy guide called ``Toxic Medicine,'' that we've distributed to the committee. We've also posted, very significantly for consumers, information on every California nursing home's use of anti- psychotic drugs, to help consumers avoid facilities that are using these drugs indiscriminately. The information shows that a resident's risk of being drugged varies tremendously by nursing home, with some facilities reporting no use of anti- psychotic drugs, while others drug all of their residents, or a majority of their residents. The campaign also has a political component, including a petition to the Governor, and proposed legislation to strengthen informed consent requirements. I cannot emphasize enough the importance of informed consent in resolving this problem. It's not just about informing people about the risks and alternatives to these drugs, it's about treating people who suffer from Alzheimer's and dementia with dignity and respect, by recognizing their right to make decisions about their treatment. A culture of respect for victims of this disease will go a long way in curbing the drugging problem. We also believe our campaign is a good model for a national campaign on this issue, and I urge the committee, and Congress, to hold hearings on the misuse of anti-psychotics and to embrace the recent national recommendations made by the Consumer Voice to stop the chemical restraint of nursing home residents. A couple of the key recommendations are as follows: First, Congress should adopt laws protecting the rights of nursing home residents to give informed consent before they are drugged. Both American common law and various State statutes protect the right of informed consent, but it does not appear in Federal nursing home laws. Codifying informed consent would give national priority to the concept that people with dementia--as any other healthcare recipients--deserve complete information about proposed treatments and have the right to ultimately decide what medications they can and cannot take. Second, we propose an education campaign to elevate the issue of anti-psychotic drugs for people with dementia into the national consciousness. The Campaign for Families and Advocates for People with Dementia would offer information about anti- psychotic drugs, from the types of medications that are most often abused, to the side effects and black-box warnings, to the supremacy of alternative approaches, many of which we have heard about today. As part of this education campaign, CMS should post each nursing home's drugging rate on its ``Nursing Home Compare'' Website, so that consumers can locate nursing homes that don't use anti-psychotic drugs as a substitute for basic dementia care. For healthcare providers, the education campaign would offer best practices for doctors, pharmacists, and facilities, stressing that if anti-psychotic drugs are to be used at all, they should be used only as a last resort after all non- pharmacologic interventions have been attempted and failed. The essence of these practices should be the promotion of individualized care. Individualized care--as we all know, and we've known for years--fosters non-pharmacologic interventions by placing a premium on relationships with people who have dementia, and dignified care approaches, such as increased exercise, formal activities and pain management. A recent study showed Vermont was able to dramatically reduce the use of anti-psychotics in nursing homes by focusing on relatively simple alternatives. One alternative was learning about a resident's past, so as to better understand the resident's needs and personality; understanding who the resident is. Another alternative is providing consistent care in nursing homes, i.e., consistent schedules for nursing home staff so that they work with the same resident, and then they can understand the resident's personality and they can pick up on the early signs of any disturbances, or signs of personality changes. What is especially helpful about these non-pharmacologic interventions is that they are less costly than drugging. Aside from the obvious high cost of the drugs themselves is the very expensive health care outcomes that they often precipitate-- things like falls, infections, strokes, and hospitalizations that are often covered under the Medicare program, and which add to the escalating costs of Medicare and Medicaid. Using pills to substitute for one-on-one care, or for adequate staffing, turns out to be not only bad medicine, but also a poor use of our resources. Reimbursement for alternative, non-pharmacologic interventions--particularly psychotherapy services and many of the interventions and model projects we've heard about today--should definitely be expanded. Congress should investigate, and the U.S. Government should continue to aggressively pursue, drug companies' marketing of off-label uses of anti-psychotics for nursing home residents. I want to make a final conclusion. Twenty-five years ago the Senate Special Committee on Aging urged a coordinated attack on the dangerous drug misuse in nursing homes led by Federal and State officials. With your help, we can begin that attack again, and maybe this time actually be successful. We call upon our national leaders to not only join a campaign to end over drugging in nursing homes, but to lead this campaign. Thank you. [The prepared statement of Ms. McGinnis follows:] [GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] STATEMENT OF ROBERT EGGE, VICE PRESIDENT, PUBLIC POLICY ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION, WASHINGTON, DC Mr. Egge. I want to thank, first of all, Chairman Kohl and Ranking Member Corker for this forum today. It's an outstanding presentation. I also want to thank the panelists for what I thought were very illuminating discussions with a common theme from a range of approaches--all were very helpful. I have been given the unenviable task--along with Eric--of trying to summarize this in 5 minutes, from my perspective. I want to do so, though, by starting out, even with that time constraint, by acknowledging, the leadership of this committee over recent years on Alzheimer's disease and related dementias. A year ago, in 2009, there was a hearing here where the results of the Alzheimer's Study Group's findings were presented along with key recommendations. One of those recommendations led to the bill that the chairman referenced earlier, the National Alzheimer's Project Act, which is right now poised, we believe, for passage in this Congress in the remaining weeks and signed into law. This legislation is extremely important for reasons that have been alluded to by panelists today. We need a comprehensive strategy for Alzheimer's and related dementias; a strategy that addresses the full range of issues, and it has to be a strategy that not only looks at issues like how do we encourage the dissemination of psychosocial interventions, but also one that approaches these issues with a bias for action. That bias for action, I think if you've listened today you've heard clearly, why we need that action emphasis in what we do. It is certainly true that, as you look at the dimensions of the Alzheimer's crisis and other