[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 79 (Tuesday, April 24, 2001)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20640-20644]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-10049]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
[CFDA No: 84.349A]
Early Childhood Educator Professional Development Programs
AGENCY: U.S. Department of Education.
ACTION: Notice inviting applications for new awards and final
procedures and requirements for a fiscal year (FY) 2001 competition for
Early Childhood Educator Professional Development Program grants.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Secretary invites applications for new grant awards for FY
2001 for Early Childhood Educator Professional Development programs.
These grants are authorized by the Department of Education
Appropriations Act for 2001 under section 2102 of the Elementary and
Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA). The Secretary also announces
final procedures and requirements to govern this competition and FY
2001 awards of these grants.
Purpose of Program
The purpose of Early Childhood Educator Professional Development
Program grants is to provide replicable high-quality professional
development programs to improve the knowledge and skills of early
childhood educators who work in early childhood programs located in
urban or rural high-poverty communities, and who serve primarily
children from low-income families. These professional development
programs must primarily provide research-based training that will
improve early childhood pedagogy and will further children's language
and literacy skills to prevent them from encountering reading
difficulties when they enter school. These grants complement the
President's early reading initiative, which will support local efforts
to enhance the school readiness of young children, particularly those
from low-income families, through scientifically based reading research
that is designed to improve the verbal skills, phonological awareness,
letter knowledge, pre-reading skills, and early language development of
children ages three through five. The Department intends to disseminate
information about these
[[Page 20641]]
professional development programs that prove to be effective models for
practice to early childhood education programs.
Applications Available: April 24, 2001.
Deadline for Transmittal of Application: June 25, 2001.
Deadline for Intergovernmental Review: August 22, 2001.
Estimated Available Funds: $10,000,000.
Estimated Range of Awards (for entire project period): $600,000-
$1,400,000.
Estimated Average Size of Awards (for entire project period):
$1,000,000.
Estimated Number of Awards: 10.
Note: The Department is not bound by any estimates in this
notice. To provide applicants the capacity to effectively plan for
and carry out the professional development and evaluation activities
involved in these programs, the Secretary anticipates awarding the
entire grant amount for the project at the time of the initial
award.
Project Period: Up to 24 months.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Research demonstrates the strong relationship between high-quality
educational experiences for children before kindergarten and their
later success in school. The National Research Council report,
Preventing Reading Difficulties in Young Children (1998), concludes
that the majority of reading problems faced by today's adolescents and
adults could have been avoided or resolved in the early years of
childhood. The Cost, Quality and Child Outcomes report (June 1999),
partially funded by the Department, concludes that children's cognitive
and social competence in the second grade can be predicted by the
experiences that they had four years previously in child care, even
after taking into account kindergarten and first grade classroom
experiences. The report also found that children who have traditionally
been at risk for not doing well in school are more affected by the
quality of child care experiences than are other children.
Research-based professional development is a critical element for
implementing a high-quality early childhood program. The National
Research Council (NRC) report Eager to Learn (2000) concluded that the
professional development of teachers is related to the quality of early
childhood education programs, and that program quality predicts
positive learning outcomes for children. In fact, the report emphasizes
that a responsive teacher is key to young children's success in school,
and a substantial investment in the education and training of those who
will work with young children is at the heart of any effort to promote
high-quality early childhood education programs. Research shows that
many early childhood providers have little formal education beyond high
school and that preschool and other group care settings for young
children (in particular, those available to families with limited
economic resources) often provide relatively impoverished language and
literacy environments. In addition, many early childhood educators do
not have access to high-quality, research-based professional
development. Accordingly, these grants will provide replicable high-
quality professional development programs for early childhood educators
that are based upon scientifically based reading research and that the
Department will be able to use in disseminating information to help
fill this professional development gap.
These Early Childhood Educator Professional Development Program
grants will concentrate on funding projects that provide, and use
rigorous methodologies to evaluate the effectiveness of, high-quality,
research-based professional development opportunities. These grants
will improve the knowledge and skills of early childhood educators who
work in urban and rural communities with high concentrations of young
children living in poverty, in programs such as Title I preschools and
schoolwide programs, Head Start, Even Start Family Literacy programs,
and publicly funded or subsidized child care.
