[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 212 (Friday, November 2, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 62175-62178]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-20845]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-HQ-0AR-2007-0510; FRL-8485-8]
Federal Implementation Plans for the Clean Air Interstate Rule:
Automatic Withdrawal Provisions
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to amend the Federal Implementation Plans
(FIPs) for the Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) to provide for
automatic withdrawal of the CAIR FIPs in a State upon the effective
date of EPA's approval of a full State implementation plan (SIP)
revision meeting the CAIR requirements. EPA believes it is appropriate
for the FIP withdrawal to be automatic because to the extent EPA
approves the State's full CAIR SIP, this corrects the deficiency that
provided the basis for EPA's promulgation of the FIPs in that State.
In the ``Rules'' section of this Federal Register, we are issuing
this action as a direct final rule without a prior proposed rule. If we
receive no adverse comment, we will not take further action on this
proposed rule.
DATES: Written comments must be received by December 17, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
OAR-2007-0510, by one of the following methods:
http://www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
E-mail: [email protected]. Attention Docket ID No.
EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0510.
Fax: (202) 566-9744. Attention Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-
2007-0510.
Mail: EPA Docket Center, EPA West (Air Docket), Attention
Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0510, Environmental Protection Agency,
Mailcode: 2822T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460.
Hand Delivery: EPA Docket Center (Air Docket), Attention
Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0510, Environmental Protection Agency,
1301 Constitution Avenue, NW., Room 3334; Washington, DC. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the Docket's normal hours of
operation, and special arrangements should be made for deliveries of
boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-
2007-0510. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through www.regulations.gov
or e-mail. The www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access''
system, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact
information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you
send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without going through
www.regulations.gov your e-mail address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket
and made available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact
information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you
submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to
consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special
characters and any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses. For additional information about EPA's public docket visit the
EPA Docket Center homepage at http://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
in www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the EPA Docket Center EPA/DC,
EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC. The
Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public
Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the EPA
Docket Center is (202) 566-1742.
Rulemaking actions related to the CAIR and the CAIR FIPs are also
available at the EPA's CAIR Web site at www.epa.gov/cair.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carla Oldham, Air Quality Planning
Division, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, mail code C539-
04, Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North
Carolina 27711; telephone number: 919-541-3347; fax number: 919-541-
0824; e-mail address: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Why Is EPA Issuing This Proposed Rule?
This document proposes to amend the CAIR FIPs to provide for
automatic withdrawal of the CAIR FIPs in a State upon the effective
date of EPA's approval of a full SIP revision meeting the CAIR
requirements. We have published a direct final rule making such
amendments in the ``Rules'' section of this Federal Register because we
view this as a noncontroversial action and anticipate no adverse
comment. We have explained our reasons for this action in the preamble
to the direct final rule.
If we receive no adverse comment, we will not take further action
on this proposed rule. If we receive adverse comment, we will withdraw
the direct final rule and it will not take effect. We would address all
public comments in any subsequent final rule based on this proposed
rule. We do not intend to institute a second comment period on this
action. Any parties interested in commenting must do so at this time.
The regulatory text for this proposal is identical to that for the
direct final rule published in the ``Rules'' section of this Federal
Register. For further information and the detailed rationale for this
proposal, see the information provided in the direct final rule.
II. Does This Action Apply to Me?
This action does not propose any control requirements. It proposes
to amend the CAIR FIPs to provide for automatic withdrawal of the CAIR
FIPs in a State upon the effective date of EPA's approval of the CAIR
SIP for the State. EPA promulgated the CAIR FIPs on April 28, 2006 (71
FR 25328). Categories and entities potentially regulated by the CAIR
FIPs include the following:
[[Page 62176]]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Examples of potentially
Category NAICS code\1\ regulated entities
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Industry....................... 221112 Fossil fuel-fired
electric utility steam
generating units.
Federal government............. \2\ 221122 Fossil fuel-fired
electric utility steam
generating units owned
by the Federal
government.
State/local/Tribal government.. \2\ 221122 Fossil fuel-fired
electric utility steam
generating units owned
by municipalities.
921150 Fossil fuel-fired
electric utility steam
generating units in
Indian Country.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ North American Industry Classification System.
\2\ Federal, State, or local government-owned and operated
establishments are classified according to the activity in which they
are engaged.
