[Federal Register Volume 67, Number 245 (Friday, December 20, 2002)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 77927-77936]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 02-32130]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 82
[FRL-7425-6]
RIN 2060-AG12
Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Notice 17 for Significant New
Alternatives Policy Program
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.
ACTION: Notice of acceptability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice of acceptability expands the list of acceptable
substitutes for ozone-depleting substances (ODS) under the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Significant New Alternatives
Policy (SNAP) program. The substitutes are for use in the following
sectors: refrigeration and air conditioning, solvents cleaning, fire
suppression and explosion protection, and aerosols.
EFFECTIVE DATE: December 20, 2002.
ADDRESSES: Information relevant to this notice is contained in Air
Docket A-91-42, 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW.; U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Mail Code 6102T; Washington, DC, 20460. The docket
reading room is located at the address above in room B102 in the
basement. Reading room telephone: (202) 566-1744, facsimile: (202) 566-
1749 Air docket staff telephone: (202) 566-1742 and facsimile: (202)
566-1741 You may inspect the docket between 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m.
weekdays. As provided in 40 CFR part 2, a reasonable fee may be charged
for photocopying.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Margaret Sheppard by telephone at
(202) 564-9163, by fax at (202) 565-2155, by e-mail at
[email protected], or by mail at U.S. Environmental Protection
[[Page 77928]]
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Mail Code 6205J, Washington, DC
20460. Overnight or courier deliveries should be sent to 501 3rd
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20001.
For more information on the Agency's process for administering the
SNAP program or criteria for evaluation of substitutes, refer to the
original SNAP rulemaking published in the Federal Register on March 18,
1994 (59 FR 13044). Notices and rulemakings under the SNAP program, as
well as other EPA publications on protection of stratospheric ozone,
are available from EPA's Ozone Depletion World Wide Web site at http://www.epa.gov/ozone/ including the SNAP portion at http://www.epa.gov/ozone/snap/.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Listing of Acceptable Substitutes
A. Refrigeration and Air Conditioning
B. Solvent Cleaning
C. Fire Suppression
D. Aerosols
II. Section 612 Program
A. Statutory Requirements
B. Regulatory History
Appendix A--Summary of Acceptable Decisions
I. Listing of Acceptable Substitutes
This section presents EPA's most recent acceptable listing
decisions for substitutes in the following industrial sectors:
refrigeration and air conditioning, solvent cleaning, fire suppression
and explosion protection, and aerosols. For copies of the full list of
SNAP decisions in all industrial sectors, visit EPA's Ozone Depletion
web site at http://www.epa.gov/ozone/snap/lists/index.html.
The sections below discuss the substitute listing in detail.
Appendix A contains a table summarizing today's listing decisions. The
statements in the ``Further Information'' column in the table provide
additional information, but are not legally binding under section 612
of the Clean Air Act. In addition, the ``further information'' may not
be a comprehensive list of other legal obligations you may need to meet
when using the substitute. Although you are not required to follow
recommendations in the ``further information'' column of the table to
use a substitute, EPA strongly encourages you to apply the information
when using these substitutes. In many instances, the information simply
refers to standard operating practices in existing industry and/or
building-code standards. Thus, many of these statements, if adopted,
would not require significant changes to existing operating practices.
Submissions to EPA for the use of the substitutes listed in this
document may be found under category VI-D of EPA air docket A-91-42 at
the address described above under ADDRESSES. You can find other
materials supporting the decisions in this action under category IX-B
of EPA docket A-91-42.
A. Refrigeration and Air Conditioning
1. and 2. R-404A and R-507A
EPA's decision: R-404A and R-507A are acceptable for use in new and
retrofit equipment as substitutes for HCFC-22 and HCFC blends
including, but not limited to, R-401A, R-401B, R-402A, R-402B, R-406A,
R-408A, R-409A, R-411A, R-411B, R-411C, R-414A, R-414B, and R-416A in:
[sbull] Retail food refrigeration
[sbull] Cold storage warehouses
[sbull] Commercial ice machines
[sbull] Refrigerated transport
[sbull] Ice skating rinks
[sbull] Water coolers
[sbull] Residential dehumidifiers
[sbull] Vending machines
[sbull] Industrial process air conditioning
[sbull] Reciprocating chillers
[sbull] Screw chillers
[sbull] Centrifugal chillers
[sbull] Industrial process refrigeration
[sbull] Very low temperature refrigeration
[sbull] Non-mechanical heat transfer systems
[sbull] Household refrigerators and freezers
[sbull] Household and light commercial air conditioning
R-404A is a blend of 44% by weight HFC-125 (pentafluoroethane), 52%
by weight HFC-143a (1,1,1-trifluoroethane) and 4% by weight HFC-134a
(1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane). You may find the submission under EPA Air
Docket A-91-42, items VI-D-284 and VI-D-287. R-507A, also known as R-
507, is a blend of 50% by weight HFC-125 (pentafluoroethane) and 50% by
weight HFC-143a (1,1,1-trifluoroethane).
EPA previously listed both R-404A and R-507A as acceptable
alternatives for various CFCs (e.g., R-12) and CFC-containing blends
(e.g., R-500 and R-502) in several applications in the original SNAP
rulemaking published in the Federal Register on March 18, 1994 (59 FR
13044) and in subsequent SNAP Notices (August 26, 1994, 59 FR 44240;
January 13, 1995, 60 FR 3318). EPA previously listed R-404A and R-507A
as acceptable substitutes for HCFC-22 in various end uses (March 22,
2002, 67 FR 13272 for R-404A; September 5, 1996, 61 FR 47012 for R-
507A). Since that time, many users have switched directly from CFCs to
R-404A or R-507A, while others have switched to HCFC-22 or many
different HCFC blends found acceptable under various SNAP rulemakings
and notices. Today's decision finds it acceptable to switch from HCFC-
22 and HCFC blends to R-404A or R-507A in the end uses listed above.
