[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 225 (Wednesday, November 23, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 70761-70765]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-23213]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 271
[FRL-8001-4]
Michigan: Final Authorization of State Hazardous Waste Management
Program Revision
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Michigan has applied to the EPA for final authorization of the
changes to its hazardous waste management program under the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). EPA has determined that these
changes satisfy all requirements needed to qualify for final
authorization and is proposing to authorize the state's changes through
this proposed final action.
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before December 23,
2005.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Ms. Judy Feigler, Michigan
Regulatory Specialist, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Waste,
Pesticides and Toxics Division (DM-7J), 77 W. Jackson Blvd., Chicago,
Illinois 60604, phone number: (312) 886-4179. We must receive your
comments by December 23, 2005. You can view and copy Michigan's
application from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. at the following addresses: Waste
Management Division, Michigan Department of Environmental Quality,
Constitution Hall--Atrium North, Lansing, Michigan (mailing address
P.O. Box 30241, Lansing, Michigan 48909), contact Ronda Blayer (517)
353-9548; and EPA Region 5, contact Judy Feigler at the following
address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Judy Feigler, Michigan Regulatory
Specialist, U.S. EPA, DM-7J, 77 W. Jackson Blvd., Chicago, IL 60604,
(312) 886-4179.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Why Are Revisions to State Programs Necessary?
States which have received final authorization from EPA under RCRA
section 3006(b), 42 U.S.C. 6926(b), must maintain a hazardous waste
program that is equivalent to, consistent with, and no less stringent
than the federal program. As the federal program changes, states must
change their programs and ask EPA to authorize the changes. Changes to
state programs may be necessary when federal or state statutory or
regulatory authority is modified or when certain other changes occur.
Most commonly, states must change their programs because of changes to
EPA's regulations in 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) parts 124,
260 through 266, 268, 270, 273 and 279.
B. What Decisions Have We Made in This Rule?
We conclude that Michigan's application to revise its authorized
program meets all of the statutory and regulatory requirements
established by RCRA. Therefore, we propose to grant Michigan final
authorization to operate its hazardous waste management program with
the changes described in the authorization application. Michigan has
responsibility for permitting treatment, storage, and disposal
facilities (TSDFs) within its borders (except in Indian country) and
for carrying out the aspects of the RCRA described in its revised
program application, subject to the limitations of the Hazardous and
Solid Waste Amendments of 1984 (HSWA). New federal requirements and
prohibitions imposed by federal regulations that EPA promulgates under
the authority of HSWA take effect in authorized states before they are
authorized for the requirements. Thus, EPA will implement those
requirements and prohibitions in Michigan, including issuing permits,
until the State is granted authorization to do so.
C. What Is the Effect of Today's Authorization Decision?
This decision means that a facility in Michigan subject to RCRA
will now have to comply with the authorized state requirements (listed
in section F of
[[Page 70762]]
this notice) instead of the equivalent federal requirements in order to
comply with RCRA. Michigan has enforcement responsibilities under its
state hazardous waste management program for violations of such
program, but EPA retains its authority under RCRA sections 3007, 3008,
3013, and 7003, which include, among others, the authority to:
Do inspections, and require monitoring, tests, analyses or
reports;
Enforce RCRA requirements and suspend or revoke permits;
and
Take enforcement actions regardless of whether the state
has taken its own actions.
This action does not impose additional requirements on the
regulated community because the regulations for which Michigan is being
authorized by today's action are already effective, and are not changed
by today's action.
D. What Happens if EPA Receives Comments That Oppose This Action?
If EPA receives comments that oppose this authorization, we will
address all public comments in a later Federal Register. You may not
have another opportunity to comment. If you want to comment on this
authorization, you must do so at this time.
