[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 84 (Tuesday, May 3, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 22792-22795]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-8732]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
30 CFR Part 915
[Docket No. IA-014-FOR]
Iowa Regulatory Program
AGENCY: Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, Interior.
ACTION: Final rule; Approval of amendment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
(OSM), are approving an amendment to the Iowa regulatory program (Iowa
program) under the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977
(SMCRA or the Act). Iowa proposed revisions to its April 1999
revegetation success guidelines titled, ``Revegetation Success
Standards and Statistically Valid Sampling Techniques.'' Iowa intends
to revise its program in response to required program amendments.
DATES: Effective Date: May 3, 2005.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew R. Gilmore, Chief, Alton Field
Division. Telephone: (618) 463-6460. E-mail: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background on the Iowa Program
II. Submission of the Amendment
III. OSM's Findings
IV. Summary and Disposition of Comments
V. OSM's Decision
VI. Procedural Determinations
I. Background on the Iowa Program
Section 503(a) of the Act permits a State to assume primacy for the
regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation operations on non-
Federal and non-Indian lands within its borders by demonstrating that
its State program includes, among other things, ``a State law which
provides for the regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation
operations in accordance with the requirements of this Act * * *; and
rules and regulations consistent with regulations issued by the
Secretary pursuant to this Act.'' See 30 U.S.C. 1253(a)(1) and (7). On
the basis of these criteria, the Secretary of the Interior (Secretary)
conditionally approved the Iowa program effective April 10, 1981. You
can find background information on the Iowa program, including the
Secretary's findings, the disposition of comments, and conditions of
approval, in the January 21, 1981, Federal Register (46 FR 5885). You
can also find later actions concerning Iowa's program and program
amendments at 30 CFR 915.10, 915.15, and 915.16.
II. Submission of the Amendment
By letter dated December 27, 2004 (Administrative Record No. IA-
449), Iowa sent us an amendment to its program under SMCRA (30 U.S.C.
1201 et seq.). Iowa sent the amendment in response to required program
amendments codified at 30 CFR 915.16(a) and (c).
We announced receipt of the amendment in the February 8, 2005,
Federal Register (70 FR 6606). In the same document, we opened the
public comment period and provided an opportunity for a public hearing
or meeting on the adequacy of the amendment. We did not hold a public
hearing or meeting because no one requested one. The public comment
period ended on March 10, 2005. We received comments from one Federal
agency.
During our review of the amendment, we identified concerns
regarding the yield data sources for revegetation success standards. We
notified Iowa of these concerns by e-mail on March 10, 2005
(Administrative Record No. IA-449.5). Iowa responded by telephone on
March 11, 2005 (Administrative Record Number IA-449.6). Because
additional information presented by Iowa merely clarified certain
provisions of its amendment, we did not reopen the public comment
period.
III. OSM's Findings
Following are the findings we made concerning the amendment under
SMCRA and the Federal regulations at 30 CFR 732.15 and 732.17. We are
approving the amendment as described below.
Iowa currently has required program amendments codified at 30 CFR
915.16(a) and (c). The required amendment codified at 30 CFR 915.16(a)
calls for Iowa to submit for our approval evidence that the U.S.
Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) concurs with its
provisions to allow the use of reference areas for determining success
of productivity on prime farmland as proposed at Section III.,
[[Page 22793]]
Part F and Section IV., Part A.2 of its revegetation success
guidelines. At 30 CFR 915.16(c), Iowa is required to either remove
Section IV., Part G from its revegetation success guidelines or submit
for our approval evidence that the NRCS concurs with the provisions in
Part G. Part G, pertaining to control areas, contains the requirements
and methods for making climate-based adjustments to the prime farmland
average yields shown in the County Soil Map Unit Yield Data tables.
In response to the above required program amendments, Iowa proposed
to amend its April 1999 revegetation success guidelines titled,
``Revegetation Success Standards and Statistically Valid Sampling
Techniques.'' More specifically, Iowa proposed to delete, from the
guidelines, all text related to prime farmland reference areas in
Section III., Part F (Reference Areas) and Section IV., Part A.2 (Prime
Farmland--Reference Area Corn and Soybean Productivity Standards).
Also, Iowa proposed to delete Section IV., Part G (Control Area
Adjustments of Prime Farmland and Revegetation Success Standards).
Following is an explanation of the portions of the revegetation success
guidelines that Iowa proposed to amend.
A. Section III. General Requirements and Exclusions of Revegetation
Part F. Reference Areas
Currently, the introductory paragraph applies to all land uses.
Iowa proposed to revise the introductory paragraph to specify that data
from reference areas can be used for direct comparison ``for all
applicable land uses except for prime farmland'' only when the Division
has approved the use of reference areas in the permit. Iowa also
proposed to delete paragraph F.1., including example numbers one
through three.