Environmental Information
The ozone depletion potential (ODP) of R-404A and of R-507A is
zero. The Global Warming Potentials (GWP) of HFC-125, HFC-143a and HFC-
134a are 3400, 4300 and 1300, respectively (relative to carbon dioxide,
using a 100-year time horizon).
All components of these blends have been exempted from listing as a
volatile organic compound (VOC) under Clean Air Act regulations
concerning the development of state implementation plans (SIPs) at 40
CFR 51.100(s).
Flammability Information
While HFC-143a is moderately flammable, the blends are not
flammable.
Toxicity and Exposure Data
All components of the blend have workplace environmental exposure
limits (WEELs) of 1000 ppm established by the American Industrial
Hygiene Association (AIHA). EPA expects users to follow all
recommendations specified in the Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) for
the blend and the individual components and other safety precautions
common in the refrigeration and air conditioning industry. We also
expect that users of R-404A and R-507A will adhere to the AIHA's WEELs.
Comparison to Other Refrigerants
R-404A and R-507A are not ozone depleting; thus, they reduce risk
from ozone depletion compared to HCFC-22, the ODS they replace, and
blends containing HCFCs. Flammability and toxicity risks are low, as
discussed above. Thus, we find that R-404A and R-507A are acceptable
because they reduce overall risk to public health and the environment
in the end uses listed.
3. RS-24
EPA's decision: RS-24 is acceptable for use in new and retrofit
equipment as a substitute for CFC-12 in the following end uses:
[sbull] Industrial process refrigeration
[sbull] Industrial process air conditioning
[sbull] Ice skating rinks
[sbull] Cold storage warehouses
[sbull] Refrigerated transport
[sbull] Retail food refrigeration
[sbull] Vending machines
[sbull] Water coolers
[sbull] Commercial ice machines
[sbull] Household refrigerators and freezers
[sbull] Residential dehumidifiers
RS-24 is acceptable, subject to use conditions, for use in new and
retrofit
[[Page 77929]]
equipment as a substitute for CFC-12 in the following end use:
[sbull] Motor vehicle air conditioning
Conditions for Use in Motor Vehicle Air Conditioning Systems
Regulations regarding recycling and prohibiting venting issued
under section 609 of the Clean Air Act apply to this blend (subpart B
of 40 CFR part 82).
On October 16, 1996, (61 FR 54029), EPA promulgated a final rule
that prospectively applied certain conditions on the use of any
refrigerant used as a substitute for CFC-12 in motor vehicle air
conditioning systems (Appendix D of subpart G of 40 CFR part 82). That
rule provided that EPA would list new refrigerants in future notices of
acceptability. Therefore, the use of RS-24 as a CFC-12 substitute in
motor vehicle air conditioning systems must follow the standard
conditions imposed on previous refrigerants, including:
[sbull] The use of unique fittings designed by the refrigerant
manufacturer,
[sbull] The application of a detailed label,
[sbull] The removal of the original refrigerant prior to charging
with RS-24, and
[sbull] The installation of a high-pressure compressor cutoff
switch on systems equipped with pressure relief devices.
The October 16, 1996, rule gives full details on these use
conditions.
You must use the following fittings to use RS-24 in motor vehicle
air conditioning systems:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Diameter
Fitting type (inches) Thread pitch (threads/inch) Thread direction
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Low-side service port................ ........... quick-connect................ .............................
High-side service port............... ........... quick-connect................ .............................
Large containers (20 lb.). ........... quick-connect................ .............................
Small cans........................... ........... quick-connect................ .............................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The quick-connect fittings have been reviewed and found to be
sufficiently different from HFC-134a and FRIGC FR-12 quick-connect
fittings to be considered unique. The labels will have a gold
background and black text.
The submitter of RS-24 claims that the composition of this HFC
blend is confidential business information. You can find a version of
the submission with information claimed confidential by the submitter
removed in EPA Air Docket A-91-42, item VI-D-281.
Environmental Information
The ozone depletion potential (ODP) of RS-24 is zero. The Global
Warming Potentials (GWPs) of the constituents are between zero and
approximately 4000 (relative to carbon dioxide, using a 100-year time
horizon).
At least one component of this blend has not been exempted from
listing as a VOC under Clean Air Act regulations concerning the
development of SIPs at 40 CFR 51.100(s).
Flammability Information
While at least one component of the blend is moderately flammable,
the blend is not flammable.
Toxicity and Exposure Data
Components of the blend have workplace guidance level exposure
limits on the order of 500 to 1000 ppm. EPA believes this exposure
limit will be protective of human health and safety. EPA expects users
to follow all recommendations specified in the Material Safety Data
Sheet (MSDS) for the blend and the individual components and other
safety precautions common in the refrigeration and air conditioning
industry.
Comparison to Other Refrigerants
RS-24 is not an ozone depleter; thus, it reduces risk from ozone
depletion compared to CFC-12, the ODS it replaces. RS-24 has a
comparable or lower GWP than the other substitutes for CFC-12.
Flammability and toxicity risks are low, as discussed above. Thus, we
find that RS-24 is acceptable because it reduces overall risk to public
health and the environment in the end uses listed.
