[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 176 (Tuesday, September 13, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 53941-53944]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-18094]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[Region II Docket No. NY69-280, FRL-7968-1]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; New York;
Revised Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets for 1990 and 2007 using MOBILE6
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is approving a revision to the New York State
Implementation Plan (SIP) for the attainment and maintenance of the 1-
hour national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS) for ozone.
Specifically, EPA is approving New York's revised 1990 and 2007 motor
vehicle emission budgets recalculated using MOBILE6 and modified date
for submittal of the State's mid-course review. The intended effect of
this action is to approve a SIP revision that will help the State
continue to plan for attainment of the 1-hour NAAQS for ozone in its
portion of the New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island nonattainment
area (New York Metropolitan NAA).
EFFECTIVE DATE: This rule will be effective October 13, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the state submittals are available at the
following
[[Page 53942]]
addresses for inspection during normal business hours:
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 2 Office, Air Programs Branch,
290 Broadway, 25th Floor, New York, New York 10007-1866.
Environmental Protection Agency, Air and Radiation Docket and
Information Center, Air Docket (6102), 401 M Street, SW., Washington,
DC 20460.
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Office of Air
and Waste Management, 14th Floor, 625 Broadway, Albany, New York 12233-
1010.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Risley, Air Programs Branch, 290
Broadway, 25th Floor, New York, NY 10007-1866, (212) 637-3741.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Background
II. Comments
III. What Are the Details of EPA's Specific Actions?
A. Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets Revised with MOBILE6
B. Are New York's motor vehicle emissions budgets approvable?
C. Modified Date for Submittal of the Mid-course Review
III. Conclusions
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background
On October 28, 2003 EPA published a notice of proposed rulemaking
(68 FR 61379) regarding a SIP revision submitted by the State of New
York for the attainment and maintenance of the 1-hour NAAQS for ozone.
That notice proposed to approve: Revised 1990 and 2007 motor vehicle
emission budgets recalculated using MOBILE6; and a modified date for
submittal of the State's mid-course review. The intended effect was to
propose to approve a SIP revision that will help the State continue to
plan for attainment of the 1-hour NAAQS for ozone in its portion of the
New York Metropolitan NAA.
The proposed SIP revision was initially submitted to EPA on January
29, 2003 and later supplemented by a June 2, 2003 submission. A
detailed description of New York's submittal and EPA's rationale for
the proposed action were presented in the October 28, 2003 notice of
proposed rulemaking and will not be restated here.
II. Comments
EPA received only one set of comments on the proposed approval,
from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, in a
letter dated January 18, 2005. The comments contained revised 2007
motor vehicle emissions budgets resulting from updated planning
assumptions including changes to vehicle registration data and diesel
fraction data. The data revisions decrease estimated volatile organic
compound (VOC) emissions by 2.7 tons per year in 2007, a decrease of
nearly 2 percent of the total on-road VOC emission inventory.
Additionally, the data revisions increase estimated oxides of nitrogen
(NOX) emissions by 3.4 tons per year in 2007, an increase of
nearly 1.4 percent of the total on-road NOX emission
inventory. These revisions to the 2007 VOC and NOX motor
vehicle emissions budgets are relatively small and do not change the
results of the State's conclusion that the budgets as revised using
MOBILE6 continue to be consistent with the State's 1-hour ozone
attainment demonstration. The method used to demonstrate this
consistency is described further below, and in more detail in the
October 28, 2003 notice of proposed rulemaking.
III. What Are the Details of EPA's Specific Actions?
A Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets Revised With MOBILE6
New York's revised budgets contained in the January 29, 2003
submittal and subsequently updated by New York's June 29, 2003 addendum
and the State's January 28, 2005 comment letter, are summarized in
Table 1 below. EPA has found that New York's revised MOBILE6 budgets
are consistent with its 1-hour ozone Attainment Demonstration. EPA has
articulated its policy regarding the use of MOBILE6 for SIP development
in its ``Policy Guidance on the Use of MOBILE6 for SIP Development and
Transportation Conformity'' \1\ and ``Clarification of Policy Guidance
for MOBILE6 in Mid-course Review Areas.'' \2\ New York included in the
January 29, 2003 submittal a relative reduction comparison to show that
its 1-Hour Ozone Attainment Demonstration SIP continues to demonstrate
attainment using revised MOBILE6 budgets for the New York Metropolitan
NAA. This relative reduction comparison was subsequently updated in New
York's June 29, 2003 addendum and again in its comments of January 18,
2005, see Table 2. New York's attainment demonstration used
photochemical grid modeling supplemented with a weight of evidence
analysis. Consistent with EPA policy, as detailed in the aforementioned
guidance documents, the State's methodology for the relative reduction
comparison consisted of comparing the new MOBILE6 budgets with the
previously approved, (67 FR 5170, February 4, 2002) MOBILE5 budgets for
the New York Metropolitan NAA to determine if attainment will still be
predicted by the 2007 attainment year. Specifically, the State
calculated the percent reduction from the 1990 base year to the 2007
attainment year for NOX and VOC MOBILE5-based budgets. These
percent reductions were then compared to the percent reductions between
the revised MOBILE6-based 1990 base year and 2007 attainment year
budgets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Memorandum, ``Policy Guidance on the Use of MOBILE6 for SIP
development and Transportation Conformity,'' issued January 18,
2002. A copy of this memorandum can be found on EPA's Web site at
http://www.epa.gov/otaq/transp/traqconf.htm.
