[Federal Register Volume 64, Number 250 (Thursday, December 30, 1999)]
[Notices]
[Pages 73594-73595]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 99-33968]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket 72-1014]
Holtec International Issuance of Environmental Assessment and
Finding of No Significant Impact Regarding the Request for Exemption
From Requirements of 10 CFR Part 72
By letter dated October 4, 1999, Holtec International (Holtec or
applicant) requested an exemption, pursuant to 10 CFR 72.7, from the
requirements of 10 CFR 72.234(c). Holtec, located in Marlton, New
Jersey, is seeking Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the
Commission) approval to procure materials for, and fabricate, three
MPC-68 multi-purpose canisters, three HI-STORM 100 overpacks, and one
HI-TRAC-125 transfer cask prior to receipt of the Certificate of
Compliance (CoC) for the HI-STORM 100 cask system. The MPC-68 multi-
purpose canister, the HI-STORM 100 overpack, and the HI-TRAC-125
transfer cask are basic components of the HI-STORM 100 system, a cask
system designed for the dry storage and transportation of spent nuclear
fuel. The HI-STORM 100 cask system is intended for use under the
general license provisions of Subpart K of 10 CFR Part 72 by New York
Power Authority (NYPA) at the James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant
(JAF) located in Oswego, New York.
Environmental Assessment (EA)
Identification of Proposed Action: By letter dated October 26,
1995, as supplemented, and pursuant to 10 CFR Part 72, Holtec submitted
an application to the NRC for a CoC for the HI-STORM 100 cask system.
This application is currently under consideration by the NRC staff. The
applicant is seeking Commission approval to procure materials for, and
fabricate, three MPC-68 multi-purpose canisters, three HI-STORM 100
overpacks, and one HI-TRAC-125 transfer cask prior to the Commission's
issuance of a CoC for the HI-STORM 100 cask system. The HI-STORM 100
system is intended for use under the general license provisions of
Subpart K of 10 CFR Part 72 by NYPA at JAF in Oswego, New York. The
applicant requests an exemption from the requirements of 10 CFR
72.234(c), which state that ``Fabrication of casks under the
Certificate of Compliance must not start prior to receipt of the
Certificate of Compliance for the cask model.'' The proposed action
before the Commission is whether to approve fabrication, including
material procurement, and whether to grant this exemption pursuant to
10 CFR 72.7.
Need for the Proposed Action: Holtec requested the exemption to 10
CFR 72. 234(c) to ensure the availability of storage casks so that NYPA
can maintain full core off-load capability at JAF. JAF will lose full
core off-load capability in the fall of 2002. JAF has proposed an
initial cask loading in the summer of 2001. To support training and dry
runs prior to the initial loading, NYPA requests the delivery of the
first cask by the spring of 2001. Holtec states that to meet this
schedule, fabrication, including material procurement, must begin in
January 2000.
The HI-STORM 100 cask system application, dated October 26, 1995,
is under consideration by the Commission. It is anticipated that, if
approved, the HI-STORM-100 cask system CoC may be issued by July 2000.
The proposed procurement and the fabrication exemption will not
authorize use of any Holtec cask to store spent fuel. That will occur
only when, and if, a CoC is issued. An NRC approval of the procurement
and grant of the fabrication exemption request should not be construed
as an NRC commitment to favorably consider any Holtec application for a
CoC. Holtec will bear the risk of all activities conducted under the
exemption, including the risk that the three MPC-68 multi-purpose
canisters, three HI-STORM 100 overpacks, and one HI-TRAC-125 transfer
cask that Holtec plans to construct may not be usable because they may
not meet specifications or conditions placed in a CoC that the NRC may
ultimately approve.
Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action: Regarding the
procurement approval and fabrication exemption, the Environmental
Assessment for the final rule, ``Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel in NRC-
Approved Storage Casks at Nuclear Power Reactor Sites'' (55 FR 29181
(1990)), considered the potential environmental impacts of casks which
are used to store spent nuclear fuel under a CoC and concluded that
there would be no significant environmental impacts. The proposed
action now under consideration would not permit use of the casks, but
would only permit procurement and fabrication. There are no
radiological environmental impacts from procurement or fabrication
since cask material procurement and cask fabrication do not involve
radioactive materials. The major non-radiological environmental impacts
involve use of natural resources due to cask fabrication. Each MPC-68
multi-purpose canister weighs approximately
[[Page 73595]]
44 tons and is made of steel. Each HI-STORM 100 overpack weighs
approximately 100 tons and is constructed of metal and concrete. The
HI-TRAC-125 transfer cask weighs approximately 125 tons and is made of
structural steel and lead. The amount of materials required to
fabricate these components is expected to have very little impact on
the associated industry. Fabrication of the metal components would be
at a metal fabrication facility, while fabrication of the concrete
overpacks would be partially fabricated at the same metal fabrication
facility, with only the concrete pours being done at JAF. The metal and
concrete used in the fabrication of these components is insignificant
compared to the amount of metal and concrete fabrication performed
annually in the United States. If the components are not usable, the
components could be disposed of or recycled. The amount of metal and
concrete disposed of is insignificant compared to the amount of metal
and concrete that is disposed of annually in the United States. Based
upon this information, the fabrication of these components will have no
significant impact on the environment since no radioactive materials
are involved, and the amount of natural resources used is minimal.
Alternative to the Proposed Action: Since there is no significant
environmental impact associated with the proposed actions, any
alternatives with equal or greater environmental impact are not
evaluated. The alternative to the proposed actions would be to deny
approval of the exemption and, therefore, not allow fabrication until a
CoC is issued. This alternative would have the same environmental
impact.
Given that there are no significant differences in environmental
impact between the proposed action and the alternative considered and
that the applicant has a legitimate need to procure materials and
fabricate the components prior to certification and is willing to
assume the risk that any fabricated components may not be approved or
may require modification, the Commission concludes that the preferred
alternative is to approve the procurement request and grant the
exemption from the prohibition on fabrication prior to receipt of a
CoC.
Agencies and Persons Consulted: Mr. J. Spath, Director, Radioactive
Waste Policy and Nuclear Coordination, New York Energy Research and
Development Authority, was contacted about the Environmental Assessment
for the proposed action and had no comments.
Finding of No Significant Impact
The environmental impacts of the proposed action have been reviewed
in accordance with the requirements set forth in 10 CFR Part 51. Based
upon the foregoing Environmental Assessment, the Commission finds that
the proposed action of approving procurement of materials for three
MPC-68 multi-purpose canisters, three HI-STORM 100 overpacks, and one
HI-TRAC-125 transfer cask, and granting an exemption from 10 CFR
72.234(c) so that Holtec may fabricate these components prior to
issuance of a CoC will not significantly impact the quality of the
human environment. Accordingly, the Commission has determined not to
prepare an environmental impact statement for the proposed exemption.
The request for the exemption from 10 CFR 72.234(c) was filed on
October 4, 1999. For further details with respect to this action, see
the application for CoC for the HI-STORM 100 cask system, dated October
26, 1995. On July 30, 1999, a preliminary Safety Evaluation Report and
a proposed CoC for the HI-STORM 100 cask system were issued by the NRC
staff to initiate the rulemaking process. The exemption request and CoC
application are docketed under 10 CFR Part 72, Docket 72-1014. These
documents are available for public inspection at the Commission's
Public Document Room, 2120 L Street, NW, Washington, DC 20555.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 21st day of December 1999.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
E. William Brach,
Director, Spent Fuel Project Office, Office of Nuclear Material Safety
and Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 99-33968 Filed 12-29-99; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P