[Federal Register Volume 69, Number 67 (Wednesday, April 7, 2004)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 18338-18343]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 04-7776]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 63

[OAR-2003-0196; FRL-7643-9]
RIN: 2060-AK73


National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for 
Stationary Combustion Turbines

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On March 5, 2004, EPA published final national emission 
standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for stationary 
combustion turbines. As part of the NESHAP, EPA established eight 
subcategories of stationary combustion turbines. Elsewhere in this 
Federal Register, EPA is publishing a proposed rule to delete four of 
these subcategories from the source category list required by section 
112(c)(1) of the Clean Air Act (CAA). The EPA has made an initial 
determination that the four subcategories satisfy the criteria for 
deletion from the source category list established by section 
112(c)(9)(B).
    In this companion action, EPA is proposing to stay the 
effectiveness of the combustion turbines NESHAP for new sources in the 
lean premix gas-fired turbines and diffusion flame gas-fired turbines 
subcategories, which are the two principal subcategories we are 
proposing to delist. This action is necessary to avoid wasteful and 
unwarranted expenditures on installation of emission controls which 
will not be required if the subcategories are delisted.

DATES: Comments. Written comments on the proposed rule must be received 
by EPA no later than May 24, 2004.
    Public Hearing. A public hearing regarding the proposed rule will 
be held if requests to speak are received by the EPA on or before April 
14, 2004. If requested, a public hearing will be held on April 21, 
2004.

ADDRESSES: Comments. Comments may be submitted electronically, by mail, 
or through hand delivery/courier. Electronic comments may be submitted 
on-line at http://www.epa.gov/edocket/. Written comments sent by U.S. 
mail should be submitted (in duplicate if possible) to: Air and 
Radiation Docket and Information Center (Mail Code 6102T), Attention 
Docket Number OAR-2003-0196, Room B108, U.S. EPA, 1301 Constitution 
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460. Written comments delivered in person 
or by courier (e.g., FedEx,

[[Page 18339]]