dementias, you see repeatedly the cause for moving quickly. You've heard today, that already, 5.3 million Americans have Alzheimers and 11 million serve as unpaid caregivers. You also have heard how, with the aging of our population, these numbers are going to increase dramatically to as many as 16 million Americans with Alzheimer's and other dementias. Of course, this means an increase in caregiver demands. At the same time, you've heard reasons why this population is so costly to care for. Research that we have commissioned from Dartmouth University looking at Medicare claims data, has found that Medicare beneficiaries with Alzheimer's and other dementias, cost three times more than comparable beneficiaries without cognitive impairment. In the case of Medicaid, the ratio is nine times more. Again, you've heard reasons why this is true. But also we've heard today that there is cause for hope that better care could lead to better outcomes. The other side of what we face today is the nature of this disease; it has to be said for the record what a cruel disease this is. It is a terminal disease, it is a progressive disease. We have no cure for this disease, we have no prevention strategy to stop its onset or even a way to slow the underlying progression of the disease. It's the sixth leading cause of death today, and of the leading causes of death, it's the only one for which we can cite those facts. So again, we need to act, and we need to act urgently. In terms of what ought to be done, there's three major points I want to emphasize, here. The first I've already referenced, which is a comprehensive strategy to approach this--to address things like psychosocial interventions that we've heard about today. The second is in the area of research. I just want to make two quick points about that. The first is, often with research we think about what we ought to think about, which is biomedical research. We've also heard today from panelists about the important research that's funded through the NIH and other agencies that deals in other ways--non-pharmacologic-- with this, that are leading to outstanding results, and that too is an important cause for research investment. Also, as we look at this from a systems perspective, we realize that the importance of having effective interventions is what makes, in part, more effective care possible. Some of you may have heard Dr. Zerhouni, former Director of the NIH, talk about as a physician at John's Hopkins in the eighties, that looking at the HIV/AIDS crisis unfolding then they projected that soon all of their beds, or a large proportion, would be overwhelmed by the needs of caring for this population. Fortunately, as means of prevention were disseminated, and interventions were developed, these changed that picture. That's very much where we are right now from a care perspective as we look at an aging population, especially with Alzheimer's and dementias. That is the course we're on, if we don't develop these kinds of approaches and disseminate them quickly. Finally to go specifically to the thrust of this forum today, we must look at care practices. We've already heard today about what we think is an outstanding development this year in this foundational effort, which is a provision for cognitive impairment detection in the Medicare annual wellness visit. Much of what is discussed today is predicated on identifying these cases early and making sure we do what needs to be done. On that latter point, in this past year, in the Senate and in the House, a bill was introduced called the ``Health Outcomes Planning and Education for Alzheimer's Act.'' What this bill does is that it provides--once there is detection-- for a package of services, notation in the medical record, and care planning. We've heard reasons why this is very important. For instance, the reference earlier to self-reported of pain among those who are cognitively impaired. You need a notation of cognitive impairment to follow that person across different care settings to allow for care interventions to track those kinds of insights. In terms of care planning, we have also heard, amply today, about the many evidence-based programs that can be implemented when there's a mechanism to encourage and provide for that kind of care planning. From the Alzheimer's Association's perspective, we have worked to advance each stage of these processes. First of all, our chapters have often been partners with the national organization and partners with the development of the research evaluation, with the AoA, with the Veteran's Administration, with NIH, and with others to develop this evidence base. As protocols have been verified by evidence to be effective--and we've heard about some of those, again, today, we have worked to disseminate those in a variety of ways. In one set of interventions, we have spoken directly to families; those with the disease and caregivers. We reach them in whatever way is most appropriate, whether it's through our call center, as you've heard about earlier today, that's available every minute of the year. Whether it's online tools or whether it's in-person support--there are support groups and other training opportunities. Also, in terms of the training for professionals who provide care, we provide training, based again on the evidence of which we've heard today, to these care professionals--both in-person training and also online through video-based training and other mechanisms--and try to disseminate these insights as quickly as we can. Also, on that front, we have worked with partners to develop practice recommendations across a variety of care settings so that, again, what we have heard about today and what we have learned is applied widely, and as quickly as possible. Our challenge is--everybody's challenge is, of course, to continue the development we've had along these fronts to understand what ought to be done as quickly as possible, and then to work together to make sure that these insights are applied as quickly and widely as we can. So I thank the committee very much for this conversation today. I thank the panelists, and I look forward to a continued conversation with each of you about how to move forward. Thank you. [The prepared statement of Mr. Egge follows:] [GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] STATEMENT OF ERIC J. HALL, PRESIDENT AND CEO, ALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION OF AMERICA, NEW YORK, NY Mr. Hall. Good afternoon, everyone. To Chairman Kohl, Ranking Member Corker, members of the committee, staff, and all of you, thank you so much for convening, for coming together for this forum, and for asking the Alzheimer's Foundation of America to provide comments. I am Eric J. Hall., I am the AFA's Founding President and Chief Executive Officer, and I am truly honored to be here today representing our membership and families we are caring for across the country. AFA was formed in February 2002, to provide optimal care and services to individuals confronting dementia, and to their caregivers and the families through member organizations dedicated to improving the quality of life. Today, our membership consists of more than 1400 