Eligible Applicants: One or more institutions of higher education,
State agencies for higher education, local educational agencies,
educational service agencies, State educational agencies, and other
public and private agencies, organizations, and institutions such as
child care consortiums, and Head Start programs.
Note: NOTE: Under 34 CFR 75.127-75.129, eligible parties may
apply as a group for a grant under this program.
Definitions: For the purposes of this notice and grant competition,
the Secretary considers the following terms to have the following
meanings:
(1) The term ``early childhood educator'' means any person who is
involved in the education and care of children at any age from birth
through pre-kindergarten, including volunteers as well as paid staff.
(2) The term ``high-poverty community'' means an urban or rural
community with a high concentration of young children living in
poverty. The Secretary considers a community to have a high
concentration of young children living in poverty if it is a
municipality, or portion of a municipality, in which at least 50
percent of children are from low-income families or a municipality that
is one of the 10 percent of municipalities within its State having the
greatest numbers of those children.
(3) The term ``low-performing school'' means a school identified
for improvement under section 1116(c) of the Elementary and Secondary
Education Act of 1965, as amended.
(4) The term ``scientifically based reading research'' consistent
with the meaning given that term in section 2252(5) of the Reading
Excellence Act--
(A) means the application of rigorous, systematic, and objective
procedures to obtain valid knowledge relevant to reading development,
reading instruction, and reading difficulties; and
(B) shall include research that--
(i) employs systematic, empirical methods that draw on observation
or experiment;
(ii) involves rigorous data analyses that are adequate to test the
stated hypotheses and justify the general conclusions drawn;
(iii) relies on measurements or observational methods that provide
valid data across evaluators and observers and across multiple
measurements and observations; and
(iv) has been accepted by a peer-reviewed journal or approved by a
panel of independent experts through a comparably rigorous, objective,
and scientific review.
Indirect Costs: For purposes of indirect costs that may be charged
to the Early Childhood Educator Professional Development Program
grants, the Secretary considers all funded projects to be educational
training grants within the meaning of 34 CFR 75.562(a). Therefore,
consistent with 34 CFR 75.562, except for costs that may be incurred by
State agencies or agencies of local governments, such as local
educational agencies, a recipient's indirect cost rate is limited to
the maximum of eight percent or the amount permitted by its negotiated
indirect cost rate agreement, whichever is less.
Applicability of Regulations: The following provisions of the
Education Department General Administrative Regulations (EDGAR)
contained in Title 34 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) apply to
these Early Childhood Educator Professional Development Program grants:
34 CFR Parts 74, 75, 77, 79, 80, 81, 82, 85, 86, 97, 98, and 99.
Waiver of Proposed Rulemaking: It is the Secretary's practice, in
accordance with the Administrative Procedures Act
[[Page 20642]]
(5 U.S.C. 553), to offer interested parties the opportunity to comment
on proposed priorities that are not taken directly from statute.
Ordinarily, this practice would have applied to the absolute priority
and competitive preference in this notice. Section 437(d)(1) of the
General Education Provisions Act (GEPA), however, exempts from this
requirement rules that apply to the first competition under a new or
substantially revised program. The Secretary, in accordance with
section 437(d)(1) of GEPA, has decided to forego public comment with
respect to the absolute priority and competitive preferences in this
grant competition in order to ensure timely awards. The absolute
priority and competitive preferences will apply only to the FY 2001
grant competition.
Priorities
Absolute Priority: Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(3), the Secretary gives
an absolute preference to any eligible applicant that meets all of the
following criteria:
(1) The applicant (or at least one party in a group application)
currently is a professional development provider for early childhood
educators;
(2) The applicant proposes with these grant funds to provide high-
quality, research-based professional development that is for early
childhood educators who work in early childhood programs in high-
poverty communities serving primarily children from low-income
families, and that focuses on training to improve early childhood
pedagogy and further children's language and literacy competencies to
prevent them from encountering reading difficulties once they enter
school; and
(3) The applicant includes in its proposal specific goals,
objectives, and indicators that measure the extent to which the program
results in an increase in participants' knowledge and skills, the
extent to which participants apply their increased knowledge and skills
in early childhood learning and care environments, the extent to which
the program results in developing children's readiness for school and
language and literacy competencies, and the extent to which the program
is replicable in multiple early childhood programs staffed by educators
serving disadvantaged children.
