[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 102 (Thursday, May 27, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 29671-29677]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-12660]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R04-OAR-2009-0612-200914(a); FRL-9155-3]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans:
Florida; Approval of Section 110(a)(1) Maintenance Plan for the 1997 8-
Hour Ozone Standards for the Jacksonville, Tampa Bay, and Southeast
Florida Areas
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final action to approve revisions to the
Florida State Implementation Plan (SIP) concerning the maintenance
plans addressing the 1997 8-hour ozone standards for the Jacksonville,
Tampa Bay, and Southeast Florida 1997 8-hour ozone attainment areas in
Florida, hereafter referred to as the ``Jacksonville Area,'' ``Tampa
Bay Area,'' and ``Southeast Florida Area,'' respectively. The
Jacksonville Area is comprised of Duval County; the Tampa Bay Area
comprises Hillsborough and Pinellas Counties; and the Southeast Florida
Area comprises Broward, Dade, and Palm Beach Counties. These
maintenance plans were submitted to EPA on July 2, 2009, by the State
of Florida, through the Florida Department of Environmental Protection
(FDEP), and ensure the continued attainment of the 1997 8-hour ozone
national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) through the year 2014 in
the Jacksonville, Tampa Bay, and Southeast Florida Areas. EPA is
approving the SIP revisions pursuant to section 110 of the Clean Air
Act (CAA). These maintenance plans meet all the statutory and
regulatory requirements, and are consistent with EPA's guidance. On
March 12, 2008, EPA issued revised ozone standards. On September 16,
2009, EPA announced it would reconsider the 2008 NAAQS for ozone and
proposed a new schedule for designations for the reconsidered
standards. EPA published a proposed rulemaking on January 19, 2010, for
reconsideration of the 2008 NAAQS, and expects to finalize the
reconsidered NAAQS by August 2010. The current action, however, is
being taken to address requirements under the 1997 8-hour ozone
standards. Requirements for the Jacksonville, Tampa Bay, and Southeast
Florida Areas under the 2010 reconsidered ozone standards will be
addressed in the future.
DATES: This rule is effective on July 26, 2010 without further notice,
unless EPA receives relevant adverse comment by June 28, 2010. If EPA
receives such comment, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal in the
Federal Register informing the public that this rule will not take
effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R04-
OAR-2009-0612, by one of the following methods:
1. http://www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
2. E-mail: [email protected].
3. Fax: (404) 562-9019.
4. Mail: ``EPA-R04-OAR-2009-0612,'' Regulatory Development Section,
Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960.
5. Hand Delivery or Courier: Lynorae Benjamin, Chief, Regulatory
Development Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics
Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61
Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. Such deliveries are
only accepted during the Regional Office's normal hours of operation.
The Regional Office's official hours of business are Monday through
Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding Federal holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. ``EPA-R04-OAR-
2009-0612.'' EPA's policy is that all comments received will be
included in the public docket without change and may be made available
online at http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal
information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed
to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit through http://www.regulations.gov or e-mail, information that you consider to be CBI
or otherwise protected. The http://www.regulations.gov Web site is an
``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through http://www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your
[[Page 29672]]
name and other contact information in the body of your comment and with
any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses. For additional information about EPA's public
docket, visit the EPA Docket Center homepage at http://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the
http://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically in http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Regulatory Development
Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth
Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. EPA requests that if at all
possible, you contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section to schedule your inspection. The Regional Office's
official hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., excluding Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Twunjala Bradley, Regulatory
Development Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics
Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61
Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. The telephone number
is (404) 562-9352. Ms. Bradley can also be reached via electronic mail
at [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Background
II. Analysis of Florida's Submittals
III. Final Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background
In accordance with the CAA, the Jacksonville, Tampa Bay and
Southeast Florida Areas in Florida were designated nonattainment for
the 1-hour ozone NAAQS on November 6, 1991, 56 FR 56694 (effective
January 6, 1992, 60 FR 7124).
On June 23, 1993, the State of Florida, through the FDEP, submitted
a request to redesignate Duval County in association with the
Jacksonville Area to attainment for the 1-hour ozone standards.