This table is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide for readers regarding entities likely to be regulated by the CAIR
FIPs. To determine whether your facility is affected by the CAIR FIPs,
you should examine the definitions and applicability criteria in 40 CFR
97.102, 97.104, 97.105, 97.202, 97.204, 97.205, 97.302, 97.304, and
97.305. If you have any questions regarding the applicability of the
CAIR FIPs to a particular entity, consult the person listed in the
preceding section under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
III. What Action Is EPA Proposing?
The EPA is proposing to amend the CAIR FIPs to provide for
automatic withdrawal of the CAIR FIPs in a State upon the effective
date of EPA's approval of a full SIP revision meeting the CAIR
requirements. All CAIR States are required to revise their SIPs to
include control measures to reduce emissions of nitrogen oxides and/or
sulfur dioxide. The EPA issued the CAIR FIPs as a backstop to implement
the CAIR in each CAIR State until that State has an EPA-approved CAIR
SIP in place to achieve the required reductions. In the FIP rulemaking,
EPA stated it would withdraw the FIPs in a State in coordination with
the approval of the CAIR SIP for that State. EPA believes it is
appropriate for the FIP withdrawal to be automatic because to the
extent EPA approves the State's full CAIR SIP, this corrects the
deficiency that provided the basis for EPA's promulgation of the FIPs
in that State. The automatic withdrawal provision would not apply to
EPA approvals of any abbreviated SIPs revisions submitted pursuant to
40 CFR 51.123(p), 40 CFR 51.123(ee) and 40 CFR 51.124(r). The detailed
description of and rational for this proposal appears in the direct
final rule published in the ``Rules'' section of this Federal Register.
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review
This action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under the
terms of Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and is
therefore not subject to review under the Executive Order.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act
This action does not impose any new information collection burden.
This action proposes to amend the CAIR FIPs to provide for automatic
withdrawal of the CAIR FIPs in a State once the State's CAIR SIP is in
place. EPA believes that the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq.) requirements of the existing CAIR FIPs rule are satisfied through
the Information Collection Request (ICR) (EPA ICR number 2152.02; OMB
control number 2060-0570) submitted to the OMB for review and approval
as part of the CAIR (70 FR 25162-25405) and approved by the OMB in
September 2005. A copy of the OMB approved Information Collection
Request (ICR) may be obtained from Susan Auby, Collection Strategies
Division; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2822T); 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460 or by calling (202) 566-
1672.
Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources
expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or
provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time
needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize
technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and
verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and
disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to
comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements;
train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information;
search data sources; complete and review the collection of information;
and transmit or otherwise disclose the information.
An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's
regulations in 40 CFR are listed in 40 CFR part 9.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) generally requires an agency
to prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis of any rule subject to
notice and comment rulemaking requirements under the Administrative
Procedure Act or any other statute unless the agency certifies that the
rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. Small entities include small businesses,
small organizations, and small governmental jurisdictions.
For purposes of assessing the impacts of this rule on small
entities, small entity is defined as: (1) A small business ``as defined
by the Small Business Administration's (SBA) regulations at 13 CFR
121.201;'' (2) a small governmental jurisdiction that is a government
of a city, county, town, school district or special district with a
population of less than 50,000; and (3) a small organization that is
any not-for-profit enterprise which is independently owned and operated
and is not dominant in its field. After considering the economic
impacts of this proposed rule on small entities, I certify that this
action will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This proposed rule will not impose any
requirements on small entities. This proposal would not impose new
requirements on any entities, but instead would provide for the
automatic withdrawal of the CAIR FIPs in certain circumstances. We
continue to be interested in the potential impacts of the proposed rule
on small entities and welcome comments on issues related to such
impacts.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA), Pub.
L. 104-4, establishes requirements for Federal agencies to assess the
effects of their regulatory actions on State, local, and tribal
governments and the private sector. Under section 202 of the UMRA, EPA
generally must prepare a written statement, including a cost-benefit
analysis, for proposed and final rules with ``Federal mandates'' that
may result in expenditures to State, local,
[[Page 62177]]
and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or to the private sector, of
$100 million or more in any one year. Before promulgating an EPA rule
for which a written statement is needed, section 205 of the UMRA
generally requires EPA to identify and consider a reasonable number of
regulatory alternatives and adopt the least costly, most cost-effective
or least burdensome alternative that achieves the objectives of the
rule. The provisions of section 205 do not apply when they are
inconsistent with applicable law. Moreover, section 205 allows EPA to
adopt an alternative other than the least costly, most cost-effective
or least burdensome alternative if the Administrator publishes with the
final rule an explanation why that alternative was not adopted. Before
EPA establishes any regulatory requirements that may significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, including tribal governments, it
must have developed under section 203 of the UMRA a small government
agency plan. The plan must provide for notifying potentially affected
small governments, enabling officials of affected small governments to
have meaningful and timely input in the development of EPA regulatory
proposals with significant Federal intergovernmental mandates, and
informing, educating, and advising small governments on compliance with
the regulatory requirements.