organizations, including grassroots not-for-profit organizations, government agencies, public safety departments and long-term care communities. Our services include a hotline staffed by licensed social workers, educational materials, care advantage--a free, quarterly family caregiver magazine that reaches, right now, about a million readers--professional training programs, AFA Teens, which is an online web support and scholarship program, and National Memory Screening Day. We, as a Foundation, also provide grants to non- profit service organizations, as well as respite grants to families in need. Advocacy is an important part of the AFA mission. AFA was the only national organization to support the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. We have also been active in efforts such as advising on the caregiver initiative for the White House Middle Class Task Force, doubling and making competitive the Federal appropriations available for the Missing Alzheimer's Disease Patient Alert Program. We played a leading role in the effort to include the detection of any cognitive impairment in the new annual Medicare wellness exam. AFA also organized a letter, signed by more than 100 national and local organizations in support of the National Alzheimer's Project Act, and we are anxiously awaiting its final passage. It is a pleasure to hear the important work being done by the Administration on Aging regarding its Alzheimer's disease supportive services program. As Assistant Secretary Greenlee noted, however, Alzheimer's is a long disease, and such programs cannot just be simply a blip on the radar of the screen of care. They must be sustained, and after a continuum of services that families cycle through at each stage of the illness. The committee is uniquely positioned to encourage policymakers to keep the momentum going next year when the Older Americans Act and the Lifespan Respite Care Act are up for reauthorization. It is useful to spread the word about the success of caregiver initiatives, such as REACH, as described by Dr. Grady and Dr. Gitlin. Yet, it must be noted that Federal research funding for the National Institute of Aging, NIA, the lead NIH Institute on Alzheimer's, and co-founder of the REACH Program, is in dire straits. Out of each dollar appropriated to NIH, only 3.6 cents goes toward supporting the work of the NIA. AFA respectfully asks the committee to further explore the Federal investment in aging research, and to support increased resources for the NIA. However, family caregivers do not need to be a part of a big research study to get help right now. AFA has several resources to help family caregivers, including ``Your Time to Care,'' an educational DVD series that addresses specific care issues in the home setting. We would be glad to provide copies of these materials to members of the committee and to any other interested parties. On the topic of community-based models, Mr. Shook's overview of Silverado Senior Living was inspiring. I know through AFA's member organizations, that there are many effective models of care across the country; however, the cost of these types of care are not covered by Medicare, and many families simply cannot afford them. AFA supported The Class Act, which will eventually help relieve some of the burden of long-term care. The Senate also included a ``Sense of the Senate'' on long-term care in its health reform bill that pledged to address long-term care services and provide in a comprehensive way that guarantees elderly and disabled individuals the care they need. We urge the committee to highlight the need for continued resources to address long-term services and support. Dr. Kovach focused on staffing issues and dementia training in the nursing home setting, which AFA believes is particularly important, since CMS estimates that as many as 70 percent of all nursing home residents have some degree of cognitive impairment; nearly half have a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease or other dementia. AFA was proud to work in coalition to support enactment of provisions of the Nursing Home Transparency and Improvement Act as part of health reform. Among its many positive reforms, the bill requires facilities to include dementia management and abuse prevention training as part of its pre-employment training. AFA believes that CMS should require that dementia training be integrated throughout nurse aide training and abuse prevention training. AFA offers two national programs that are specifically designed to raise the bar on dementia care in the United States--Dementia Care Professionals of America, DCPA, and Excellence in Care, EIC. DCPA is a division of AFA that offers practical training to healthcare professionals. Presently, it has trained over 5,000 individuals. EIC partners with care settings in the establishment of a nationwide standard of excellence in care for individuals with Alzheimer's disease or related dementias. The last issue of today's forum addressed the overuse of chemical restraints in nursing home settings. AFA agrees with California Advocates for Nursing Home Reform that there is a lot of work still to be done on staffing levels and education of nursing home professionals. We do want to note that there is an appropriate time and place for anti-psychotics in the nursing home setting, but only under proper training conditions, as well as strict supervision of dosage, monitoring of symptoms, and length of treatment. At the Alzheimer's Foundation of America, our strength over these years and our success has come from our collaboration. AFA looks forward to working with all of you here to address the issues raised in today's forum, and in the long term, to end the devastation caused by Alzheimer's disease. Thank you. [The prepared statement of Mr. Hall follows:] [GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT] Ms. Montgomery. Well, thank you to all of our panelists. You can see that there's a wealth of information and expertise and research and practice here. I'm assuming that there is a wealth of expertise in the audience, as well. So, now is your turn. You have the opportunity to come to the microphone, which is right there in the center aisle and ask some questions. So, if you would like to do so, I encourage you to do that. For those of you who would like to come to the microphone, please state your name and your affiliation, so that we have it for the record. So, who's going to be the first bold person? While you're thinking, I'll start things off by addressing the anti-psychotic use issue. Pat McGinnis mentioned a proposal to include anti-psychotic use rates on ``Nursing Home Compare,'' which is an interesting idea. One potential downside of this is that it could create an incentive to encourage discharging people because of difficult behavior, as Dr. Kovach mentioned. So, I'm wondering how could we create benchmarks that encourage people to improve the standard of care, rather than to pass on the problem? Ms. McGinnis. We already include that information on our Web site in California. That information is already collected by CMS. It's on the Minimum Data Sheet (MDS) data; it is facility self-reported, so we don't even know