Likewise, Florida submitted redesignation requests for Broward, Dade,
and Palm Beach Counties in association with the Southeast Florida Area
on November 8, 1992, and for Hillsborough and Pinellas Counties in
association with the Tampa Bay Area on February 7, 1995. Included with
these redesignation requests, Florida submitted the required 1-hour
ozone monitoring data and maintenance plans ensuring these areas would
remain in attainment of the 1-hour ozone standards for at least a
period of 10 years (consistent with CAA 175A(a)). The maintenance plans
submitted by Florida followed EPA guidance for maintenance areas,
subject to section 175A of the CAA.
On January 3, 1995, EPA approved Florida's request to redesignate
the Jacksonville Area (60 FR 41) to attainment for the 1-hour ozone
NAAQS. Likewise, the Southeast Florida and Tampa Bay Areas were
redesignated to attainment on February 24, 1995, and December 7, 1995
(60 FR 10325 and 60 FR 62793), respectively. The maintenance plans for
the Jacksonville, Tampa Bay, and Southeast Florida Areas became
effective on March 6, 1995, February 5, 1996, and April 1995,
respectively. Florida later updated all three maintenance plans, in
accordance with section 175(A)(b), to extend the maintenance plans to
cover additional years such that the entire maintenance period was for
at least 20 years after the initial redesignation of these areas to
attainment.
On April 30, 2004, EPA designated and classified areas for the 1997
8-hour ozone NAAQS (69 FR 23858), and published the final Phase 1 Rule
for implementation of the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS (69 FR 23951) (Phase
1 Rule). The Jacksonville, Tampa Bay, and Southeast Florida Areas were
designated as attainment for the 1997 8-hour ozone standards, effective
June 15, 2004. These attainment areas consequently were required to
submit a 10-year maintenance plan under section 110(a)(1) of the CAA
and the Phase 1 Rule. On May 20, 2005, EPA issued guidance providing
information on how a state might fulfill the maintenance plan
obligation established by the CAA and the Phase 1 Rule (Memorandum from
Lydia N. Wegman to Air Division Directors, Maintenance Plan Guidance
Document for Certain 8-hour Ozone Areas Under Section 110(a)(1) of
Clean Air Act, May 20, 2005--hereafter referred to as the ``Wegman
Memorandum''). On December 22, 2006, the United States Court of Appeals
for the District of Columbia Circuit issued an opinion that vacated
EPA's Phase 1 Rule for the 1997 8-hour Ozone Standard. South Coast Air
Quality Management District. v. EPA, 472 F.3d 882 (D.C. Cir. 2006). The
Court vacated those portions of the Phase 1 Rule that provided for
regulation of the 1997 8-hour ozone nonattainment areas designated
under Subpart 1 in lieu of Subpart 2 (of part D of the CAA), among
other portions. The Court's decision does not alter any requirements
under the Phase 1 Rule for section 110(a)(l) maintenance plans. EPA is
taking action to approve Florida's July 2, 2009, SIP revisions which
satisfy CAA section 110(a)(1) CAA requirements for a plan providing for
maintenance of the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS in the Jacksonville, Tampa
Bay and Southeast Florida Areas.
II. Analysis of Florida's Submittals
On July 2, 2009, the State of Florida, through the FDEP, submitted
SIP revisions containing the 1997 8-hour ozone maintenance plans for
the Jacksonville, Tampa Bay and Southeast Florida Areas as required by
section 110(a)(1) of the CAA and the provisions of EPA's Phase 1 Rule
(see 40 CFR 51.905(a)(4)). The purpose of these plans is to ensure
continued attainment and maintenance of the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS in
these Areas until 2018.
As required, these plans provide for continued attainment and
maintenance of the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS in the Jacksonville, Tampa
Bay and Southeast Florida Areas for at least 10 years from the
effective date of these areas' designation as attainment for the 1997
8-hour ozone NAAQS. These plans also include components illustrating
how each area will continue attainment of the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS,
and provide contingency measures. Each of the section 110(a)(1) plan
components is discussed below for each area.
