[Federal Register Volume 66, Number 124 (Wednesday, June 27, 2001)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 34137-34139]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 01-16039]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
30 CFR Part 918
[SPATS No. LA-020-FOR]
Louisiana Regulatory Program
AGENCY: Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule; public comment period and opportunity for public
hearing.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM)
is announcing receipt of a proposed amendment to the Louisiana
regulatory program (Louisiana program) under the Surface Mining Control
and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA). Louisiana proposes to add
standards for measuring revegetation success on pastureland. Louisiana
intends to revise the Louisiana program to be consistent with the
corresponding Federal regulations and to improve operational
efficiency.
This document gives the times and locations that the Louisiana
program and the proposed amendment to that program are available for
your inspection, the comment period during which you may submit written
comments on the amendment, and the procedures that we will follow for
the public hearing, if one is requested.
DATES: We will accept written comments until 4 p.m., c.d.t., July 27,
2001. If requested, we will hold a public hearing on the amendment on
July 23, 2001. We will accept requests to speak at the hearing until 4
p.m., c.d.t. on July 12, 2001.
ADDRESSES: You should mail or hand deliver written comments and
requests to speak at the hearing to Michael C. Wolfrom, Director, Tulsa
Field Office, at the address listed below.
You may review copies of the Louisiana program, the amendment, a
listing of any scheduled public hearings, and all written comments
received in response to this document at the addresses listed below
during normal business hours, Monday through Friday, excluding
holidays. You may receive one free copy of the amendment by contacting
OSM's Tulsa Field Office.
Michael C. Wolfrom, Director, Tulsa Field Office, Office of Surface
Mining, 5100 East Skelly Drive, Suite 470, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74135-6547,
Telephone: (918) 581-6430.
Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, Office of Conservation,
Injection and Mining Division, 625 N . 4th Street, P. O. Box 94275,
Baton Rouge, LA 70804, Telephone: (504) 342-5540.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael C. Wolfrom, Director, Tulsa
Field Office. Telephone: (918) 581-6430. Internet: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background on the Louisiana Program
On October 10, 1980, the Secretary of the Interior approved the
Louisiana program. You can find background information on the Louisiana
program, including the Secretary's findings and the disposition of
comments in the October 10, 1980, Federal Register (45 FR 67340). You
can find later actions concerning the Louisiana program at 30 CFR
918.15 and 918.16.
II. Description of the Proposed Amendment
By letter dated June 1, 2001 (Administrative Record No. LA-365.04),
Louisiana sent us an amendment to its program under SMCRA and the
Federal regulations at 30 CFR 732.17(b). Louisiana sent the amendment
in response to our letters dated March 24, 1999, and August 16, 2000,
that we sent to Louisiana under 30 CFR 732.17 (Administrative Record
Nos. LA-365 and LA365.01, respectively). Below is a summary of the
revegetation success guidelines proposed by Louisiana. The full text of
the program amendment is available for your inspection at the locations
listed above under ADDRESSES.
1. Section A: Introduction
Section A describes the purpose of the revegetation success
guidelines for pastureland. It also summarizes the State regulation at
Louisiana Administrative Code (LAC) 43:XV.5423 that applies to ground
cover and production success on pastureland.
2. Section B: General Revegetation Requirements
Section B describes the determinations that the Commissioner of
Conservation (Commissioner) must make in order for the requirements of
LAC 43:XV.5417 to be considered satisfied. LAC 43:XV.5417 provides
general requirements for revegetation of all approved post-mining land
uses.
3. Section C: Success Standards and Measurement Frequency
Section C provides success standards and measurement frequency
information for ground cover and forage production. It also provides
requirements for reference areas.
4. Section D: Sampling Procedures
Section D.1. provides standards for sampling pastureland. Section
D.2.a. describes approved methods for measuring ground cover. Section
D.2.b. describes factors that may affect production yields. It also
describes approved methods for evaluating production. Section D.3.
provides criteria for choosing and using test plots. Finally, section
D.4. describes how to determine the size of a sample for ground cover
and productivity.
5. Section E: Data Submission and Analysis
Section E describes when and how a permittee should submit data to
the Commissioner for review.
6. Section F: Maps
Section F describes what a permittee must include on the maps he or
she submits when submitting a proposed reclamation phase III release or
data from a previously approved plan to the Commissioner.
7. Section G: Mitigation Plans
Section G describes when a permittee must submit a mitigation plan
to the Commissioner. It also describes what the mitigation plan must
include.
8. Appendices
Appendix A describes how to choose horizontal and vertical
coordinates in establishing the location of sampling sites on the
reclaimed area. Appendices B, C, and D provide formats for submitting
data on ground cover, sampling frames, and whole release area
harvesting, respectively. Appendix E provides T-Tables for use in
calculating sample adequacy of ground cover and productivity data.
Appendices F and G
[[Page 34138]]
provide examples of using the sample adequacy formula for ground cover
and hay production measurements, respectively. Appendices H, I, and J
provide examples for performing statistical analysis on ground cover
measurements, sampling frame data, and whole release area harvesting,
respectively. Appendix K provides the average yields per acre of
pasture by soil for DeSoto and Red River Parishes. It also describes
how to calculate yield adjustments when test plots and reference plots
fall on different soil series. Appendix L provides examples of some
acceptable plant species for permanent ground cover. Finally, Appendix
M provides a list of references.
III. Public Comment Procedures
Under the provisions of 30 CFR 732.17(h), we are seeking comments
on whether the proposed amendment satisfies the applicable program
approval criteria of 30 CFR 732.15. If we approve the amendment, it
will become part of the Louisiana program.