if that's reliable--but when a facility reports that they've got 80 percent of their residents on psychotropics or anti-psychotics, you tend to believe, if that's what they're reporting. We have all kinds of quality indicators, and we have all kinds of data that is collected by CMS, posted on ``Nursing Home Compare''--it seems like that would be one of them. But are you suggesting that nursing homes may start discharging people? Ms. Montgomery. Yes. That might be a possibility, so if we could create better benchmarks to avoid that problem, that would be worth thinking about. We don't have to do that right here. Ms. McGinnis. Yeah, OK. [Laughter.] Ms. Montgomery. All right. Ms. McGinnis. Yeah. Ms. Montgomery. I'll ask one more question before we turn to the person at the microphone, and that is about the cost- effectiveness of the psychosocial interventions we've been talking about. They seem pretty overwhelmingly cost effective to those of us here today, and so I'm wondering, what ideas do you all have that would help us make the economic argument to those who fund programs, and in the medical community, that these interventions ought to be more widely considered for broad use? Mr. Shook. One of the approaches that should be taken is the reduction and utilization of medical-surgical services, the reduction in trips to emergency rooms. We measured that, and found we have a significant reduction of hospitalization for behavioral health by implementing these different tools--some of which do use psychotropic medications, but as I said, we reduced the use of those by more than 30 percent. But these other measures that have been discussed by the panelists here are very effective in reducing people's behaviors, keeping them out of behavioral health. But, you know, there are also tools that are available to keep people out of ERs. If an assisted living doesn't have a nurse available, having one on call or working with a hospice can help--71 percent of the people at Silverado, to 89 percent--depending on the year you want to evaluate, die on hospice care. In nursing homes, it's about 3 percent. In assisted living generally, it is nowhere near enough. If you've got somebody with COPD and, late at night--any time of the day--you don't have medical support to assess that person, and they have a hard time breathing, what are you going to do as the operator? You're going to call 911 and send them to the ER. But they don't need to be there, they just need to have a cooperative arrangement with a good hospice company-- even if they don't have their own--that gets a nurse out there and addresses that problem with the physicians. It is easily taken care of right on the site, and you don't have the pain and suffering and inconvenience of the resident going to the nursing home. ERs do not want to see them, I guarantee you. The hospital, however, has to admit them to protect themselves from a tort point of view. So there are many different tools to reduce costs. We reduced the use of prescription medications from 10 to 12 per resident to five and a half. That's a cost savings right there. Medicare is usually picking up that cost. There are many others, I'll let others speak. Dr. Grady. We funded a series of clinical trials, working with the elderly--in particular with chronic heart failure, congestive heart failure. That is one of the most treatment- resistant groups that we have in our society, and it's also very common among the elderly--one of the most common disorders. That series of studies has a cost-effectiveness piece built into it, so that we can actually document how much money is saved. The components of that have been built into the health care reform bill, so there will be reimbursement for that by CMS all goes forward. This investigator is taking this into the community of Alzheimer's patients so that we will be able to show, for this group, how much the increase in quality of care is, as we've shown in this other group. So, hopefully that increase in quality of care will show in patients and also the cost effectiveness. Dr. Gitlin. With regard to the psychosocial, non- pharmacologic approaches for people with dementia and family caregivers in the home, cost effectiveness measures have not traditionally been part of the randomized trial methodology and it's really rather recent that this has been understood as something that's very, very important. I think that what will be important, moving forward, is that there is funding at the NIH for these kinds of methodologies to be either supplemental to the randomized control trial, or that they be integrated within a randomized control trial. But, really, the history has been that we have, you know, two decades of caregiver support programs, and only very few have been evaluated from a cost perspective. Mr. Egge. I'd just like to underscore how important that is from a policy perspective, as you know full well, in driving that question, I'm sure, to do just what you've described, and Director Grady, what you've described. To build in these cost- effective measures is, in the current context, one of the most effective tools we can have, then, to encourage the policy adoption that we need legislatively and by other means. Ms. Montgomery. All right, we'll go the microphone. Ms. Horton. I'm Kelly Horton, I'm a Health and Aging Policy Fellow working with Congresswoman Louise Slaughter. A speaker talked about training that then leads to reduced need for restricting the patient. It's of course very important to train people who work in nursing homes, and that has helped to reduce the need to physically restrict patients with Alzheimer's, but I'm also wondering was there a correlation, are they overmedicating them? Ms. McGinnis. I think I was talking about the restraint-- physical restraint reduction movement which, in fact, ended up reducing the use of physical restraints from 25 percent to less than 3 percent, and sometimes less than .1 percent in some of the States. Clearly there's been a substitute; we used to have a very low use of anti-psychotic drugs, and then it went up. With the Nursing Home Reform Act the use went down, and then it started rising again. So, yes, you probably can find a real, direct correlation, the reduction in physical restraints, with the increase in the use of anti-psychotics. I don't think that there's any question about that. Certainly in California, and from what I've seen, in the rest of the country as well. I see some other advocates shaking their heads yes, too. Anti-psychotics have become a substitute for adequate staffing in some instances. Anti-psychotics have also become a substitute for alternate interventions, as we've discussed today, no question about it. Ms. Montgomery. OK, next question? Dr. Dong. Thank you very much, my name is Xinqi Dong, I'm a Health and Aging Policy Fellow, and also a geriatrician. I particularly appreciate the comments made by Ms. McGinnis linking Alzheimer's disease and elder abuse an area that I'm very passionate about. My question is more toward the issue of culture in dealing with the Alzheimer's disease population. Amongst different cultures--and take Chinese culture, for example, the word dementia literally