[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 165 (Friday, August 26, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 50199-50205]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-16594]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[R04-OAR-2005-TN-0001, R04-OAR-2004-GA-0004-200522; FRL-7956-9]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Tennessee and Georgia; Attainment Demonstrations for the Chattanooga,
Nashville, and Tri-Cities Early Action Compact Areas
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The EPA is approving revisions to the Tennessee and Georgia
State Implementation Plans (SIPs) submitted by the State of Tennessee,
through the Department of Environment and Conservation (TDEC) on
December 29, 2004, and by the State of Georgia, through the
Environmental Protection Division (GAEPD) on December 31, 2004, for the
three Early Action Compact (EAC) areas in Tennessee and Georgia: the
Chattanooga, Nashville, and Tri-Cities Areas (the Tennessee and Georgia
EAC Areas). The Chattanooga EAC Area is the only one of the three with
counties in both Tennessee and Georgia; the other two EAC Areas are
located entirely within the State of Tennessee. The SIP revisions meet
the requirements for the Tennessee and Georgia EAC Areas to attain and
maintain the 8-hour ozone national ambient air quality standard (8-hour
ozone standard) as described in the EAC Protocol and related
regulations. EPA is also now approving the photochemical modeling used
by Tennessee and Georgia to support the attainment and maintenance
demonstrations of the 8-hour ozone standard in the Tennessee and
Georgia EAC Areas.
In this action, EPA is not finalizing its proposed rulemaking to
defer the effective date of the nonattainment designations for EAC
areas. In a separate action, published on June 8, 2005, EPA proposed to
defer the effective date of the nonattainment deferred designation for
EAC areas until December 31, 2006 (69 FR 23858). EPA final action on
the deferral is expected to be published before September 30, 2005.
DATES: This rule will be effective September 26, 2005.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Regional
Material in EDocket (RME) ID No. R04-OAR-2005-TN-0001 and R04-OAR-2004-
GA-0004. The EAC Protocol can be found in RME ID No. R04-OAR-2005-TN-
0001. The Protocol can also be found at http://www.epa.gov/air/eac/.
All documents in the docket are listed in the RME index at http://docket.epa.gov/rmepub/. Once in the system, select ``quick search,''
then key in the appropriate RME Docket identification number. Although
listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, i.e.,
confidential business information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically in RME or in hard copy at
the Regulatory Development Section,
[[Page 50200]]
Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. EPA requests that if at all possible, you
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section to schedule your inspection. The Regional Office's official
hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding
Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anne Marie Hoffman, or Scott Martin,
Regulatory Development Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides
and Toxics Management Division, Region 4, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, 61 Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. The
telephone number for Mr. Martin is (404) 562-9036, and the telephone
number for Ms. Hoffman is (404) 562-9074. Mr. Martin can also be
reached via electronic mail at [email protected]. Ms. Hoffman can
also be reached via electronic mail at [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Background
II. Today's Action
III. Response to Comments
IV. Final Action
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background
On May 26, 2005, EPA proposed approval of SIP revisions for the
Tennessee and Georgia EAC Areas demonstrating attainment and
maintenance of the 8-hour ozone standard, 0.08 parts per million (ppm),
in these areas by December 31, 2007.\1\ Additional information
regarding the SIP revisions being approved today is available in the
proposed rule (70 FR 30389, May 26, 2005) and the Docket for this
action. The submitted revisions are consistent with the requirements
established in the EAC Protocol and related regulations. For further
information on the designation process and the Tennessee and Georgia
EAC designations, see 69 FR 23856, April 30, 2004.\2\ EPA received one
public comment during the thirty day comment period for the SIP
revisions being approved today. This comment is discussed below, in
Part III., ``Response to Comments.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The 8-hour ozone standard was promulgated on July 18, 1997
(62 FR 38856).
\2\ As discussed in the April 30, 2004, designations and the May
26, 2005, proposal for the Tennessee and Georgia SIP revisions, the
Tennessee and Georgia EAC Areas include counties designated as
unclassifiable/attainment and nonattainment deferred. The specific
measures included in the SIP revisions may be different depending on
the specific county's designation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, today's action corrects an inadvertent error in the
May 26, 2005, proposal to approve the Tennessee and Georgia EAC SIP
revisions. In the proposal document, EPA indicated in Table 5 (see 70
FR 30389, 30388) that two local measures were not modeled for the
Chattanooga EAC Area. In fact, the two measures were modeled and
included as part of the attainment demonstration, and the measures
should not appear in Table 5. See Section II., ``Today's Action'' for
more details regarding this inadvertent error.
