[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 231 (Monday, December 3, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 67878-67880]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-23384]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R03-OAR-2007-1000; FRL-8500-7]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Maryland; Amendments to the Control of Volatile Organic Compound
Emissions From Portable Fuel Containers
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve a State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revision submitted by the State of Maryland. This SIP revision pertains
to the control of emissions of volatile organic compounds from portable
fuel containers. This action is being taken under the Clean Air Act
(CAA).
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before January 2, 2008.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID Number EPA-
R03-OAR-2007-1000 by one of the following methods:
A. http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
B. E-mail: [email protected].
C. Mail: EPA-R03-OAR-2007-1000, Cristina Fernandez, Acting Chief,
Air Quality Planning Branch, Mailcode 3AP21, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania 19103.
[[Page 67879]]
D. Hand Delivery: At the previously-listed EPA Region III address.
Such deliveries are only accepted during the Docket's normal hours of
operation, and special arrangements should be made for deliveries of
boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R03-OAR-
2007-1000. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change, and may be made available online
at http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through http://www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The http://www.regulations.gov Web site
is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through http://www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the
http://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically in http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy during normal business hours at the
Air Protection Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region
III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. Copies of the
State submittal are available at Maryland Department of the
Environment, 1800 Washington Boulevard, Suite 705, Baltimore, Maryland
21230.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gobeail McKinley, (215) 814-2033, or
by e-mail at [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 18, 2007, the Maryland Department of
Environment (MDE) submitted a revision to its State implementation Plan
(SIP). The SIP revision (07-12) consists of amendments to the
control of volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from portable fuel
containers (COMAR 26.11.13.07).
I. Background
A portable fuel container is defined as a container or vessel with
a nominal capacity of 10 gallons or less intended for reuse, that is
designed or used primarily for receiving, transporting, storing, and
dispensing fuel. Portable fuel containers are used to refuel a wide
range of small off-road equipment and engines. Refueling these pieces
of equipment may result in VOC emissions from gasoline spillage from
either improper handling or overfilling of the receiving tank. VOC
emissions also result from poor transportation, poor storage
procedures, and permeation of vapors through the portable fuel
container itself. Portable fuel containers incorrectly sealed will emit
evaporative emissions. This amounts to a significant amount of VOC
emissions per day in Maryland.
In 2001, Maryland adopted the portable fuel container regulation
based on the 2001 Ozone Transport Commission (OTC) Model Rule that was
based on the California Air Resources Board (CARB) rule. The OTC
Portable Fuel Container Model Rule required that spill-proof containers
be made available for sale within the state meet certain performance
standards that reduce VOC emissions. The standards, which are based
upon a similar regulation by CARB, require that nearly all portable
fuel containers or spouts or both portable fuel containers and spouts
manufactured, sold or made available for use after January 1, 2003 be
spill-proof, have an automatic shut-off feature to prevent overfilling,
an automatic closing feature so that the container will be sealed when
not in use, and meet certain permeation standards. On June 29, 2004,
EPA published in the Federal Register (69 CFR 38848), its approval of a
revision to the Maryland SIP revision that added regulation .07 under
COMAR 26.11.13 to establish VOC emission standards for portable fuel
containers.
II. Summary of SIP Revision
Maryland's amendments to the portable fuel containers rule
incorporate the changes to the 2007 OTC Model Rule for portable fuel
containers that was based on the changes adopted by CARB in July 2006.
The amendments address the fact that the original rule did not apply to
kerosene containers which were offered for sale in place of compliant
portable fuel containers. Other amended incorporations include:
Modifying the existing spout regulations in order to improve spillage
control; elimination of the fuel flow rate and fill level performance
standards; elimination of the automatic shutoff performance standard;
new containers must be certified for use and sale by the manufacturer
through CARB; and, new portable fuel container testing procedures to
streamline testing. The amendments, which include a one-year sell-
through period, apply to any person who sells, supplies, advertises or
offers for sale, or manufactures for sale portable fuel containers and/
or spouts. Owners of portable fuel containers and/or spouts purchased
prior to the July 1, 2007 implementation date are not required to
purchase or replace the containers and/or spouts with newer compliant
fuel containers. There are no manufacturers of portable fuel containers
in Maryland.
III. Proposed Action
Maryland has adopted the amended version of the 2006 OTC Model Rule
to assure that the regulation achieves the estimated emissions
reductions. EPA is proposing to approve the Maryland SIP revision for
the control of VOC emissions from portable fuel containers (COMAR
26.11.13.07) submitted on June 18, 2007. EPA is soliciting public
comments on the issues discussed in this document. These comments will
be considered before taking final action.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
proposed action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and
therefore is not subject to review by the Office of Management and
Budget. For this reason, this action is also not subject to Executive
Order 13211, ``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355 (May 22, 2001)).
This action merely proposes to approve state law as meeting Federal
requirements and imposes no additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that
this proposed rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601
[[Page 67880]]
et seq.). Because this rule proposes to approve pre-existing
requirements under state law and does not impose any additional
enforceable duty beyond that required by state law, it does not contain
any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small
governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(Public Law 104-4). This proposed rule also does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between
the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian
tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000), nor will it have substantial direct effects on the States, on
the relationship between the national government and the States, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels
of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999), because it merely proposes to approve a state rule
implementing a Federal requirement, and does not alter the relationship
or the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the
CAA. This proposed rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045
(62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it approves a state rule
implementing a Federal standard.
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. In this
context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the State
to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority to
disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP
submission, to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise
satisfies the provisions of the CAA. Thus, the requirements of section
12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
(15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. As required by section 3 of
Executive Order 12988 (61 FR 4729, February 7, 1996), in issuing this
proposed rule, EPA has taken the necessary steps to eliminate drafting
errors and ambiguity, minimize potential litigation, and provide a
clear legal standard for affected conduct. EPA has complied with
Executive Order 12630 (53 FR 8859, March 15, 1988) by examining the
takings implications of the rule in accordance with the ``Attorney
General's Supplemental Guidelines for the Evaluation of Risk and
Avoidance of Unanticipated Takings'' issued under the executive order.
This proposed rule to approve Maryland's amendments to the portable
fuel containers rule (COMAR 26.11.13.07) does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Ozone, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: November 20, 2007.
Donald S. Welsh,
Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. E7-23384 Filed 11-30-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P