[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 13 (Friday, January 20, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3317-3319]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 06-523]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
Notice of Availability of the Draft Comprehensive Conservation
Plan and Environmental Assessment for St. Marks National Wildlife
Refuge in Wakulla, Jefferson and Taylor Counties, FL
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Fish and Wildlife Service announces that a Draft
Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Environmental Assessment for St.
Marks National Wildlife Refuge are available for review and comment.
The National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966, as
amended by the National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997,
requires the Service to develop a comprehensive conservation plan for
each national wildlife refuge. The purpose in developing a
comprehensive conservation plan is to provide refuge managers with a
15-year strategy for achieving refuge purposes and contributing toward
the mission of the National Wildlife Refuge System, consistent with
sound principles of fish and wildlife management, conservation, legal
mandates, and Service policies. In addition to outlining broad
management direction on conserving wildlife and their habitats, plans
identify wildlife-dependent recreational opportunities available to the
public, including opportunities for hunting, fishing, wildlife
observation, wildlife photography, and environmental education and
interpretation.
DATES: Public meetings will be held in each county to present the plan
to the public. Mailings, media releases, and Web site postings will be
the avenues to inform the public of the dates and times for the
meetings. Individuals wishing to comment on the Draft Comprehensive
Conservation Plan and Environmental Assessment for St. Marks National
Wildlife Refuge should do so no later than March 21, 2006.
ADDRESSES: Requests for copies of the Draft Comprehensive Conservation
Plan and Environmental Assessment should be addressed to Mary Morris,
Natural Resource Planner, St. Marks National Wildlife Refuge, P.O. Box
68, St. Marks, Florida 32355; Telephone (850) 925-6121. The plan and
environmental assessment may also be accessed and downloaded from the
Service's Internet Web site http://southeast.fws.gov/planning/ or the
refuge's Web site http://saintmarks.fws.gov. Comments on the draft plan
may be submitted to the above address (attention: Mary Morris, Natural
Resource Planner) or via electronic mail to [email protected].
Please include your name and return address in your Internet message.
Our practice is to make comments, including names and home addressed of
respondents, available for pubic review during regular business hours.
Individual respondents may request that we withhold their home
addresses from the record, which we will honor to the extent allowable
by law.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Priority issues addressed in the draft plan
include: habitat protection and land conservation; migratory birds;
partnerships; fire and forest management; exotic, invasive and nuisance
species; wildlife inventory and monitoring; imperiled species
management; visitor services; funding and staffing; and wilderness and
cultural resources protection.
The Service developed three alternatives for managing the refuge
and chose Alternative 2 as the preferred alternative.
Alternatives
Alternative 1 represents no change from current management of the
refuge. The most recent approved acquisition boundary expansion (2000)
would allow for the acquisition and protection of 3,764 acres of land
adjacent to the refuge. Habitat planning documents would be revised as
staff resources allow. Currently, the State of Florida provides funding
for the majority of exotic plant species control and supplies, but
staff resources are used for an aggressive control program. Exotic
animals are removed through the hunt program. A series of impoundments
are
[[Page 3318]]
managed for waterfowl and these habitats are dependent on the upper
basin outside of the refuge, which is experiencing hydrologic change.
Most research work on the refuge is conducted with outside funding
and partnering agencies. Monitoring work is focused to the highest
priority species, such as red-cockaded woodpeckers. The refuge has a
need for basic inventories of threatened, endangered, and imperiled
species and plant and animal species. The habitat and life requirement
needs of many species are unknown and the presence or absence of rare
or imperiled species has not been fully addressed.
Visitor services would remain with existing programs, facilities,
and staff addressing the priority public uses--hunting, fishing,
wildlife observation, wildlife photography, and environmental education
and interpretation. Environmental education and interpretation programs
would continue and be conducted mainly onsite, with staff participation
in a few offsite outreach festivals yearly.
Protection of cultural resources would continue to rely on patrols
by the law enforcement officer. A comprehensive inventory of resources
is needed. The St. Marks Lighthouse would remain an unimproved
structure without public access. Maintenance would be performed, as
required for a national historic site to the extent funding is
available.
The Wilderness Area would remain a Class I airshed and monitoring
of ozone would continue. Patrols in the Wilderness Areas would also
continue to be performed by the law enforcement officer.
All refuge functions would be conducted in existing administrative,
visitor service, fire, and maintenance facilities. The existing staff
would be maintained.
The preferred alternative, Alternative 2, is considered the most
effective management action for meeting the purposes of the refuge. The
proposed management plan outlines the enhancement of wildlife
populations and related habitats over the next 15 years. It also
improves refuge safety and protection of resources, and may provide
visitors with more opportunities for wildlife viewing and wildlife-
dependent recreation. Environmental education and outreach would be
expanded under this proposed option.