Note: NOTE: Following is an example of the type of performance
goal, objective, and indicators for these grants that a high-quality
application might include:
Performance goal: To promote school readiness and better reading
outcomes for young children, aged birth through pre-kindergarten,
living in high-poverty areas through high-quality, research-based
professional development.
Performance Objective: To improve the knowledge and skills of early
childhood educators working in high-poverty communities to enable them
to further children's language and literacy competencies and readiness
for school.
Indicator #1: Increasing percentages of classrooms staffed by early
childhood educators who participated in professional development made
available through this grant will show an improvement in the literacy
environment.
Indicator #2: Increasing percentages of early childhood educators
will demonstrate knowledge and understanding of effective, research-
based approaches to school readiness, language and literacy
development, and early childhood pedagogy.
Indicator #3: Increasing percentages of children participating in
early childhood education programs staffed by educators who
participated in professional development provided by this grant will
demonstrate age-appropriate language and literacy competencies and
readiness for school.)
Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(3), the Secretary will fund under this
competition only applicants that meet this absolute priority.
Competitive Preferences: Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(2), the Secretary
gives three separate competitive preferences to applications as
follows:
Competitive Preference 1--Group Applications
Group applications that have, in addition to the professional
development provider required in the absolute priority, one or more
eligible applicants that operates or administers an early childhood
program that is located in a high-poverty community and serves
primarily children from low-income families, such as a local
educational agency with a Title I pre-school or schoolwide program, a
Head Start agency, a State or local agency administering programs
funded under the Child Care and Development Fund, an entity operating
an Even Start Family Literacy program, a State educational agency, or a
State human services agency.
An application that meets this first competitive preference would
receive 10 points in the competition. These points are in addition to
any points the applicant earns under the selection criteria and any
other competitive preference.
Competitive Preference 2--Research-based Training in Specific Areas
Applications that, in addition to meeting the absolute priority,
provide comprehensive research-based training for each participating
early childhood educator that incorporates all of the following areas:
(a) Child, language, and literacy development and early childhood
pedagogy;
(b) Working with parents and families to prepare their young
children to succeed in school;
(c) Working with children who have limited English proficiency; and
(d) Identifying and working with children with disabilities and
other special needs.
An application that meets this second competitive preference would
receive 10 points in the competition. These points are in addition to
any points the applicant earns under the selection criteria or any
other competitive preference.
Competitive Preference 3--Communities with High Concentrations of
Children with Limited English Proficiency
Applicants that meet the absolute priority and target professional
development services for early childhood educators who work in early
childhood education programs that serve high-poverty communities with
concentrations of children who have limited English proficiency.
An application that meets this third competitive preference would
receive 10 points in the competition. These points are in addition to
any points the applicant earns under the selection criteria or any
other competitive preference.
Invitational Priorities: The Secretary is particularly interested
in receiving applications that propose to do one or both of the
following:
Invitational Priority 1--Strategy for Improving Low-Performing
Schools
Applications that target professional development services on early
childhood educators who work in early childhood education programs with
children who will enter low-performing schools and that describe and
demonstrate that improved early childhood education is part of a more
comprehensive strategy for improving those low-performing schools.
Invitational Priority 2--Training That Results in College Credit
and/or Leads to Certification
Applications that propose to provide early childhood professional
[[Page 20643]]
development that results in college credit, or leads to a degree,
credential, or certification in early childhood education, or both.
An application that meets either of these invitational priorities
receives no competitive or absolute preference over applications that
do not meet the priority.
Selection Criteria: The Secretary will use the following selection
criteria in 34 CFR 75.210 to evaluate applications under this
competition. The maximum score for all of these selection criteria is
100 points. The maximum score for each criterion is indicated in
parenthesis with the criterion. The criterion, and the factors within
each criterion, are as follows:
(a) Need for project (15 points). (1) The Secretary considers the
need for the proposed project.
