[Federal Register Volume 65, Number 78 (Friday, April 21, 2000)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21419-21422]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 00-10039]
[[Page 21419]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[SW-FRL-6583-2]
Notice Proposing To Reissue a Variance From Land Disposal
Restrictions Granted to Exxon Mobil Corporation, Billings, MT
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of proposed decision.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This is a notice to interested parties that EPA is proposing
to reissue a no-migration variance for land disposal of hazardous waste
to Exxon Mobil Refining & Supply Company Billings Refinery (``Exxon''),
a division of Exxon Mobil Corporation, formerly known as Exxon Company
U.S.A. Authority for the decision has been delegated to the EPA
Regional Administrator. The original July 27, 1993 variance (58 FR
40134) approved under Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
regulations (40 CFR 268.6) allowed Exxon to place certain untreated
hazardous wastes subject to the RCRA land disposal restrictions (42
U.S.C. 36901 et. seq.) at their Billings (Montana) refinery South Land
Treatment Unit (SLTU). In the original variance, the unit was referred
to as the New South Land Treatment Unit. Exxon submitted a request to
EPA on March 24, 1998 for renewal of this no-migration variance in
conjunction with their State of Montana hazardous waste permit
reissuance. Exxon also petitioned to amend the variance by adding the
newly listed hazardous waste, Petroleum Refinery Primary Oil/Water/
Solids Separation Sludge (EPA hazardous waste code F037). The proposed
variance reissuance includes the F037 waste stream, ``Primary Sludge,''
generated at the Exxon Billings Refinery.
In granting the original variance, we concluded that Exxon
demonstrated to a reasonable degree of certainty that hazardous
constituents would not migrate out of the land treatment facility at
levels exceeding no-migration criteria for as long as the wastes remain
hazardous. We have reviewed the SLTU monitoring data submitted by Exxon
for the period the variance was in effect along with other relevant
information, and it still supports our original conclusion on Exxon's
no-migration demonstration. We also concluded that Exxon adequately met
the conditions of the original variance, which were included to ensure
compliance with their no-migration demonstration.
The present proposal considered how the terms of the original
variance were affected by certain changes in waste application
techniques and closure requirements incorporated into the recently
issued Montana hazardous waste permit (No. MTHWP-99-02) and one failure
to correctly manage a waste stream whose hazardous status had changed
during the term of the original variance. We concluded that these
factors did not materially affect the overall demonstration of no-
migration. The proposed variance reissuance again includes specific
conditions tailored to reflect additions of a newly hazardous waste
stream (F037), modifications to how no-migration standards apply to
specific SLTU monitoring systems, additional monitoring requirements,
and improvements to the Exxon waste application tracking system.
Certain conditions of the original variance are also included. The full
set of variance conditions are presented below.
RCRA regulations require that we provide for public comment on a
proposed no-migration variance decision. In addition to seeking written
comments through this notice, we have elected to hold a public hearing
in Billings, Montana to gather comment on this proposed decision from
the local citizens near Exxon's land treatment facility and other
interested parties. All comments received will be entered into the
public record for this decision making process. Details appear below in
the DATES section of this document. A final decision will be made by
EPA after considering and responding to public comments. We will then
publish a notice in the Federal Register of our decision on the
reissuance of the variance and the addition of Primary Sludge (F037).
Copies of the statement of basis for the proposed decision are
available in the record for today's document and can be requested from
Tina Diebold at the address or telephone number listed below.
DATES: Comments on the proposed decision must be received on or before
June 5, 2000. In addition to the written comments received at EPA's
Montana Office, written and oral comments on the proposed decision also
will be accepted by the Hearing Officer at the public hearing in
Billings, Montana. The public hearing is scheduled for May 23, 2000
from 6 p.m. to 8:30 p.m.
ADDRESSES: Comments on the proposal should be sent to EPA at the
following address: Tina Diebold, Mail Code 8MO, Montana Office, U.S.
EPA Region VIII, 301 S. Park, Drawer 10096, Helena, Montana 59626-0096.
The public hearing will be held at the Parmly Library at 510 North
Broadway, Billings, Montana (large, open meeting room on third floor).
A copy of the record supporting this proposal is available to the
public at the Parmly Library at 510 North Broadway, Billings, Montana,
and is available for public review during regular library hours.
Another copy of the record is available in Helena, Montana, at the EPA
Region VIII, Montana Operations Office, Federal Building, 301 South
Park. The public may make arrangements to view the documents in Helena
by calling Tina Diebold at (406) 441-1130. The record is available for
inspection in Helena from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tina Diebold, Mail Code 8MO, Montana
Office, U.S. EPA Region VIII, 301 S. Park, Drawer 10096, Helena,
Montana 59626-0096, at (406) 441-1130.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Wherever ``we'' is used throughout this
document, it refers to EPA.