Summary of EAC Process
An EAC is an agreement between a state, local governments, and EPA
to implement measures not necessarily required by the Clean Air Act
(CAA) in order to achieve cleaner air as soon as possible.\3\
Communities close to or exceeding the 8-hour ozone standard, which have
elected to enter into an EAC, have started reducing air pollution at
least two years sooner than required by the CAA. In many cases, these
reductions will be achieved by local air pollution control measures not
otherwise mandated under the CAA. In accordance with the EAC Protocol,
Tennessee submitted EACs for the Chattanooga area, Nashville area, and
Tri-Cities area, on December 30, 2002. The State of Georgia submitted
materials supporting the Chattanooga EAC on December 24, 2002. The
compacts were signed by State air quality officials, representatives of
local communities, and the Regional Administrator of EPA Region 4. The
EAC program was designed for areas that approached or monitored
violations of the 8-hour ozone standard, but that were in attainment
for the 1-hour ozone national ambient air quality standard (1-hour
ozone standard). The 1-hour ozone standard will be revoked for counties
in the EAC areas one year after the effective dates of the counties'
respective 8-hour ozone designations. See 40 CFR 50.9(b) for additional
information on the 1-hour ozone revocation.
As part of the EAC process, EPA deferred the effective date of the
nonattainment designations for EAC areas that were violating the 8-hour
ozone standard, but continue to meet the milestones described in the
EAC Protocol. Details of this deferral were published in the Federal
Register on April 30, 2004 (69 FR 23858). On June 8, 2005, EPA proposed
to extend the deferred effective date of the nonattainment designations
through December 31, 2006 (70 FR 33409), for the EAC areas that have
met their obligations. A subsequent EPA action will continue the
deferral until December 31, 2007, when attainment evaluations will
begin. Pursuant to the EAC Protocol, the designation process is
scheduled to be completed by April 15, 2008. To date, the Tennessee and
Georgia EAC Areas have met all the EAC milestones. In April, 2008, it
is anticipated that EAC areas with air quality monitoring data showing
attainment for the years 2005-2007, that have also met all the compact
milestones, will be designated attainment for the 8-hour ozone
standard. EPA believes that early planning and implementation of
control measures that improve air quality will likely accelerate
protection of public health. The EAC program allows participating state
and local entities to make decisions that will accelerate meeting the
new 8-hour ozone standard using a mix of local, state, and federal
measures. All of the measures being adopted today as part of the SIP
revisions will be mandatory and federally enforceable.
Brief Summary of Control Measures and Modeling
The details of the SIP revisions being approved today are available
for review under RME ID No. R04-OAR-2005-TN-0001 and R04-OAR-2004-GA-
0004. In addition, the measures discussed in this paragraph are applied
differently to different areas depending on the specific area's
designation (i.e., unclassifiable/attainment or nonattainment
deferred). Generally, however, the SIP revisions include emissions
inventory, modeling, control strategies, and maintenance for growth
elements as required by the EAC Protocol. With regard to control
measures, the Tennessee and Georgia SIP revisions include Federal,
State, and local control measures. The federal control measures
include, among others, Tier 2 vehicle standards and low sulfur fuel.
The State of Tennessee control measures include, among others,
expansion of the Motor Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance (I/M)
program, expansion of the Stage I Vapor Recovery program, and a Motor
Vehicle Tampering provision. The State of Georgia submittal included
two control measures that will be implemented in the Chattanooga EAC
Area: an open burning ban during the ozone season and Stage I Vapor
Recovery. These
[[Page 50201]]
statewide measures were enacted through state legislation, but
implementation will occur at a local level, through both county and
state involvement in implementation and enforcement. The local control
measures in both states include, among others, open burning bans and
transportation emissions control measures. All of these measures,
including the local measures, will be enforceable once they are
incorporated into the SIP.
