[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 70 (Tuesday, April 11, 2000)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 19606-19614]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-8890]
[[Page 19605]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Part VI
Department of Education
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
34 CFR Parts 75 and 611
Teacher Quality Enhancement Grants Program; Final Rule and Notice
Federal Register / Vol. 65, No. 70 / Tuesday, April 11, 2000 / Rules
and Regulations
[[Page 19606]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
34 CFR Parts 75 and 611
Teacher Quality Enhancement Grants Program
AGENCY: Office of Postsecondary Education, Department of Education
ACTION: Final regulations.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary Education issues
regulations for the three grant programs included in the Teacher
Quality Enhancement Grants Program, sections 202-204 of the Higher
Education Act of 1965, as amended (HEA). These regulations contain
selection criteria that will be used to select applicants for awards
under the State Program, Partnership Program, and Teacher Recruitment
Program. These regulations also contain certain other requirements that
would apply to the programs.
DATES: These regulations are effective May 11, 2000.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy Price, Higher Education
Programs, Office of Postsecondary Education, Office of Policy,
Planning, and Innovation, 1990 K Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20006-
8525: Telephone: (202) 502-7775. Inquiries also may be sent by e-mail
to: [email protected] or by FAX to: (202) 502-7775. If you use a
telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD), you may call the Federal
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339.
Individuals with disabilities may obtain this document in an
alternate format (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, or computer
diskette) on request to the contact person listed in the preceding
paragraph.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On October 8, 1998, the President signed into law the Higher
Education Amendments of 1998 (Pub. L. 105-244). This law addresses the
Nation's need to ensure that new teachers enter the classroom prepared
to teach all students to high standards by authorizing, as Title II of
the Higher Education Act (HEA), the Teacher Quality Enhancement Grants
for States and Partnerships (Teacher Quality Programs). The new Teacher
Quality Enhancement Grants Program provides an historic opportunity to
effect positive change in the recruitment, preparation, licensing, and
on-going support of teachers in America.
The new Teacher Quality Enhancement Grants Program consists of
three different competitive grant programs: (1) The State Grants
Program, which is designed to help States promote a broad array of
improvements in teacher licensure, certification, preparation, and
recruitment; (2) the Partnership Grants for Improving Teacher
Preparation Program, which is designed to have schools of education,
schools of arts and sciences, high-need local educational agencies
(LEAs), and others work together to ensure that new teachers have the
content knowledge and skills their students need of them when they
enter the classroom; and (3) the Teacher Recruitment Grants Program,
which is designed to help schools and school districts with severe
teacher shortages to secure the high-quality teachers that they need.
Together, these programs are designed to increase student achievement
by supporting comprehensive approaches to improving teacher quality.
State Grants Program (State Program)
The State Grants Program offers a unique opportunity to support
far-reaching efforts to redesign teacher education. Through the policy
leadership of Governors, State legislatures, and other important
partners, the program can assure the statewide support so essential to
bringing about the important policy changes needed in teacher
recruitment, preparation, licensing and certification, and retention.
States are in the position to increase the expectations for newly
state-certified and licensed teachers as well as test for and reward
high-quality teaching.
Under the program, each State may develop a program application
that focuses on activities it chooses to conduct in one or more areas
that are key to improving the quality of new teachers. In this regard,
areas in which a State may propose to focus include:
Teacher licensure, certification, and preparation policies and
practices, including rigorous alternative routes to certification;
Reforms that hold institutions of higher education (IHE)
with teacher preparation programs accountable for preparing teachers
who are highly competent in academic content areas and possess strong
teaching skills;
Wholesale redesign of teacher preparation programs, in
collaboration with the schools of arts and sciences, in ways that
promote stronger academic content and subject-matter knowledge of
students in those programs;
Improved linkages between IHEs and K-12 schools, with more
time spent by college faculty and teacher education students in K-12
classrooms, and greater use of technology in the teacher education
programs;
Use of new strategies to attract, prepare, support, and
retain highly competent teachers in high-poverty urban and rural areas;
Redesign and improvement of existing teacher professional
development programs to improve the content knowledge, technology
skills, and teaching skills of practicing teachers;
Improved accountability for high-quality teaching through
performance-based compensation and the expeditious removal of
incompetent or unqualified teachers while ensuring due process; and
Efforts to address the problem of social promotion and to
prepare teachers to deal with the issues raised by ending social
promotion.
Partnership Grants for Improving Teacher Education (Partnership
Program)
The purpose of the Partnership Program is to improve student
learning by bringing about fundamental change and improvement in
traditional teacher education programs. Through multi-year awards to a
limited number of highly-committed partnerships, the Partnership
Program is intended to ensure that new teachers have the content
knowledge and teaching skills they need when they enter the classroom.
Section 203(a) and (b) of the HEA provides that partnerships eligible
for awards must comprise, at a minimum, a partnership institution, a
school of arts and science, and a high-need LEA as the law defines
these terms. Partnerships also may include other entities that can
contribute expertise, resources or both to the teacher preparation
project. A key aspect of the program is the active participation of all
members of the partnership in the design and implementation of project
activities.
By law, successful applicants must propose to implement certain
activities:
The reform of teacher preparation programs so that these
programs become accountable for producing teachers who are highly
competent in the academic content areas in which they plan to teach;
The provision of high quality and sustained pre-service
clinical experiences and mentoring for new teachers, together with a
substantial increase in the interaction between teachers, principals,
and higher education faculty; and
The creation of opportunities for enhanced and ongoing
professional development that improves the academic content knowledge
of teachers
[[Page 19607]]
in fields in which they are or will be certified to teach.