4. NU-22
EPA's decision: NU-22 [R-125/134a/600 (46.6/50.0/3.4)] is
acceptable for use in new and retrofit equipment as a substitute for R-
502 in:
[sbull] Industrial process refrigeration
[sbull] Industrial process air-conditioning
[sbull] Cold storage warehouses
[sbull] Refrigerated transport
[sbull] Retail food refrigeration
[sbull] Commercial ice machines
[sbull] Vending machines
[sbull] Water coolers
[sbull] Ice skating rinks
NU-22 is a blend of 46.6 percent HFC-125, 50.0 percent HFC-134a,
and 3.4 percent n-butane.
You can find the most recent submission in EPA Air Docket A-91-42,
item VI-D-286.
In SNAP Notice of Acceptability 16 (March 22, 2002; 67 FR
13272), EPA noted that the composition of NU-22 was changed to match
that of ISCEON 59, and that EPA previously found ISCEON 59 acceptable
as a substitute for R-22 in a number of end uses in SNAP Notice of
Acceptability 11 (December 6, 1999; 64 FR 68039).
Environmental Information
For environmental information on HFC-125 and HFC-134a, see above in
section I.A.1 for R-404A. The ozone depletion potential (ODP) of NU-22
is zero. The Global Warming Potential (GWP) of butane is less than 10
(relative to carbon dioxide, using a 100-year time horizon). Butane is
a VOC under Clean Air Act regulations concerning the development of
SIPs at 40 CFR 51.100(s).
Flammability Information
While butane, one component of the blend, is flammable, the blend
is not flammable.
Toxicity and Exposure Data
HFC-125 and HFC-134a have guidance level WEELs of 1000 ppm
established by the AIHA. Butane has a threshold limit value (TLV) of
800 ppm established by the American Conference of Goverment Industrial
Hygienists (ACGIH). EPA expects users to follow all recommendations
specified in the Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) for the blend and
the individual components and other safety precautions common in the
refrigeration and air conditioning industry. We also expect that users
of NU-22 will adhere to the AIHA's WEELs and the ACGIH's TLVs.
Comparison to Other Refrigerants
NU-22 is not an ozone depleter; thus, it reduces risk from ozone
depletion compared to R-502, the ODS it replaces. NU-22 has a
comparable or lower GWP than the other substitutes for R-502.
Flammability and toxicity risks are low, as discussed above. Thus, we
find that NU-22 is acceptable because it reduces overall risk to public
health and the environment in the end uses listed.
[[Page 77930]]
5. R-407C
EPA's decision: R-407C is acceptable for use in new and retrofit
equipment as a substitute for HCFC-22 and HCFC blends including, but
not limited to, R-401A, R-401B, R-402A, R-402B, R-406A, R-408A, R-409A,
R-411A, R-411B, R-411C, R-414A, R-414B, and R-416A in:
[sbull] Retail food refrigeration
[sbull] Cold storage warehouses
[sbull] Commercial ice machines
[sbull] Refrigerated transport
[sbull] Ice skating rinks
[sbull] Water coolers
[sbull] Residential dehumidifiers
[sbull] Vending machines
[sbull] Industrial process air conditioning
[sbull] Reciprocating chillers
[sbull] Screw chillers
[sbull] Centrifugal chillers
[sbull] Industrial process refrigeration
[sbull] Very low temperature refrigeration
[sbull] Non-mechanical heat transfer systems
[sbull] Household refrigerators and freezers
[sbull] Household and light commercial air conditioning
R-407C is a blend of 23% by weight HFC-32 (difluoromethane), 25% by
weight HFC-125 (pentafluoroethane) and 52% by weight HFC-134a (1,1,1,2-
tetrafluoroethane).
EPA previously listed R-407C as an acceptable alternative for HCFC-
22 and CFCs in various end uses under SNAP (February 8, 1996; 61 FR
4736). Since that time, many users have switched to R-407C, while
others have switched to many different HCFC blends found acceptable
under various SNAP rulemakings and notices. Today's decision finds it
acceptable to switch from HCFC blends to R-407C.
Environmental Information
The ozone depletion potential (ODP) of R-407C is zero. The Global
Warming Potentials (GWP) of HFC-125, HFC-32 and HFC-134a are 3400, 880,
and 1300, respectively (relative to carbon dioxide, using a 100-year
time horizon).
HFC-32 is the only component of this blend that is a VOC under
Clean Air Act regulations.
Flammability Information
While HFC-32 is moderately flammable, the blend is not flammable.
Toxicity and Exposure Data
All components of the blend have workplace environmental exposure
limits (WEELs) of 1000 ppm established by the American Industrial
Hygiene Association (AIHA). EPA expects users to follow all
recommendations specified in the Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) for
the blend and the individual components and other safety precautions
common in the refrigeration and air conditioning industry. We also
expect that users of R-407C will adhere to the AIHA's WEELs.
Comparison to Other Refrigerants
R-407C is not an ozone depleter; thus, it reduces risk from ozone
depletion compared to HCFC-22, the ODS it replaces, and blends
containing HCFCs. R-407C has a comparable or lower GWP than the other
substitutes for HCFC-22. Flammability and toxicity risks are low, as
discussed above. Thus, we find that R-407C is acceptable because it
reduces overall risk to public health and the environment in the end
uses listed.
6. R-410A
EPA's decision: R-410A is acceptable for use in new equipment as a
substitute for HCFC blends including, but not limited to, R-401A, R-
401B, R-402A, R-402B, R-406A, R-408A, R-409A, R-411A, R-411B, R-411C,
R-414A, R-414B, and R-416A in:
[sbull] Retail food refrigeration
[sbull] Cold storage warehouses
[sbull] Commercial ice machines
[sbull] Refrigerated transport
[sbull] Ice skating rinks
[sbull] Water coolers
[sbull] Residential dehumidifiers
[sbull] Vending machines
[sbull] Industrial process air conditioning
[sbull] Reciprocating chillers
[sbull] Screw chillers
[sbull] Centrifugal chillers
[sbull] Industrial process refrigeration
[sbull] Very low temperature refrigeration
[sbull] Non-mechanical heat transfer systems
[sbull] Household refrigerators and freezers
[sbull] Household and light commercial air conditioning
R-410A is a blend of 50% by weight HFC-32 (difluoromethane) and 50%
by weight HFC-125 (pentafluoroethane).