In addition to control measures, the Tennessee and Georgia SIP
revisions also include maintenance for growth plans that meet and
exceed the requirements of the EAC Protocol for such plans. The EAC
Protocol requires that maintenance of the 8-hour ozone standard be
demonstrated through 2012. In the SIP revisions being approved today,
the States of Tennessee and Georgia modeled maintenance of the 8-hour
ozone standard through at least 2012, and until 2017, in some Tennessee
EAC Areas.
Both Tennessee and Georgia used a process known as photochemical
modeling to evaluate attainment and maintenance of the 8-hour ozone
standard. Photochemical modeling performed by Tennessee used the above
described control measures, and others, to model attainment and
maintenance of the 8-hour ozone standard through 2017, passing the
attainment test for 2007, 2012, and 2017. Georgia's SIP revisions model
attainment and maintenance through 2012, passing the attainment test
for 2007, and 2012. The use of photochemical modeling is consistent
with the EAC Protocol and the EPA Draft modeling guidance that was
provided to EAC areas.\4\ The Chattanooga EAC is a multi-state EAC
Area, including counties in Tennessee and Georgia; therefore, an
attainment demonstration was developed for the Chattanooga EAC Area by
the State of Georgia. According to Georgia's modeling for the
Chattanooga EAC Area, maintenance of the 8-hour ozone standard is
demonstrated through 2012. For further information on the photochemical
modeling performed by Tennessee, please see RME ID No. R04-OAR-2005-TN-
0001. For further information on photochemical modeling performed by
Georgia, please see RME ID No. R04-OAR-2004-GA-0004.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Further information about the EAC program is available in
the EAC Protocol and prior Federal Register notices available at
http://www.epa.gov/air/eac/.
\4\ This guidance can be found at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/naaqs/ozone/eac/index.htm#Guidance.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Today's Action
Today we are taking final action to approve revisions to the
Tennessee and Georgia SIPs under sections 110 and 116 of the Act, 42
U.S.C. 7410 and 7416. The SIP revisions are consistent with the EAC
Protocol and related regulations. Pursuant to the EAC Protocol, the SIP
revisions demonstrate attainment of the 8-hour ozone standard within
the Tennessee and Georgia EAC Areas by 2007, maintenance for five or
more years beyond 2007, and incorporate the control measures developed
by these EAC Areas into the Tennessee and Georgia SIPs.
Additionally, today we are correcting inadvertent errors in Table 5
of the proposed rule published on May 26, 2005 (70 FR 30382). The
specific corrections apply to Section VII.--``What Measures are
Included in this EAC SIP Submittal.'' Table 5--``Additional EAC Local
Reductions Not Modeled,'' on page 30387 of the proposal, shows that
neither the seasonal open burning ban, nor the Spare the Air Program,
was modeled for the Chattanooga EAC Area. These two local control
measures were modeled and included in the Chattanooga EAC Area
attainment demonstration. Therefore, these measures should not be
included in Table 5.
III. Response to Comments
EPA Region 4 received one comment in response to the May 26, 2005,
proposal to approve the Tennessee and Georgia SIP revisions. The
commenter commended Tennessee and Georgia for taking steps to improve
air quality, but noted opposition to today's action for two reasons.
First, the SIP revisions provide for the deferment of a nonattainment
designation until a future date potentially as late as December 31,
2007; second, the revisions relieve the areas of obligations under
Title I, Subpart D of the CAA. These two issues are directly related to
the proposed deferral of the nonattainment designation for the
Tennessee and Georgia EAC Areas, published on June 8, 2005, (70 FR
33409), and not to today's approval of the SIP revisions. In addition,
the same issues were raised by this commenter in response to EPA's June
8, 2005, deferral proposal. Because the comment relates to deferral
issues, it will be responded to by EPA in our subsequent rulemaking
addressing the deferred effective date for nonattainment designations
for EAC areas. When published, this final deferral rule will be
available on the EAC Web site http://www.epa.gov/air/eac/. Notably,
contrary to the comment, today's action neither provides for deferral
of the nonattainment designation nor relieves an area from obligations
under Title I, Subpart D of the CAA.
IV. Final Action
Today EPA is approving revisions to the Tennessee SIP, submitted on
December 29, 2004, and the Georgia SIP, submitted December 31, 2004.