(2) In determining the need for the proposed project, the Secretary
considers one or more of the following factors:
(i) The extent to which the proposed project will provide services
or otherwise address the needs of students at risk of educational
failure.
(ii) The extent to which specific gaps or weakness in services,
infrastructure, or opportunities have been identified and will be
addressed by the proposed project, including the nature and magnitude
of those gaps or weaknesses.
Note: Applicants may address this criterion and factor in any
way that they choose. The Secretary believes, however, that high-
quality applications likely will include a description of the high-
poverty community to be served by the project, including relevant
demographic and socioeconomic information.
(b) Significance (10 points). (1) The Secretary considers the
significance of the proposed project.
(2) In determining the significance of the proposed project, the
Secretary considers one or more of the following factors:
(i) The potential contribution of the proposed project to increased
knowledge or understanding of educational problems, issues, or
effective strategies.
(ii) The importance or magnitude of the results or outcomes likely
to be attained by the proposed project.
Note: Applicants may address this criterion and factor in any
way that they choose. The Secretary believes, however, that high-
quality applications likely will propose a professional development
program that will be large enough in scope to serve a significant
number of early childhood educators, while being balanced with
professional development that is of sufficient quality, intensity,
and duration to ensure improvements in practice among educators
receiving those services. The Secretary anticipates that high-
quality applications also likely will include specific information
on how many early childhood educators the application proposes to
serve, and how many early childhood programs the applicant
anticipates will be directly enhanced by improvements in practice
among educators receiving the professional development services.
(c) Quality of the project design (15 points).
(1) The Secretary considers the quality of the design of the
proposed project.
(2) In determining the quality of the design of the proposed
project, the Secretary considers one or more of the following factors:
(i) The extent to which the proposed activities constitute a
coherent, sustained program of training in the field.
(ii) The extent to which the design of the proposed project
includes a thorough, high-quality review of the relevant literature, a
high-quality plan for project implementation, and the use of
appropriate methodological tools to ensure successful achievements of
project objectives.
Note: Applicants may address this criterion and factor in any
way that they choose. The Secretary believes, however, that high-
quality applications likely will include information on the quality
of the early childhood educator professional development program
currently conducted by the institution of higher education or other
professional development provider that is the applicant or party in
a group application for the grant.
(iii) The extent to which the proposed project will be coordinated
with similar or related efforts, and with other appropriate community,
State, and Federal resources.
Note: Applicants may address this criterion and factor in any
way that they choose. The Secretary believes, however, that high-
quality applications likely will include information on how the
project will coordinate with and build on, and will not supplant or
duplicate, other high-quality early childhood educator professional
development activities that exist in the community.
(d) Quality of project services (20 points). (1) The Secretary
considers the quality of the services to be provided by the proposed
project.
(2) In determining the quality of the services to be provided by
the proposed project, the Secretary considers the quality and
sufficiency of strategies for ensuring equal access and treatment for
eligible project participants who are members of groups that have
traditionally been underrepresented based on race, color, national
origin, gender, age, or disability.
(3) In addition, the Secretary considers one or more of the
following factors:
(i) The extent to which the training or professional development
services to be provided by the proposed project are of sufficient
quality, intensity, and duration to lead to improvements in practice
among the recipients of those services.
(ii) The extent to which the services to be provided by the
proposed project are appropriate to the needs of the intended
recipients or beneficiaries of those services.
Note: Applicants may address this criterion and factor in any
way that they choose. The Secretary believes, however, that high-
quality applications likely will include the results of the
assessment that the applicant has undertaken to determine the most
critical professional development needs of the early childhood
educators to be served by the project and in the broader community,
and a description of how the proposed project will address those
needs.
(e) Quality of project personnel (5 points). (1) The Secretary
considers the quality of the personnel who will carry out the proposed
project.
(2) In determining the quality of project, the Secretary considers
the extent to which the applicant encourages applications for
employment from persons who are members of groups that have been
traditionally underrepresented based on race, color, national origin,
gender, age, or disability.
