[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 231 (Thursday, December 3, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 63309-63310]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-28536]
[[Page 63309]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R09-OAR-2009-0188; FRL-9086-7]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
California; Determination of Attainment of the 1997 8-Hour Ozone
Standard
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The EPA is determining that the Imperial County, California
moderate 8-hour ozone nonattainment area has attained the 1997 8-hour
National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for ozone. This
determination is based upon certified ambient air monitoring data that
show the area has monitored attainment of the 8-hour ozone NAAQS since
the 2006-2008 monitoring period. In addition, quality controlled and
quality assured ozone data for 2008 that are available in the EPA Air
Quality System database, but not yet certified, show that this area
continues to attain the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. This determination
suspends the requirements for California to submit an attainment
demonstration, a reasonable further progress plan, contingency
measures, and other planning State Implementation Plans for this area
related to attainment of the 8-hour ozone NAAQS. These requirements
shall remain suspended for so long as the area continues to attain the
ozone NAAQS.
DATES: Effective Date: This rule is effective on January 4, 2010.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket
Identification No. EPA-R09-OAR-2009-0188. All documents in the docket
are listed on the http://www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed
in the index, some information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or
other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain
other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the
Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
through http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Air Planning
Office, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 75 Hawthorne Street, San
Francisco, CA 94105-3901. EPA requests that if at all possible, you
contact the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section to schedule your inspection. The Regional Office's official
hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8 to 4:55, excluding
Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Wienke Tax, Air Planning Office, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency Region 9, 75 Hawthorne Street, San
Francisco, CA 94105-3901, telephone number (415) 947-4192, fax number
(415) 947-3579, electronic mail [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA.
Table of Contents
I. What Action Is EPA Taking?
II. What Is the Effect of This Action?
III. Final Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. What Action Is EPA Taking?
EPA is determining that the Imperial County, California moderate 8-
hour ozone nonattainment area has attained the 1997 8-hour National
Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for ozone. This determination is
based upon certified ambient air monitoring data that show the area has
monitored attainment of the 1997 ozone NAAQS since the 2006-2008
monitoring period. In addition, quality controlled and quality assured
ozone data for 2009 that are available in the EPA Air Quality System
(AQS) database, but not yet certified, show that this area continues to
attain the ozone NAAQS.
Other specific requirements of the determination and the rationale
for EPA's proposed action are explained in the Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (NPR) published on September 23, 2009 (74 FR 48495) and will
not be restated here. EPA received no public comments on the NPR.
II. What Is the Effect of This Action?
Under the provisions of EPA's ozone implementation rule (see 40 CFR
51.918), this determination suspends the requirements for the Imperial
County, California moderate ozone nonattainment area to submit an
attainment demonstration, a reasonable further progress plan, section
172(c)(9) contingency measures, and any other planning State
Implementation Plans (SIPs) related to attainment of the 1997 8-hour
ozone NAAQS for so long as the area continues to attain the 1997 ozone
NAAQS.
This action does not constitute a redesignation to attainment under
CAA section 107(d)(3), because the area does not have an approved
maintenance plan as required under section 175A of the CAA, nor a
determination that the area has met the other requirements for
redesignation. The classification and designation status of the area
remains moderate nonattainment for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS until
such time as EPA determines that it meets the CAA requirements for
redesignation to attainment.
If EPA subsequently determines, after notice-and-comment rulemaking
in the Federal Register, that the area has violated the 1997 8-hour
ozone standard, the basis for the suspension of these requirements
would no longer exist, and the area would thereafter have to address
the pertinent requirements.
III. Final Action
EPA is determining that the Imperial County, California 8-hour
ozone nonattainment area has attained the 1997 8-hour ozone standard
and continues to attain the standard based on data through the 2009
ozone season. As provided in 40 CFR 51.918, this determination suspends
the requirements for California to submit an attainment demonstration,
a reasonable further progress plan, and contingency measures under
section 172(c)(9), and any other planning SIP related to attainment of
the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS for this area, for so long as the area
continues to attain the standard.
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action
makes a determination based on air quality data, and results in the
suspension of certain Federal requirements. Accordingly, the
Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this rule
makes a determination based on air quality data, and results in the
suspension of certain Federal requirements, it does not contain any
unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments,
as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-
4).
This rule also does not have tribal implications because it will
not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
[[Page 63310]]
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (59 FR 22951, November 9, 2000). This action also
does not have Federalism implications because it does not have
substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government, as
specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999),
because it merely makes a determination based on air quality data and
results in the suspension of certain Federal requirements, and does not
alter the relationship or the distribution of power and
responsibilities established in the Clean Air Act. This rule also is
not subject to Executive Order 13045 ``Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23,
1997), because it determines that air quality in the affected area is
meeting Federal standards.
The requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply
because it would be inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when
determining the attainment status of an area, to use voluntary
consensus standards in place of promulgated air quality standards and
monitoring procedures that otherwise satisfy the provisions of the
Clean Air Act.
This rule does not impose an information collection burden under
the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.)
Under Executive Order 12898, EPA finds that this rule involves a
determination of attainment based on air quality data and will not have
disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental
effects on any communities in the area, including minority and low-
income communities.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by May 19, 2008. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such
rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings
to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: November 13, 2009.
Laura Yoshii,
Acting Regional Administrator,
Region IX.
0
Part 52 of chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F--California
0
2. Section 52.282 is amended by adding paragraph (c) to read as
follows:
Sec. 52.282 Control strategy and regulations: Ozone.
* * * * *
(c) Determination of attainment. Effective January 4, 2010, EPA is
determining that the Imperial County, California 8-hour ozone
nonattainment area has attained the 1997 8-hour ozone standard. Under
the provisions of EPA's ozone implementation rule (see 40 CFR 51.918),
this determination suspends the reasonable further progress and
attainment demonstration requirements of section 182(b)(1) and related
requirements of section 172(c)(9) of the Clean Air Act for as long as
the area does not monitor any violations of the 8-hour ozone standard.
If a violation of the 1997 ozone NAAQS is monitored in the Imperial
County, California 8-hour ozone nonattainment area, this determination
shall no longer apply.
[FR Doc. E9-28536 Filed 12-2-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P