E. What Has Michigan Previously Been Authorized for?
Michigan initially received final authorization on October 16,
1986, effective October 30, 1986 (51 FR 36804-36805) to implement the
RCRA hazardous waste management program. We granted authorization for
changes to Michigan's program on November 24, 1989, effective January
23, 1990 (54 FR 48608); on January 24, 1991, effective June 24, 1991
(56 FR 18517); on October 1, 1993, effective November 30, 1993 (58 FR
51244); on January 13, 1995, effective January 13, 1995 (60 FR 3095);
on February 8, 1996, effective April 8, 1996 (61 FR 4742); on November
14, 1997, effective November 14, 1997 (62 FR 61775); on March 2, 1999,
effective June 1, 1999 (64 FR 10111); and on July 31, 2002, effective
July 31, 2002 (67 FR 49617).
F. What Changes Are We Authorizing With Today's Action?
On September 7, 2005, Michigan submitted a complete program
revision application seeking authorization of its changes in accordance
with 40 CFR 271.21. We now make a final decision, subject to receipt of
written comments that oppose this action, that Michigan's hazardous
waste management program revision satisfies all requirements necessary
to qualify for final authorization. Therefore, we propose to grant
Michigan final authorization for the following program changes:
Program Revisions Based on Federal RCRA Changes
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Federal Register date
Description of federal Checklist No., if relevant and page (and/or RCRA Analogous state
requirement statutory authority) authority
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HSWA Codification Rule; 17C......................... July 15, 1985, 50 FR R 299.9204(2)(a) and
Household Waste (Resource 28702. (2)(a)(i)-(ii).
Recovery Facilities).
Corrective Action Management 121......................... February 16, 1993, 58 R 299.9102(s) and (cc),
Units and Temporary Units. FR 8658. R 299.9103(r), R
299.9105(c)(vii), R
299.9105(t), R
299.9107(j), R
299.9311, R 299.9413,
R 299.9519(9), R
299.9601(1), (2)(k)
and (l) and (3)(a), R
299.9627, R
299.9629(3)(a) and
(b), R 299.9635(3), R
299.9636, and R
299.11003(1)(u).
Waste Water Treatment Sludges 184......................... March 8, 2000, 65 FR R 299.9306(1)(d) and
from Metal Finishing Industry; 12378. (7)-(10).
180-day Accumulation Time.
Organobromine Production Waste 187......................... June 8, 2000, 65 FR R 299.9220 and R
and Petroleum Refining Process 36365. 299.11003(1)(u).
Waste: Technical Correction.
NESHAPS: Final Standards for 188, 188.1, 188.2........... July 10, 2000, 65 FR R 299.9230(2) and (3);
Hazardous Air Pollutants for 42292; May 14, 2001, R 299.9519(5)(j)(v); R
Hazardous Waste Combusters. 66 FR 24270; July 3, 299.9623(2), (3)(b)
2001, 66 FR 35087. and (11); and R
299.11003(1)(n).
Chlorinated Aliphatics 189......................... November 8, 2000, 65 FR R 299.9222, R 299.9311,
Production Wastes; Land 67068. R 299.9413, R
Disposal Restrictions for Newly 299.9627, and R
Identified Wastes; and CERCLA 299.11003(1)(j) and
Hazardous Substance Designation (u).
and Reportable Quantities.
Deferral of Phase IV Standards 190......................... December 26, 2000, 65 R 299.9311, R 299.9413,
for PCBs as a Constituent FR 81373. R 299.9627, and R
Subject to Treatment in Soil. 299.11003(1)(u).
Storage, Treatment, 191......................... May 16, 2001, 66 FR R 299.9101(q), R
Transportation and Disposal of 27218. 299.9102(d) and (z), R
Mixed Wastes. 299.9103(d) and (k), R
299.9104, R
299.9105(b), (j), (k),
(v), (w), (z) and
(aa), R 299.9203, R
299.9822(2)-(14), R
299.9823(2)-(4) and
(6)-(12).
Mixture and Derived-From Rule 192A........................ May 16, 2001, 66 FR R 299.9203(1)(c), (3),
Revisions. 27266. (7) and (8).
Land Disposal Restrictions 192B........................ May 16, 2001, 66 FR R 299.9311, R 299.9413,
Correction. 27266. R 299.9627, and R
299.11003(1)(u).
Change of EPA Mailing Address; 193......................... June 28, 2001, 66 FR R 299.11005(2).