(3) In addition, the Secretary considers the following factor:
(i) The qualifications, including relevant training and experience,
of key project personnel.
(f) Adequacy of resources (10 points). (1) The Secretary considers
the adequacy of resources for the proposed project.
(2) In determining the adequacy for the proposed project, the
Secretary considers one or more of the following factors:
(i) The adequacy of support, including facilities, equipment,
supplies, and other resources, from the applicant organization or the
lead applicant organization.
(ii) The relevance and demonstrated commitment of each partner in
the proposed project to the implementation and success of the project.
Note: The Secretary generally considers ``partner'' in this
context to mean parties in a group application that are not the lead
applicant organization, and other relevant agencies, organizations,
and institutions.
(iii) The potential for continued support of the project after
Federal funding ends, including, as appropriate,
[[Page 20644]]
the demonstrated commitment of appropriate entities to such support.
(g) Quality of the management plan (15 points).
(1) The Secretary considers the quality of the management plan for
the proposed project.
(2) In determining the quality of the management plan for the
proposed project, the Secretary considers the following factors:
(i) The adequacy of the management plan to achieve the objectives
of the proposed project on time and within budget, including clearly
defined responsibilities, timelines, and milestones for accomplishing
project tasks.
(ii) The adequacy of procedures for ensuring feedback and
continuous improvement in the operation of the proposed project.
(iii) The extent to which the time commitments of the project
director and principal investigator and key project personnel are
appropriate and adequate to meet the objectives of the proposed
project.
(h) Quality of proposed evaluation (10 points).
(1) The Secretary considers the quality of the evaluation to be
conducted of the proposed project.
(2) In determining the quality of the evaluation, the Secretary
considers the following factor:
(i) The extent to which the methods of evaluation are thorough,
feasible, and appropriate to the goals, objectives, and outcomes of the
proposed project.
Note: Applicants may address this criterion and factor in any
way that they choose. The Secretary believes, however, that high-
quality applications likely will describe how the proposed methods
of evaluation specifically are linked to each of the project's
performance goals, objectives, and indicators, and will include the
use of rigorous methodologies with assessments that are reliable and
valid for the purposes intended.
Paperwork Reduction Act Considerations: The procedures and
requirements contained in this notice relate to an application package
that the Department has developed for the Early Childhood Educator
Professional Development Program grants. The public may obtain copies
of this application package by calling or writing the individual
identified below as the Department's contact, or through the
Department's Web site at: www.ed.gov/GrantApps/#84.349A.
As required by the Paperwork Reduction Act, the Office of
Management and Budget has approved the use of this application package
under OMB control number 1810-0633, which expires July 31, 2001.
For Applications and Further Information Contact: Doris F. Sligh,
Compensatory Education Programs, Office of Elementary and Secondary
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20202-6132.
Telephone: (202) 260-0999, or via Internet: [email protected].
The application package also is available on the Department's Web
site at the address indicated above.
If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD), you may
call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339.
Individuals with disabilities may obtain this document in an
alternative format (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, or computer
diskette) on request to the contact person listed in the preceding
paragraph.
Individuals with disabilities may obtain a copy of the application
package in an alternative format by contacting that person. However,
the Department is not able to reproduce in an alternative format the
standard forms included in the application package.
Electronic Access to This Document
You may view this document, as well as all other Department of
Education documents published in the Federal Register, in text or Adobe
Portable Document Format (PDF) on the Internet at the following site:
www.ed.gov/legislation/fedregister.
To use the PDF, you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is
available free at that site. If you have questions about using PDF,
call the U.S. Government Printing Office (GPO), toll free, at 1-888-
293-6498; or in the Washington, DC area at (202) 512-1530.
Note: The official version of this document is the document
published in the Federal Register. Free Internet access to the
official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of Federal
Regulations is available on GPO Access at: http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/index.html
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 6622 and Public Law No. 106-554.
Dated: April 18, 2001.
Thomas M. Corwin,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Elementary and Secondary
Education.
[FR Doc. 01-10049 Filed 4-23-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P