Airborne, and UPS) should be submitted (in duplicate if possible) to: 
Air and Radiation Docket and Information Center (Mail Code 6102T), 
Attention Docket Number OAR-2003-0196, Room B102, U.S. EPA, 1301 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460. The EPA requests a 
separate copy also be sent to the contact person listed below (see FOR 
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT).
    Public Hearing. If a public hearing is requested by April 14, 2004, 
the public hearing will be held in our EPA Office of Administration 
Auditorium, Research Triangle Park, NC on April 21, 2004. Persons 
interested in presenting oral testimony should contact Ms. Kelly A. 
Rimer, Risk and Exposure Assessment Group, Emission Standards Division 
(C404-01), U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, 
telephone number (919) 541-2962. Persons interested in attending the 
public hearing should also contact Ms. Rimer to verify the time of the 
hearing.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Kelly A. Rimer, Risk and Exposure 
Assessment Group, Emission Standards Division (C404-01), U.S. EPA, 
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, telephone number (919) 541-2962, 
electronic mail address [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Docket. The EPA has established an official public docket for this 
action under Docket ID Number OAR-2003-0196. The official public docket 
is the collection of materials that is available for public viewing at 
the EPA Docket Center (Air Docket), EPA West, Room B-108, 1301 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20004. The Docket Center is 
open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding 
legal holidays. The telephone number for the Reading Room is (202) 566-
1744, and the telephone number for the Air Docket is (202) 566-1742.
    Electronic Access. An electronic version of the public docket is 
available through EPA's electronic public docket and comment system, 
EPA Dockets. You may use EPA Dockets at http://www.epa.gov/edocket/ to 
submit or view public comments, access the index of the contents of the 
official public docket, and access those documents in the public docket 
that are available electronically. Once in the system, select 
``search'' and key in the appropriate docket identification number.
    Certain types of information will not be placed in the EPA dockets. 
Information claimed as confidential business information (CBI) and 
other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute, which is 
not included in the official public docket, will not be available for 
public viewing in EPA's electronic public docket. The EPA's policy is 
that copyrighted material will not be placed in EPA's electronic public 
docket but will be available only in printed, paper form in the 
official public docket. Although not all docket materials may be 
available electronically, you may still access any of the publicly 
available docket materials through the EPA Docket Center.
    For public commenters, it is important to note that EPA's policy is 
that public comments, whether submitted electronically or in paper, 
will be made available for public viewing in EPA's electronic public 
docket as EPA receives them and without change unless the comment 
contains copyrighted material, CBI, or other information whose 
disclosure is restricted by statute. When EPA identifies a comment 
containing copyrighted material, EPA will provide a reference to that 
material in the version of the comment that is placed in EPA's 
electronic public docket. The entire printed comment, including the 
copyrighted material, will be available in the public docket.
    Public comments submitted on computer disks that are mailed or 
delivered to the docket will be transferred to EPA's electronic public 
docket. Public comments that are mailed or delivered to the docket will 
be scanned and placed in EPA's electronic public docket. Where 
practical, physical objects will be photographed, and the photograph 
will be placed in EPA's electronic public docket along with a brief 
description written by the docket staff.
    Comments. You may submit comments electronically, by mail, by 
facsimile, or through hand delivery/courier. To ensure proper receipt 
by EPA, identify the appropriate docket identification number in the 
subject line on the first page of your comment. Please ensure that your 
comments are submitted within the specified comment period. Comments 
submitted after the close of the comment period will be marked 
``late.'' The EPA is not required to consider these late comments.
    Electronically. If you submit an electronic comment as prescribed 
below, EPA recommends that you include your name, mailing address, and 
an e-mail address or other contact information in the body of your 
comment. Also include this contact information on the outside of any 
disk or CD ROM you submit and in any cover letter accompanying the disk 
or CD ROM. This ensures that you can be identified as the submitter of 
the comment and allows EPA to contact you in case EPA cannot read your 
comment due to technical difficulties or needs further information on 
the substance of your comment. The EPA's policy is that EPA will not 
edit your comment and any identifying or contact information provided 
in the body of a comment will be included as part of the comment that 
is placed in the official public docket and made available in EPA's 
electronic public docket. If EPA cannot read your comment due to 
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA 
may not be able to consider your comment.
    Your use of EPA's electronic public docket to submit comments to 
EPA electronically is EPA's preferred method for receiving comments. Go 
directly to EPA Dockets at http://www.epa.gov/edocket, and follow the 
online instructions for submitting comments. Once in the system, select 
``search'' and key in Docket ID No. OAR-2003-0196. The system is an 
``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your 
identity, e-mail address, or other contact information unless you 
provide it in the body of your comment.
    Comments may be sent by electronic mail (e-mail) to [email protected], Attention Docket ID No. OAR-2003-0196. In contrast to 
EPA's electronic public docket, EPA's e-mail system is not an 
``anonymous access'' system. If you send an e-mail comment directly to 
the docket without going through EPA's electronic public docket, EPA's 
e-mail system automatically captures your e-mail address. E-mail 
addresses that are automatically captured by EPA's e-mail system are 
included as part of the comment that is placed in the official public 
docket and made available in EPA's electronic public docket.
    You may submit comments on a disk or CD ROM that you mail to the 
mailing address identified in this document. These electronic 
submissions will be accepted in WordPerfect or ASCII file format. Avoid 
the use of special characters and any form of encryption.
    By Mail. Send your comments (in duplicate, if possible) to: EPA 
Docket Center (Air Docket), U.S. EPA West, (MD-6102T), Room B-108, 1200 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20460, Attention Docket ID No. 
OAR-2003-0196.
    By Hand Delivery or Courier. Deliver your comments (in duplicate, 
if possible) to: EPA Docket Center, Room B-108, U.S. EPA West, 1301 
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20004, Attention Docket ID No. 
OAR-2003-0196. Such deliveries are

[[Page 18340]]