(a) Attainment Inventory. In order to demonstrate maintenance in
the aforementioned areas, Florida developed comprehensive inventories
of volatile organic compounds (VOC) and nitrogen oxide (NOX)
emissions from area, stationary, on-road mobile, and non-road mobile
sources using 2002 as the base year. The year 2002 is an appropriate
year for Florida to base attainment level emissions because states may
select any one of the three years on which the 1997 8-hour attainment
designation was based (2001, 2002, and 2003). The State's submittal
[[Page 29673]]
contains the detailed inventory data and summaries by source category
for each area. Using the 2002 inventory (as a base year) reflects one
of the years used for calculating the air quality design values on
which the 1997 8-hour ozone designation decisions were based.
A further practical reason for selecting 2002 as the base year
emission inventory is that Section 110(a)(2)(B) of the CAA and the
Consolidated Emissions Reporting Rule (67 FR 39602, June 10, 2002)
requires states to submit emissions inventories for all criteria
pollutants and their precursors every three years, on a schedule that
includes the emissions year 2002. The due date for the 2002 emissions
inventory is established in the rule as June 2004. In accordance with
these requirements, Florida compiles a statewide emissions inventory
for point sources on an annual basis. On-road mobile emissions of VOC
and NOX were estimated using MOBILE6 motor vehicle emissions
factor computer model. Non-road mobile emissions data were derived
using the U.S. EPA's NONROAD 2002 model.
In projecting data for the maintenance year 2014 emissions
inventories, Florida used several methods to project data from the base
year 2002 to the years 2009 and 2018; and the interim years 2005, 2008,
2011 and 2014. These projected inventories were developed using EPA-
approved technologies and methodologies including the Visibility
Improvement State and Tribal Association of the Southeast (VISTAS)
methodology. Point source inventories were developed through VISTAS
using the Integrated Planning Model (IPM) for electrical generating
units (EGU) sources and updated growth and control data for non-EGU
sources. EPA's Emissions Growth Analysis System model was used to
derive area source emissions data. Non-road mobile projections were
derived from the NONROAD model.
The following tables provide VOC and NOX emissions data
for the 2002 base attainment year inventories, as well as projected
detailed source category VOC and NOX emission inventory data
for 2009 and 2018. To further support these maintenance demonstrations,
interim projections for VOC and NOX emission inventory data
beginning in the year 2005 through the year 2018 are also provided for
each area. The requirement for these maintenance plans is an end year
of 2014, but Florida has chosen to provide projections through 2018
also in support of these maintenance demonstrations. The Phase 1 Rule
provides that the 10-year maintenance period begin as of the effective
date of designation for the 1997 8-hour NAAQS for the area. The
designations were effective in 2004 so the maintenance period must end
no earlier than 2014. Florida has opted to provide additional
supporting information through the year 2018.
Table 1--2002 VOC and NOX Base Year Emissions Inventory
[Tons/day]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Southeast Florida Tampa Bay Jacksonville
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Miami-Dade Broward Palm Beach Total Hillsborough Pinellas Total Duval
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
VOC
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point Source............................ 4.68 4.28 1.44 10.40 5.19 2.81 8.00 5.61
Area Source............................. 132.08 96.74 73.77 302.60 72.34 61.20 133.54 59.53
On-Road................................. 131.07 107.43 80.69 319.19 81.76 61.47 143.23 64.13
Non Road................................ 52.79 37.39 55.74 145.92 29.39 22.97 52.36 25.39
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total............................... 320.63 245.54 211.64 778.11 188.67 148.45 337.13 154.65
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOX
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point Source............................ 40.23 58.76 25.33 124.32 151.02 25.64 176.66 115.47
Area Source............................. 7.41 5.08 3.53 16.02 4.39 15.63 20.02 6.10
On-Road................................. 144.95 120.19 91.31 356.46 92.88 62.63 155.51 72.68
Non Road................................ 57.42 54.79 39.62 151.82 86.98 18.41 105.39 43.34
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total............................... 250.01 238.82 159.79 648.62 335.26 122.31 457.57 237.60
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 2--2009 Projected VOC and NOX Emissions Inventory
[Tons/day]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Southeast Florida Tampa Bay Jacksonville
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Miami-Dade Broward Palm Beach Total Hillsborough Pinellas Total Duval
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
VOC