A. What Conditions and Reporting Requirements Are Proposed for the
Exxon No-Migration Variance Reissuance?
As part of this reissuance of the no-migration variance and
addition of Primary Sludge (F037), we propose that Exxon comply with
the following conditions. These conditions are in addition to those
required of Exxon under 40 CFR 268.6. EPA would directly enforce these
conditions, and a violation of a condition would constitute a violation
of the RCRA land disposal restrictions. Unless otherwise notified by
EPA, Exxon shall provide the required notices and reports to the EPA
Region VIII Montana Operations Office, Federal Building, 301 South
Park, Drawer 10096, Helena, MT, 59626. Exxon shall provide a separate
copy to the State of Montana of any report or notice required by the
variance if the information is not combined with the reports required
under its Montana hazardous waste permit. Exxon shall provide copies to
the State at the address specified for its Montana hazardous waste
permit reporting requirements.
We interpret the no-migration standard to mean that concentrations
of hazardous constituents cannot exceed EPA-approved health-based
levels in any environmental medium at the boundary of the land disposal
unit. Hazardous constituent levels exceeding those presented in Table 1
of this document constitute migration into ground water at the unit
boundary, as measured by soil-pore liquid and below
[[Page 21420]]
treatment zone (BTZ) soil-core monitoring, and as measured by ground
water monitoring under the Exxon Montana hazardous waste permit and as
defined below. In the event that Exxon should detect other RCRA
hazardous constituents (defined in 40 CFR part 261, appendix VIII)
above health-based levels, this event would also be subject to the
notification requirements in 40 CFR 268.6(f). Definitions of the unit
boundaries (i.e., points of compliance for no-migration purposes)
remain the same as in the original variance (57 FR 10478). Metals
levels in the SLTU zone of incorporation (ZOI) soils (the top 23
centimeters of the treatment zone) exceeding the limits listed in item
1.a. below are also evidence of a no-migration standard exceedance.
In accordance with 40 CFR 268.6(k), the proposed variance will be
valid for up to ten years from the date of EPA approval of the
petition, but no longer than the term of Exxon's Montana hazardous
waste permit, unless the permit is renewed or reissued.
1. Montana Hazardous Waste Permit Conditions
Exxon must comply with conditions of the Montana hazardous waste
permit effective June 28, 1999 (No. MTHWP-99-02) regarding
characterization of wastes disposed of at the SLTU, and monitoring of
ground water, soil and soil-pore liquids at that unit. Exxon must
provide the results of this characterization and monitoring to EPA on
the same schedule as they are provided to the State of Montana under
Exxon's Montana hazardous waste permit.
In addition, Exxon must follow the monitoring provisions below
specific to this variance, which are intended to supplement the
existing Montana hazardous waste permit conditions. Exxon may provide
the information required as a condition of the variance to EPA in the
annual reports required by its Montana hazardous waste permit. Exxon
shall submit annual reports for the previous calendar year by April 30.
a. ZOI Metals Loading Limit
Exxon shall determine if any of the following risk limits have been
exceeded when it evaluates the annual SLTU ZOI soil samples for the
metals loading limits under its Montana hazardous waste permit: 31 mg/
kg for antimony; 15 mg/kg for arsenic; 2 mg/kg for beryllium; 140 mg/kg
for total chromium; 400 mg/kg for lead; and 7 mg/kg for mercury. In the
event one or more of these criteria are exceeded, Exxon may only place
wastes on the SLTU areas(s) for which the metals concentrations are
less than or equal to the in-soil concentration limits. Exxon shall
submit the analytical results and comparisons in an annual report to
EPA. Exxon shall report exceedances of these limits to EPA within ten
days of receiving the analytical results.