B. Section IV. Revegetation Success Standards
1. Part A. Prime Farmland
a. Iowa proposed to delete the fourth paragraph in the introductory
language under Part A that reads as follows:
The use of reference areas to develop these prime farmland
productivity standards is not recommended due to the difficulty of
obtaining a reference area with similar prime farmland soil map
units over which the Permittee can retain absolute control of the
management practices. Reference area management practices must be
identical to the management practices of the reclaimed prime
farmland area. (See the criteria listed in III. General
Requirements, F. Reference Areas above for definition of identical
management practices.) The use of reference areas for development of
row crop production standards shall be allowed only when they are
approved as a part of the Permit for the site containing the
reclaimed prime farmland. The development of reference area corn and
soybean productivity standards is detailed in III. General
Requirements, F. Reference Areas above.
b. In what is currently paragraph A.1., Iowa proposed to (1) revise
the introductory language to paragraphs A.1.a and b, (2) delete
paragraph A.1.a, and (3) remove the paragraph designation from
paragraph b. The newly revised language will read as follows:
These calculated County Soil Map Unit Yield Data corn and
soybean productivity revegetation success standards will remain
constant for the entire period of responsibility. These standards
can only be adjusted if the permittee receives written concurrence
from the USDA-NRCS to adjust the calculated County Soil Map Unit
Yield Data corn and/or soybean productivity revegetation success
standards to reflect a one year disease, pest, or weather induced
variation in that county during the specific growing season in
question. The Division must also concur that this variation actually
impacted the Permit site.
c. Iowa proposed to delete paragraph A.2. pertaining to Reference
Area Corn and Soybean Productivity Standards and to remove the number
one (1) designation from what is currently paragraph A.1.
2. Part G. Control Area Adjustments of Prime Farmland Revegetation
Success Standards
Iowa proposed to delete Part G in its entirety.
We are approving Iowa's proposed amendments as discussed above
because the State is deleting from its revegetation success guidelines
provisions that cannot be approved without concurrence from the NRCS.
We are also removing the required amendments at 30 CFR 915.16(a) and
(c).
IV. Summary and Disposition of Comments
Public Comments
We asked for public comments on the amendment, but did not receive
any.
Federal Agency Comments
Under 30 CFR 732.17(h)(11)(i) and section 503(b) of SMCRA, we
requested comments on the amendment from various Federal agencies with
an actual or potential interest in the Iowa program (Administrative
Record No. IA-449.1). The NRCS responded on January 18, 2005
(Administrative Record No. IA-449.3), that it recommended that where
the term ``County Soil Map Unit Yield Data'' is used it should be
revised to more accurately reflect the source and location of the data.
The NRCS suggested that the term should read, ``provided in the USDA-
Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Field Office Technical
Guide, Section II, County Soil Map Unit Yield Data Tables.'' We
forwarded the NRCS's comments to Iowa. We will address the issue of
yield data sources for revegetation success standards, as appropriate,
in our future oversight of the Iowa program.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Concurrence and Comments
Under 30 CFR 732.17(h)(11)(ii), we are required to get a written
concurrence from EPA for those provisions of the program amendment that
relate to air or water quality standards issued under the authority of
the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.) or the Clean Air Act (42
U.S.C. 7401 et seq.). None of the revisions that Iowa proposed to make
in this amendment pertain to air or water quality standards. Therefore,
we did not ask EPA to concur on the amendment.
Under 30 CFR 732.17(h)(11)(i), we requested comments on the
amendment from EPA (Administrative Record No. IA-449.1). EPA did not
respond to our request.
State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) and the Advisory Council on
Historic Preservation (ACHP)
Under 30 CFR 732.17(h)(4), we are required to request comments from
the SHPO and ACHP on amendments that may have an effect on historic
properties. On January 5, 2005, we requested comments on Iowa's
amendment (Administrative Record No. IA-449.1), but neither responded
to our request.
V. OSM's Decision
Based on the above findings, we approve the amendment Iowa sent us
on December 27, 2004.
To implement this decision, we are amending the Federal regulations
at 30 CFR part 915, which codify decisions concerning the Iowa program.
We find that good cause exists under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3) to make this
final rule effective immediately. Section 503(a) of SMCRA requires that
the State's program demonstrate that the State has the capability of
carrying out the provisions of the Act and meeting its purposes. Making
this rule effective immediately will expedite that process. SMCRA
requires consistency of State and Federal standards.
[[Page 22794]]
VI. Procedural Determinations
Executive Order 12630--Takings
This rule does not have takings implications. This determination is
based on the analysis performed for the counterpart Federal
regulations.