These revisions demonstrate attainment of the 8-hour ozone standard
within the Tennessee and Georgia EAC Areas by 2007, maintenance of the
standard for five or more years beyond 2007, and incorporate the
control measures developed by the EAC Areas into the Tennessee and
Georgia SIPs.
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action
merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and imposes
no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law.
Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because
this rule approves pre-existing requirements under state law and does
not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by
state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4).
This rule also does not have tribal implications because it will
not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on
the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This action also does not have federalism
implications because it does not have substantial direct effects on the
states, on the relationship between the National Government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64
FR 43255, August 10, 1999). This action merely approves a state rule
implementing a Federal standard, and does not alter the relationship or
the distribution of power
[[Page 50202]]
and responsibilities established in the Clean Air Act. This rule also
is not subject to Executive Order 13045 ``Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23,
1997), because it is not economically significant.
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. In
this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the
State to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP
submission, to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise
satisfies the provisions of the Clean Air Act. Thus, the requirements
of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This rule does not
impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by October 25, 2005. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such
rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings
to enforce its requirements. (See CAA section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.
Dated: August 15, 2005.
J.I. Palmer, Jr.,
Regional Administrator, Region 4.
0
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart L--Georgia
0
2. Section 52.570 is amended by:
0
a. In paragraph (c) by revising the entries for: ``391-3-1-.02(2)(pp)
Bulk Gasoline Plants''; ``391-3-1-.02(2)(rr) Gasoline Dispensing
Facility--Stage I'', ``391-3-1.02(2)(ss) Gasoline Transport Vehicles
and Vapor Collection Systems'' and ``391-3-1-.02(5) Open Burning''.
0
b. In paragraph (e) by adding a new entry 22. at the end of the table
to read as follows:
Sec. 52.570 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
EPA Approved Georgia Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State
State citation Title/subject effective EPA approval date Explanation
date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
391-3-1-.02(2)(pp).................. Bulk Gasoline Plants.. 1/08/2005 8/26/2005.............
[Insert first page
number of
publication].
* * * * * * *
391-3-1-.02(2)(rr).................. Gasoline Dispensing 1/08/2005 8/26/2005.............
Facility--Stage I. [Insert first page
number of
publication].
391-3-1-.02(2)(ss).................. Gasoline Transport 1/08/2005 8/26/2005.............
Vehicles and Vapor [Insert first page
Collection Systems. number of
publication]..
* * * * * * *
391-3-1-.02(5)...................... Open Burning.......... 1/08/2005 8/26/2005.............
[Insert first page
number of
publication].
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
(e) * * *
[[Page 50203]]
EPA Approved Georgia Nonregulatory Provisions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Applicable geographic State submittal date/
Name of nonregulatory SIP provision or nonattainment area effective date EPA approval date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
22. Attainment Demonstration for the Walker and Catoosa December 31, 2004...... August 26, 2005.
Chattanooga Early Action Area. Counties. [Insert first page
number of publication]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subpart RR--Tennessee
0
3. Section 52.2220 is amended by:
0
a. In paragraph (c) under ``Table-1 EPA Approved Tennessee
Regulations'' by revising entries for ``1200-3-18-.22,'' ``1200-3-
18-.24,'' ``1200-3-29-.02,'' ``1200-3-29-.03,'' ``1200-3-29-04,''
``1200-3-29-.05,'' ``1200-3-29-.06,'' ``1200-3-29-.07,'' ``1200-3-
29-.08,'' ``1200-3-29-.09,'' and ``1200-3-29-.10.''
0
b. In paragraph (c) under ``Table-1 EPA Approved Tennessee
Regulations'' by adding in numerical order a new entry for ``1200-3-
29-.12.''
0
c. In paragraph (c) under ``Table-1 EPA Approved Tennessee
Regulations'' by adding in numerical order a new chapter heading No.
``1200-3-36 Motor Vehicle Tampering'' and entries for ``1200-3-
26-.01,'', ``1200-3-26-.02,'', ``1200-3-26-.03,'' ``1200-3-26-.04'' and
``1200-3-26-.05.''