EPA previously listed R-410A as an acceptable alternative for HCFC-
22 and CFCs in various end uses under SNAP (February 8, 1996; 61 FR
4736). Since that time, many users have switched to R-410A, while
others have switched to many different HCFC blends found acceptable
under various SNAP rulemakings and notices. Today's decision finds it
acceptable to switch from HCFC blends to R-410A.
Environmental Information
The ozone depletion potential (ODP) of R-410A is zero. For
environmental information about HFC-125, see section I.A.1 above for R-
404A; for environmental information about HFC-32, see section I.A.5
above for R-407C.
Flammability Information
While HFC-32 is moderately flammable, the blend is not flammable.
Toxicity and Exposure Data
For toxicity and exposure data on HFC-125 and HFC-32, see section
I.A.5 above for R-407C. We expect that users of R-410A will adhere to
the AIHA's WEELs.
Comparison to Other Refrigerants
R-410A is not an ozone depleter; thus, it reduces risk from ozone
depletion compared to HCFC-22, the ODS it replaces, and blends
containing HCFCs. Flammability and toxicity risks are low, as discussed
above. Thus, we find that R-410A is acceptable because it reduces
overall risk to public health and the environment in the end uses
listed.
7. R-414B
EPA's decision: R-414B [R-22/124/600a/142b (50/39/1.5/9.5)] is
acceptable for use in new and retrofit equipment as a substitute for
CFC-12 and CFC-114 in:
[sbull] Industrial process air conditioning
R-414B, sold under the trade name Hot Shot, is a blend of 50% by
weight HCFC-22 (chlorodifluoromethane), 39% by weight HCFC-124 (2-
chloro-1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane), 1.5% by weight R-600a (isobutane)
and 9.5% by weight HCFC-142b (1-chloro-1,1-difluoroethane). You may
find the submission under EPA Air Docket A-91-42, item VI-D-289.
EPA previously listed R-414B as an acceptable alternative for CFC-
12 and R-500 in several end-uses under SNAP (September 5, 1996; 61 FR
47012) and found it acceptable subject to use conditions as a CFC-12
alternative in motor vehicle air conditioners (October 16, 1996; 61 FR
54029). Today's decision extends this decision to an additional end-
use.
Environmental Information
The ozone depletion potentials (ODPs) of HCFC-22, HCFC-124 and
HCFC-142b are 0.055, 0.022 and 0.065, respectively. The global warming
potentials (GWPs) are 1700, 620 and 2400, respectively (relative to
carbon dioxide, using a 100-year time horizon).
Isobutane is under Clean Air Act regulations concerning the
development of SIPs at 40 CFR 51.100(s).
Flammability Information
While HCFC-142b and isobutane are flammable, the blend is not
flammable.
Toxicity and Exposure Data
HCFC-22, HCFC-124 and HCFC-142b have workplace environmental
exposure
[[Page 77931]]
limits (WEELs) established by the American Industrial Hygiene
Association (AIHA) or threshold limit value (TLV) established by the
American Conference of Goverment Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) of 1000
ppm. Isobutane has a recommended exposure limit (REL) of 800 ppm
established by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and
Health (NIOSH). EPA expects users to follow all recommendations
specified in the Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) for the blend and
the individual components and other safety precautions common in the
refrigeration and air conditioning industry. We also expect that users
of R-414B will adhere to all recommended exposure limits.
Comparison to Other Refrigerants
R-414B has a much lower ozone-depletion potential than CFC-12 and
CFC-114, the ODSs it replaces; thus, it reduces risk from ozone
depletion. R-414B has a comparable or lower GWP than the other
substitutes for CFC-12 and CFC-114 in the end-use listed. Flammability
and toxicity risks are low, as discussed above. Thus, we find that R-
414B is acceptable because it reduces overall risk to public health and
the environment in the end use listed.
B. Solvent Cleaning
1. HCFC-225ca/cb
EPA's Decision: HCFC-225ca and HCFC-225cb are acceptable for use as
a substitute for CFC-113 and methyl chloroform in the metals cleaning
end use.
HCFC-225ca is also called 3,3-dichloro-1,1,1,2,2-
pentafluoropropane. HCFC-225cb is also called 1,3-dichloro-1,1,2,2,3-
pentafluoropropane. They are sold in a commercial blend of 45% of the
ca isomer and 55% of the cb isomer (``HCFCca/cb'').
EPA has previously found HCFC-225ca/cb acceptable subject to use
conditions for use in solvents cleaning in the precision cleaning and
electronics cleaning end uses (June 13, 1995, 60 FR 31092) and
acceptable for use in aerosol solvents (April 28, 1999, 64 FR 22981).
Environmental Information
HCFC-225ca and HCFC-225cb have ozone depletion potentials (ODPs),
respectively, of 0.025 and 0.033. HCFC-225ca and HCFC-225cb have global
warming potentials (GWPs) of 180 and 620, respectively, over a 100-year
time horizon. HCFC-225ca has an atmospheric lifetime (ALT) of 2.1 years
and HCFC-225cb has an ALT of 6.2 years.
