[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 158 (Wednesday, August 17, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 48287-48290]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-16292]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[R03-OAR-2005-WV-0001; FRL-7954-3]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
West Virginia; Attainment Demonstration for the Eastern Panhandle
Region Ozone Early Action Compact Area
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is taking final action to approve a revision to the West
Virginia State Implementation Plan (SIP). This revision consists of an
Early Action Compact (EAC) Plan that will enable the Eastern Panhandle
Region Ozone EAC Area to demonstrate attainment and maintenance of the
8-hour ozone national ambient air quality (NAAQS) standard. This action
is being taken under the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act).
DATES: This final rule is effective on September 16, 2005.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Regional
Material in EDocket (RME) ID Number R03-OAR-2005-WV-0001. All documents
in the docket are listed in the RME index at http://www.docket.epa.gov/rmepub/. Once in the system, select ``quick search,'' then key in the
appropriate RME identification number. Although listed in the
electronic docket, some information is not publicly available, i.e.,
confidential business information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically in RME or in hard copy
for public inspection during normal business hours at the Air
Protection Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III,
1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. Copies of the State
submittal are available at the West Virginia Department of
Environmental Protection, Division of Air Quality, 7012
[[Page 48288]]
MacCorkle Avenue, SE., Charleston, West Virginia 25304-2943.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rose Quinto, (215) 814-2182, or by e-
mail at [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On May 17, 2005 (70 FR 28264), EPA published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPR) for the State of West Virginia. The NPR proposed
approval of the attainment demonstration and the Early Action Plan
(EAP) for the West Virginia Eastern Panhandle Region EAC Area, which
consists of Berkeley and Jefferson Counties. The formal SIP revision
was submitted by the West Virginia Department of Environmental
Protection on December 29, 2004. Other specifics of the State's SIP
revision for the Eastern Panhandle Region Ozone EAC Area, and the
rationale for EPA's proposed action are explained in the NPR and will
not be restated here. On June 16, 2005, EPA received adverse comments
on its May 17, 2005, NPR. A summary of the comments submitted and EPA's
responses are provided in Section II of this document.
II. Summary of Public Comments and EPA Responses
Comment: One commenter opposes the approval of the SIP revision for
the Eastern Panhandle Region Ozone EAC Area because the Area is in
violation of the 8-hour ozone standard. The commenter also states that
the SIP revision provides for the deferment of a nonattainment
designation until a future date, potentially as late as December 31,
2007, and relieves the Area of obligations under Title I, subpart D of
the CAA. Although the commenter is supportive of the goal of addressing
proactively the public health concerns associated with ozone pollution,
the commenter believes that EPA does not have legal authority to defer
effective dates of designations or to allow areas to be relieved of
obligations under Title I, part D of the CAA while they are violating
the 8-hour ozone standard or are designated nonattainment of that
standard.
Response: EPA first announced the EAC process in a June 19, 2002
letter from Gregg Cooke, Administrator, EPA Region VI to Robert Huston,
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, followed by a November 14,
2002 memorandum from Jeffrey R. Holmstead, Assistant Administrator,
EPA's Office of Air and Radiation to the EPA Regional Administrators,
entitled, ``Schedule for 8-Hour Ozone Designations and its Effect on
Early Action Compacts.'' EPA formalized the EAC process in the
designation rulemaking on April 30, 2004 (69 FR 23858). In the
designation rule, EPA designated 14 EAC areas as nonattainment, but
deferred the effective date of the designation until September 30,
2005. The EAC program gives local areas the flexibility to develop
their own approach to meeting the 8-hour ozone standard, provided the
participating communities are serious in their commitment to control
emissions from local sources earlier than the CAA would otherwise
require. By involving diverse stakeholders, including representatives
from industry, local and State governments, and local environmental
citizens' groups, a number of communities are discussing for the first
time the need for regional cooperation in solving air quality problems
that affect the health and welfare of its citizens. People living in
these areas that realize reductions in pollution levels sooner will
enjoy the health benefits of cleaner air sooner than might otherwise
occur. EPA believes this proactive approach involving multiple, diverse
stakeholders is beneficial to the citizens of the area by raising
awareness of the need to adopt and implement measures that will reduce
emissions and improve air quality.