Additional Technical Amendments 34374.
and Corrections.
[[Page 70763]]
Correction to the Hazardous 194......................... October 3, 2001, 66 FR R 299.9203(1)(c) and
Waste Identification Rule 50332. (7)(c).
(HWIR): Revisions to the
Mixture and Derived-From Rules.
Inorganic Chemical Manufacturing 195, 195.1.................. November 20, 2001, 66 R 299.9204(2)(o), R
Wastes Information and Listing. FR 58258; April 9, 299.9222, R 299.9311,
2002, 67 FR 17119. R 299.9413, R
299.9627, and R
299.11003(1)(j) and
(u).
CAMU Amendments................. 196......................... January 22, 2002, 67 FR R 299.9102(s) and (t),
2962. R 299.9107(j), R
299.9635, R 299.9638,
and R 299.9639.
Hazardous Air Pollutant 197......................... February 13, 2002, 67 R 299.9504(4), (15) and
Standards for Combusters: FR 6792. (20), R
Interim Standards. 299.9508(1)(b), R
299.9601(2)(i) and
(7), R 299.9623, R
299.9640, R
299.9808(4), (7) and
(9), R
299.11003(1)(v).
Hazardous Air Pollutant 198......................... February 14, 2002, 67 R 299.9519(5)(j)(v), R
Standards for Combusters; FR 6968. 299.9808(2), (3), (4),
Corrections. (7) and (9); and R
299.11003(1)(r).
Vacatur of Mineral Processing 199......................... March 13, 2002, 67 FR R 299.9202(1)(b)(iii),
Spent Materials Being Reclaimed 11251. R 299.9204(1)(v), and
as Solid Wastes and TCLP Use R 299.9212(4).
with MGP Waste.
Zinc Fertilizers Made From 200......................... July 24, 2002, 67 FR R 299.9204(1)(x) and
Recycled Hazardous Secondary 48393. (y), R 299.9311, R
Materials. 299.9413, R 299.9627,
R 299.9801(3) and (5),
and R 299.11003(1)(u).
Land Disposal Restrictions: 201......................... October 7, 2002, 67 FR R 299.9311, R 299.9413,
National Treatment Variance to 48393. R 299.9627, and R
Designate New Treatment 299.11003(1)(u).
Subcategories for Radioactively
Contaminated Cadmium-, Mercury-
, and Silver-Containing
Batteries.
NESHAP: Standards for Hazardous 202......................... December 19, 2002, 67 R 299.9504(4) and (15)
Air Pollutants for Hazardous FR 77687. and R 299.9508(1)(b),
Waste Combusters: Corrections. R 299.9623(8), and R
299.9808(7) and (9).
Recycled Used Oil Management 203......................... July 30, 2003, 68 FR R 299.9205(8), R
Standards. 44659. 299.9809 (1)(e) and
(2)(p), and R
299.9815(1)(b) and
(3)(f).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State-Initiated Modifications
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State requirement Effective date Federal analog
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MAC R 299.9205(4).............. October 15, 1996.. 40 CFR 261.5 and 262.34.
MAC R 299.9206(3).............. September 11, 2000 40 CFR 261.6(a)(3).
MAC R 299.9206(3)(g)........... September 11, 2000 40 CFR 261.6(1)(2).
MAC R 299.9207(3).............. June 21, 1994..... 40 CFR 261.7(b)(1)(i).
MAC R 299.9212(1), (2), and (3) October 15, 1996.. 40 CFR 261.21, 261.22, and 261.23.
MAC R 299.9215(3).............. April 20, 1988.... 40 CFR 261.21(c).
MAC R 299.9303(4).............. September 22, 1998 40 CFR 262.12(b) and 270.11.
MAC R 299.9304(2)(h) and (4)(c) October 15, 1996.. 40 CFR 262.20.
MAC R 299.9304(6).............. October 15, 1996.. None.
MAC R 299.9306(1)(e) and (f)... October 15, 1996.. 40 CFR 262.34(a)(1).
MAC R 299.9307(5)-(7).......... September 22, 1998 40 CFR 262.40(c).