This rule contains no Federal mandates (under the regulatory
provisions of Title II of the UMRA) for State, local, or tribal
governments or the private sector. The rule imposes no enforceable duty
on any State, local or tribal governments or the private sector because
this proposal would not impose new requirements on any entities, but
instead would provide for the automatic withdrawal of the CAIR FIPs in
certain circumstances. Thus, this rule is not subject to the
requirements of sections 202 and 205 of the UMRA.
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
Executive Order 13132, entitled ``Federalism'' (64 FR 43255, August
10, 1999), requires EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure
``meaningful and timely input by State and local officials in the
development of regulatory policies that have federalism implications.''
``Policies that have federalism implications'' is defined in the
Executive Order to include regulations that have ``substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.''
This proposed rule does not have federalism implications. It will
not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government,
as specified in Executive Order 13132. This proposal would not impose
an enforceable duty on any State, local or tribal governments or the
private sector. Thus, Executive Order 13132 does not apply to this
proposal. In the spirit of Executive Order 13132, and consistent with
EPA policy to promote communications between EPA and State and local
governments, EPA specifically solicits comment on this proposed rule
from State and local officials.
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments
Executive Order 13175, entitled ``Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
requires EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure ``meaningful
and timely input by tribal officials in the development of regulatory
policies that have tribal implications.'' This proposed rule does not
have tribal implications, as specified in Executive Order 13175 because
it would not impose an enforceable duty on any State, local or tribal
governments or the private sector. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not
apply to this rule.
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental
Health and Safety Risks
Executive Order 13045: ``Protection of Children from Environmental
health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997) applies
to any rule that: (1) Is determined to be ``economically significant''
as defined under Executive Order 12866, and (2) concerns an
environmental health or safety risk that EPA has reason to believe may
have a disproportionate effect on children. If the regulatory action
meets both criteria, the Agency must evaluate the environmental health
or safety effects of the planned rule on children, and explain why the
planned regulation is preferable to other potentially effective and
reasonably feasible alternatives considered by the Agency.
EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 as applying only to those
regulatory actions that are based on health or safety risks, such that
the analysis required under section 5-501 of the Order has the
potential to influence the regulation. This rule is not subject to
Executive Order 13045 because it does not establish an environmental
standard intended to mitigate health or safety risks.
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use
This proposal is not subject to Executive Order 13211, ``Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355 (May 22, 2001)) because it is not a
significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.
I. National Technology Transfer Advancement Act
Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (``NTTAA''), Public Law No. 104-113, 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272
note) directs EPA to use voluntary consensus standards in its
regulatory activities unless to do so would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards
are technical standards (e.g., materials specifications, test methods,
sampling procedures, and business practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus standards bodies. The NTTAA directs EPA
to provide Congress, through OMB, explanations when the Agency decides
not to use available and applicable voluntary consensus standards.
This proposed rulemaking does not involve technical standards.
Therefore, EPA is not considering the use of any voluntary consensus
standards.
EPA welcomes comments on this aspect of the proposed rulemaking
and, specifically, invites the public to identify potentially-
applicable voluntary consensus standards and to explain why such
standards should be used in this regulation.
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629 (Feb. 16, 1994)) establishes
federal executive policy on environmental justice. Its main provision
directs federal agencies, to the greatest extent practicable and
permitted by law, to make environmental justice part of their mission
by identifying and addressing, as appropriate, disproportionately high
and adverse human health or environmental effects of their programs,
policies, and activities on minority populations and low-income
populations in the United States.
EPA has determined that this proposal would not have
[[Page 62178]]
disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental
effects on minority or low-income populations because it would not
affect the level of protection provided to human health or the
environment. This action does not propose an enforceable duty on any
State, local or tribal governments or the private sector. It would
neither increase nor decrease environmental protection.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Electric utilities, Intergovernmental relations,
Nitrogen oxides, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur dioxide.
Dated: October 17, 2007.
Stephen L. Johnson,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. E7-20845 Filed 11-1-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P