Beyond these minimum requirements, the Partnership Program supports
activities that propose to educate teachers in ways that reflect up-to-
date knowledge from research and effective practice, and embody high
teaching standards. These activities include the preparation of
teachers to work with diverse student populations so that all students
they will teach can achieve to high State and local content and
performance standards, and implementation of instructional programs
whose effectiveness has been demonstrated through research.
The Partnership Program also seeks to--
Offer alternative routes into teaching to individuals who
may have had careers in other professions, in the military or in other
fields, and to educational paraprofessionals;
Prepare teachers to successfully integrate technology into
teaching and learning;
Require prospective teachers to participate in intensive,
structured, and clinically-based experiences with master teachers;
Offer continuous assistance to graduates during their
initial years in the classroom; and
Prepare school principals, superintendents, and other
school administrators to employ strong management and leadership skills
that can help increase student achievement.
Teacher Recruitment Grants Program (Teacher Recruitment Program)
The Teacher Recruitment Program is designed to address the
challenge of America's teacher shortage by making significant and
lasting systemic changes to the ways that teachers are recruited,
prepared, and supported as new teachers in high-need schools. The
Teacher Recruitment Program supports projects that use funds to--
Award scholarships to help students pay the costs of
tuition, room, board, and other expenses of completing a teacher
training program;
Provide support services, if needed, to enable scholarship
recipients to complete postsecondary education programs; and
Provide for follow-up services to former scholarship
recipients during their first three years of teaching.
Alternatively, funds may be used to develop and implement effective
mechanisms to ensure that high-need LEAs and schools are able to
effectively recruit highly qualified teachers.
Both States and eligible partnerships may receive awards under the
Teacher Recruitment Program. For both States and partnerships,
effective relationships and partnerships among all those who will
implement project activities are keys to effective Teacher Recruitment
Program activities. In particular, out of these partnerships and
relationships will come (1) the recruitment strategies that are so
vital to meeting the severe teaching needs of the high-need LEAs, (2)
the kind of teacher preparation programs, which are built around
effective support from both schools of education and schools of arts
and science and other areas of the IHE, that recruited individuals will
need in order to be effective teachers to the diverse student
populations in those LEAs, and (3) the support services these
individuals will need once they begin to teach.
The Teacher Recruitment Program also anticipates that projects will
provide prospective teachers with high-quality teacher preparation and
induction programs that--
Set high standards for teaching;
Reflect the best research and practice known across the
country; and
Prepare teachers to use technology in their classrooms.
Finally, all three of the Teacher Quality Enhancement Grant
Programs anticipate that when program funding ceases, the work that
States and partnerships have begun will be sustained. Therefore, the
ability and willingness of grantees to sustain activities after the end
of the project are key determinants of success. Section 205(a)(2) of
Title II permits an eligible state or eligible partnership to receive
only one grant award under each of the State, Partnership, and Teacher
Recruitment Programs.
On February 11, 2000, the Secretary published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) for this part in the Federal Register (65 FR 6936-
6946). In the preamble to the NPRM, the Secretary discussed on pages
6938 through 6940 the content of proposed regulations for these
programs. The major issues addressed by the NPRM included--
The content of selection criteria for grant competitions
conducted under the three Teacher Quality Programs;
The use of a pre-application process to determine which
applicants should be invited to submit full applications under the
Partnership Program and Teacher Recruitment Program;
The elements of a workplan that all applicants for any of
the three Teacher Quality Programs would be required to submit with
their full applications;
The applicability of a maximum eight-percent indirect cost
rate for all IHE and nonprofit organizations in their use of Teacher
Quality Program funds.
The requirement that recipients of State Program grants
provide for each year of their grant, from non-federal sources, an
amount equal to 50 percent of the State Program grant award to carry
out the activities supported by the grant.
As noted in the section of this preamble entitled ``Analysis of
Comments and Changes,'' these final regulations correct a few errors
contained in the NPRM, such as the proposed requirement that applicants
for Partnership or Teacher Recruitment Program grant awards submit a
detailed workplan with their pre-applications rather than, as intended,
with their full program applications. Otherwise, while these
regulations in a few places clarify language that had been proposed,
there are no differences between the final regulations and those
proposed in the February 11, 2000 NPRM.
In addition, these regulations include two technical changes for
which public comment is not necessary. First, these regulations correct
an error made in the final regulations governing scholarships provided
with Teacher Quality Program funds, which were published in the Federal
Register on January 12, 2000 (65 FR 1780-1787). As published,
Sec. 611.43(d) requires grantees offering a scholarship to ensure that
the scholarship agreement the recipient executes includes the current
rate of interest, as provided by the Department. This provision was not
included in the proposed regulations to govern the scholarships
published on November 5, 1999 at 64 FR 60632-60646, but was added to
the final regulations to clarify the grantees' responsibility to add
the applicable interest rate annually to the approved scholarship
agreements. We added this provision to establish the interest rate that
would apply to any scholarship funds received under that agreement in
the event the scholarship recipient failed to meet the service
obligation and instead had to repay the scholarship.