only accepted during the Docket Center's normal hours of operation.
    By Facsimile. Fax your comments to: (202) 566-1741, Docket ID No. 
OAR-2003-0196.
    CBI. Do not submit information that you consider to be CBI through 
EPA's electronic public docket or by e-mail. Send or deliver 
information identified as CBI only to the following address: Kelly 
Rimer, c/o Roberto Morales, OAQPS Document Control Officer (C404-02), 
U.S. EPA, 109 TW Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, 
Attention Docket ID No. OAR-2003-0196. You may claim information that 
you submit to EPA as CBI by marking any part or all of that information 
as CBI (if you submit CBI on disk or CD ROM, mark the outside of the 
disk or CD ROM as CBI and then identify electronically within the disk 
or CD ROM the specific information that is CBI). Information so marked 
will not be disclosed except in accordance with procedures set forth in 
40 CFR part 2.
    Worldwide Web (WWW). In addition to being available in the docket, 
an electronic copy of today's proposed rule will also be available on 
the WWW through the Technology Transfer Network (TTN). Following the 
Administrator's signature, a copy of the proposed rule will be placed 
on the TTN's policy and guidance page for newly proposed or promulgated 
rules at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/oarpg. The TTN provides information and 
technology exchange in various areas of air pollution control. If more 
information regarding the TTN is needed, call the TTN HELP line at 
(919) 541-5384.
    Applicable Law. Pursuant to CAA section 307(d)(1)(V), the 
Administrator has determined that it is appropriate to conduct this 
rulemaking according to the procedures established by CAA section 
307(d).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Regulated Entities. Categories and entities potentially regulated 
by this action include:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Category                     SIC              NAICS                                 Examples of regulated entities
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Any industry using a stationary               4911              2211  Electric power generation, transmission, or distribution.
 combustion turbine as defined                4922            486210  Natural gas transmission.
 in the regulation.                           1311            211111  Crude petroleum and natural gas production.
                                              1321            211112  Natural gas liquids producers.
                                              4931               221  Electric and other services combined.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This table is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a 
guide for readers regarding entities likely to be regulated by this 
action. To determine whether your facility is regulated by this action, 
you should examine the applicability criteria in Sec.  63.6085 of the 
final rule. If you have any questions regarding the applicability of 
this action to a particular entity, consult the person listed in the 
preceding FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.

I. Description of the Proposed Rule

    Elsewhere in today's Federal Register, EPA is proposing a rule to 
amend the list of categories of sources that was developed pursuant to 
CAA section 112(c)(1). The EPA is proposing to delete four 
subcategories from the Combustion Turbines source category. Final MACT 
standards creating these subcategories was published on March 5, 2004. 
The standards will be published soon and will be codified at 40 CFR 
part 63, subpart YYYY. The subcategories, as defined in 40 CFR 63.6175, 
are: (1) Lean premix gas-fired stationary combustion turbines (also 
referred to herein as ``lean premix gas-fired turbines''), (2) 
diffusion flame gas-fired stationary combustion turbines (also referred 
to herein as ``diffusion flame gas-fired turbines''), (3) emergency 
stationary combustion turbines, and 4) stationary combustion turbines 
located on the North Slope of Alaska.
    The proposed rule to amend the source category list is being issued 
in part to respond to a petition submitted by the Gas Turbine 
Association (GTA) and in part upon the Administrator's own motion. 
Petitions to remove a source category from the source category list are 
permitted under section 112(c)(9) of the CAA. The proposed rule to 
delete the four subcategories is based on an initial determination by 
EPA that the subcategories satisfy the substantive criteria for 
deletion set forth in section 112(c)(9)(B). The proposed rule to delete 
the subcategories that appears elsewhere in today's Federal Register 
contains a detailed description of the technical basis for the initial 
determination.
    Although EPA is proposing to delete from the source category list 
four subcategories established by the final MACT standards for 
Stationary Combustion Turbines, CAA section 112(d)(10) provides that 
the standards for the four subcategories will take effect upon 
publication of the standards. All turbines in the lean premix gas-fired 
turbine and the diffusion flame gas-fired turbine subcategories which 
were constructed or reconstructed after January 14, 2003, will then be 
required to comply immediately with the emission standards for new 
sources. This may cause some sources in the two subcategories to make 
immediate expenditures on installation and testing of emission 
controls, even though such controls will not be required if we adopt a 
final rule to delete these subcategories. In view of our initial 
determination that the statutory criteria for delisting have been met 
for all sources in the four subcategories, we consider it inappropriate 
and contrary to statutory intent to mandate such expenditures until 
after a final determination has been made whether or not these 
subcategories should be delisted. Such expenditures would be wasteful 
and unwarranted if we take final action to delist these subcategories. 
Moreover, if we take final action to delist the subcategories, sources 
constructed or reconstructed while the rulemaking to delist is pending 
would bear a regulatory burden not placed on identical sources 
constructed or reconstructed thereafter. Accordingly, we are proposing 
this rule to stay the effectiveness of the emission standards for new 
sources for the lean premix gas-fired turbine and diffusion flame gas-
fired turbine subcategories during the pendency of the rulemaking to 
delete these subcategories.
    We are mindful that there would be no need to stay the 
effectiveness of the standards for new sources in the two subcategories 
if a rulemaking to delist the affected sources had been completed 
before promulgation of the final MACT standards for combustion 
turbines. However, we note that the GTA petition was not submitted 
until quite late in the regulatory process. Moreover, we generally do 
not make a definite determination concerning the characteristics of 
subcategories until promulgation of final MACT standards. In these 
circumstances, we do not believe it would be fair to make certain 
affected sources bear the burden of a delay in our determination that a 
subcategory meets the statutory criteria for delisting.