HCFC-225ca, HCFC-225cb, and the commercial blend of HCFC-225ca/cb
have been exempted from listing as volatile organic compounds (VOCs)
under Clean Air Act regulations concerning the development of state
implementation plans at 40 CFR 51.100(s).
Flammability
HCFC-225ca, HCFC-225cb, and the commercial blend of HCFC-225ca/cb
are non-flammable.
Toxicity and Exposure Data
The manufacturer's recommended exposure guidelines over an eight-
hour time-weighted average are 50 ppm for HCFC-225ca, 400 ppm for HCFC-
225cb, and 100 ppm for the commercial mixture of HCFC-225ca/cb. EPA
initially established a use condition for HCFC-225ca/cb in the
precision cleaning and electronics cleaning end uses and did not issue
an acceptability determination for the metal cleaning end use because
of earlier data indicating the exposure guideline for the commercial
mixture should be only 50 ppm. More recent analysis of the
toxicological data indicate that a higher exposure guideline is
appropriate (SNAP Notice 16, March 22, 2002, 67 FR 13272). EPA
expects users of HCFC-225ca/cb to follow all recommendations specified
in the manufacturer's Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDSs).
Comparison to Other Cleaning Solvents
HCFC-225ca and HCFC-225cb have ODPs of 0.025 and 0.033,
respectively; thus, they reduce risk overall compared to CFC-113 and
methyl chloroform, the ODSs they replace. HCFC-225ca and HCFC-225cb
have comparable or lower GWP than some acceptable substitutes for CFC-
113 and methyl chloroform. HCFC-225ca and HCFC-225cb are non-flammable.
HCFC-225ca and HCFC-225cb are VOC-exempt. Thus, we find that HCFC-
225ca, HCFC-225cb, and the commercial blend of HCFC-225ca/cb are
acceptable because they reduce overall risk to public health and the
environment in the end use listed.
C. Fire Suppression and Explosion Protection
1. C6-perfluoroketone
EPA's decision: C6-perfluoroketone is acceptable as a substitute
for halon 1301 in the total flooding end use for both normally occupied
and unoccupied spaces.
C6-perfluoroketone is comprised of a perfluoroalkyl ketone
(1,1,1,2,2,4,5,5,5-nonafluoro-4-(trifluoromethyl)-3-pentanone). It is
marketed under the trade name Novec-1230. Other names include FK-5-1-
12mmy2, perfluoro-2-methyl-3-pentanone, and L-15566. You can find a
version of the submission with information claimed confidential by the
submitter removed in EPA Air Docket A-91-42, items VI-D-269 and VI-D-
277. Additional information on this fire suppressant is available in
EPA Air Docket A-2002-08.
Environmental Information
C6-perfluoroketone has no ozone-depletion potential, a global
warming potential of six to 100 relative to CO2 over a 100
year time horizon, and an atmospheric lifetime of less than three days.
Flammability
C6-perfluoroketone is non-flammable.
Toxicity and Exposure Data
The C6-perfluoroketone was assayed for its ability to induce
cardiac sensitization in the beagle dog (Huntington 2001). In that
study, the cardiotoxic NOAEL was determined to be 10 percent. The
manufacturer's maximum design concentration of 6.44 percent is
significantly below the cardiotoxic NOAEL.
Appropriate protective measures should be taken and proper training
administered for the manufacture, clean-up and disposal of this product
and for the installation and maintenance of the total flooding systems
using this product. EPA recommends the following for establishments
installing and maintaining total flooding systems using this agent:
[sbull] Install and use adequate ventilation;
[sbull] Clean up all spills immediately in accordance with good
industrial hygiene practices;
[sbull] Provide training for safe handling procedures to all
employees that would be likely to handle containers of the agent or
extinguishing units filled with the agent; and
[sbull] Provide safety features such as pre-discharge alarms, time
delays, and system abort switches, as directed by applicable OSHA
regulations and NFPA standards. EPA recommends that unnecessary
exposure to fire suppression agents and their decomposition products be
avoided and that personnel exposure be limited to no more than 5
minutes.
Use of this agent should conform with relevant Occupational Safety
and Health Administration (OSHA) requirements, including 29 CFR 1910,
subpart L, sections 1910.160 and 1910.162. EPA expects that users will
follow the safety guidelines in the NFPA 2001 standard for clean agent
fire extinguishing systems and the guidelines in the manufacturer's
MSDSs.
[[Page 77932]]
Comparison to Other Fire Suppressants
EPA has reviewed the potential environmental impacts of this
substitute and has concluded that, by comparison to halon 1301 and
other acceptable substitutes, C6-perfluoroketone significantly reduces
overall risk to the environment. With no ozone-depletion potential, a
global warming potential value of less than 100, and an atmospheric
lifetime of less than three days, C6-perfluoroketone provides an
improvement over use of halon 1301, hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs)
and hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) in fire protection. We find that C6-
perfluoroketone is acceptable because it reduces overall risk to public
health and the environment in the end use listed.
D. Aerosols
1. HCFC-225ca/cb
EPA's Decision: HCFC-225ca and HCFC-225cb are acceptable for use as
a substitute for HCFC-141b in the aerosol solvent end use.
For further information on HCFC-225ca and HCFC-225cb, see section
B., Solvent Cleaning, above.
Comparison to Other Aerosol Solvents
HCFC-225ca and HCFC-225cb have ODPs of 0.025 and 0.033, while HCFC-
141b has an ODP of 0.11; thus, HCFC-225ca and -225cb reduce risk
overall compared to HCFC-141b, the ODS they replace. HCFC-225ca and
HCFC-225cb have GWPs of 180 and 620, respectively, which are comparable
or lower than the GWP of HCFC-141b (700) and the GWPs of some
acceptable substitutes for HCFC-141b. HCFC-225ca and HCFC-225cb are
non-flammable. They are less toxic than some other acceptable
substitutes for HCFC-141b. HCFC-225ca and -225cb are VOC-exempt and are
not hazardous air pollutants, unlike many alternatives in this end use.