However, the terms of the scholarship agreement provide that the
recipient is not liable for repayment of the scholarship until the
Department first has determined that he or she has not fulfilled the
service obligation. Therefore, in accordance with 31 U.S.C. 3717, the
rate of interest that should apply to the amount of scholarship that a
recipient must repay for failure to meet the service obligation is the
rate in effect when the indebtedness is established, not the rate in
effect when the recipient received the scholarship. Section 611.43(d)
has been amended to
[[Page 19608]]
reflect this change by deleting the additional provision added to the
final regulations. Scholarship recipients who have executed scholarship
agreements with a stated rate of interest prior to the effective date
of these regulations will be given a choice of--
Retaining this rate of interest for the portion of their
scholarship they have received prior to the effective date of these
regulations; or
Having the interest rate in effect if and when the
recipient fails to meet the service obligation apply to both this
portion of the scholarship and to scholarship amount received after the
regulations' effective date.
In addition, these regulations amend Sec. 75.60(b) of the Education
Department General Administrative Regulations (EDGAR). Section 75.60(b)
contains a list of Departmental scholarship, fellowship, discretionary
grant, and loan programs for which an individual who has received
financial assistance must be current in any payments that are due as a
condition of eligibility for financial assistance under this or other
Department programs. When Sec. 75.60 was proposed on August 18, 1992
(53 FR 31580), the Department announced its intent to apply this rule
generally to all Department scholarship or fellowship programs to which
part 75 applies. Since part 75 applies to the Teacher Quality Programs
and to all other Department discretionary grant programs, we now are
adding the Teacher Quality Programs to the list of programs in
Sec. 75.60 that are covered by this rule.
Analysis of Comments and Changes
In response to the Assistant Secretary's invitation in the NPRM, we
received two comments. An analysis of the comments follows. Generally,
we do not address technical and other minor changes--and suggested
changes the law does not authorize the Secretary to make.
Comment: The commenters questioned several aspects of the proposed
regulations, and asked us to clarify the language of a number of
provisions. For example, they objected to language in proposed
Sec. 611.2 that would have all those who wish to receive grant awards
under the Partnership or Teacher Recruitment Programs submit detailed
workplans as part of those pre-applications. One commenter requested
that we revisit page limitations of pre-applications in view of the
changes in criteria from those used last year under the Partnership
program for FY 1999 grants. The commenter asked that we clarify how the
Department would implement the tie-breaking measure for applications
with the most impact on the nation's Empowerment Zones and Enterprise
Communities Sec. 611.2), specifically whether we would use factors such
as the number of affected Empowerment Zones and Enterprise Communities,
or the number of teachers whom a proposed project would recruit to
teach in their schools. The commenter also asked that we clarify how
the competitive preference for the State Grants Program (Sec. 611.13)
would work, and how the preference differs from more general State
Program activities that the statute authorizes. Finally, the commenter
recommended that we clarify aspects of the pre-application and general
application selection criteria for the Partnership Program, and general
selection criteria for the State Program, to clarify these criteria and
the points to be awarded under them.
Discussion: In view of the comment, we have modified the proposed
regulations in a number of ways. Sections 611.2 and 611.3 now clarify
that only applicants submitting a full application for a Teacher
Quality Program grant must submit a detailed workplan. Those submitting
pre-applications under the Partnership or Teacher Recruitment Programs
will not need to submit workplans with their pre-applications. The
final regulations also correct several technical errors that the
commenter identified in the proposed regulations. The program
application packages, and not these regulations, identify the maximum
number of points that reviewers will award applications under the
elements of each criterion.
We continue to believe that the proposed language in Sec. 611.2,
which would resolve any ties in scoring applications on the basis of a
project's relative impact on the nation's Empowerment Zones and
Enterprise Communities, is adequate. It provides the Department the
latitude to resolve ties on a case-by-case basis in ways that permit us
comprehensively to examine the likely impact of a project on the
nation's Empowerment Zones and Enterprise Communities. With regard to
the proposed competitive preference in Sec. 611.13, we agree with the
commenter that each of the three activities entitling an applicant to a
preference mirrors activities that section 202 of Title II authorizes.
However, the competitive preference in Sec. 611.13 reflects statutory
requirements of section 205(b)(2) of the HEA, in which Congress
identified certain allowable State Program activities as deserving of
this preference.
Changes: The final regulations for this part have been revised
accordingly.
Goals 2000: Educate America Act
The Goals 2000: Educate America Act (Goals 2000) focuses the
Nation's education reform efforts on the eight National Education Goals
and provides a framework for meeting them. Goals 2000 promotes new
partnerships to strengthen schools and expands the Department's
capacities for helping communities to exchange ideas and obtain
information needed to achieve the goals.
These regulations address the National Education Goal that the
Nation's teaching force will have the content knowledge and teaching
skills needed to instruct all American students for the next century.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 does not require you to respond
to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control
number. We display the valid OMB control numbers assigned to the
collections of information in these final regulations at the end of the
affected sections of the regulations.
Waiver of Proposed Rulemaking
Under the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 553) the
Department generally offers interested parties the opportunity to
comment on proposed regulations. However, two regulations announced
included in these final regulations are being issued without public
comment. The correction of Sec. 611.43(d) reflects a legal requirement
governing when a Teacher Quality program scholarship recipient incurs
liability for failure to meet the service obligation, and hence no
public comment is needed. The amendment to Sec. 75.60(b) of EDGAR,
which includes the Teacher Quality Enhancement Grants Program in the
list of Department programs for which individuals must be current in
their payments or be ineligible for further financial assistance
provided by Department programs is a technical amendment. The
Department already took public comment on the content of Sec. 75.60(b)
before the regulation was published as a final regulation on August 18,
1992 (53 FR 31580). Therefore, under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Secretary
has determined that proposed regulations are unnecessary and contrary
to the public interest.