[[Page 18341]]

    The proposed stay is consistent with the precedents we have 
established in similar circumstances in the past. In 1991, we issued a 
final rule staying the effective date of the National Emission 
Standards for Radionuclide Emissions from Federal Facilities Other Than 
Nuclear Regulatory Commission Licenses and not covered by Subpart H (40 
CFR part 61, Subpart H) (40 CFR part 61, Subpart I) for commercial 
nuclear power reactors during the pendency of another rulemaking to 
rescind the standards for those facilities (56 FR 37158 August 5, 
1991). The rescission was authorized by section 112(d)(9) of the CAA 
(the ``Simpson amendment''), which provides that we may decline to 
regulate Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) licensees under CAA 
section 112 if the Administrator determines that the regulatory program 
established by the NRC for a category or subcategory provides an ample 
margin of safety to protect the public health. We had made an initial 
determination that the NRC program for commercial nuclear power 
reactors met this test, and we reasoned that ``it would frustrate the 
evident purpose of Section 112(d)(9) if EPA were to permit Subpart I to 
take effect for this subcategory during the pendency of the rulemaking 
on rescission'' (56 FR 37159). That action was not challenged.
    In 1995, we acted to provide another type of interim relief during 
a delisting rulemaking. We suspended the listing of caprolactam, during 
a rulemaking to delete caprolactam from the list of HAP established by 
CAA section 112(b)(1) for purposes of determining the applicability of 
title V permitting requirements (60 FR 081, September 18, 1995). We 
based that action on our determination that ``retention, during the 
rulemaking to delist caprolactam, of permit application requirements 
which will no longer exist after the delisting process has been 
completed would result in unnecessary private and public expenditures 
on preparation, submission, and processing of such applications, and 
would yield no environmental benefits'' (60 FR 084-85). That interim 
relief action also was not challenged.
    We are proposing to stay the effectiveness of the combustion 
turbines emission standards for new sources in the lean premix gas-
fired turbines and the diffusion flame gas-fired turbines 
subcategories, but only during the pendency of the rulemaking to delist 
the subcategories. It is not our intention by staying the effectiveness 
of the standards to change the definition of new sources within these 
subcategories or to alter the status of any individual source. If the 
subcategories are not ultimately delisted, the stay will be lifted, and 
all sources in the subcategories constructed or reconstructed after 
January 14, 2003 will then be subject to the final standards. The 
sources will then be given the same time to make the requisite 
demonstration of compliance they would have had if there had been no 
stay.

II. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review

    Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), EPA 
must determine whether the regulatory action is ``significant'' and 
therefore subject to Office of Management and Budget (OMB) review and 
the requirements of the Executive Order. The Executive Order defines 
``significant regulatory action'' as one that is likely to result in a 
rule that may:
    (1) Have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more or 
adverse affect in a material way the economy, a sector to the economy, 
productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public health or 
safety, or state, local or tribal governments or communities;
    (2) Create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an 
action taken or planned by another agency;
    (3) Materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants, 
user fees, or loan programs, or the rights and obligation of recipients 
thereof; or
    (4) Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal 
mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles set forth in 
the Executive Order.
    Pursuant to the terms of Executive Order 12866, it has been 
determined that the proposed action constitutes a ``significant 
regulatory action'' because it may raise novel policy issues and is 
therefore subject to OMB review. Changes made in response to OMB 
suggestions or recommendations are documented in the public record (see 
ADDRESSES section of this preamble).

B. Paperwork Reduction Act

    This action does not impose an information collection burden under 
the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. 
The proposed action will stay the effectiveness of the combustion 
turbines NESHAP for new sources in the lean premix gas-fired turbines 
and diffusion flame gas-fired turbines subcategories until a conclusion 
is reached regarding deletion and therefore eliminate the need for 
information collection toward regulatory compliance under the CAA. 
Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by 
persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide 
information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time needed 
to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize 
technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and 
verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and 
disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to 
comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements; 
train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; 
search data sources; complete and review the collection of information; 
and transmit or otherwise disclose the information. An Agency may not 
conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to a 
collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB 
control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations are 
listed in 40 CFR part 9 and 48 CFR chapter 15.

