[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 198 (Friday, October 14, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 60037-60038]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-20613]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[R05-OAR-2005-WI-0002; FRL-7974-5]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Wisconsin
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve a revision to the Wisconsin State
Implementation Plan (SIP) for an alternative volatile organic compounds
(VOC) control device for Serigraph, Incorporated (Serigraph). On May
18, 2005, the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources submitted a
request to revise the Wisconsin SIP. The proposed revision approves
Serigraph's use of a biofilter to control VOC emissions from its
printing facility in Washington County, Wisconsin. The biofilter system
will reliably control emissions at or below the level of the control
methods listed in the SIP. Serigraph has designed one of its plants as
a permanent total enclosure (PTE), which captures all VOC emissions and
routes them to the biofilter. There are no fugitive emissions from the
plant. This reduces the total VOC emissions from Serigraph's facility.
In the final rules section of this Federal Register, EPA is
approving the SIP revision as a direct final rule without prior
proposal, because EPA views this as a noncontroversial revision and
anticipates no adverse comments. A detailed rationale for the approval
is set forth in the direct final rule. We do not intend to take any
further action in relation to this proposed rule unless we receive
adverse comment this action. If EPA receives adverse comment, we will
withdraw the direct final rule and will respond to all public comments
in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. EPA will not
institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties
interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before November 14,
2005.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by Regional Material in EDocket
(RME) ID No. R05-OAR-2005-WI-0002 by one of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting comments.
Agency Web site: http://docket.epa.gov/rmepub/.
RME, EPA's electronic public docket and comment system, is EPA's
preferred method for receiving comments. Once in the system, select
``quick search,'' then key in the appropriate RME Docket identification
number. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments.
E-mail: [email protected].
Fax: (312) 886-5824.
Mail: You may send written comments to: John M. Mooney, Chief,
Criteria Pollutant Section, (AR-18J), U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
Hand delivery: Deliver your comments to: John M. Mooney, Chief,
Criteria Pollutant Section (AR-18J), U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 18th floor, Chicago,
Illinois 60604.
Such deliveries are only accepted during the Regional Office's
normal hours of operation. The Regional Office's official hours of
business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. excluding
Federal holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to RME ID No. R05-OAR-2005-WI-
0002. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in
the public docket without change, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through RME, regulations.gov,
or e-mail. The EPA RME Web site and the Federal regulations.gov Web
site are ``anonymous access'' systems, which means EPA will not know
your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body
of your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through RME or regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses. For additional instructions on submitting
comments, go to Section I(B) of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
of this document.
Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the
RME index at http://www.epa.gov/rmepub/. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other
information the disclosure of which is restricted by statute. Publicly
available docket materials are available either electronically in RME
or in hard copy at Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, Air and
Radiation Division, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
[[Page 60038]]
Illinois 60604. Please telephone Matt Rau at (312) 886-6524 before
visiting the Region 5 Office.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matt Rau, Environmental Engineer,
Criteria Pollutant Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), USEPA, Region
5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886-6524.
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does This Action Apply to Me?
B. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA?
II. What Action Is EPA Taking Today?
III. Where Can I Find More Information About This Proposal and the
Corresponding Direct Final Rule?
I. General Information
A. Does This Action Apply to Me?
This action applies to a single source, Serigraph, Incorporated of
Washington County, Wisconsin.
B. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA?
1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit CBI to EPA through RME,
regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or
CD ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD ROM as
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD ROM the
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
2. Tips for Preparing Your Comments. When submitting comments,
remember to:
a. Identify the rulemaking by docket number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal Register date and page number).
b. Follow directions--The agency may ask you to respond to specific
questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) part or section number.
c. Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and
substitute language for your requested changes.
d. Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information
and/or data that you used.
e. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you
arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be
reproduced.
f. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns, and
suggest alternatives.
g. Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of
profanity or personal threats.
h. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period deadline
identified.
II. What Action Is EPA Taking Today?
EPA is proposing to approve a revision to the Wisconsin VOC SIP for
Serigraph. The revision approves Serigraph's use of a biofilter to
control VOC emissions from several lines in Plant 2 at its facility.
This is an alternative to the controls listed in the SIP. Section NR
422.04(2)(d) of the Wisconsin Administrative Code allows an alternative
control method that is demonstrated to reliably control emissions to a
level at or below the applicable SIP limit and is approved by the
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. The biofilter will reliably
control VOC emissions at a level in line with other control techniques
for surface printing facilities. An eighty percent overall control
efficiency for VOC emissions is required for a control device. Overall
control efficiency includes both capture and destruction efficiencies.
Plant 2 is designed as a PTE ensuring all the emissions are captured
and exhausted into the biofilter. Serigraph has operated its biofilter
since May 1997. An average of 54 tons of VOC emissions are vented to
the biofilter each year. The average exhaust from the biofilter is
about 8 tons of VOC per year. This comfortably exceeds the control
requirement.
III. Where Can I Find More Information About This Proposal and the
Corresponding Direct Final Rule?
For additional information, see the Direct Final Rule which is
located in the Rules section of this Federal Register. Copies of the
request and the EPA's analysis are available electronically at RME or
in hard copy at the above address. Please telephone Matt Rau at (312)
886-6524 before visiting the Region 5 Office.
Dated: September 15, 2005.
Bharat Mathur,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 05-20613 Filed 10-13-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P