translates into the words ``catatonic,'' and ``crazy.'' There's a lot of cultural misbeliefs regarding what is Alzheimer's disease, what is dementia, and it's many believe it's really a mark of shame on the ancestry of the family when doctors review these types of conditions. So with screening, as a geriatrician, as someone working in the community, we face a lot of those barriers. So, I hope to seek your guidance as far as, where do you see this issue in the field dealing specifically with culture, linguistic barriers--not only the Asian population, but across other racial and ethnic populations as well? Ms. Montgomery. Anybody like to comment? Mr. Egge. I'll comment from one perspective, at least, which is that at the Alzheimer's Association, we've found it necessary to invest considerably in order to pursue our mission in translation services--to the linguistic point specifically-- but also broadly in cultural terms. So, you can see in our most recent edition of ``Facts and Figures: A Special Report,'' the differential impact that they have by different groups. So that has been a major emphasis of ours. There are also some other encouraging things: for instance, a recent Nobel Prize winner, from China, has been very open about talking about Alzheimer's disease, which is partly, I suspect, we need not only due to the outreach that we do proactively, but also due to those individuals courageous steps by individuals in terms of talking about this and making sure that others feel that it is a safe conversation to have and to really deal with the stigma. Of course, stigma is still an issue overall for our culture far too much with these conditions. I think you're right, that we have to work on that. It's very important. Mr. Hall. The Alzheimer's Foundation of America this year just put out and did National Memory Screening Day in Spanish for Latinos. We actually started by going to the consulates from various countries and asking them to work with us on educating us, and allowing our materials to be succinct and culturally sensitive, but also by asking their communities to come together. So, I think there are opportunities. There's no doubt that there is a lift required--but it is quite necessary. Your translation into ``crazy'' is something that applies also to the Latino population, as well. So coupled with immigration issues there this population specifically has enormous difficulties, and so that is not something that one organization is going to be able to do; it's probably something that we're all going to have to stand shoulder-to-shoulder to accomplish. Dr. Gitlin. Yes, I would like to say that your comment is very critical to ``REACH.'' The NIH-supported REACH initiative involved over 600 people with dementia who were white, African- American, and Latino. We have a lot more work to do in terms of a showing the effectiveness of REACH, as well as other non- pharmacologic approaches, in different groups, and I think that's very important as part of what we might call the translational effort. If we have a randomized trial with a more homogeneous group of individuals, what does that mean for a much more diverse population? Ms. Montgomery. Please? Ms. Comer. I'm Meryl Comer, I'm President of the Geoffrey Beene Foundation Alzheimer's Initiative, and I'm a member of Us Against Alzheimer's, I'm also on the Alzheimer's Association Board, but my comments to you are as a caregiver of 17 years, for both my husband and my mother. I want to thank you for your efforts on our behalf. But I want to pose a question to all of you. We've had this conversation for 25 years, with no action, with the same issues. I would like you to fast-forward and create a sense of urgency in how we manage a pending epidemic, with a baby boom generation beginning to turn 65 January 1 of next year. Now, apply the issues that you have just discussed--with great empathy and concern--and tell us how you would manage if it all overwhelmed you at the same time. Dr. Kovach. I think that on a national level, this is a call to action. It calls for a very bold move. It calls for us saying, ``There are problems, here, and we can do better.'' We have interventions that have been tested, and how are we going to get these implemented, how are we going to be monitoring more carefully and raise our expectations. Some of these are real caregiver issues and they come down to reimbursement and how much money is being put into the system right now to care for this population. We have a substantial amount of data that shows that if you increase the competence of the registered nurses who are in a nursing home, quality of care improves dramatically. It takes a national call to arms and an organized initiative. Ms. McGinnis. I would like to speak to that, too. My mother went into the hospital 4 weeks ago--my mother is blind, she's 89 years old, and she could probably beat anybody here in ``Jeopardy'' any day. [Laughter.] Even though she doesn't care for Alex too much. However, my mother went in for a broken hip. It's not real serious, but serious enough that she's going to be in rehab for awhile. Immediately, after she went into the hospital, they had given her Respardol, which is an anti-psychotic. My mother did not need that, they never asked my sisters--I have 5 sisters and a brother--never asked any one of us, and of course, within 2 days we got her off of that. But what it shows is, it's just as a matter of course and that we need to take this seriously. It's baby boomers in California who are rising up, too. Baby boomers in California who are saying, ``You know, we're tired of this, we're not going to take it anymore. I want to know, I want nursing homes to be accountable. If they're using a lot of anti-psychotic drugs, I want to know why. If pharmacies and pharmaceutical companies are out there, using and issuing drugs and recommending their use--even though there are black-box warnings--they should be penalized, they should be sued. Those are some of the things--we have to look at all aspects. We have to look at advocacy, educating consumers, educating family members, we have to get our legislators to take this stuff seriously and say, ``You know, 35 years, this is enough. Let's start doing something about it.'' You're absolutely correct--I think baby boomers are going to be the ones that start questioning and saying, ``Nah, we're not going to do this. We're not going to take this.'' I don't think that we're adequately prepared, by any stretch of the imagination, but I'm saying, we are at least able to just say no, as Nancy Reagan used to say. [Laughter.] Ms. Comer. I will just validate that. I've been a caregiver for 17 years, because I knew that my husband would be overmedicated and restrained in a nursing home facility in 1990, based on the current conditions. Having slept on the floor of one facility that would take us, I knew there was no care. So I applaud your efforts, Mr. Shook, around the quality of care, but you are dealing with the consequences--not the cause, often. It's often a fact, that the staffing ratios of caregivers to patients has a great deal to do with quality care, and training. But again, unless we marry the issue of research