C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)

    The RFA generally requires an agency to prepare a regulatory 
flexibility analysis of any rule subject to notice and comment 
rulemaking requirements under the Administrative Procedure Act or any 
other statute unless the agency certifies that the rule will not have a 
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. 
Small entities include small business, small organizations, and small 
governmental jurisdictions. For the purposes of assessing the impacts 
of today's proposed rule on small entities, small entity is defined as: 
(1) A small business that meets the definitions for small business 
based on the Small Business Association (SBA) size standards which, for 
this proposed action, can include manufacturing (NAICS 3999-03) and air 
transportation (NAICS 4522-98 and 4512-98) operations that employ less 
1,000 people and engineering services (NAICS 8711-98) operations that 
earn less than $20 million annually; (2) a small governmental 
jurisdiction that is a government of a city, county, town, school 
district or special district with a population of less than 50,000; and 
(3) a small organization that is any not-for-profit enterprise which is 
independently owned and operated and is not dominant in its field.
    After considering the economic impact of today's proposed rule on 
small entities, I certify that this

[[Page 18342]]

proposed action will not have a significant economic impact on a 
substantial number of small entities. In determining whether a rule has 
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities, 
the impact of concern is any significant adverse economic impact on 
small entities, since the primary purpose of the regulatory flexibility 
analysis is to identify and address regulatory alternatives ``which 
minimize any significant economic impact of the proposed rule on small 
entities.'' (5 U.S.C. 603 and 604). Thus, an agency may certify that a 
rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial 
number of small entities if the rule relieves regulatory burden, or 
otherwise has a positive economic effect on all of the small entities 
subject to the rule. The proposed rule will stay the effectiveness of 
the combustion turbines NESHAP for new sources in the lean premix gas-
fired turbines and diffusion flame gas-fired turbines subcategories. 
This will stay the requirements to apply controls and will also stay 
associated operating, monitoring and reporting requirements. These 
burdens will be permanently lifted if EPA ultimately removes the four 
source categories from the stationary combustion turbine source 
category, and temporarily lifted if EPA does not ultimately delist the 
subcategories. We have, therefore, concluded that today's proposed rule 
will relieve regulatory burden for all small entities. We continue to 
be interested in the potential impacts of the proposed rule on small 
entities and welcome comments on issues related to such impacts.

D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA), Public 
Law 1044, establishes requirements for Federal agencies to assess the 
effects of their regulatory actions on State, local, and tribal 
governments and the private sector. Under section 202 of the UMRA, EPA 
generally must prepare a written statement, including a cost-benefit 
analysis, for proposed and final rules with ``Federal mandates'' that 
may result in expenditures to State, local, and tribal governments, in 
the aggregate, or to the private sector, of $100 million or more in any 
1 year. Before promulgating an EPA rule for which a written statement 
is needed, section 205 of the UMRA generally requires EPA to identify 
and consider a reasonable number of regulatory alternatives and adopt 
the least costly, most cost-effective or least burdensome alternative 
that achieves the objectives of the rule. The provisions of section 205 
do not apply when they are inconsistent with applicable law. Moreover, 
section 205 allows EPA to adopt an alternative other than the least 
costly, most cost-effective or least burdensome alternative if the 
Administrator publishes with the final rule an explanation why that 
alternative was not adopted. Before EPA establishes any regulatory 
requirements that may significantly or uniquely affect small 
governments, including tribal governments, it must have developed under 
section 203 of the UMRA a small government agency plan. The plan must 
provide for notifying potentially affected small governments, enabling 
officials of affected small governments to have meaningful and timely 
input in the development of EPA regulatory proposals with significant 
Federal intergovernmental mandates, and informing, educating, and 
advising small governments on compliance with the regulatory 
requirements.
    Today's proposed rule contains no Federal mandates for State, 
local, or tribal governments or the private sector. The proposed rule 
imposes no enforceable duty on any State, local or tribal governments 
or the private sector. In any event, EPA has determined that the 
proposed rule does not contain a Federal mandate that may result in 
expenditures of $100 million or more for State, local, and tribal 
governments, in the aggregate, or the private sector in any one year. 
Thus, today's proposed rule is not subject to the requirements of 
sections 202 and 205 of the UMRA.