MAC R 299.9401................. October 15, 1996.. 40 CFR 263.10.
MAC R 299.9404................. October 15, 1996.. 40 CFR 263.12.
MAC R 299.9410(1) and (3)...... October 15, 1996.. 40 CFR 263.30 and 263.31.
MAC R 299.9503(1)(i) and (k) October 15, 1996.. 40 CFR 262.34.
and (5).
MAC R 299.9508(1)(f)........... October 15, 1996.. 40 CFR 270.14(b)(17).
MAC R 299.9514(1) and (2)(c)... September 22, 1998 40 CFR 124.12.
MAC R 299.9516(3).............. October 15, 1996.. 40 CFR 270.50.
MAC R 299.9611(4).............. October 15, 1996.. None.
MAC R 299.9629(3)(a)(ii) and September 11, 2000 40 CFR 264.90(a) and 264.101(b).
(iii) and (3)(b)(ii) and (iii).
MAC R 299.9633................. October 15, 1996.. 40 CFR 260.10, definition of ``treatment''.
MAC R 299.9701(2) (removal) and September 11, 2000 40 CFR 264.140(a) and (c).
(3) renumbered as (2).
MAC R 299.9713(6) and (7)...... October 15, 1996.. 40 CFR 264.101(b).
MAC R 299.11004(4)............. September 11, 2000 40 CFR part 263.
MAC R 299.11007(2)............. September 11, 2000 None.
MAC R 299.11008(2)............. September 11, 2000 None.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 70764]]
G. Where Are the Revised State Rules Different from the Federal Rules?
Michigan hazardous waste management regulations are more stringent
than the corresponding federal regulations in a number of different
areas. The more stringent provisions are being recognized as a part of
the federally-authorized program and are federally enforceable. More
stringent provisions in the state's authorization application include,
but are not limited to, the following:
1. At MAC R 299.9203(7)(a) and (c), Michigan's exclusion differs
from the corresponding Federal counterpart at 40 CFR 261.3(g)(2)(i) in
that the exclusion only applies to mixtures generated as a result of a
cleanup conducted at the individual site of generation pursuant to
parts 31, 111, 201, or 213 of Michigan's Act 451 (1994 PA 451, MCL
324.101, known as the natural resources and environmental protection
act), or CERCLA.
2. At R 299.9306(7)(d)(i) and (ii) and (g), Michigan's rules
contain containment, inspection, recordkeeping and emergency
requirements that are not found in the Federal counterpart at 40 CFR
262.34(g)(4)(i)(A) and (B) and (g)(4)(v), respectively.
3. At R 299.9307(7)(d)(i)(C), Michigan does not allow containment
buildings, as does 40 CFR 262.34(g)(4)(i)(C).
4. At R 299.9639(5)(e), Michigan does not allow permits as a shield
as does the Federal counterpart at 40 CFR Sec. 264.555(e)(5).
We consider the following state requirements to be beyond the scope
of the Federal program, though this list may not be exhaustive:
At R 299.9104 and R 299.9203, Michigan regulates more hazardous
wastes than the Federal counterpart at 40 CFR 266.210. The hazardous
wastes that are regulated by Michigan but not by EPA are broader-in-
scope requirements.
Broader-in-scope requirements are not part of the authorized
program and EPA cannot enforce them. Although you must comply with
these requirements in accordance with state law, they are not RCRA
requirements.
H. Who Handles Permits After the Authorization Takes Effect?
Michigan will issue permits for all the provisions for which it is
authorized and will administer the permits it issues. EPA will continue
to administer any RCRA hazardous waste permits or portions of permits
which we issued prior to the effective date of this authorization,
until they expire or are terminated. We will not issue any more new
permits or new portions of permits for the provisions listed in the
Table above after the effective date of this authorization. EPA will
continue to implement and issue permits for HSWA requirements for which
Michigan is not yet authorized.
I. How Does Today's Action Affect Indian Country (18 U.S.C. 1151) in
Michigan?