b. Soil-Pore Liquid Monitoring
Exxon shall evaluate the following metals as part of semi-annual
SLTU soil-pore lysimeter monitoring requirements under the Montana
hazardous waste permit: antimony, arsenic, barium, beryllium, cadmium,
chromium, lead, mercury, nickel, selenium, vanadium, and zinc. Samples
from each of the three SLTU lysimeters shall be .45-micron filtered
prior to analysis for metals. SW-846 \1\ or equivalent analytical
methods shall be used which can provide reporting limits of .001 mg/l,
except .0002 mg/l for mercury. Exxon shall attempt to collect
sufficient sample volumes to meet these performance criteria, following
the general analytical priority scheme in its Montana hazardous waste
permit. Should sample volumes be insufficient, Exxon shall investigate
collecting additional sample volumes in a reasonable time frame for
metals analysis once the Montana hazardous waste permit conditions have
been met. Additionally, analyses of soil-pore organic monitoring
constituents shall meet the SW-846 estimated quantitation limits (EQL)
specified for water samples in Exxon's Montana hazardous waste permit
and as listed in Table 1, to the extent possible.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ These methods are found in the third edition of ``Test
Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste Physical/Chemical Methods,'' EPA,
SW-846, which is available from the Government Printing Office
(GPO). This compendium of EPA test methods is commonly referred to
as ``SW-846'' and we will use this term to refer to the compendium
throughout this document.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
c. Soil-Pore Liquid Monitoring Evaluation and Reporting
Exxon shall compare the organic hazardous constituents and the
metals results to the leachate soil-pore health-based standards
identified in Table 1 below. Exxon shall submit the analytical results
and comparisons including information on sample volumes collected,
analytical methods used, and EQLs achieved for all sample constituents,
in an annual report to EPA. Exxon shall report exceedances of these
limits to EPA within ten days of receiving the analytical results.
Exxon shall notify EPA and the State if sufficient sample volumes
cannot be collected or EQLs cannot be achieved in any semi-annual
sampling period.
d. BTZ Soil-Core Monitoring
When collecting the five (5) annual soil cores from the SLTU Below
Treatment Zone (BTZ) as required by its Montana hazardous waste permit,
Exxon shall also collect intermediate level treatment zone soil samples
at three depth intervals of 2-2.5 feet below ground surface (bgs), 3-
3.5 feet bgs, and 4-4.5 feet bgs and in the BTZ itself (5-5.5 feet
bgs), sufficient for analyses of oil and grease and soil pH. Oil and
grease and soil pH results shall be reported for the four depth
intervals in each of the five soil core samples. Exxon shall use an oil
and grease analytical method which can provide detection limits in the
range of 10 to 100 mg/kg consistent with the Montana hazardous waste
permit. Exxon also shall analyze any BTZ resamples required under the
Montana hazardous waste permit for oil and grease and soil pH. Exxon
shall submit the results of the annual BTZ sampling (including the pH
and oil and grease results from the intermediate levels) in an annual
report to EPA. Exxon shall submit the results of any resampling to EPA
on the same schedule as provided to the State under Exxon's hazardous
waste permit.
e. Evaluation of BTZ Soil-Core Monitoring
Analyses for organic monitoring constituents shall meet soil low-
level required EQLs as specified in Exxon's Montana hazardous waste
permit and as specified in Table 1 below. Exxon shall compare the
results of BTZ soil samples with soil-core health-based standards
identified in Table 1 of this document. Exxon shall submit the
analytical results and comparisons in an annual report to EPA. Exxon
shall report exceedances of these limits to EPA within ten days of
receiving the analytical results.
[[Page 21421]]
Table 1.--Proposed Exxon No-Migration Variance Leachate and Soil-Core Standards
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Soil-core standards (mg/
Constituents Leachate soil-pore standards (mg/l) kg)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Volatiles:
Benzene................................. .005 (EQL)--MCL .002 (EQL)
Ethylbenzene............................ .7--MCL .65
Toluene................................. 1--MCL .56
Xylene(s)............................... 10--MCL 9.8
II. Semi-Volatiles:
Anthracene.............................. 10--Risk 620
Benzo(a)anthracene...................... .0001 (EQL)--Risk .08 (EQL)
Benzo(b)fluoranthene.................... .0001(EQL)--Risk .25 (EQL)
Benzo(a)pyrene.......................... .0002(EQL)--MCL .41
Chrysene................................ .0012 (EQL)--Risk 9.3
Fluoranthene............................ 1.4--Risk 300
1-Methylnaphthalene..................... NS NS
Naphthalene............................. 1.4--Risk 5.9
Phenanthrene............................ NS NS
Pyrene.................................. 1--Risk 220
2,4-Dimethyl phenol..................... .7--Risk .43
Phenol.................................. 21--Risk 5.4
Cresol (o-)............................. 1.8--Risk .69
III. Metals:
Antimony................................ .006--MCL Not proposed
Arsenic................................. .05--MCL Do.
Barium.................................. 2--MCL Do.
Beryllium............................... .004--MCL Do.
Cadmium................................. .005--MCL Do.
Chromium................................ .1--MCL Do.
Lead.................................... .015--MCL Do.
Mercury................................. .002--MCL Do.
Nickel.................................. .7--Risk Do.
Zinc.................................... 10--Risk Do.
Selenium................................ .05--MCL Do.