Executive Order 12866--Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is exempted from review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) under Executive Order 12866.
Executive Order 12988--Civil Justice Reform
The Department of the Interior has conducted the reviews required
by section 3 of Executive Order 12988 and has determined that this rule
meets the applicable standards of subsections (a) and (b) of that
section. However, these standards are not applicable to the actual
language of State regulatory programs and program amendments because
each program is drafted and promulgated by a specific State, not by
OSM. Under sections 503 and 505 of SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1253 and 1255) and
the Federal regulations at 30 CFR 730.11, 732.15, and 732.17(h)(10),
decisions on proposed State regulatory programs and program amendments
submitted by the States must be based solely on a determination of
whether the submittal is consistent with SMCRA and its implementing
Federal regulations and whether the other requirements of 30 CFR parts
730, 731, and 732 have been met.
Executive Order 13132--Federalism
This rule does not have Federalism implications. SMCRA delineates
the roles of the Federal and State governments with regard to the
regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation operations. One of
the purposes of SMCRA is to ``establish a nationwide program to protect
society and the environment from the adverse effects of surface coal
mining operations.'' Section 503(a)(1) of SMCRA requires that State
laws regulating surface coal mining and reclamation operations be ``in
accordance with'' the requirements of SMCRA, and section 503(a)(7)
requires that State programs contain rules and regulations ``consistent
with'' regulations issued by the Secretary pursuant to SMCRA.
Executive Order 13175--Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
In accordance with Executive Order 13175, we have evaluated the
potential effects of this rule on Federally-recognized Indian tribes
and have determined that the rule does not have substantial direct
effects on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
This determination is based on the fact that the Iowa program does not
regulate coal exploration and surface coal mining and reclamation
operations on Indian lands. Therefore, the Iowa program has no effect
on Federally-recognized Indian tribes.
Executive Order 13211--Regulations That Significantly Affect the
Supply, Distribution, or Use of Energy
On May 18, 2001, the President issued Executive Order 13211 which
requires agencies to prepare a Statement of Energy Effects for a rule
that is (1) considered significant under Executive Order 12866, and (2)
likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy. Because this rule is exempt from review
under Executive Order 12866 and is not expected to have a significant
adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy, a
Statement of Energy Effects is not required.
National Environmental Policy Act
This rule does not require an environmental impact statement
because section 702(d) of SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1292(d)) provides that
agency decisions on proposed State regulatory program provisions do not
constitute major Federal actions within the meaning of section
102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C.
4332(2)(C)).
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not contain information collection requirements that
require approval by OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3507 et seq.).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior certifies that this rule will not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
The State submittal, which is the subject of this rule, is based upon
counterpart Federal regulations for which an economic analysis was
prepared and certification made that such regulations would not have a
significant economic effect upon a substantial number of small
entities. In making the determination as to whether this rule would
have a significant economic impact, the Department relied upon the data
and assumptions for the counterpart Federal regulations.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. This rule: (a) Does not
have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million; (b) Will not
cause a major increase in costs or prices for consumers, individual
industries, Federal, State, or local government agencies, or geographic
regions; and (c) Does not have significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the
ability of U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based
enterprises. This determination is based upon the fact that the State
submittal, which is the subject of this rule, is based upon counterpart
Federal regulations for which an analysis was prepared and a
determination made that the Federal regulation was not considered a
major rule.
Unfunded Mandates
This rule will not impose an unfunded mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector of $100 million or more in any
given year. This determination is based upon the fact that the State
submittal, which is the subject of this rule, is based upon counterpart
Federal regulations for which an analysis was prepared and a
determination made that the Federal regulations did not impose an
unfunded mandate.
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 915
Intergovernmental relations, Surface mining, Underground mining.
Dated: March 29, 2005.
Charles E. Sandberg,
Regional Director, Mid-Continent Regional Coordinating Center.
0
For the reasons set out in the preamble, 30 CFR part 915 is amended as
set forth below:
PART 915--IOWA
0
1. The authority citation for part 915 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 30 U.S.C. 1201 et seq.
0
2. Section 915.15 is amended in the table by adding a new entry in
chronological order by ``Date of final publication'' to read as
follows:
Sec. 915.15 Approval of Iowa regulatory program amendments.
* * * * *
[[Page 22795]]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Original amendment submission Date of final
date publication Citation/description
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
12/27/2004....................... 5/3/2005 Section III.F and
Section IV.A and G
of Iowa's April 1999
Revegetation Success
Standards and
Statistically Valid
Sampling Techniques.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec. 915.16 [Amended]
0
3. Section 915.16 is amended by removing and reserving paragraph (a)
and by removing paragraphs (c) through (e).
[FR Doc. 05-8732 Filed 5-2-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-05-P