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point Source............................ 3.74 3.95 1.19 8.87 5.12 2.49 7.61 5.62
Area Source............................. 140.57 103.37 77.41 321.35 77.18 65.88 143.06 62.55
On-Road................................. 77.98 66.24 50.31 194.53 50.22 37.64 87.86 39.26
Non Road................................ 41.55 27.40 39.46 108.41 22.47 17.58 40.05 18.23
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total............................... 263.84 200.95 168.36 633.16 154.98 123.59 278.57 125.67
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOX
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point Source............................ 24.75 18.39 7.31 50.45 16.62 5.03 21.65 21.43
Area Source............................. 7.36 5.05 3.53 15.95 4.46 12.68 17.13 6.43
On-Road................................. 93.47 79.81 61.32 234.60 61.62 41.79 103.41 47.94
[[Page 29674]]
Non Road................................ 52.07 49.55 34.11 135.72 80.40 15.38 95.78 39.13
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total............................... 177.64 152.80 106.27 436.72 163.10 74.88 237.98 114.93
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 3--2018 Projected VOC and NOX Emissions Inventory
[Tons/day]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Southeast Florida Tampa Bay Jacksonville
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Miami-Dade Broward Palm Beach Total Hillsborough Pinellas Total Duval
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
VOC
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point Source............................ 4.64 4.95 1.54 11.13 6.39 3.29 9.68 6.63
Area Source............................. 168.91 124.81 90.22 33.94 90.21 79.95 170.16 73.89
On-Road................................. 49.76 43.85 33.54 127.15 33.14 24.81 57.94 25.85
Non Road................................ 41.61 27.56 36.15 105.32 21.17 16.02 37.19 17.08
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total............................... 264.92 201.16 161.45 627.52 150.90 124.07 274.97 123.45
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOX
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point Source............................ 28.52 16.93 9.64 55.08 18.25 6.96 25.22 22.20
Area Source............................. 7.84 5.39 3.78 17.0 5.03 13.86 18.90 6.89
On-Road................................. 42.41 37.74 29.17 109.31 28.81 19.84 48.64 22.42
Non Road................................ 40.34 39.56 21.90 101.80 67.67 9.86 77.52 31.13
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total............................... 119.11 99.62 64.48 283.21 119.76 50.52 170.28 82.65
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 4--Projections of Anthropogenic VOC and NOX Emissions
[Tons/day]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Southeast Florida Tampa Bay Jacksonville
Year ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Miami-Dade Broward Palm Beach Total Hillsborough Pinellas Total Duval
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
VOC
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2002.................................... 320.63 245.84 211.64 778.11 188.67 148.45 337.13 154.65
2005.................................... 296.29 226.61 193.09 715.99 174.24 137.80 312.03 142.23
2008.................................... 271.96 207.37 174.55 653.87 159.80 127.14 286.94 129.81
2009*................................... 263.84 200.95 168.36 633.16 154.98 123.59 278.57 125.67
2011.................................... 264.08 201.00 166.83 631.91 154.08 123.70 277.77 125.17
2014.................................... 264.44 201.07 164.52 630.04 152.71 123.85 276.57 124.44
2018*................................... 264.92 201.16 161.45 627.52 150.90 124.07 274.97 123.45
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOX
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2002.................................... 250.01 238.82 159.79 648.62 335.26 122.31 457.57 237.60
2005.................................... 219.00 201.95 136.85 557.81 261.48 101.98 363.46 185.03
2008.................................... 187.98 165.09 113.92 466.99 187.70 81.66 269.35 132.45
2009*................................... 177.64 152.80 106.27 436.72 163.10 74.88 237.98 114.93
2011.................................... 164.64 140.98 96.99 402.61 153.47 69.47 222.94 107.75
2014.................................... 145.13 123.25 83.06 351.44 139.02 61.35 200.37 97.00
2018*................................... 119.11 99.62 64.48 283.21 119.76 50.52 170.28 82.65
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* More detailed information regarding the source category emissions for these projections is provided in Tables 2 and 3 in this rulemaking.
As shown in Table 4 above, the Jacksonville, Tampa Bay, and
Southeast Florida Areas projected to decrease total VOC and
NOX emissions from the base year of 2002 to the maintenance
year of 2014. This VOC and NOX emission decrease
demonstrates continued attainment/maintenance of the 1997 8-hour ozone
standards for ten years from 2004 as required by the CAA and Phase 1
Rule. Furthermore, total VOC and NOX emissions are projected
to steadily decrease from the base year of 2002 through 2018.