Intergovernmental Review
This program is subject to the requirements of Executive Order
12372
[[Page 19609]]
and the regulations in 34 CFR Part 79. The objective of the Executive
order is to foster an intergovernmental partnership and a strengthened
federalism by relying on processes developed by State and local
governments for coordination and review of proposed Federal financial
assistance.
In accordance with the order, we intend this document to provide
early notification of specific plans and actions for this program.
Assessment of Educational Impact
In the NPRM we requested comments on whether the proposed
regulations would require transmission of information that any other
agency or authority of the United States gathers or makes available.
Based on the response to the NPRM and on our review, we have
determined that these final regulations do not require transmission of
information that any other agency or authority of the United States
gathers or makes available.
Electronic Access to This Document
You may review this document, as well as all other Department of
Education documents published in the Federal Register, in text or Adobe
Portable Document Format (PDF) on the Internet at either of the
following sites:
http://ocfo.ed.gov/fedreg.htm
http://www.ed.gov/news.html
To use the PDF you must have the Adobe Acrobat Reader Program with
Search, which is available free at either of these sites. If you have
questions about using the PDF, call the U.S. Government Printing Office
(GPO) toll free, at 1-888-293-6498; or in the Washington, DC area at
(202) 512-1530.
Note: The official version of the document is the document
published in the Federal Register. Free Internet access to the
official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of Federal
Regulations is available on GPO Access at: http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/index.html
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 84.336: Teacher
Quality Enhancement Grants Program)
List of Subjects
34 CFR part 75
Administrative practice and procedure, Education Department, Grant
programs--education, Grant administration, Incorporation by reference,
Performance reports, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements,
Unobligated funds.
34 CFR part 611
Colleges and universities, Elementary and secondary education,
Grant programs--education.
Dated: April 5, 2000.
Claudio R. Prieto,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary Education.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Secretary amends parts
75 and 611 of title 34 of the Code of Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 75--DIRECT GRANT PROGRAMS
1. The authority citation for part 75 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1221e-3 and 3474
2. Section 75.60 is amended by adding a new paragraph (b) (7) to
read as follows:
Sec. 75.60 Individuals ineligible to receive assistance.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(7) A scholarship awarded under the Teacher Quality Enhancement
Grants Program (20 U.S.C. 1021 et seq.).
PART 611--TEACHER QUALITY ENHANCEMENT GRANTS PROGRAM
1. The authority citation for part 611 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1021 et seq., unless otherwise noted.
2-3. Sections 611.2 and 611.3 are added to Subpart A of part 611 to
read as follows:
Sec. 611.2 What management plan must be included in a Teacher Quality
Enhancement Grants Program application?
(a) In addition to a description of the proposed multiyear project,
timeline, and budget information required by 34 CFR 75.112 and 75.117
and other applicable law, an applicant for a grant under this part must
submit with its application under paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(2)(iii), or
(a)(3)(iii) of Sec. 611.3, as appropriate, a management plan that
includes a proposed multiyear workplan.
(b) At a minimum, this workplan must identify, for each year of the
project--
(1) The project's overall objectives;
(2) Activities that the applicant proposes to implement to promote
each project objective;
(3) Benchmarks and timelines for conducting project activities and
achieving the project's objectives;
(4) The individual who will conduct and coordinate these
activities;
(5) Measurable outcomes that are tied to each project objective,
and the evidence by which success in achieving these objectives will be
measured; and
(6) Any other information that the Secretary may require.
(c)(1) In any application for a grant that is submitted on behalf
of a partnership, the workplan also must identify which partner will be
responsible for which activities.
(2) In any application for a grant that is submitted on behalf of a
State, the workplan must identify which entities in the State will be
responsible for which activities.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control
number 1840-0007.)
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1021 et seq.)
Sec. 611.3 What procedures does the Secretary use to award a grant?
The Secretary uses the selection procedures in 34 CFR 75.200
through 75.222 except that--
(a) Application procedures for each program. (1) For the State
Grants Program, the Secretary evaluates applications for new grants on
the basis of the selection criteria and competitive preference
contained in Secs. 611.11 through 611.13.
(2) For the Partnership Grants Program, the Secretary--
(i) Uses a two-stage application process to determine which
applications to fund;
(ii) Uses the selection criteria in Secs. 611.21 through 611.22 to
evaluate pre-applications submitted for new grants, and to determine
those applicants to invite to submit full program applications; and
(iii) For those applicants invited to submit full applications,
uses the selection criteria and competitive preference in Secs. 611.23-
611.25 to evaluate the full program applications.
(3) For the Teacher Recruitment Grants Program, the Secretary--
(i) Uses a two-stage application process to determine which
applications to fund;
(ii) Uses the selection criteria in Sec. 611.31 to evaluate pre-
applications submitted for new grants, and to determine those
applicants to invite to submit full program applications; and
(iii) For those applicants invited to submit full applications,
uses the selection criteria in Sec. 611.32 to evaluate the full program
applications.
(b) Required budgets in pre-applications. An applicant that submits
a pre-application for a Partnership Program or Teacher Recruitment
Program grant under paragraphs (b)(2)(ii) and (b)(3)(ii) must also
submit any budgetary information that the
[[Page 19610]]
Secretary may require in the program application package.
(c) Tie-breaking procedures. In the event that two or more
applicants are ranked equally for the last available award under any
program, the Secretary selects the applicant whose activities will
focus (or have most impact) on LEAs and schools located in one (or
more) of the Nation's Empowerment Zones and Enterprise Communities.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control
number 1840-0007.)
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1021 et seq.)