\2\ Memorandum, ``Clarification of Policy Guidance for MOBILE6
SIPs in Mid-course Review Areas,'' issued February 12, 2003. A copy
of this memorandum can be found on EPA's Web site at http://www.epa.gov/otaq/transp/traqconf.htm.
Table 1.--New York Metropolitan NAA Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets,
Revised With MOBILE6
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOX VOC
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1990.............................................. 512 596
2007.............................................. 233.4 179.3
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 2.--Relative Reduction Comparison Between MOBILE5-Based Budgets
and MOBILE6-Based Budgets From Base Year to Attainment Year
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOX VOC
(percent) (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
MOBILE5........................................... 44.8 66.7
MOBILE6........................................... 54.4 69.9
------------------------------------------------------------------------
As shown in Table 2, New York's relative reduction comparison shows
that for the New York Metropolitan NAA the percent reductions in VOC
and NOX budgets obtained through the use of MOBILE6 are
greater than the percent reductions calculated with MOBILE5-based
budgets. As such, New York's MOBILE6 SIP revision satisfies the
conditions outlined in EPA's MOBILE6 Policy guidance, and demonstrates
that the new levels of motor vehicle emissions calculated using MOBILE6
continue to support achievement of the projected attainment of the 1-
Hour Ozone NAAQS by the attainment date of 2007 for the New York
Metropolitan NAA, i.e. the SIP continues to demonstrate its purpose.
B. Are New York's Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets Approvable?
EPA's October 28, 2003 notice of proposed rulemaking (68 FR 61379)
determined that New York's revised
[[Page 53943]]
motor vehicle emission budgets, developed using appropriate methodology
and supporting the SIP in demonstrating its purpose, were approvable.
EPA posted the notice on EPA's conformity Web site on July 1, 2003
beginning the required 30-day comment period. EPA received no comments.
Table 1 summarizes New York's revised budgets contained in the January
29, 2003 submittal and subsequently updated by New York's June 29, 2003
addendum and the State's January 28, 2005 comment letter. EPA is taking
action to find these budgets adequate and concurrently approve these
budgets. The revised 2007 attainment budget will apply for the New York
Metropolitan Transportation Council's transportation conformity
purposes.
C. Modified Date for Submittal of the Mid-Course Review
As described in EPA's October 28, 2003 proposal, New York requested
to revise the date by which it would submit a required mid-course
review of the SIP's ability to meet attainment on-time. In order to be
consistent with surrounding states and to include the benefit of the
regional NOX program in its mid-course review, New York
revised its commitment to perform a mid-course review to December 31,
2004 which is consistent with EPA guidance. New York has performed the
mid-course review and has submitted it to EPA for review.
III. Conclusions
EPA is taking final action to approve New York's January 29, 2003
SIP revision. This submittal revises New York's 1990 and 2007 motor
vehicle emission budgets using MOBILE6 and modifies the planned date to
complete the State's mid-course review to December 31, 2004. In
accordance with the parallel processing procedures, EPA has evaluated
New York's final SIP revision submitted on January 29, 2003 and
supplemental information submitted on June 29, 2003 and New York's
January 18, 2005 comment letter and finds that no substantial changes
were made from the proposed SIP revision submitted on January 29, 2003.
New York has demonstrated that its revised 1-Hour Ozone Attainment
Demonstration SIP for the New York Metropolitan NAA continues to
demonstrate attainment with the revised MOBILE6 inventories.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action
merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and imposes
no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law.
Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because
this rule approves pre-existing requirements under state law and does
not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by
state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4).
This rule also does not have tribal implications because it will
not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on
the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This action also does not have Federalism
implications because it does not have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64
FR 43255, August 10, 1999). This action merely approves a state rule
implementing a Federal standard, and does not alter the relationship or
the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Clean
Air Act. This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045
``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically
significant.
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. In
this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the
State to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP
submission, to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise
satisfies the provisions of the Clean Air Act. Thus, the requirements
of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This rule does not
impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by November 14, 2005. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such
rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings
to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2))
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: August 11, 2005.
Kathleen C. Callahan,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 2.
0
Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
[[Page 53944]]
Subpart HH--New York
0
2. Section 52.1683 is amended by removing and reserving paragraphs
(h)(3) and (i)(4), removing paragraphs (i)(6)(v) and (i)(6)(vi) and
adding paragraph (j) to read as follows:
Sec. 52.1683 Control strategy: Ozone.
* * * * *
(j)(1) The 1990 and 2007 conformity emission budgets for the New
York portion of the New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island
nonattainment area contained in New York's January 29, 2003 SIP
revision, amended by New York's June 29, 2003 submittal and January 18,
2005 comment letter.
(2) The revised commitment to perform a mid-course review and
submit the results by December 31, 2004 included in the January 29,
2003 SIP revision is approved.
[FR Doc. 05-18094 Filed 9-12-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P