[Federal Register Volume 67, Number 206 (Thursday, October 24, 2002)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 65468]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 02-27083]
[[Page 65467]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Part IV
Department of Defense
General Services Administration
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
48 CFR Part 31
Federal Acquisition Regulation; Reimbursement of Relocation Costs on a
Lump-Sum Basis; Proposed Rule
Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 206 / Thursday, October 24, 2002 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 65468]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
48 CFR Part 31
Federal Acquisition Regulation; Reimbursement of Relocation Costs
on a Lump-Sum Basis
AGENCIES: Department of Defense (DoD), General Services Administration
(GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Notice of request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Civilian Agency Acquisition Council and the Defense
Acquisition Regulations Council (Councils) are considering revising the
relocation cost principle to expand the use of reimbursement of costs
on a lump-sum basis. The Councils are requesting comments regarding
this potential change. The Councils will consider the comments received
in their decision whether to develop a proposed rule. Should the
Councils decide to draft a proposed rule, an additional 60-day public
comment period will be provided.
DATES: Interested parties should submit comments in writing on or
before December 23, 2002 to be considered in the formulation of a
proposed rule.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments to: General Services Administration,
FAR Secretariat (MVA), 1800 F Street, NW., Room 4035, ATTN: Laurie
Duarte, Washington, DC 20405. Submit electronic comments via the
Internet to: [email protected].
Please submit comments only and cite FAR Notice on Reimbursement of
Relocation Costs on a Lump-Sum Basis in all correspondence related to
this case.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The FAR Secretariat, Room 4035, GS
Building, Washington, DC, 20405, at (202) 501-4755 for information
pertaining to status or publication schedules. For clarification of
content, contact Mr. Jeremy Olson at (202) 501-3221. Please cite FAR
Notice on Reimbursement of Relocation Costs on a Lump-Sum Basis.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The relocation cost principle at FAR 31.205-
35 permits the Government to reimburse contractors for relocation costs
(with the exception of miscellaneous costs) up to the employee's actual
expenses. For miscellaneous costs that are addressed at FAR 31.205-
35(a)(5), the Government may reimburse the contractor a flat or lump-
sum amount up to $5,000, in lieu of actual costs. The Councils are
considering revising FAR 31.205-35, Relocation costs, to permit
contractors the option of claiming employee relocation costs based on
actual costs, an appropriate lump-sum basis, or a combination of the
two approaches.
While individual receipts are not required with a lump-sum
approach, contractors would still have to demonstrate that amounts paid
are reasonable and appropriate for the circumstances of each relocating
employee. The Councils anticipate that this change may achieve overall
benefits by reducing administrative costs for contractors and by
improving employee morale. However, there is concern that permitting
lump-sum payments in lieu of actual costs may result in an increase in
costs to the Government.Therefore, the Councils invite interested
parties to provided the following information to help assess the
potential costs and benefits of the lump-sum reimbursement approach.
Note that public comments provided in response to this notice will be
available in their entirety to any requester, including any requester
under the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552). Under no
circumstances should respondents provide any information unless they do
so with a clear understanding that their comments will be made
available to the public.
1. Commercial practice. What has been your company's experience in
using a lump-sum approach instead of an actual cost method for
reimbursement of employee relocation expenses? If used, is the practice
to use the lump-sum approach for total costs of relocating employees,
or only certain types of costs? If so, which types?
2. Reasonableness. How would your company ensure that relocation
costs charged to the Government using a lump-sum approach are
reasonable?
3. Limits. Does your company now use commercially available data,
such as that developed by the Employee Relocation Council, in order to
establish reimbursement limits on relocation costs? If so, what sources
of commercially available data do you use, and how do you use the data?
If not, what other criteria or standards could be (or are being) used
to assess reasonableness?
4. Benefits. What are the types and amounts of savings or other
benefits that you anticipate would result if reimbursement on a lump-
sum basis were permitted?
5. Costs. What are the types and amounts of costs or other
disadvantages that you anticipate would result if reimbursement on a
lump-sum basis were permitted?
Dated: October 18, 2002.
Al Matera,
Director, Acquisition Policy Division.
[FR Doc. 02-27083 Filed 10-23-02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-EP-P