4. Subpart B, consisting of Secs. 611.11 through 611.13, is added
to part 611, to read as follows:
Subpart B--State Grants Program
611.11 What are the program's general selection criteria?
611.12 What additional selection criteria are used for an
application proposing teacher recruitment activities?
611.13 What competitive preference doe the Secretary provide?
Sec. 611.11 What are the program's general selection criteria?
Subpart B--State Grants Program
In evaluating the quality of applications, the Secretary uses the
following selection criteria.
(a) Quality of project design. (1) The Secretary considers the
quality of the project design.
(2) In determining the quality of the project design, the Secretary
considers the extent to which--
(i) The project design will result in systemic change in the way
that all new teachers are prepared, and includes partners from all
levels of the education system;
(ii) The Governor and other relevant executive and legislative
branch officials, the K-16 education system or systems, and the
business community are directly involved in and committed to supporting
the proposed activities;
(iii) Project goals and performance objectives are clear,
measurable outcomes are specified, and a feasible plan is presented for
meeting them;
(iv) The project is likely to initiate or enhance and supplement
systemic State reforms in one or more of the following areas: teacher
recruitment, preparation, licensing, and certification;
(v) The applicant will ensure that a diversity of perspectives is
incorporated into operation of the project, including those of parents,
teachers, employers, academic and professional groups, and other
appropriate entities; and
(vi) The project design is based on up-to-date knowledge from
research and effective practice.
(b) Significance. (1) The Secretary considers the significance of
the project.
(2) In determining the significance of the project, the Secretary
considers the extent to which--
(i) The project involves the development or demonstration of
promising new strategies or exceptional approaches in the way new
teachers are recruited, prepared, certified, and licensed;
(ii) Project outcomes lead directly to improvements in teaching
quality and student achievement as measured against rigorous academic
standards;
(iii) The State is committed to institutionalize the project after
federal funding ends; and
(iv) Project strategies, methods, and accomplishments are
replicable, thereby permitting other States to benefit from them.
(c) Quality of resources. (1) The Secretary considers the quality
of the project's resources.
(2) In determining the quality of the project resources, the
Secretary considers the extent to which--
(i) Support available to the project, including personnel,
equipment, supplies, and other resources, is sufficient to ensure a
successful project;
(ii) Budgeted costs are reasonable and justified in relation to the
design, outcomes, and potential significance of the project; and
(iii) The applicant's matching share of the budgeted costs
demonstrates a significant commitment to successful completion of the
project and to project continuation after federal funding ends.
(d) Quality of management plan. (1) The Secretary considers the
quality of the project's management plan.
(2) In determining the quality of the management plan, the
Secretary considers the following factors:
(i) The extent to which the management plan, including the
workplan, is designed to achieve goals and objectives of the project,
and includes clearly defined activities, responsibilities, timelines,
milestones, and measurable outcomes for accomplishing project tasks.
(ii) The adequacy of procedures to ensure feedback and continuous
improvements in the operation of the project.
(iii) The qualifications, including training and experience, of key
personnel charged with implementing the project successfully.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control
number 1840-0007.)
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1021 et seq.)
Sec. 611.12 What additional selection criteria are used for an
application proposing teacher recruitment activities?
In reviewing applications that propose to undertake teacher
recruitment activities, the Secretary also considers the following
selection criteria:
(a) In addition to the elements contained in Sec. 611.11(a)
(Quality of project design), the Secretary considers the extent to
which the project addresses--
(1) Systemic changes in the ways that new teachers are to be
recruited, supported and prepared; and
(2) Systemic efforts to recruit, support, and prepare prospective
teachers from disadvantaged and other underrepresented backgrounds.
(b) In addition to the elements contained in Sec. 611.11(b)
(Significance), the Secretary considers the applicant's commitment to
continue recruitment activities, scholarship assistance, and
preparation and support of additional cohorts of new teachers after
funding under this part ends.
(c) In addition to the elements contained in Sec. 611.11(c)
(Quality of resources), the Secretary considers the impact of the
project on high-need LEAs and high-need schools based upon--
(1) The amount of scholarship assistance the project will provide
students from federal and non-federal funds;
(2) The number of students who will receive scholarships; and
(3) How those students receiving scholarships will benefit from
high-quality teacher preparation and an effective support system during
their first three years of teaching.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control
number 1840-0007.)
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1021 et seq.)
Sec. 611.13 What competitive preference does the Secretary provide?
The Secretary provides a competitive preference on the basis of how
well the State's proposed activities in any one or more of the
following statutory priorities are likely to yield successful and
sustained results:
(a) Initiatives to reform State teacher licensure and certification
requirements so that current and future teachers possess strong
teaching skills and academic content knowledge in the subject areas in
which they will be certified or licensed to teach.
(b) Innovative reforms to hold higher education institutions with
teacher preparation programs accountable for preparing teachers who are
highly competent in the academic content areas and have strong teaching
skills.
[[Page 19611]]
(c) Innovative efforts to reduce the shortage (including the high
turnover) of highly competent teachers in high-poverty urban and rural
areas.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control
number 1840-0007.)
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1021 et seq.)
5. Subpart C, consisting of Secs. 611.21 through 611.25, is added
to part 611, to read as follows:
Subpart C--Partnership Grants Program
611.21 What are the program's selection criteria for pre-
applications?
611.22 What additional selection criteria are used for pre-
application that proposes teacher recruitment activities?
611.23 What are the program's general selection criteria for full
applications?
611.24 What additional selection criteria are used for a full
application that proposes teacher recruitment activities?