with care, and had the call for more basic research around the cause and finding some disease-modifying drug, we are in serious trouble. It is a national strategy that's needed. Thank you. Mr. Shook. I would like to comment on that, and I want to agree with you that we've got a tremendous crisis coming that we're not prepared to handle. One of the things that hasn't been discussed is we need to open up our thinking and change the financing mechanism of how we pay for care. Right now, if a family is able to supplement a Medicaid-- or, in California, Medi-Cal--service delivery, it's against the law. That's ridiculous. People should be able to provide additional funding if their loved one qualifies for Medicaid or Medi-Cal, and the family members have additional money, enabling them to move up from a nursing home that receives Medicaid or Medi-Cal rates which are commonly not providing as much staffing as is found in Silverado. We have one full-time equivalent per resident care ratio. Medicare, Medi-Cal, in any State, will not pay for that. If a family comes in with an additional $10, $20, $30 a day--which families can do--then that would give choice to consumers to be able to elevate their care to the private sector which, you know, we would get our care from, if we had a choice, that would put competition into long-term care that does not exist today. That would drive a lot more resources. Now, that doesn't take away the importance of education about the non-medication approaches to treatment, which are a huge opportunity. The book ``Silverado Story,'' is about teaching families and explaining to families, ``Don't let your loved ones sit in a wheelchair. Have them engaged, and don't accept what is commonly thought throughout the United States today as acceptable care for Alzheimer's.'' People don't know what they don't know. What we've heard about on this panel is news to much of the United States. When we went into Houston and took over four problem long-term care communities, I first did a satisfaction survey of the families. I thought they would say the care was terrible, and then after we took over, I thought they would say the care was great. From a business point of view, this is not a bad idea. So I went in and I surveyed, and they said the care was great. It was terrible. But they didn't know, because there it wasn't anything to compare it to. This shows that the message of education is huge; it's so important. You had the knowledge to know that your loved one might be overmedicated in that setting, and kept them out. Most of the United States does not know that, and it's our job to get that word out. That's one of the reasons I'm here, and I suspect the reason these people at the forum are not only here, but in the profession they're in. Ms. Love. My name is Karen Love and I'm the President for the Center for Excellence in Assisted Living. I am somebody who provided 20 years of care to people who have dementia. My dad had dementia and died of dementia, so it's near and dear to my heart. But my question to the panel is, if we keep doing the same old, same old, isn't that what we're going to get? I hear inspiration from you, but specifically there are a lot of things that are out there that aren't getting tied together. For example, there is community-based participatory research, which is a type of research that integrates policy, practice, and the research field. The invested stakeholders are all participating in the project from all of the stages. I think something like that would be a phenomenal project. You could get providers, such as Silverado, that are renowned for their dementia care, some of the researchers on the panel with their body of evidence and research, and policymakers. It's a type of research where we translate it into practice. Because that's the problem. We work a lot, for example, with the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. They have a wide and long history in demendtia care research--yet it never gets translated into the field. There is this enormous disconnect--a disconnect between having information inform policy. How do we pull all of these things together in a more effective role, so that we have better outcomes? Mr. Shook. Excellent point. I want to add that the Assisted Living Federation of America, the National Investor Conference, and the American Senior Housing Association are now open to communicating with universities and doing research with them within the settings where people are actually being served. Silverado started doing that research in conjunction with those settings, and that has been expanded to many other companies-- Brookdale's one of them, Emeritus--there's a variety of companies, and I know the CEOs are very active and interested in partnering with the universities to do research. That is how you get it in the field. Dr. Gitlin. I would just like to add that I think our biggest challenge is taking the evidence that we do have--we certainly have to create more evidence--but taking the evidence that we do have and translating it. Some of the work that we have had funded from the Administration on Aging, as you heard from Assistant Secretary Greenlee, has been to translate some of the evidence-based programs funded by NIA, for example, and NINR, into the community. The lesson learned from that is that that you need money to translate, because the team is very different, just as you're suggesting. If you have evidence from the randomized trial and then you want to implant it in a treatment and a practice setting, the team is very, very different, and it takes time and effort and funding to support that, and you learn new lessons. But it's something that we have to do. I also want to say that most other developed countries have made dementia a No. 1 health priority. That has meant that they have identified funding sources to support the widespread training of health and human service professionals, and have also supported translation of evidence-based programs developed all around the world, and have also supported an increase in funding for not only a cure, but also for more enhanced psychosocial and environmental interventions. So we could take the lead from our partners, because they have made dementia a priority, and they're making some progress with regard to some of the points that you raise. Ms. Love. Well, in CBPR, it's not a separate step to translate the research, it's accommodated in that. Dr. Grady. Yes. We are actually funding a fair amount of CBPR, now. We're finding problems that are identified by the community and which are brought to us, and then we have vested partners in the community to implement it. But it does take a partnership, as Dr. Gitlin said, and I think that part of the answer to your question is that's why we're here today, because we really do need more exposure about this, to get the word out, and it does need a national presence. It is starting to happen, basically we're facing a train wreck. We're facing the increasing age of the population--not all of whom have dementia, but a lot of whom do--and the problems that we're facing in this population are mirrored elsewhere. We have a new law out, and more people