In support of habitat and wildlife conservation, the most notable
proposal is to emphasize and encourage the protection of additional
conservation lands, outside the current acquisition boundary, that are
critical to the protection of refuge resources. This conservation focus
area includes lands south of U.S. Highway 98, southeast of Panacea,
south of the Ochlockonee river, and the East and Wacissa Rivers
drainage basins. The State of Florida is actively pursuing the
acquisition of lands adjacent to the refuge and seeking partnerships
with the Service for management. A conservation buffer area around the
refuge would help ensure the integrity of the refuge's land and water
resources and enhance the connectivity of wildlands critical for
species, such as the Florida black bear, by providing a conservation
corridor. Many objectives and strategies focus on maintaining and
restoring native communities, particularly longleaf pine. The
development of the refuge as a Land Management Research and
Demonstration Area would help the refuge to become a leader in longleaf
pine research and conservation and would enable the sharing of that
knowledge with other to benefit both private and publicly owned lands.
Programs to control or eradicate terrestrial and aquatic non-indigenous
and invasive plants are proposed, as is nuisance animal control.
Hydrologic studies and land conservation are proposed to maintain the
integrity of refuge resources and to manage the impoundments to benefit
migratory birds.
Many ongoing and proposed programs and effort focus on threatened,
endangered, rare, and imperiled species of plants and animals. The need
for extensive inventorying and monitoring for baseline data is
addressed in this management plan, particularly for red-cockaded
woodpeckers, bald eagles, wood storks, least terns and flatwood
salamanders.
Since a primary purpose for refuge establishment is to provide
habitat for migratory birds, the improvement of the impoundments to
provide high quality for waterfowl, shorebirds and marsh birds is
proposed. So, too, are strategies to improve forested habitat, such as
pine flatwoods, pine-cabbage palmetto hammocks, mesic and hydric pine
hardwood, and hardwood hammocks.
A primary focus of the visitor services program, as proposed, is to
enhance environmental education and outreach efforts substantially.
This plan may offer increased opportunity for wildlife-dependent
recreation, such as photography, hiking and wildlife observation.
Fishing improvements and angler awareness programs are proposed. The
feasibility of conducting youth hunt programs and clinics will be
explored. The restoration of the St. Marks Lighthouse would provide an
opportunity to present the refuge's rich cultural and historic
heritage.
Sensitive areas and rich resources, such as the refuge's designated
Wilderness Area and cultural resources, would receive more protection
through increased law enforcement. A major provision of this
alternative is a comprehensive study of all refuge archaeological and
historical resources.
Meeting basic refuge operation needs has been addressed. Essential
new office space, staffing, and equipment needs are proposed.
Alternative 3 incorporates and builds-upon all the habitat
improvements listed under Alternative 2. Protection of the East River
drainage basin would occur. Exotic plant and animal species would be
controlled or eradicated. Hardwood habitat management would be
improved.
The biological programs of the refuge would be greatly enhanced
with the addition of three biologist and/or biological technician
positions to expand the Land Management Research and Demonstration Area
program, to add additional projects, and to improve outreach and
coordination with other conservation agencies and the public.
Monitoring and inventorying of rare and imperiled species would be
enhanced, especially for reptiles, amphibians, mammals, and those bird
species not considered highest priority. A herpetologist would be
employed to study reptiles and amphibians, to conduct literature
reviews, and to share data with partners. Wood-duck banding would be
increased. The impoundments would be actively managed for rails, and
life-history studies would be conducted. Point counts of priority
species would be undertaken for regional and national trend analysis.
With additional staff, refuge personnel could more effectively monitor
and respond to wildlife disturbance and habitat management issues.
Visitor services would be improved with the addition of a ranger
position to operate the expanded Visitor Center and to assist with both
on- and off-site outreach opportunities. Two additional environmental
education specialists would maintain the environmental education
classroom, laboratory outdoor classrooms and overnight facility,
providing maximum opportunity to the public and groups 7 days a week.
They would assist the lead environmental education specialist in
program development and training of staff, volunteers, and educators.
In addition to needed facilities proposed under Alternative 2, a
research center to house the Land Management Research and
[[Page 3319]]
Demonstration Area program staff would be constructed in order to
provide laboratory and housing facilities for partnering researchers
and educators.
Cultural and wilderness resources would be further protected
through the addition of a law enforcement officer who would also serve
as a community police liaison in an effort to educate the public about
refuge resources and to deter and prevent crime. All step-down plans,
except for the Land Protection Plan, would be completed within 5 years
of plan adoption.
The refuge, established in 1931 as a breeding ground for wild
animals and birds, is situated along the Gulf coast of northwest
Florida, about 25 miles south of Tallahassee. It currently covers about
68,931 acres with an approved acquisition boundary of 74,469 acres.
Refuge personnel also manage 947 acres of State land and 334 acres of
USDA Forest Service land within the approved acquisition boundary. The
Wilderness Act designated 17,446 acres as the St. Marks Wilderness. The
refuge aims to provide habitat for a natural diversity of plants and
animals with a primary purpose of wildlife habitat conservation. The
refuge is also being managed to provide opportunity for compatible
wildlife-dependent recreation.
Authority: This notice is published under the authority of the
National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997, Pub. L.
105-57.
Dated: October 31, 2005.
Cynthia K. Dohner,
Acting Regional Director.
[FR Doc. 06-523 Filed 1-19-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-M