EPA disagrees with the comments that this action on this SIP
revision for the Eastern Panhandle Region Ozone EAC Area defers the
nonattainment designation for this Area. In our May 17, 2005, NPR (70
FR 28264), EPA proposed approval of an attainment demonstration and EAP
SIP revision for the Eastern Panhandle Region Ozone EAC Area. This SIP
revision includes an attainment demonstration which demonstrates
attainment of the 8-hour ozone NAAQS in the Eastern Panhandle Region
Ozone EAC Area by December 31, 2007, and also demonstrates maintenance
of the 8-hour NAAQS for five years following the attainment date. As
noted in the proposed action, approval of the attainment demonstration
and EAP constitutes one of several milestones that an area must meet in
order to participate in the EAC process. While approval of this plan is
a prerequisite for an extension of the deferred effective date of the
designation of this Area, see 40 CFR 81.300(e)(3), neither the proposed
approval of this SIP revision nor this final action approving the SIP
purports to extend the deferral of the effective date of the
nonattainment designation for this Area. In a separate rulemaking (69
FR 23858, April 30, 2004), EPA deferred the effective date of the air
quality designations of all 14 EAC areas to September 30, 2005. In the
April 30, 2004, final rule, EPA responded to comments received during
the comment period for this final rule. In a separate proposed rule (70
FR 33409, June 8, 2005), EPA proposed to extend the deferral of the
effective date of the air quality designations for these 14 EAC areas.
EPA will consider comments regarding its legal authority in the final
rule associated with the June 8, 2005, proposed rule.
Regardless of whether EPA's separate actions deferring the
effective date of the nonattainment designation for this Area are
appropriate, EPA sees no basis to disapprove the attainment and
maintenance plan. The provisions of the statute generally provide that
areas must demonstrate attainment and maintenance of the NAAQS. See,
e.g., CAA section 110(a)(1) (requiring areas to submit plans providing
for ``implementation, maintenance, and enforcement'' of each NAAQS) and
CAA section 172(c)(1) (requiring nonattainment areas to submit plans
demonstrating attainment of the NAAQS). The commenter has provided no
substantive reason why this plan does not demonstrate attainment and
maintenance of the 8-hour standard. Therefore, this action approving
the attainment demonstration and maintenance plan is appropriate.
III. Final Action
EPA is approving the attainment demonstration and the EAP for the
West Virginia Eastern Panhandle Region Ozone EAC Area. The modeling of
the ozone and ozone precursor emissions from sources affecting the
Eastern Panhandle Region EAC Area demonstrates that the specified
control strategies will provide for attainment of the 8-hour ozone
NAAQS by December 31, 2007, and maintenance of that standard through
2012.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. General Requirements
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action
merely approves State law as meeting Federal requirements and imposes
no additional
[[Page 48289]]
requirements beyond those imposed by State law. Accordingly, the
Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this rule
approves pre-existing requirements under State law and does not impose
any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by State law, it
does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform
Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4). This rule also does not have tribal
implications because it will not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
This action also does not have federalism implications because it does
not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government,
as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999).
This action merely approves a State rule implementing a Federal
standard, and does not alter the relationship or the distribution of
power and responsibilities established in the Clean Air Act. This rule
also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 ``Protection of Children
from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April
23, 1997), because it is not economically significant.
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. In
this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the
State to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP
submission, to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise
satisfies the provisions of the Clean Air Act. Thus, the requirements
of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This rule does not
impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
B. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. This rule is not a
``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
C. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by October 17, 2005. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such
rule or action. This action, approving the attainment demonstration and
the EAP for the Eastern Panhandle Region Ozone EAC Area, may not be
challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See
section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Nitrogen dioxide,
Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.
Dated: August 9, 2005.
Donald S. Welsh,
Regional Administrator, Region III.
0
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for 40 CFR part 52 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart XX--West Virginia
0
2. In Sec. 52.2520, the table in paragraph (e) is revised by adding
the entry for the Attainment Demonstration and Early Action Plan for
the Eastern Panhandle Region Ozone Early Action Compact Area at the end
of the table to read as follows:
Sec. 52.2520 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
EPA-Approved Nonregulatory and Quasi-Regulatory Material
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State
Name of nonregulatory SIP revision Applicable geographic submittal EPA approval date Additional
area date explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Attainment Demonstration and Early Berkeley and Jefferson 12/29/04 8/17/05 [Insert
Action Plan for the Eastern Counties. Federal Register page
Panhandle Region Ozone Early number where the
Action Compact Area. document begins].
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 48290]]
[FR Doc. 05-16292 Filed 8-16-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P