will be covered, and yet there are many people who do not receive care. We have a growing diversity in our populations; minority populations are quickly becoming majority populations, and we don't have a lot of research to address those needs. We're working on it, but we're not there yet. All of these factors are converging in a way that demand attention. So, I really think the good news is that we have a lot of information that we could be implementing, but the urgency, and the tempo is really increasing. Those of us in this field have this sense of heading in a very fast train toward the end of a cliff and so I think that we are, by circumstances, forced to coordinate our efforts and so this is a very national approach. Ms. Montgomery. I think we have time for two more quick questions and then we'll wrap it up and thank you all. Dr. Levy-Storms. Hello, my name is Lene Levy-Storms and I'm a professor, and a Health and Aging Policy Fellow from UCLA. My question is directed particularly at Mr. Eric Hall and Mr. Loren Shook. It seems like today we've spoken about caregivers of persons with dementia in the community. We haven't really mentioned or spoken about family members for persons with dementia who are institutionalized. Mr. Hall, could you address any programs that your organization supports for those family caregivers? Also, Mr. Shook, could you address your knowledge of what issues family caregivers face once they do institutionalize their loved one? Mr. Hall. There's no doubt that support is necessary even after institutionalization. The emotional burden to a family is still very real. I wanted to say something along these lines, as well. We're sitting here and we're talking about all of the things that need to get done--and there is no doubt that they do. I have had the honor of traveling most of the country and seeing organizations all over who are providing incredible care and support right now. There's an enormous footprint already present in our country. There are dedicated professionals, all over, who are giving their life's blood for this cause. So, I simply just want to make sure that we posit that a lot more is needed. What we have right now is not enough, there's no doubt. But I wouldn't want anyone listening to us here thinking that we're not aware of all of the organizations all over the country who are providing care, and who are doing incredible jobs, and are seeing an increase in people coming to their door and less financial resources. They need a lot more support. As far as support groups for these individuals, the family members, or sensitivity on behalf of nursing homes and assisted livings, across the country, I have found organizations who are stepping in and who are helping in those regards. Another thing about the Alzheimer's Foundation of America, when we fund programs and services and we go through a very rigid review of grants, and then when we fund, we ask for a response of what the money has funded, and then the program that was funded, if successful, is made available so that other organizations can share. I have to tell you, the network that we have, of the 1400 organizations people don't care if you're a county away, or if you're the country away, on the East Coast. If an organization has a program that's really very effective, they're willing to share that with others. I think it's one of the things that we have found, is that a lot of it's about the research, but it's also about--this is how you do it. This is exactly how you fulfill this, this is exactly how you follow through, this is how you make this happen. I know that, organizations are hungry to provide those type of necessary services to their families. Mr. Shook. As with all of the questions, this is an excellent question, and I'll be as brief as I can. But, what we do at Silverado, is first of all, we relieve the burden from the family. We take the husband, the wife, the sister, the daughter, the son, and we take the burden of care giving away from them and let them return to be the loving wife, the loving daughter. We relieve them of their stress in terms of being able to count on us to do the right thing in caring for their loved one, so that they can return to more normalcy in their own life. We realize that the guilt is intense when we move people in. So, we will take pictures of their loved one the next day, when they're in an activity, seeing them smiling and engaged in an activity and email it to them, much as you might have experienced if you have children, what happens at kindergarten, when you know, they send you back a message that your child that you've given up to the school is, indeed, in good hands. Because sometimes family members-- residents have a hard time transitioning when the family member is there, it's like, ``Take me home, take me home,'' and then when they go away, they're laughing and having a great time. So, when you have that kind of scenario, you try to give the family other proof that they're having a good time. But the transition happens fairly quickly. We also put the family in touch with other families so they can have socially supportive time together with other people who have the same trouble in an enjoyable setting. We take them out for a lunch or dinner or something like that. We provide them with a constant education about what's going on. We talk to them in the beginning about end-of-life concerns, and how do you want to handle end-of-life? This is a difficult problem that frequently is not covered in our culture, and end-of-life comes and people don't know what to do about it, and then they go off treating people who don't need treatment. We get the DNR do not resucitate order you know, put together, so you're not sending someone off for resuscitation and incurring all of that trauma. Children are also invited to come--the family's children. My father had dementia in the eighties, and the only thing I could find was a nursing home. My mother had Parkinson's, which I subsequently cared for at home--it was Silverado's Home Care, and she was the first patient, in fact. But the nursing home did not want to see my children, that was really crystal clear. My dad loved them, and yet they did not want to see them in there. So, at Silverado we create an environment where children are welcome. We have playgrounds, we have pets, we have several hundreds pets, actually. We have things that engage children. The families eat for free. We want to re-engage families in a disease that disengages families, oftentimes, and that's one of our core values, so I don't want to charge you five bucks or eight bucks or whatever it is for dinner, and chase around a charge slip, and have my staff do all of that nonsense. Please come and eat for free and bring all of your family's members with you. Thanksgiving can get pretty large at Silverado--four and five hundred people is not uncommon. We have private dining rooms--you want to have a party, let's do it. We connect families. There was an article written in the paper about Valentine's where a lady whose husband is 57 and had early stage Lewy body dementia, wound up in our community and, you know, she describes it as the best Valentine's Day they