Written Comments: If you submit written or electronic comments on
the proposed rule during the 30-day comment period, they should be
specific, should be confined to issues pertinent to the notice, and
should explain the reason for your recommendation(s). We may not be
able to consider or include in the Administrative Record comments
delivered to an address other than the one listed above (see
ADDRESSES).
Electronic Comments: Please submit Internet comments as an ASCII,
WordPerfect, or Word file avoiding the use of special characters and
any form of encryption. Please also include ``Attn: SPATS NO. LA-020-
FOR'' and your name and return address in your Internet message. If you
do not receive a confirmation that we have received your Internet
message, contact the Tulsa Field Office at (918) 581-6430.
Availability of Comments: Our practice is to make comments,
including names and home addresses of respondents, available for public
review during regular business hours at OSM's Tulsa Field Office (see
ADDRESSES). Individual respondents may request that we withhold their
home address from the administrative record, which we will honor to the
extent allowable by law. There also may be circumstances in which we
would withhold from the administrative record a respondent's identity,
as allowable by law. If you wish us to withhold your name and/or
address, you must state this prominently at the beginning of your
comment. However, we will not consider anonymous comments. We will make
all submissions from organizations or businesses, and from individuals
identifying themselves as representatives or officials of organizations
or businesses, available for public inspection in their entirety.
Public Hearing: If you wish to speak at the public hearing, contact
the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT by 4 p.m.,
c.d.t. on July 12, 2001. We will arrange the location and time of the
hearing with those persons requesting the hearing. If no one requests
an opportunity to speak at the public hearing, the hearing will not be
held.
To assist the transcriber and ensure an accurate record, we
request, if possible, that each person who speaks at a public hearing
provide us with a written copy of his or her testimony. The public
hearing will continue on the specified date until all persons scheduled
to speak have been heard. If you are in the audience and have not been
scheduled to speak and wish to do so, you will be allowed to speak
after those who have been scheduled. We will end the hearing after all
persons scheduled to speak and persons present in the audience who wish
to speak have been heard.
If you are disabled and need a special accommodation to attend a
public hearing, contact the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
Public Meeting: If only one person requests an opportunity to speak
at a hearing, a public meeting, rather than a public hearing, may be
held. If you wish to meet with us to discuss the proposed amendment,
you may request a meeting by contacting the person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. All such meetings are open to the public
and, if possible, we will post notices of meetings at the locations
listed under ADDRESSES. We will also make a written summary of each
meeting a part of the Administrative Record.
IV. Procedural Determinations
Executive Order 12866--Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is exempted from review by the Office of Management and
Budget under Executive Order 12866.
Executive Order 12630--Takings
This rule does not have takings implications. This determination is
based on the analysis performed for the counterpart Federal
regulations.
Executive Order 13132--Federalism
This rule does not have federalism implications. SMCRA delineates
the roles of the Federal and State governments with regard to the
regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation operations. One of
the purposes of SMCRA is to ``establish a nationwide program to protect
society and the environment from the adverse effects of surface coal
mining operations.'' Section 503(a)(1) of SMCRA requires that State
laws regulating surface coal mining and reclamation operations be ``in
accordance with'' the requirements of SMCRA, and section 503(a)(7)
requires that State programs contain rules and regulations ``consistent
with'' regulations issued by the Secretary under SMCRA.
Executive Order 12988--Civil Justice Reform
The Department of the Interior has conducted the reviews required
by section 3 of Executive Order 12988 and has determined that, to the
extent allowed by law, this rule meets the applicable standards of
subsections (a) and (b) of that section. However, these standards are
not applicable to the actual language of State regulatory programs and
program amendments since each program is drafted and promulgated by a
specific State, not by OSM. Under sections 503 and 505 of SMCRA (30
U.S.C. 1253 and 1255) and 30 CFR 730.11, 732.15, and 732.17(h)(10),
decisions on proposed State regulatory programs and program amendments
submitted by the States must be based solely on a determination of
whether the submittal is consistent with SMCRA and its implementing
Federal regulations and whether the other requirements of 30 CFR Parts
730, 731, and 732 have been met.
National Environmental Policy Act
Section 702(d) of SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1292(d)) provides that a
decision on a proposed State regulatory program provision does not
constitute a major Federal action within the meaning of section
102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) (42 U.S.C.
4332(2)(C)). A determination has been made that such decisions are
categorically excluded from the NEPA process (516 DM 8.4.A).
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not contain information collection requirements that
require approval by the Office of Management and Budget under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3507 et seq.).
[[Page 34139]]
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior has determined that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
The State submittal which is the subject of this rule is based upon
counterpart Federal regulations for which an economic analysis was
prepared and certification made that such regulations would not have a
significant economic effect upon a substantial number of small
entities. Accordingly, this rule will ensure that existing requirements
previously promulgated by OSM will be implemented by the State. In
making the determination as to whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact, the Department relied upon the data and
assumptions for the counterpart Federal regulations.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. This rule:
a. Does not have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million.
b. Will not cause a major increase in costs or prices for
consumers, individual industries, federal, state, or local government
agencies, or geographic regions.
c. Does not have significant adverse effects on competition,
employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of
U.S. based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises.
This determination is based upon the fact that the State submittal
which is the subject of this rule is based upon counterpart Federal
regulations for which an analysis was prepared and a determination made
that the Federal regulation was not considered a major rule.
Unfunded Mandates
This rule will not impose a cost of $100 million or more in any
given year on any governmental entity or the private sector.
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 918
Intergovernmental relations, Surface mining, Underground mining.
Dated: June 11, 2001.
John W. Coleman,
Acting Regional Director, Mid-Continent Regional Coordinating Center.
[FR Doc. 01-16039 Filed 6-26-01; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-05-P