[Federal Register Volume 67, Number 162 (Wednesday, August 21, 2002)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 54159-54161]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 02-21286]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[AL-200234; FRL-7264-4]
Proposed Determination of Attainment of 1-hour Ozone Standard as
of November 15, 1993, for the Birmingham, AL, Marginal Ozone
Nonattainment Area
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA proposes to determine that the Birmingham marginal ozone
nonattainment area (hereinafter referred to as the Birmingham area)
attained the 1-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS)
by November 15, 1993, the date required by the Clean Air Act (CAA). The
Birmingham area is comprised of Jefferson and Shelby Counties. On July,
10, 2002, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia
concluded that EPA failed to exercise its non-discretionary duty to
make a final attainment determination for the Birmingham area by May
15, 1994. The Court required that EPA make a formal attainment
determination within 120 days from date of opinion. Sierra Club v.
Whitman, No. 00-2206 (D.D.C. July 10, 2002). Therefore, in response to
the Court's order, EPA proposes to determine that the Birmingham area
attained the 1-hour ozone standard by its statutory attainment date of
November 15, 1993.
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before September 20,
2002.
ADDRESSES: All comments should be addressed to: Sean Lakeman;
Regulatory Development Section; Air Planning Branch; Air, Pesticides
and Toxics Management Division; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Region 4; 61 Forsyth Street, SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960.
Copies of documents relative to this action are available at the
following address for inspection during normal business hours:
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, Air Planning Branch, 61
Forsyth Street, SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960.
The interested persons wanting to examine these documents should
make an appointment at least 24 hours before the visiting day and
reference file AL-200234.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Lakeman, Regulatory Development
Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management
Division, Region 4, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 61 Forsyth
Street, SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. The telephone number is (404)
562-9043. Mr Lakeman can also be reached via electronic mail at
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. What Action Is EPA Proposing To Take?
II. What Is the Background for This Action?
III. Why Is EPA Taking This Action?
[[Page 54160]]
IV. Proposed Action
V. Administrative Requirements.
I. What Action Is EPA Proposing To Take?
Pursuant to section 181(b)(2)(A) of the CAA, EPA is proposing to
determine that the Birmingham area has attained the 1-hour NAAQS for
ozone by November 15, 1993, the date required by section 181(a)(1) of
the CAA. This determination is based upon three years of complete,
quality-assured, ambient air monitoring data for the years 1991-1993
which indicate that Birmingham area attained the 1-hour ozone NAAQS.
II. What Is the Background for This Action?
The Clean Air Act (CAA) requires EPA to establish NAAQS for certain
pollutants that cause or contribute to air pollution that is reasonably
anticipated to endanger public health or welfare (CAA sections 108 and
109). In 1979, EPA promulgated the 1-hour 0.12 parts per million (ppm)
ground-level ozone NAAQS (44 FR 8202 (February 8, 1979)). Ground-level
ozone is not emitted directly by sources. Rather, emissions of nitrogen
oxides (NOX) and volatile organic compounds (VOC) react in
the presence of sunlight to form ground-level ozone. NOX and
VOC are referred to as precursors of ozone.
An area exceeds the 1-hour ozone NAAQS each time an ambient air
quality monitor records a 1-hour average ozone concentration above
0.124 ppm. An area is violating the NAAQS when the average of expected
exceedances during a consecutive three-year period is greater than 1 at
any one monitor (40 CFR part 50, appendix H). The CAA required EPA to
designate as nonattainment any area that was violating the 1-hour ozone
NAAQS, generally based on air quality monitoring data from the three-
year period from 1987-1989, or any area contributing to a violation
(CAA section 107(d)(4); 56 FR 56694 (November 6, 1991)). The CAA
further classified these areas, based on the area's design value (i.e.,
the 4th highest ozone value during the relevant three year period at
the violating monitor with the highest ozone levels), as marginal,
moderate, serious, severe or extreme (CAA section 181(a)). Marginal
areas were suffering the least significant air pollution problems.
The control requirements and dates by which attainment needs to be
achieved vary with the area's classification. Marginal areas were
subject to the fewest mandated control requirements and had the
earliest attainment date. Marginal areas were required to attain the 1-
hour NAAQS by November 15, 1993. Section 181(a) of the CAA.
The Birmingham area was originally designated as a 1-hour ozone
nonattainment area by EPA on March 3, 1978 (43 FR 8962). The Birmingham
nonattainment area at that time was geographically defined as Jefferson
County, Alabama. On November 6, 1991, by operation of law under section
181(a) of the CAA, EPA classified the Birmingham nonattainment area as
a marginal nonattainment area for ozone and added Shelby County to the
nonattainment area (56 FR 56693). The nonattainment classification for
the Birmingham marginal ozone area was based on ambient air sampling
measurements for ozone made during 1987-1989. The area was required to
attain the 1-hour ozone NAAQS by November 15, 1993, (i.e., three years
from the enactment of the CAA) which is the date set forth in section
181(a)(1).