E. Executive Order 13132, Federalism

    Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999) requires EPA 
to develop an accountable process to ensure ``meaningful and timely 
input by State and local officials in the development of regulatory 
policies that have federalism implications.'' ``Policies that have 
federalism implications'' is defined in the Executive Order to include 
regulations that have ``substantial direct effects on the States, on 
the relationship between the national government and the States, or on 
the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels 
of government.''
    Under Executive Order 13132, EPA may not issue a regulation that 
has federalism implications, that imposes substantial direct compliance 
costs, and that is not required by statute, unless the Federal 
government provides the funds necessary to pay the direct compliance 
costs incurred by State and local governments, or EPA consults with 
State and local officials early in the process of developing the 
proposed regulation. The EPA also may not issue a regulation that has 
federalism implications and that preempts State law unless the Agency 
consults with State and local officials early in the process of 
developing the proposed regulation.
    Today's action proposes to stay the effectiveness of the combustion 
turbines NESHAP for new sources in the lean premix gas-fired turbines 
and diffusion flame gas-fired turbines subcategories. It does not 
impose any additional requirements on the States and does not affect 
the balance of power between the States and the Federal government. 
Thus, the requirements of section 6 of the Executive Order do not apply 
to the proposed rule.

F. Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination With Indian 
Tribal Governments

    Executive Order 13175, entitled ``Consultation and Coordination 
with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), 
requires EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure ``meaningful 
and timely input by tribal officials in the development of regulatory 
policies that have tribal implications.'' The proposed rule does not 
have tribal implications, as specified in Executive Order 13175. The 
proposed action will stay the effectiveness of the combustion turbines 
NESHAP for new sources in the lean premix gas-fired turbines and 
diffusion flame gas-fired turbines subcategories. Executive Order 13175 
does not apply to the proposed rule.

G. Executive Order 13045, Protection of Children From Environmental 
Health Risks and Safety Risks

    Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997) applies to any 
rule that: (1) Is determined to be ``economically significant'' as 
defined under Executive Order 12866, and (2) concerns an environmental 
health or safety risk that EPA has reason to believe may have a 
disproportionate effect on children. If the regulatory action meets 
both criteria, the Agency must evaluate the environmental health or 
safety effects of the planned rule on children, and explain why the 
planned regulation is preferable to other potentially effective and 
reasonably feasible alternatives considered by the Agency.
    The EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 as applying only to those 
regulatory actions that are based on health or safety risks, such that 
the analysis required under section 5-501 of the Executive Order has 
the potential to influence the regulation. The proposed rule is not 
subject to Executive Order 13045 because it is not economically

[[Page 18343]]

significant as defined in Executive Order 12866, and because this 
action is not based on health or safety risks. Thus, Executive Order 
13045 does not apply to this rule.

H. Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That 
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use

    Executive Order 13211, ``Actions Concerning Regulations that 
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 
28355, May 22, 2001), requires EPA to prepare and submit a Statement of 
Energy Effects to the Administrator of the Office of Information and 
Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, for certain 
actions identified as ``significant energy actions.'' The proposed rule 
is not a ``significant energy action'' because it is not likely to have 
a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of 
energy.

I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act

    Section 112(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement 
Act of 1995 (NTTAA), Public Law No. 104-113, section 12(d) 915 U.S.C. 
272 note), directs all Federal agencies to use voluntary consensus 
standards instead of government-unique standards in their regulatory 
activities unless to do so would be inconsistent with applicable law or 
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical 
standards (e.g., material specifications, test method, sampling and 
analytical procedures, business practices, etc.) that are developed or 
adopted by one or more voluntary consensus standards bodies. Examples 
of organizations generally regarded as voluntary consensus standards 
bodies include the American society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), 
the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), and the Society of 
Automotive Engineers (SAE). The NTTAA requires Federal agencies like 
EPA to provide Congress, through OMB, with explanations when an agency 
decides not to use available and applicable voluntary consensus 
standards. The proposed rule does not involve technical standards. 
Therefore, EPA is not considering the use of any voluntary consensus 
standards.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR part 63

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Hazardous 
substances, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: March 31, 2004.
Michael O. Leavitt,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 04-7776 Filed 4-6-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P