Michigan is not authorized to carry out its hazardous waste program
in Indian country within the state, as defined in 18 U.S.C. 1151. This
includes:
1. All lands within the exterior boundaries of Indian reservations
within the State of Michigan;
2. Any land held in trust by the U.S. for an Indian tribe; and
3. Any other land, whether on or off an Indian reservation that
qualifies as Indian country.
EPA will continue to implement and administer the RCRA program in
Indian country. It is EPA's long-standing position that the term
``Indian lands'' used in past Michigan hazardous waste approvals is
synonymous with the term ``Indian country.'' Washington Dep't of
Ecology v. U.S. EPA, 752 F.2d 1465, 1467, n.1 (9th Cir. 1985). See 40
CFR 144.3 and 258.2.
J. What Is Codification and Is EPA Codifying Michigan's Hazardous Waste
Program as Authorized in This Rule?
Codification is the process of placing the state's statutes and
regulations that comprise the state's authorized hazardous waste
program into the Code of Federal Regulations. We do this by referencing
the authorized state rules in 40 CFR part 272. Michigan's rules, up to
and including those revised October 19, 1991, have previously been
codified through incorporation-by-reference effective April 24, 1989
(54 FR 7421, February 21, 1989); as amended effective March 31, 1992
(57 FR 3724, January 31, 1992). We reserve the amendment of 40 CFR part
272, subpart X, for the codification of Michigan's program changes
until a later date.
K. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
This proposed rule only authorizes hazardous waste requirements
pursuant to RCRA 3006 and does not impose requirements other than those
already imposed by state law (see SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, Section A.
Why Are Revisions to State Programs Necessary?; and Section C. What Is
the Effect of Today's Authorization Decision?). Therefore, this rule
complies with applicable executive orders and statutory provisions as
follows:
1. Executive Order 18266: Regulatory Planning Review
The Office of Management and Budget has exempted this rule from its
review under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993).
2. Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not impose an information collection burden under
the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.).
3. Regulatory Flexibility Act
After considering the economic impacts of today's rule on small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), I
certify that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
4. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Because this rule approves pre-existing requirements under state
law and does not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that
required by state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or
significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4).
5. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 19, 1999) does not apply
to this rule because it will not have federalism implications (i.e.,
substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between
the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government).
6. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000) does not
apply to this rule because it will not have tribal implications (i.e.,
substantial direct effects on one or more Indian tribes, or on the
relationship between the federal government and Indian tribes, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities between the federal
government and Indian tribes.)
7. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental
Health and Safety Risks
This rule is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997) because it is not economically significant and it is
not based on environmental health or safety risks.
[[Page 70765]]
8. Executive Order 13211: Actions That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use
This rule is not subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001) because it is not a significant regulatory action as defined
in Executive Order 12866.
9. National Technology Transfer Advancement Act
EPA approves state programs as long as they met criteria required
by RCRA, so it would be inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, in
its review of a state program, to require the use of any particular
voluntary consensus standard in place of another standard that meets
requirements of RCRA. Thus, the requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) do not apply to this rule.
10. Executive Order 12988
As required by section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (61 FR 4729,
February 7, 1996), in issuing this rule, EPA has taken the necessary
steps to eliminate drafting errors and ambiguity, minimize potential
litigation, and provide a clear legal standard for affected conduct.
11. Executive Order 12630: Evaluation of Risk and Avoidance of
Unanticipated Takings
EPA has complied with Executive Order 12630 (53 FR 8859, March 15,
1988) by examining the takings implications of the rule in accordance
with the Attorney General's Supplemental Guidelines for the Evaluation
of Risk and Avoidance of Unanticipated Takings issued under the
Executive Order.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 271
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Confidential business information, Hazardous waste, Hazardous waste
transportation, Indian lands, Intergovernmental relations, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Authority: This action is issued under the authority of sections
2002(a), 3006, and 7004(b) of the Solid Waste Disposal Act as
amended, 42 U.S.C. 6912(a), 6926, 6974(b).
Dated: November 9, 2005.
Margaret M. Guerriero,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 05-23213 Filed 11-22-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P