611.25 What competitive preference does the Secretary provide?
Subpart C--Partnership Grants Program
Sec. 611.21 What are the program's selection criteria for pre-
applications?
In evaluating the quality of pre-applications, the Secretary uses
the following selection criteria.
(a) Project goals and objectives. (1) The Secretary considers the
goals and objectives of the project design.
(2) In determining the quality of the project goals and objectives,
the Secretary considers the following factors:
(i) The extent to which the partnership's vision will produce
significant and sustainable improvements in teacher education.
(ii) The needs the partnership will address.
(iii) How the partnership and its activities would be sustained
once federal support ends.
(b) Partnering commitment. (1) The Secretary considers the
partnering commitment embodied in the project.
(2) In determining the quality of the partnering commitment, the
Secretary considers the following factors:
(i) Evidence of how well the partnership would be able to
accomplish objectives working together that its individual members
could not accomplish working separately.
(ii) The significance of the roles given to each principal partner
in implementing project activities.
(c) Quality and comprehensiveness of key project components. (1)
The Secretary considers the quality and comprehensiveness of key
project components in the process of preparing new teachers.
(2) In determining the quality and comprehensiveness of key project
components in the process of preparing new teachers, the Secretary
considers the extent to which--
(i) Specific activities are designed and would be implemented to
ensure that students preparing to be teachers are adequately prepared,
including activities designed to ensure that they have improved content
knowledge, are able to use technology effectively to promote
instruction, and participate in extensive, supervised clinical
experiences;
(ii) Specific activities are designed and would be implemented to
ensure adequate support for those who have completed the teacher
preparation program during their first years as teachers; and
(iii) The project design reflects up-to-date knowledge from
research and effective practice.
(d) Specific project outcomes. (1) The Secretary considers the
specific outcomes the project would produce in the preparation of new
teachers.
(2) In determining the specific outcomes the project would produce
in the preparation of new teachers, the Secretary considers the
following factors:
(i) The extent to which important aspects of the partnership's
existing teacher preparation system would change.
(ii) The way in which the project would demonstrate success using
high-quality performance measures.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control
number 1840-0007.)
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1021 et seq.)
Sec. 611.22 What additional selection criteria are used for a pre-
application that proposes teacher recruitment activities?
In reviewing pre-applications that propose to undertake teacher
recruitment activities, the Secretary also considers the following
selection criteria:
(a) In addition to the elements contained in Sec. 611.21(a)
(Project goals and objectives), the Secretary considers the extent to
which--
(1) The partnership's vision responds to LEA needs for a diverse
and high quality teaching force, and will lead to reduced teacher
shortages in these high-need LEAs; and
(2) The partnership will sustain its work after federal funding has
ended by recruiting, providing scholarship assistance, training and
supporting additional cohorts of new teachers.
(b) In addition to the elements contained in Sec. 611.21(c)
(Quality and comprehensiveness of key project components), the
Secretary considers the extent to which the project will--
(1) Significantly improve recruitment of new students, including
those from disadvantaged and other underrepresented backgrounds; and
(2) Provide scholarship assistance and adequate training to
preservice students, as well as induction support for those who become
teachers after graduating from the teacher preparation program.
(c) In addition to the elements contained in Sec. 611.21(d)
(Specific project outcomes), the Secretary considers the extent to
which the project addresses the number of new teachers to be produced
and their ability to teach effectively in high-need schools.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control
number 1840-0007.)
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1021 et seq.)
Sec. 611.23 What are the program's general selection criteria for full
applications?
In evaluating the quality of applications, the Secretary uses the
following selection criteria.
(a) Quality of project design. (1) The Secretary considers the
quality of the project design.
(2) In determining the quality of the project design, the Secretary
considers the following factors:
(i) The extent of evidence of institution-wide commitment to high
quality teacher preparation that includes significant policy and
practice changes supported by key leaders, and which result in
permanent changes to ensure that preparing teachers is a central
mission of the entire university.
(ii) The extent to which the partnership creates and sustains
collaborative mechanisms to integrate professional teaching skills,
including skills in the use of technology in the classroom, with strong
academic content from the arts and sciences.
(iii) The extent of well-designed and extensive preservice clinical
experiences for students, including mentoring and other forms of
support, implemented through collaboration between the K-12 and higher
education partners.
(iv) Whether a well-planned, systematic induction program is
established for new teachers to increase their chances of being
successful in high-need schools.
(v) The strength of linkages within the partnership between higher
education and high-need schools or school districts so that all
partners have important roles in project design, implementation,
governance and evaluation.
[[Page 19612]]
(vi) Whether the project design is based on up-to-date knowledge
from research and effective practice, especially on how students learn.
(b) Significance of project activities. (1) The Secretary considers
the significance of project activities.
(2) In determining the significance of the project activities, the
Secretary considers the following factors:
(i) How well the project involves promising new strategies or
exceptional approaches in the way new teachers are recruited, prepared
and inducted into the teaching profession.
(ii) The extent to which project outcomes include preparing
teachers to teach to their State's highest K-12 standards, and are
likely to result in improved K-12 student achievement.
(iii) The extent to which the partnership has specific plans to
institutionalize the project after federal funding ends.
(iv) The extent to which the partnership is committed to
disseminating effective practices to others and is willing to provide
technical assistance about ways to improve teacher education.
(v) How well the partnership will integrate its activities with
other education reform efforts underway in the State or communities
where the partners are located, and will coordinate its work with
local, State or federal teacher training, teacher recruitment, or
professional development programs.