For further background, see the Court's opinion in Sierra Club v.
Whitman, No. 00-2206 (D.D.C. July 10, 2002).
Section 181(b)(2)(A) of the Clean Air Act states that:
Within 6 months following the applicable attainment date (including
any extension thereof) for an ozone nonattainment area, the
Administrator shall determine, based on the area's design value (as of
the attainment date), whether the area attained the standard by that
date. Except for any Severe or Extreme area, any area that the
Administrator finds has not attained the standard by that date shall be
reclassified by operation of law in accordance with table 1 of
subsection (a) to the higher of--
(i) the next higher classification for the area, or
(ii) the classification applicable to the area's design value as
determined at the time of the notice required under subparagraph (B).
No area shall be reclassified as extreme under clause (ii).
After the end of the 1993 ozone season, the Birmingham area had
three years of quality assured air monitoring data (1991, 1992 and
1993) which demonstrated that the 1-hour ozone NAAQS was attained.
Table 1 shows the number of exceedances at each of the monitoring sites
in Jefferson and Shelby Counties. No individual monitor recorded more
than two exceedances during the three year period. The national 1-hour
primary and secondary ambient air quality standard for ozone is
attained when the expected number of days per calendar year with
maximum hourly average concentrations above 0.12 ppm is equal to or
less than 1, averaged over a three year period (40 CFR part 50,
appendix H). The design value for the Birmingham area is 0.124 ppm,
based on the fourth highest 1-hour value recorded at the Bearden Farm
monitor. The recorded values for that monitor were 0.144, 0.125, 0.124,
and 0.124 ppm.
Table 1.--Birmingham Area 1-hour Ozone NAAQS Exceedances From 1991 to 1993
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jefferson County Shelby
----------------------------------------------------------------- County
Year ------------
Fairfield Route 8 Tamassee LA Pinson High Tarrant Bearden
McAdory Sch Elem Sch Farm
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1991.............................. 0 0 0 0 0 0
1992.............................. 0 0 0 1 1 0
1993.............................. 0 0 1 0 0 2
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Therefore, in accordance with section 181(b)(2) of the CAA, EPA
proposes to determine that the Birmingham area attained the standard by
the area's November 15, 1993, attainment date.
III. Why Is EPA Taking This Action?
In 2000, the Sierra Club brought suit in district court, seeking,
among other claims, an order requiring EPA to issue a determination
pursuant to section 181(b) as to whether the Birmingham area had
attained the NAAQS.
On July, 10, 2002, the United States District Court for the
District of Columbia concluded that EPA failed to perform its non-
discretionary duty to
[[Page 54161]]
make a final attainment determination for the Birmingham area (CAA
section 181(6)) by May 15, 1994. The Court required EPA to make a
formal determination within 120 days from the date of its opinion.
Sierra Club v. Whitman, No. 00-2206 (D.D.C. July 10, 2002). In
compliance with the Court's order, EPA proposes to determine that the
Birmingham area had attained the 1-hour ozone standard by November 15,
1993.
IV. Proposed Action
Pursuant to section 181(b)(2)(A) of the CAA, EPA is proposing to
determine that the Birmingham area attained the 1-hour NAAQS for ozone
by November 15, 1993. This determination is based upon the area's
design value as of its attainment date, and upon three years of
complete, quality-assured, ambient air monitoring data for the years
1991-1993 which indicate that Birmingham area attained the 1-hour ozone
NAAQS.
V. Administrative Requirements
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
proposed action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and
therefore is not subject to review by the Office of Management and
Budget. For this reason, this action is also not subject to Executive
Order 13211, ``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This
proposed action merely proposes to approve state law as meeting Federal
requirements and imposes no additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that
this proposed rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this rule proposes to approve pre-
existing requirements under state law and does not impose any
additional enforceable duty beyond that required by state law, it does
not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect
small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995 (Public Law 104-4).
This proposed rule also does not have tribal implications because
it will not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian
tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between
the Federal Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive
Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This action also does not
have Federalism implications because it does not have substantial
direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government, as specified
in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999). This action
merely proposes to approve a state rule implementing a Federal
standard, and does not alter the relationship or the distribution of
power and responsibilities established in the Clean Air Act. This
proposed rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 ``Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically significant.
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. In
this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the
State to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP
submission, to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise
satisfies the provisions of the Clean Air Act. Thus, the requirements
of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This proposed
determination of attainment does not impose an information collection
burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Intergovernmental
relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: August 9, 2002.
J. I. Palmer, Jr.,
Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 02-21286 Filed 8-20-02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P