Therefore, we find that HCFC-225ca, HCFC-225cb, and the commercial
blend of HCFC-225ca/cb are acceptable because they reduce overall risk
to public health and the environment in the end use listed.
II. Section 612 Program
A. Statutory Requirements
Section 612 of the Clean Air Act authorizes EPA to develop a
program for evaluating alternatives to ozone-depleting substances. We
refer to this program as the Significant New Alternatives Policy (SNAP)
program. The major provisions of section 612 are:
[sbull] Rulemaking--Section 612(c) requires EPA to promulgate rules
making it unlawful to replace any class I (chlorofluorocarbon, halon,
carbon tetrachloride, methyl chloroform, methyl bromide, and
hydrobromofluorocarbon) or class II (hydrochlorofluorocarbon) substance
with any substitute that the Administrator determines may present
adverse effects to human health or the environment where the
Administrator has identified an alternative that (1) reduces the
overall risk to human health and the environment, and (2) is currently
or potentially available.
[sbull] Listing of Unacceptable/Acceptable Substitutes--Section
612(c) also requires EPA to publish a list of the substitutes
unacceptable for specific uses. EPA must publish a corresponding list
of acceptable alternatives for specific uses.
[sbull] Petition Process--Section 612(d) grants the right to any
person to petition EPA to add a substance to or delete a substance from
the lists published in accordance with section 612(c). The Agency has
90 days to grant or deny a petition. Where the Agency grants the
petition, it must publish the revised lists within an additional six
months.
[sbull] 90-day Notification--Section 612(e) directs EPA to require
any person who produces a chemical substitute for a class I substance
to notify the Agency not less than 90 days before new or existing
chemicals are introduced into interstate commerce for significant new
uses as substitutes for a class I substance. The producer must also
provide the Agency with the producer's unpublished health and safety
studies on such substitutes.
[sbull] Outreach--Section 612(b)(1) states that the Administrator
shall seek to maximize the use of federal research facilities and
resources to assist users of class I and II substances in identifying
and developing alternatives to the use of such substances in key
commercial applications.
[sbull] Clearinghouse--Section 612(b)(4) requires the Agency to set
up a public clearinghouse of alternative chemicals, product
substitutes, and alternative manufacturing processes that are available
for products and manufacturing processes which use class I and II
substances.
B. Regulatory History
On March 18, 1994, EPA published the final rulemaking (59 FR 13044)
which described the process for administering the SNAP program. In the
same notice, we issued the first acceptability lists for substitutes in
the major industrial use sectors. These sectors include:
[sbull] Refrigeration and air conditioning;
[sbull] Foam blowing;
[sbull] Solvents cleaning;
[sbull] Fire suppression and explosion protection;
[sbull] Sterilants;
[sbull] Aerosols;
[sbull] Adhesives, coatings and inks; and
[sbull] Tobacco expansion.
These sectors compose the principal industrial sectors that
historically consumed the largest volumes of ozone-depleting compounds.
As described in this original rule for the SNAP program, EPA does
not believe that rulemaking procedures are required to list
alternatives as acceptable with no limitations. Such listings do not
impose any sanction, nor do they remove any prior license to use a
substance. Therefore, by this notice we are adding substances to the
list of acceptable alternatives without first requesting comment on new
listings.
However, we do believe that notice-and-comment rulemaking is
required to place any substance on the list of prohibited substitutes,
to list a substance as acceptable only under certain conditions, to
list substances as acceptable only for certain uses, or to remove a
substance from the lists of prohibited or acceptable substitutes. We
publish updates to these lists as separate notices of rulemaking in the
Federal Register.
The Agency defines a ``substitute'' as any chemical, product
substitute, or alternative manufacturing process, whether existing or
new, intended for use as a replacement for a class I or class II
substance. Anyone who produces a substitute must provide EPA with
health and safety studies on the substitute at least 90 days before
introducing it into interstate commerce for significant new use as an
alternative. This requirement applies to substitute manufacturers, but
may include importers, formulators, or end-users, when they are
responsible for introducing a substitute into commerce.
You can find a complete chronology of SNAP decisions and the
appropriate Federal Register citations from the SNAP section of EPA's
Ozone Depletion World Wide Web site at www.epa.gov/ozone/title6/snap/chron.html. This information is also available from the Air Docket (see
ADDRESSES section above for contact information).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 82
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: December 9, 2002.
Brian J. McLean,
Director, Office of Atmospheric Programs, Office of Air and Radiation.
Appendix A: Summary of Acceptable Decisions
[[Page 77933]]
Refrigeration and Air-Conditioning
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
End-Use Substitute Decision Further information
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Industrial process refrigeration RS-24 as a substitute for Acceptable ......................
(retrofit and new). CFC-12.
NU-22 as a substitute for R- Acceptable ......................
502.
R-404A as a substitute for Acceptable............ See note \1\
HCFC-22 and HCFC blends.
R-507A as a substitute for Acceptable............ See note
HCFC-22 and HCFC blends.
R-407C as a substitute for Acceptable............ See note
HCFC-22 and HCFC blends.
Industrial process refrigeration R-410A as a substitute for Acceptable............ See note
(new). HCFC-22 and HCFC blends.
Industrial process air conditioning RS-24 as a substitute for Acceptable ......................
(retrofit and new). CFC-12.