(c) Quality of resources. (1) The Secretary considers the quality
of resources of project activities.
(2) In determining the quality of resources, the Secretary
considers the extent to which--
(i) Support available to the project, including personnel,
equipment, supplies, and other resources, is sufficient to ensure a
successful project;
(ii) Budgeted costs are reasonable and justified in relation to the
design, outcomes, and potential significance of the project; and
(iii) The applicant's matching share of the budgeted costs
demonstrates a significant commitment to successful completion of the
project and to project continuation after federal funding ends.
(d) Quality of management plan. (1) The Secretary considers the
quality of the management plan.
(2) In determining the quality of the management plan, the
Secretary considers the following factors:
(i) The extent to which the management plan, including the work
plan, is designed to achieve goals and objectives of the project, and
includes clearly defined activities, responsibilities, timelines,
milestones, and measurable outcomes for accomplishing project tasks.
(ii) The extent to which the project has an effective, inclusive,
and responsive governance and decision-making structure that will
permit all partners to participate in and benefit from project
activities, and to use evaluation results to ensure continuous
improvements in the operations of the project.
(iii) The qualifications, including training and experience, of key
personnel charged with implementing the project successfully.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control
number 1840-0007.)
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1021 et seq.)
Sec. 611.24 What additional selection criteria are used for a full
application that proposes teacher recruitment activities?
In reviewing full applications that propose to undertake teacher
recruitment activities, the Secretary also considers the following
selection criteria:
(a) In addition to the elements contained in Sec. 611.23(a)
(Quality of project design), the Secretary considers the extent to
which the project reflects--
(1) A commitment to recruit, support and prepare additional well-
qualified new teachers for high-need schools;
(2) Appropriate academic and student support services; and
(3) A comprehensive strategy for addressing shortages of well-
qualified and well-trained teachers in high-need LEAs, especially
teachers from disadvantaged and other underrepresented backgrounds.
(b) In addition to the elements contained in Sec. 611.23(b)
(Significance of project activities), the Secretary considers the
extent to which the project promotes the recruitment, scholarship
assistance, preparation, and support of additional cohorts of new
teachers.
(c) In addition to the elements contained in Sec. 611.23(c)
(Quality of resources), the Secretary considers the impact of the
project on high-need LEAs and high-need schools based upon--
(1) The amount of scholarship assistance the project will provide
students from federal and non-federal funds;
(2) The number of students who will receive scholarships; and
(3) How those students receiving scholarships will benefit from
high-quality teacher preparation and an effective support system during
their first three years of teaching.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control
number 1840-0007.)
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1021 et seq.)
Sec. 611.25 What competitive preference does the Secretary provide?
The Secretary provides a competitive preference on the basis of how
well the project includes a significant role for private business in
the design and implementation of the project.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control
number 1840-0007.)
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1021 et seq.)
6. Subpart D, consisting of Secs. 611.31 and 611.32, is added to
part 611, to read as follows:
Subpart D--Teacher Recruitment Grants Program
611.31 What are the program's selection criteria for pre-
applications?
611.32 What are the program's general selection criteria?
Subpart D--Teacher Recruitment Grants Program
Sec. 611.31 What are the program's selection criteria for pre-
applications?
In evaluating pre-applications, the Secretary considers the
following criteria:
(a) Project goals and objectives. (1) The Secretary considers the
goals and objectives of the project design.
(2) In determining the quality of the project goals and objectives,
the Secretary considers how the partnership or State applicant intends
to--
(i) Produce significant and sustainable improvements in teacher
recruitment, preparation, and support; and
(ii) Reduce teacher shortages in high-need LEAs and schools, and
improve student achievement in the schools in which teachers who
participate in its project will teach.
(b) Partnership commitment. (1) The Secretary considers the
partnering commitment embodied in the project.
(2) In determining the quality of the partnering commitment, the
Secretary considers the following factors:
(i) What the partnership, or the State and its cooperating
entities, can accomplish by working together that could not be achieved
by working separately.
(ii) How the project proposed by the partnership or State is driven
by the needs of LEA partners.
(c) Quality of key project components. (1) The Secretary considers
the quality of key project components.
(2) In determining the quality of key project components, the
Secretary considers the following factors:
(i) The extent to which the project would make significant and
lasting systemic changes in how the applicant recruits, trains, and
supports new
[[Page 19613]]
teachers, and reflects knowledge gained from research and practice.
(ii) The extent to which the project would be implemented in ways
that significantly improve recruitment, scholarship assistance to
preservice students, training, and induction support for new entrants
into teaching.
(d) Specific project outcomes. (1) The Secretary considers the
specific outcomes the project would produce in the recruitment,
preparation, and placement of new teachers.
(2) In determining the specific outcomes the project would produce
in the recruitment, preparation, and placement of new teachers, the
Secretary considers the following factors:
(i) The number of teachers to be produced and the quality of their
preparation.
(ii) The partnership's or State's commitment to sustaining the work
of the project after federal funding has ended by recruiting, providing
scholarship assistance, training, and supporting additional cohorts of
new teachers.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control
number 1840-0007.)
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1021 et seq.)
Sec. 611.32 What are the program's general selection criteria?
In evaluating the quality of full applications, the Secretary uses
the following selection criteria.
(a) Quality of the project design. (1) The Secretary considers the
quality of the project design for ensuring that activities to recruit
and prepare new teachers are a central mission of the project.