Vanadium................................ .24--Risk Do.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
An (EQL) indicates a risk-based standard lying below the expected
low-level quantification limit for the routine analytical methods
assumed from Exxon's Montana hazardous waste permit. Typical
quantification limits would be: SW-846 Method 8260--.005 mg/l aqueous
and .005 mg/kg clean soils and Method 8270--.01 mg/l aqueous and .33
mgl/kg clean soil. NS indicates no standard.
2. Annual Benzene Loading Limit
The total amount of benzene that may be disposed of at the SLTU may
not exceed a cumulative mass loading of 49 Kg per calendar year. Exxon
must determine the benzene content of each wastestream, including each
load of Primary Sludge (F037) prior to placement at the land treatment
unit. Representative samples of each wastestream must be analyzed for
benzene as they are generated during the land application season in
accordance with the promulgated edition of SW-846. The term ``as
generated'' means each time the wastes are removed from the wastewater
system, created through a spill, or a tank is cleaned out, and the
wastes are taken or will be taken to the land treatment unit, which may
be several times a year. A tracking system must be in place which
continually estimates and updates the cumulative benzene waste loading
during the operating season. Exxon must submit a summary of these waste
analyses demonstrating its compliance with the loading limit to EPA in
an annual report. When the 49 Kg benzene limit is reached, Exxon must
not dispose of any additional waste containing detectable levels of
benzene at the SLTU until the next calendar year. Exxon shall notify
EPA when the 49 Kg limit is reached within ten days of receiving the
analytical results.
3. Waste Characterization
Exxon must identify in the annual report to EPA the following
additional information for each applied waste at the SLTU: the location
of waste generation (e.g., Tank 17 sewer, Tank 108 contaminated soil);
analytical results of waste determination for any wastes for which the
hazardous status was not known when it was generated, mass of waste;
application date(s); the hazardous waste code (if any); and the matrix
(e.g., soil or sludge). In the report, Exxon must distinguish between
the F037 waste generated from the sewer (e.g., ``F037 sewer sludge'')
and the F037 waste generated from the Alkyllation Unit Neutralization
Basins (e.g., ``F037 lime sludge''). In the annual report, Exxon must
also include the total quantity of waste applied at the SLTU during the
last operating season and a break down of the total quantity of
hazardous and of non-hazardous waste.
4. Application of F037 Sewer Sludge
Exxon's application of Primary Sludge generated from the sewer
system (F037 sewer sludge) to the SLTU is restricted to times when
Exxon also applies API Separator Sludge (K051). Exxon must combine the
F037 sewer sludge with the API Separator Sludge prior to or during
application at the SLTU. Exxon shall incorporate this condition in its
waste tracking system to ensure that any time F037 sewer sludge is
cleared for application to the SLTU, it is accompanied by K051 waste.
5. Application of F037 Lime Sludge
Exxon's application of Primary Sludge generated from the
Alkyllation Unit Neutralization Basin (F037 lime sludge) to the SLTU is
limited to when it has determined pH adjustment of the ZOI
[[Page 21422]]
soils is needed according to the applicable criteria and methods
identified in its Montana hazardous waste permit. For the years in
which Exxon uses F037 lime sludge to adjust the pH of the ZOI soils at
the SLTU, Exxon must submit to EPA the following information in the
annual report: pH of the F037 lime sludge applied to the SLTU, and the
other measurements and tests used to determine the need for pH
adjustment as well as the quantity of F037 lime sludge applied and the
quantity of any other substance (e.g., lime) used to adjust the pH of
the ZOI soil at the SLTU.
6. Waste Tracking
As part of its waste tracking process, Exxon must confirm receipt
of analytical results for any wastes for which the hazardous status is
not currently known prior to application of the waste at the SLTU.
Exxon must comply with its Montana hazardous waste permit conditions
with regard to restrictions on the application of waste to the SLTU,
such as any restrictions based on the pH of the waste.
7. Information Requests
Upon request by EPA, Exxon shall provide to the EPA within a
reasonable time, any relevant information requested to determine
compliance with the conditions of this variance.
8. Access
Exxon shall allow EPA, or authorized representatives, upon the
presentation of credentials and other documents as may be required by
law to: (a) inspect at reasonable times any records, facilities,
equipment (including monitoring and control equipment), practices, or
operations related to the disposal of restricted hazardous wastes at
the SLTU; and (b) sample or monitor at reasonable times, for the
purposes of assuring compliance with the conditions of this variance or
to determine migration or as otherwise authorized by RCRA, any wastes
intended or proposed for disposal at the SLTU and the soil, air, soil-
pore liquids or ground water in or surrounding the SLTU.
Dated: April 13, 2000.
Stephen S. Tuber,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region VIII.
[FR Doc. 00-10039 Filed 4-20-00; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P