NU-22 as a substitute for R- Acceptable ......................
502.
R-404A as a substitute for Acceptable............ See note
for HCFC-22 and HCFC
blends.
R-507A as a substitute for Acceptable............ See note
for HCFC-22 and HCFC
blends.
R-407C as a substitute for Acceptable............ See note
for HCFC-22 and HCFC
blends.
R-414B as a substitute for Acceptable ......................
for CFC-12 and CFC-14.
Industrial process air conditioning R-410A as a substitute for Acceptable See note
(new). HCFC-22 and HCFC blends.
Ice skating rinks (retrofit and RS-24 as a substitute for Acceptable ......................
new). CFC-12.
NU-22 as a substitute for R- Acceptable ......................
502.
NU-22 as a substitute for R- Acceptable ......................
502.
R-404A as a substitute for Acceptable............ See note
HCFC-22 and HCFC blends.
R-507A as a substitute for Acceptable............ See note
HCFC-22 and HCFC blends.
R-407C as a substitute for Acceptable............ See note
HCFC-22 and HCFC blends.
Ice skating rinks (new)............ R-410A as a substitute for Acceptable............ See note
HCFC-22 and HCFC blends.
Cold storage warehouses (retrofit RS-24 as a substitute for Acceptable ......................
and new). CFC-12.
NU-22 as a substitute for R- Acceptable ......................
502.
R-404A as a substitute for Acceptable............ See note
HCFC-22 and HCFC blends.
R-507A as a substitute for Acceptable............ See note
HCFC-22 and HCFC blends.
R-407C as a substitute for Acceptable............ See note
HCFC-22 and HCFC blends.
Cold storage warehouses (new)...... R-410A as a substitute for Acceptable............ See note
HCFC-22 and HCFC blends.
Refrigerated transport (retrofit RS-24 as a substitute for Acceptable ......................
and new). CFC-12.
NU-22 as a substitute for R- Acceptable ......................
502.
R-404A as a substitute for Acceptable............ See note
HCFC-22 and HCFC blends.
R-507A as a substitute for Acceptable............ See note
HCFC-22 and HCFC blends.
R-407C as a substitute for Acceptable............ See note
HCFC-22 and HCFC blends.
Refrigerated transport (new)....... R-410A as a substitute for Acceptable............ See note
HCFC-22 and HCFC blends.
Retail food refrigeration (retrofit RS-24 as a substitute for Acceptable ......................
and new). CFC-12.
R-404A as a substitute for Acceptable............ See note
HCFC-22 and HCFC blends.
R-507A as a substitute for Acceptable............ See note
HCFC-22 and HCFC blends.
R-407C as a substitute for Acceptable............ See note
HCFC-22 and HCFC blends.
Retail food refrigeration (new).... R-410A as a substitute for Acceptable............ See note
HCFC-22 and HCFC blends.
Vending machines (retrofit and new) RS-24 as a substitute for Acceptable ......................
CFC-12.
NU-22 as a substitute for R- Acceptable ......................
502.
R-404A as a substitute for Acceptable............ See note
HCFC-22 and HCFC blends.
R-507A as a substitute for Acceptable............ See note
HCFC-22 and HCFC blends.
R-407C as a substitute for Acceptable............ See note
HCFC-22 and HCFC blends.
[[Page 77934]]
Vending machines (new)............. R-410A as a substitute for Acceptable............ See note
HCFC-22 and HCFC blends.
Water coolers (retrofit and new)... RS-24 as a substitute for Acceptable ......................
CFC-12.
NU-22 as a substitute for R- Acceptable ......................
502.
R-404A as a substitute for Acceptable............ See note
HCFC-22 and HCFC blends.
R-507A as a substitute for Acceptable............ See note
HCFC-22 and HCFC blends.
R-407C as a substitute for Acceptable............ See note
HCFC-22 and HCFC blends.
Water coolers (new)................ R-410A as a substitute for Acceptable............ See note
HCFC-22 and HCFC blends.
Commercial ice machines (retrofit RS-24 as a substitute for Acceptable ......................
and new). CFC-12.
NU-22 as a substitute for R- Acceptable ......................
502.
R-404A as a substitute for Acceptable............ See note
HCFC-22 and HCFC blends.
R-507A as a substitute for Acceptable............ See note
HCFC-22 and HCFC blends.
R-407C as a substitute for Acceptable............ See note
HCFC-22 and HCFC blends.
Commercial ice machines (new)...... R-410A as a substitute for Acceptable............ See note
HCFC-22 and HCFC blends.
Household refrigerators and R-404A as a substitute for Acceptable............
freezers (retrofit and new). CFC-12.
RS-24 as a substitute for Acceptable ......................
CFC-12.
R-404A as a substitute for Acceptable............ See note
HCFC-22 and HCFC blends.
R-507A as a substitute for Acceptable............ See note
HCFC-22 and HCFC blends.
R-407C as a substitute for Acceptable............ See note
HCFC-22 and HCFC blends.
Household refrigerators and R-410A as a substitute for Acceptable............ See note
freezers (new). HCFC-22 and HCFC blends.
Reciprocating chillers (retrofit R-404A as a substitute for Acceptable............ See note
and new). HCFC-22 and HCFC blends.
R-507A as a substitute for Acceptable............ See note
HCFC-22 and HCFC blends.
R-407C as a substitute for Acceptable............ See note
HCFC-22 and HCFC blends.
Reciprocating chillers (new)....... R-410A as a substitute for Acceptable............ See note
HCFC-22 and HCFC blends.
Centrifugal chillers (retrofit and R-404A as a substitute for Acceptable............ See note
new). HCFC-22 and HCFC blends.