As shown in the tables above, Florida has demonstrated that the
future year emissions will be less than the 2002 base attainment year's
emissions for the
[[Page 29675]]
1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS for the Jacksonville, Tampa Bay and Southeast
Florida Areas. The attainment inventories submitted by Florida for
these areas are consistent with the criteria as discussed in the Wegman
Memorandum. EPA finds that the future emission levels for the projected
years 2005, 2008, 2009, 2011, 2014 and 2018, are expected to be less
than the attainment level emissions in 2002. In the event that a future
8-hour ozone monitoring reading in one of these areas is found to
violate the 1997 ozone standards, the contingency plan section of each
area's maintenance plan includes measures that will be promptly
implemented to ensure that the Area returns to maintenance of the 1997
ozone standards. Please see section (d) Contingency Plan, below, for
additional information related to the contingency measures in each of
the maintenance plans.
(b) Maintenance Demonstration. The primary purpose of a maintenance
plan is to demonstrate how an area will continue to remain in
attainment with the 1997 8-hour ozone standards for the 10-year period
following the effective date of designation as unclassifiable/
attainment. The required end projection year for all three maintenance
areas is 2014; however, Florida has opted to provide additional
supporting information through the year 2018. As discussed in section
(a) Attainment Inventory above, Florida identified the level of ozone-
forming emissions that were consistent with attainment of the NAAQS for
ozone in 2002. Florida projected VOC and NOX emissions for
2009 and 2018, as well as provided interim projection emissions
inventories for VOC and NOX emissions for the years 2005,
2008, 2011 and 2014 in the Jacksonville, Tampa Bay and Southeast
Florida Areas. EPA finds that the future emissions levels in these
years are expected to be below the emissions levels in 2002 in the
Jacksonville, Tampa Bay, and Southeast Florida Areas.
Florida's SIP revision for the maintenance plans for the
Jacksonville, Tampa Bay, and Southeast Florida Areas also relies on a
combination of several air quality measures that will provide for
additional 8-hour ozone emissions reductions in these areas. These
measures include the implementation of the following, among others: (1)
Heavy Duty 2007 Engine Standards, (2) Tier 2 Tailpipe Program, (3)
Large Spark Ignition and Recreational Vehicle Rule, (4) Nonroad Diesel
Rule, (5) Industrial Boiler/Process Heater/RICE maximum available
control technology (MACT), (6) Petroleum Refinery Initiative, (7) VOC
2-, 4-, 7-, and 10-year MACT Standards, (8) Combustion Turbine MACT,
and (9) consent decrees from Tampa Electric, Virginia Electric and
Power Company and Gulf Power Crist. These Florida attainment areas are
also benefiting from the following reductions that are occurring in
other states in the Southeast: (1) North Carolina Clean Smokestacks
Act, (2) Atlanta/Northern Kentucky/Birmingham 1-hour SIPs, (3)
NOX Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) in 8-hour
nonattainment area SIP, and (4) implementation of NOX SIP
Call Phase 1 in southeastern states. Moreover, despite the legal status
of the Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) as remanded, many facilities
have already installed or are continuing with plans to install emission
controls that may benefit the Jacksonville, Tampa Bay, and Southeast
Florida Areas.
There are no sources subject to CAIR or the NOX SIP Call
in the Jacksonville, Tampa Bay, and Southeast Florida Areas. Hence, the
recent remand of CAIR does not affect the maintenance inventories or
maintenance demonstrations in any way. Moreover, these areas were in
attainment prior to implementation of these rules. As a result, any
contribution to the reduction in the background ozone levels from these
rules would be in addition to the projected decreases within the
maintenance planning areas. These rules, even though the submittal
takes no credit for emissions reductions from them, would be expected
to reduce transported NOX and ozone from outside the
nonattainment area, thereby providing a further, unquantified
improvement in these areas' air quality.
(c) Ambient Air Quality Monitoring. The table below shows design
values \1\ for the Jacksonville, Tampa Bay, and Southeast Florida
Areas. The ambient ozone monitoring data were collected at sites that
were selected with assistance from EPA and are considered
representative of the areas of highest concentration. Florida will
continue to depend on local air pollution control agencies in the
Jacksonville, Tampa Bay, and Southeast Florida Areas to conduct ambient
air quality monitoring programs for ozone in their respective areas.