ever had, because the staff took into consideration that it was also a birthday, and got the husband set up with the birthday gift, and a party. The dinner in our private dining room was as though he presented it himself. I need that kind of help in my own home, by the way. [Laughter.] But those are just some of the things we do. We have many parties, and families are always invited. A lot of our communities are considered rocking places--they are just happening. Nothing dull, nothing boring. That's part of what you need to get rid of in your minds about what's OK nationally, it is not ``over-stimulating'' for people with dementia to have a good time. Ms. McGinnis. I just remind folks, too, that family councils in nursing homes are some of the most important groups that you can possibly have for family members to get the kind of support and validation, and all of that that they need. You can go on our Web site and get a free, ``How to Organize a Family Council,'' and also, of course, from ``Consumer Voice,'' right here in Washington. Every nursing home should have an independent family council. Ms. Montgomery. OK. Final question. Dr. Mudannayake. Good afternoon. My name is Dr. Louis Mudannayake, I'm a geriatrician, internist, and hospice and palliative care specialist. I work out of Brooklyn in New York, and in the health care system that I work out of, which are nursing homes, we've reduced anti-psychotics by over 300 percent and gone down from average amount of drugs consumed per resident from 9 down to about 4. The question I have was first raised by Lucette Lagnado on the front page of the ``Wall Street Journal,'' in 2007, how can we change the culture when the Federal Government reimburses more readily for pills than people? It's a very difficult question, and I know Patricia McGinnis answered it in one respect by having consent forms, say, for the prescription of anti-psychotics, but that brings along its own set of problems--tort reform, and something I've been campaigning against, and certainly taught, one of the things that drives healthcare costs up. So, is there any other way we could convince people that we really need, you know, to pay people more, rather than depend on medications that often just don't work and can do harm? Ms. McGinnis. Yes, I absolutely agree. I'm not a doctor but as a non-professional health professional, I would say, if you demonstrate the high cost of poor care, we used to be able to do that, you know, before we had Medicare Part D, we could actually get the amount of money that the State of California spent on anti-psychotic and psychotropic and all of those kinds of drugs--if you show the high cost of poor care--there are more falls, more problems, more pneumonia, there are is more admissions to acute care hospitals because of the use of anti- psychotic drugs; if you could track that, and show that it's going to cost more to drug people up than to provide them with decent care, then I think that we're going to get the Federal Government to follow. At least that's my opinion. Dr. Kovach. This issue is an example of how much cultural attitudes have consequences. We live in a society that fears death, does all sorts of things to avoid death, and we think there's a magic bullet that's going to cure everything and stave off death. Then when we have a family member that has the natural and the inevitable--a chronic illness that is going to eventually lead to their death, and we act in all sorts of ways that are inappropriate. We want care that is futile, we want you to do something. Prescribers just feel like, ``I have to do something for you that's going to make you happy.'' Because we have been trained through television commercials, and other messages, that, ``If you take this pill, you're going to get better.'' Physicians have a lot of pressure to write those prescriptions and do something. In this country we need to get more comfortable with the notion of end-of-life and illness. I`m really happy when I see Michael J. Fox showing his tremors. When Christopher Reeve would get out there and show himself. You'll go to a restaurant and see somebody who has a disability and people are offended by that witnessing the symptoms while dining. We have to show that this is a normal part of life. That becoming ill and dying is a normal part, of the life cycle, so it's a major issue of education, cultural values. Mr. Shook. We need to shift the focus from paying for treatment, and paying instead for results. Right now our whole system is set up for the number of incidents that we pay for that have been done to you. It doesn't mean that it's going to make you any better. At the end of life, there's nothing you're going to be able to do to prevent the end of life, and yet our culture is so blind to dealing with this. If there's one thing we know for sure, it's that we're all going to die, but we don't want to talk about it. All of these interventions that are taken at the end of life, we avoid at Silverado by having those conversations, and 71 to 87 percent of the people pass away on hospice care. If every long-term care community had a standard of just doing something like that, there would be a tremendous reduction in cost. This is much bigger than the use of psychotropic medications. But this is where the big money's at--are people going into surgery to fix that mitral valve? --My mother had a mitral valve failure at the end of her life. She also had Parkinson's, was blind in one eye, taking care of my dad and experiencing great stress there, another lesion. Did we go in and fix it? No, we had a conversation. I sat with her surgeon and said, ``What--what does this really mean? We can fix that, but then what's the risk of significant dementia just from the anesthesia? Where's your life going? At Silverado, we believe in a good death, and a good death brings the family together. It's a magical moment, it's a way to change people's lives, and I can give you story after story after story of how it changes people's lives who remain. It's a growth in life for the person passing away and preparing to move on to the next stage for them. We, as a culture, have got to embrace that and understand that, and it's not a bad thing. Dr. Mudannayake. Thank you. Dr. Grady. I would be remiss if I didn't mention that we are the lead at NIH for end-of-life issues. One of the major things that we deal with is, what do we call it? The resistance is such that we can't use that term, and if we use ``palliative care,'' people are sensitive to that as well. So, we are now addressing it as with issues related to life-limiting and life- threatening illnesses. But it is--but the biggest piece of that is about communication and changing the focus from focus on cure to focus on care. Thank you. Ms. Montgomery. I think that's a great way to end this forum; I think it's been extraordinary. I want to thank everyone here today, the panelists, everyone in the audience, and especially my colleague Neil Thacker without whom this forum would never have been possible. So, thank you again. [Whereupon, at 3:22 p.m., the hearing was adjourned.] A P P E N D I X ---------- [GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]