0
d. In paragraph (c) under ``Table 4 EPA Approved Chattanooga
Regulations'' by revising the entries for ``Section 4-41 Rule 6
Prohibition of Open Burning'' and ``Section 41 Rule 25.10 Gasoline
dispensing facilities--stage 1 vapor recovery,'' and
0
e. In paragraph (e) by adding a new entry at the end of the table to
read as follows:
Sec. 52.2220 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
Table 1.--EPA Approved Tennessee Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State
State citation Title/subject effective EPA approval date Explanation
date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Chapter 1200-3-18 Volatile Organic Compounds
Section 1200-3-18-.22............... Bulk Gasoline Plants.. 12/29/2004 8/26/2005.............
[Insert first page
number of
publication].
* * * * * * *
Section 1200-3-18.24................ Gasoline Dispensing 12/29/2004 8/26/2005.............
Facility-Stage I and [Insert first page
Stage II Vapor number of
Recovery. publication].
* * * * * * *
Chapter 1200-3-29 Light-Duty Motor Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance
* * * * * * *
Section 1200-3-29.02................ Definitions........... 12/29/2004 8/26/2005.............
[Insert first page
number of
publication].
Section 1200-3-29.03................ Motor Vehicle 12/29/2004 8/26/2005.............
Inspection [Insert first page
Requirements. number of
publication].
Section 1200-3-29-.04............... Exemption From Motor 12/29/2004 8/26/2005.............
Vehicle Inspection [Insert first page
Requirements. number of
publication].
Section 1200-3-29-.05............... Motor Vehicle Emission 12/29/2004 8/26/2005.............
Performance Test [Insert first page
Criteria. number of
publication].
Section 1200-3-29-.06............... Motor Vehicle Anti- 12/29/2004 8/26/2005.............
Tampering Test [Insert first page
Criteria. number of
publication].
Section 1200-3-29-.07............... Motor Vehicle 12/29/2004 8/26/2005.............
Emissions Performance [Insert first page
Test Methods. number of
publication].
Section 1200-3-29-.08............... Motor Vehicle Anti- 12/29/2004 8/26/2005.............
Tampering Test [Insert first page
Methods. number of
publication].
Section 1200-3-29-.09............... Motor Vehicle 12/29/2004 8/26/2005.............
Inspection Program. [Insert first page
number of
publication].
[[Page 50204]]
Section 1200-3-29-.10............... Motor Vehicle 12/29/2004 8/26/2005.............
Inspection Fee. [Insert first page
number of
publication].
Section 1200-3-29-.12............... Area of Applicability. 12/29/2004 8/26/2005.............
[Insert first page
number of
publication].
* * * * * * *
Chapter 1200-3-36 Motor Vehicle Tampering
1200-03-36-.01...................... Purpose............... 12/29/2004 8/26/2005.............
[Insert first page
number of
publication].
1200-03-36-.02...................... Definitions........... 12/29/2004 8/26/2005.............
[Insert first page
number of
publication].
1200-03-36-.03...................... Motor Vehicle 12/29/2004 8/26/2005.............
Tampering Prohibited. [Insert first page
number of
publication].
1200-03-36-.04...................... Recordkeeping 12/29/2004 8/26/2005.............
Requirements. [Insert first page
number of
publication].
1200-03-36-.05...................... Exemptions............ 12/29/2004 8/26/2005.............
[Insert first page
number of
publication].
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
Table 4.--EPA Approved Chattanooga Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Adoption
State citation Title/subject date EPA approval date Explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 4-41, Rule 6................ Prohibition of Open 12/08/04 8/26/05...............
Burning
[Insert first page
number of
publication].
* * * * * * *
Section 4-41, Rule 25............... General Provisions and 12/08/04 8/26/05...............
Applicability for [Insert first page
Volatile Organic number of
Compounds publication].
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
(e) * * *
EPA Approved Tennessee Non-Regulatory Provisions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State
Name of nonregulatory SIP provision Applicable geographic effective EPA approval date Explanation
or nonattainment area date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Attainment Demonstrations for Early Chattanooga, December 31, August 26, 2005.......
Action Compact Areas. Nashville, and Tri- 2004 [Insert first page
Cities Early Action number of
Compact Areas publication].
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 50205]]
[FR Doc. 05-16594 Filed 8-25-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P