All monitoring programs will continue in accordance with applicable EPA
monitoring requirements contained in 40 CFR part 58.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The air quality design value at a monitoring site is defined
as that concentration that when reduced to the level of the standard
ensures that the site meets the standard. For a concentration-based
standard, the air quality design value is simply the standard-
related test statistic. Thus, for the primary and secondary 1997 8-
hour ozone standards, the 3-year average annual fourth-highest daily
maximum 8-hour average ozone concentration is also the air quality
design value for the site. 40 CFR part 50, Appendix I, Section 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Even though 2002 is established as the base year, the actual year
each of these areas monitored attainment for the 1997 8-hour NAAQS
occurred prior to 2002. The Southeast Florida Area has not had a
monitor design value exceed the 1997 8-hour NAAQS since the 1970s. For
the Tampa Bay Area, the most recent year of a monitored 8-hour design
value exceedance of the 1997 NAAQS was 2000. For the Jacksonville Area,
the most recent year of a monitored NAAQS exceedance was 1989.
Table 5--Maximum 8-Hour Ozone Design Values
[Ppm]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Year Jacksonville Tampa Bay Southeast Florida
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2001-2003............................ 0.070 0.080 0.071
2002-2004............................ 0.070 0.078 0.068
2003-2005............................ 0.073 0.078 0.067
2004-2006............................ 0.076 0.079 0.068
2005-2007............................ 0.077 0.080 0.074
2006-2008............................ 0.075 0.081 0.074
2007-2009............................ 0.070 0.078 0.069
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 29676]]
Based on Table 5 above, the maximum design values identified
demonstrate attainment with the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. Further, these
design values indicate that these maintenance areas are expected to
continue attainment of the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. The attainment
level for the 1997 8-hour ozone standards is 0.080 parts per million
(ppm), effectively 0.084 ppm with the rounding convention. However, in
the event a design value for one of the Jacksonville, Tampa Bay and
Southeast Florida Areas' monitors exceeds the 1997 8-hour ozone
standards, one or more contingency measures included in Florida's
maintenance plans for the Jacksonville, Tampa Bay and Southeast Florida
Areas would be promptly implemented in accordance with the contingency
plan, as discussed below.
(d) Contingency Plan. In accordance with 40 CFR 51.905(a)(4)(ii)
and the Wegman Memorandum, the section 110(a)(1) maintenance plans
include contingency provisions to promptly correct a violation of the
1997 ozone NAAQS that may occur. The indicators for triggering
contingency measures for the Jacksonville, Tampa Bay, and Southeast
Florida Areas are based on updates to the emission inventories. The
State of Florida has established two triggers to activate contingency
measures including: (1) violation of the 1997 8-hour ozone standards at
any monitor and (2) a five percent or more increase in ozone precursor
emissions for the emissions inventory update (for VOC or
NOX) above the 2002 emissions inventory and the ozone design
value for the update year is greater than or equal to 0.081 ppm. In the
maintenance plans for the Jacksonville, Tampa Bay and Southeast Florida
Areas, if contingency measures are triggered, Florida is committed to
implement the measures as expeditiously as practicable, including
adopting one or more contingency measures within 18-months of the
trigger and implementing the measures within twenty-four months of the
triggering event. The contingency measures include: (1) Reinstate
nonattainment new source review; (2) mandate less volatile gasoline
\2\; (3) provide additional or revise existing VOC or NOX
RACT Rules; (4) expand VOC or NOX control strategies to
other counties affecting the maintenance area; (5) expand control
strategies to new control technique guideline categories; (6) implement
mobile source transportation control measures; and/or (7) other
measures deemed appropriate by the FDEP at the time as a result of
efficient and cost-effective emissions reduction.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ States are generally preempted from prescribing low
volatility fuel requirements that are different from those
prescribed by EPA under CAA section 211(c)(4). Therefore, EPA notes
that consideration of the preemption provisions of 211(c)(4)(A) of
the CAA would be required and that this contingency could only be
implemented after such time that EPA grants a waiver to allow the
mandate of a low volatility fuel, under CAA section 211(c)(4)(C).