(2) In considering the quality of the project design for ensuring
that activities to recruit and prepare new teachers are a central
mission of the project, the Secretary considers the extent to which the
project design--
(i) Shows evidence of institutional or (in the case of a State
applicant) State-level commitment both to recruitment of additional new
teachers, and to high-quality teacher preparation that includes
significant policy and practice changes supported by key leaders and
that result in permanent changes to current institutional practices;
(ii) Creates and sustains collaborative mechanisms to integrate
professional teaching skills, including skills in the use of technology
in the classroom, with academic content provided by the school of arts
and sciences;
(iii) Includes well-designed academic and student support services
as well as carefully planned and extensive preservice clinical
experiences for students, including mentoring and other forms of
support, that are implemented through collaboration between the K-12
and higher education partners;
(iv) Includes establishment of a well-planned, systematic induction
program for new teachers that increases their chances of being
successful in high-need schools;
(v) Includes strong linkages among the partner institutions of
higher education and high-need schools and school districts (or, in the
case of a State applicant, between the State and these entities in its
project), so that all those who would implement the project have
important roles in project design, implementation, governance, and
evaluation;
(vi) Responds to the shortages of well-qualified and well-trained
teachers in high-need school districts, especially from disadvantaged
and other underrepresented backgrounds; and
(vii) Is based on up-to-date knowledge from research and effective
practice.
(b) Significance. (1) The Secretary considers the significance of
the project.
(2) In determining the significance of the project, the Secretary
considers the extent to which--
(i) The project involves promising new strategies or exceptional
approaches in the way new teachers are recruited, prepared, and
inducted into the teaching profession;
(ii) Project outcomes include measurable improvements in teacher
quality and in the number of well-prepared new teachers, that are
likely to result in improved K-12 student achievement;
(iii) The project will be institutionalized after federal funding
ends, including recruitment, scholarship assistance, preparation, and
support of additional cohorts of new teachers;
(iv) The project will disseminate effective practices to others,
and provide technical assistance about ways to improve teacher
recruitment and preparation; and
(v) The project will integrate its activities with other education
reform activities underway in the State or communities in which the
project is based, and will coordinate its work with local, State, and
federal teacher recruitment, training, and professional development
programs.
(c) Quality of resources. (1) The Secretary considers the quality
of the project's resources.
(2) In determining the quality of the project's resources, the
Secretary considers the extent to which--
(i) The amount of support available to the project, including
personnel, equipment, supplies, student scholarship assistance, and
other resources is sufficient to ensure a successful project.
(ii) Budgeted costs are reasonable and justified in relation to the
design, outcomes, and potential significance of the project.
(iii) The applicant's matching share of budgeted costs demonstrates
a significant commitment to successful completion of the project, and
to project continuation after federal funding ends.
(d) Quality of management plan. (1) The Secretary considers the
quality of the project's management plan.
(2) In determining the quality of the management plan, the
Secretary considers the following factors:
(i) The extent to which the management plan, including the
workplan, is designed to achieve goals and objectives of the project,
and includes clearly defined activities, responsibilities, timelines,
milestones, and measurable outcomes for accomplishing project tasks.
(ii) The extent to which the project has an effective, inclusive,
and responsive governance and decisionmaking structure that will permit
all partners to participate in and benefit from project activities, and
to use evaluation results to continuously improve project operations.
(iii) The qualifications, including training and experience, of key
personnel charged with implementing the project successfully.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control
number 1840-0007.)
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1021 et seq.)
7. Section 611.43 is amended by revising paragraph (d) to read as
follows:
Sec. 611.43 What are the consequences of a scholarship recipient's
failure to meet the service obligation?
* * * * *
(d) Interest. In accordance with 31 U.S.C. 3717 and 34 CFR part 30,
the Secretary charges interest on the unpaid balance that the
scholarship recipient owes. However, except as provided in
Sec. 611.44(d), the Secretary does not charge interest for the period
of time that precedes the date on which the scholarship recipient is
required to begin repayment.
* * * * *
8. Subpart F of part 611 is revised to read as follows:
[[Page 19614]]
Subpart F--Other Grant Conditions
Subpart F--Other Grant Conditions
611.61 What is the maximum indirect cost rate that applies to a
recipient's use of program funds?
611.62 What are a grantee's matching requirements?
Sec. 611.61 What is the maximum indirect cost rate that applies to a
recipient's use of program funds?
Notwithstanding 34 CFR 75.560-75.562 and 34 CFR 80.22, the maximum
indirect cost rate that any recipient of funds under the Teacher
Quality Enhancement Grants Program may use to charge indirect costs to
these funds is the lesser of--
(a) The rate established by the negotiated indirect cost agreement;
or
(b) Eight percent.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1021 et seq.)
Sec. 611.62 What are a grantee's matching requirements?
(a)(1) Each State receiving a grant under the State Grants Program
or Teacher Recruitment Grants Program must provide, from non-federal
sources, an amount equal to 50 percent of the amount of the grant to
carry out the activities supported by the grant.
(2) The 50 percent match required by paragraph (a)(1) of this
section must be made annually during the project period, with respect
to each grant award the State receives.
(b) Each partnership receiving a grant under the Partnership Grant
Program or the Teacher Recruitment Grant Program must provide, from
non-federal sources, an amount equal to--
(1) 25 percent of the grant award for the first year of the grant;
(2) 35 percent of the grant award for the second year of the grant;
and
(3) 50 percent of the grant award for each succeeding year of the
grant.
(c) The match from non-federal sources required by paragraphs (a)
and (b) of this section may be made in cash or in kind.
(Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1021 et seq.)
[FR Doc. 00-8890 Filed 4-10-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-U