R-507A as a substitute for Acceptable............ See note
HCFC-22 and HCFC blends.
R-407C as a substitute for Acceptable............ See note
HCFC-22 and HCFC blends.
Centrifugal chillers (new)......... R-410A as a substitute for Acceptable............ See note
HCFC-22 and HCFC blends.
Screw chillers (retrofit and new).. R-404A as a substitute for Acceptable............ See note
HCFC-22 and HCFC blends.
R-507A as a substitute for Acceptable............ See note
HCFC-22 and HCFC blends.
R-407C as a substitute for Acceptable............ See note
HCFC-22 and HCFC blends.
Screw chillers (new)............... R-410A as a substitute for Acceptable............ See note
HCFC-22 and HCFC blends.
Very low temperature refrigeration R-404A as a substitute for Acceptable............ See note
(retrofit and new). HCFC-22 and HCFC blends.
R-507A as a substitute for Acceptable............ See note
HCFC-22 and HCFC blends.
R-407C as a substitute for Acceptable............ See note
HCFC-22 and HCFC blends.
Very low temperature refrigeration R-410A as a substitute for Acceptable............ See note
(new). HCFC-22 and HCFC blends.
Non-mechanical heat transfer R-404A as a substitute for Acceptable............ See note
systems (retrofit and new). HCFC-22 and HCFC blends.
R-507A as a substitute for Acceptable............ See note
HCFC-22 and HCFC blends.
R-407C as a substitute for Acceptable............ See note
HCFC-22 and HCFC blends.
Non-mechanical heat transfer R-410A as a substitute for Acceptable............ See note
systems (new). HCFC-22 and HCFC blends.
[[Page 77935]]
Household and light commercial air
conditioning (retrofit and new).
R-404A as a substitute for Acceptable............ See note
HCFC-22 and HCFC blends.
R-507A as a substitute for Acceptable............ See note
HCFC-22 and HCFC blends.
R-407C as a substitute for Acceptable............ See note
HCFC-22 and HCFC blends.
Household and light commercial air R-410A as a substitute for Acceptable............ See note
conditioning (new). HCFC-22 and HCFC blends.
Residential dehumidifiers (retrofit RS-24 as a substitute for Acceptable............ ......................
and new). CFC-12.
R-404A as a substitute for Acceptable............ See note
HCFC-22 and HCFC blends.
R-507A as a substitute for Acceptable............ See note
HCFC-22 and HCFC blends.
R-407C as a substitute for Acceptable............ See note
HCFC-22 and HCFC blends.
Residential dehumidifiers (new).... R-410A as a substitute for Acceptable............ See note
HCFC-22 and HCFC blends.
Motor vehicle air conditioning RS-24 as a substitute for Acceptable subject to Users must use the
(retrofit and new). CFC-12. use conditions. unique fittings and
label specified by
the manufacturer. Use
is subject to
requirements under
Sec. 609 of the
Clean Air Act.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Note: HCFC blends include, but are not limited to, R-410A, R-401B, R-402A, R-402B, R-406A, R-408A, R-409A, R-
411A, R-411B, R-411C, R-414A, R-414B, and R-416.
Solvent Cleaning
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
End-Use Substitute Decision Further Information
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Metal cleaning.............. HCFC-225ca and HCFC-225cb as a Acceptable........ EPA recommends
substitute for CFC-113 and methyl observing the
chloroform. manufacturer's
recommended
exposure guidelines
of 50 ppm for the -
ca isomer, 400 ppm
for the -cb isomer,
and 100 ppm for the
commercial mixture
of HCFC-225ca/cb.
EPA encourages users
to consider other
alternatives that
do not have an
ozone depletion
potential.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fire Suppression and Explosion Protection
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
End-Use Substitute Decision Further Information
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total flooding.............. C6-perfluoroketone Acceptable........ Use of the agent should be in accordance
as a substitute for with the safety guidelines in the
Halon 1301. latest edition of the NFPA 2001
Standard for Clean Agent Fire
Extinguishing Systems.
For operations that install and maintain
total flooding systems using this
agent, EPA recommends the following:
-- Install and use adequate ventilation;
-- Clean up all spills immediately in
accordance with good industrial hygiene
practices; and
-- Provide training for safe handling
procedures to all employees that would
be likely to handle containers of the
agent or extinguishing units filled
with the agent.
See additional notes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additional notes:
1. Should conform with relevant OSHA requirements, including 29 CFR 1910, subpart L, sections 1910.160, 1910.161
(dry chemicals and aerosols) and 1910.162 (gaseous agents).
2. Per OSHA requirements, protective gear (SCBA) should be available in the event personnel should reenter the
area.
3. Discharge testing should be strictly limited to that which is essential to meet safety or performance
requirements.
[[Page 77936]]
4. The agent should be recovered from the fire protection system in conjunction with testing or servicing, and
recycled for later use or destroyed.
5. EPA has no intention of duplicating or displacing OSHA coverage related to the use of personal protective
equipment (e.g., respiratory protection), fire protection, hazard communication, worker training or any other
occupational safety and health standard with respect to halon substitutes.
Aerosols
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
End-Use Substitute Decision Further Information
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Aerosol solvents............ HCFC-225ca and HCFC- Acceptable........ EPA recommends observing the
225cb as a manufacturer's recommended exposure
substitute for HCFC- guidelines of 50 ppm for the -ca
141b. isomer, 400 ppm for the -cb isomer, and
100 ppm for the commercial mixture of
HCFC-225ca/cb.
EPA encourages users to consider other
alternatives that do not have an ozone
depletion potential.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 02-32130 Filed 12-19-02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-U