See ``Guidance on use of opt-in to RFG and low RVP requirements in
ozone SIPs'' at http://www.epa.gov/otaq/regs/fuels/rvpguide.pdf and
the ``Boutique fuels list under Section 1541(b) of the Energy Policy
Act'' at http://www.epa.gov/EPA-AIR/2006/December/Day-28/a22313.htm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
These contingency measures and schedules for implementation satisfy
EPA's long-standing guidance on the requirements of section 110(a)(1)
of continued attainment. Continued attainment of the 1997 8-hour ozone
NAAQS in the Jacksonville, Tampa Bay and Southeast Florida Areas will
depend, in part, on the air quality measures discussed previously (see
section II). In addition, Florida along with the assistance of local
air pollution control agencies and local metropolitan planning
organizations commit to verify the 1997 8-hour ozone status in each
maintenance plan through periodic ozone precursor emission inventory
updates. Emission inventory updates will be completed by 18 months
following the end of the inventory year to verify continued attainment
of the 1997 8-hour ozone standards.
III. Final Action
Pursuant to section 110 of the CAA, EPA is approving the
maintenance plans addressing the 1997 8-hour ozone standards in the
Jacksonville, Tampa Bay, and Southeast Florida Areas in Florida,
submitted by FDEP on July 2, 2009. These maintenance plans ensure
continued attainment of the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS through the
maintenance year 2014. Further, Florida has provided additional
information to indicate maintenance in these areas through 2018. EPA
has evaluated Florida's submittals and has determined that it meets the
applicable requirements of the CAA and EPA regulations, and is
consistent with EPA policy.
EPA is publishing this rule without prior proposal because the
Agency views this as a non-controversial amendment and anticipates no
adverse comments. However, in the proposed rules section of this
Federal Register publication, EPA is publishing a separate document
that will serve as the proposal to approve the SIP revision should
adverse comment be filed. This rule will be effective on July 26, 2010
without further notice unless the Agency receives adverse comment by
June 28, 2010. If EPA receives such comments, then EPA will publish a
document withdrawing the final rule and informing the public that the
rule will not take effect. All public comments received will then be
addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. EPA
will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties
interested in commenting must do so at this time. If no such comments
are received, the public is advised this rule will be effective on July
26, 2010 and no further action will be taken on the proposed rule.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. Accordingly,
this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements
and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by
state law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
[[Page 29677]]
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as specified
by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the
SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in the state,
and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct costs on
tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by July 26, 2010. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. Parties with objections to this direct final rule are
encouraged to file a comment in response to the parallel notice of
proposed rulemaking for this action published in the proposed rules
section of today's Federal Register, rather than file an immediate
petition for judicial review of this direct final rule, so that EPA can
withdraw this direct final rule and address the comment in the proposed
rulemaking. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Intergovernmental
relations, Incorporation by reference, Ozone, Nitrogen dioxides,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: May 11, 2010.
Beverly H. Banister,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
0
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart K--Florida
0
2. Section 52.520(e) is amended by adding new entries at the end of the
table for the ``110(a)(1) Maintenance Plan for the Southeast Florida
Area'', ``110(a)(1) Maintenance Plan for the Tampa Area'', and
``110(a)(1) Maintenance Plan for the Jacksonville, Florida Area'' to
read as follows:
Sec. 52.520 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
EPA-Approved Florida Non-Regulatory Provisions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State effective Federal Register
Provision date EPA approval date notice Explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
110(a)(1) Maintenance Plan for July 2, 2009...... July 26, 2010..... [Insert citation 110(a)(1)
the Southeast Florida Area. of publication]. maintenance plan
for 1997 8-hour
ozone NAAQS.
110(a)(1) Maintenance Plan for July 2, 2009...... July 26, 2010,.... [Insert citation 110(a)(1)
the Tampa, Florida Area. of publication]. maintenance plan
for 1997 8-hour
ozone NAAQS.
110(a)(1) Maintenance Plan for July 2, 2009...... July 26, 2010..... [Insert citation 110(a)(1)
the Jacksonville, Florida Area. of publication]. maintenance plan
for 1997 8-hour
ozone NAAQS.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 2010-12660 Filed 5-26-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P